Laboratory Control System’s Effects on Student Achievement and Attitudes

Abstract

Problem Statement: The current study investigates whether the learning environment designed based on the laboratory control system affects the academic achievement, the attitude toward the learning-teaching process and the retention of the students in computer education. Purpose of Study: The study aims to identify the laboratory control system based learning environment’s effects on students’ academic success on computer education, the related attitudes in the learning-teaching process and the permanence of the information that is learned. Methods: The study was conducted with 66 10th grade students attending a state high school in Kayseri in the 2010-2011 school year. Out of 66 students, 33 were assigned to an experimental group and 33 were assigned to a control group. While the control group students were educated primarily based on lecturing and presentations reflected through a projector, the experimental group students were trained in an active learning environment that was designed based on the laboratory control system. Both of the groups were administered the “Scale of Attitudes towards Learning and Teaching Process” and the “Achievement Test” as a pretest and posttest. The Achievement test was applied again after five weeks to find out if the learning has permanence. Findings and Results: Findings show that the experiment/test group educated in an active learning environment created with the Laboratory Control System was more successful than the control group educated in a

Kaynakça

1. Altun, E., Kisla, T. & Cobanoglu, I. (2009). Alana ozgu uygulamalar ve bilgisayar
2. laboratuvar ortamlarinin incelenmesi. In E. Altun (Eds). Bilgisayar ve ogretim
3. teknolojileri egitimi bolumleri icin ozel ogretim yontemleri I-II. Ankara: PegemA
4. Yayincilik
5. Atici, B. (2007). Sosyal bilgi insasina dayali sanal ogrenme cevrelerinin ogrenci
6. basarisi ve tutumlarina etkisi, Eğitim ve Bilim, 32(143), 41-54.
7. Briner, J.V., Roberts, J.E. & Worthy, F. (June 12-16, 2005). Teaching computer science at a
8. small university. Presented at ASCUE Conference, Myrtle Beach, South

9. Carolina.
10. Business Wire (29 January,2008). Washington county public schools increase use of netop
11. school software for more effective student ınstruction.Retrieved from
12. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2008_Jan_29/ai_n24237641
13. /
14. Communications News (2001). Remote Training - CrossTec NetOp School 2.0 Classroom
15. Management Software - Brief Article – Product Announcement Find Articles.com.
16. Retrieved from
17. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0CMN/is_7_38/ai_76769769/
18. Cure, F., & Ozdener, N. (2008). Ogretmenlerin bilgi ve iletişim teknolojileri (BİT)
19. uygulama basarilari ve BIT’e yonelik tutumlari. Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim
20. Fakultesi Dergisi, 34, 41-53.
21. Demirli, C. (2007). Elektronik portfolyo ogretim surecinin ogrenen tutumlarina ve ogrenme
22. algilarina etkisi. Doktora tezi, Firat Universitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu,
23. Elazig.
24. Doslu, A. (2009). Ortaogretim 10. sınıf bilgi ve iletisim teknolojileri dersinde web tabanli
25. portfolyo kullanimi -Adana Ilinde bir calisma. Yuksek lisans tezi, Cukurova
26. Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu, Adana.
27. Duffy, J.L., McDonald, J.B., & Mizell,A.P., (2005). Teaching and learning with
28. technology. USA: Pearson Education.
29. Hope, A. (2010). Seductions of risk, social control, and resistance to school
30. surveillance. In T.Monahan & R.D. Torres (Eds.) Schools under surveillance:
31. cultures of control in public education. USA: Rutgers University Press.
32. Jelemenská, K., Koine, P., & Čičák, P. (2010). Enhanced classroom presenter. Paper
33. presented at CISSE 2010, Philadelphia, USA.
34. Jones, R., Peters, K. & Shields, E. (2007). Transform your training: practical
35. approaches to interactive information literacy teaching. Journal of Information
36. Literacy, 1(1), 35-42.
37. Maharjan, K., & Falla J.D. (June 14-18 ,2009). The ethical application of technology in
38. student decision-making. association of small users in education (ASCUE)
39. Conference, North Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.
40. Moor, S.S. (2006). Case Study: Renovating a computer teaching laboratory for active and
41. cooperative learning. Paper presented at the Illinois – Indiana and North
42. Central Joint Section Conference, Indiana.
43. Nicholson, J., Nicholson, D., & Valacich, J. (2007). Computer-mediated learning:
44. leveraging technology attributes to enhance learning outcomes. Presented at the AIS
45. SIG- ED IAM 2007 Conference.
46. Rawat, K.S., Elahi, M. & Massiha, G.H. (2008). A pilot project in evaluating the use of
47. tablet –pcs and supporting technologies in sophomere electronic technology courses.
48. IAJC-IJME International Conference, ISBN- 978-1-60643-379-9.
49. Sigle, J., Critcher, A., & Agarwal, K. (November 4 ,2007). Experience with a fully
50. colloborative classroom. Information Systems Education Conference (ISECON),
51. Elwood
52. Simpson, C., Crews,M., Rydl,L. & Roge,J.(2005). Teaching programming classes using
53. net support school. Proc ISECON,V22 (Columbus OH).
54. Smaldino, S.E., Lowther, D.L. & Russell, J.D. (2008). Instructional technology and media
55. for learning. 9th Edition. Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Pearson Merrill Prentice
56. Hall.
57. Sulak, S.A. (2007). Dokuzuncu sinif bilgi ve iletisim teknolojisi dersi programinin
58. değerlendirilmesi. Yuksek lisans tezi, Selcuk Universitesi, Sosyal Bilimler
59. Enstitusu, Konya.
60. Thai, C.N. (2008). A dual mode collaborative teaching and learning classroom
61. enviroment., In M.Iskander (Eds.), Innovative tecniques in ınstruction technology,
62. e-learning, e-assesment and education.USA:Springer Science+ Business Media
63. B.V.
64. Thilakarathna, K.,Keppitiyagama,C., Zoysa,K.D., Jasinghe, P. & Hansson, H. (2010).
65. Design and evaluation of an application software for ınformal peer group
66. learning. In Proceedings of 9th WSEAS International Conference on Education and
67. Educational Technology (EDU’10), volume 1 (pp. 229 – 234). WSEAS Press,
68. October 2010.
69. Vural, B.(2004). Egitim ogretimde teknoloji ve materyal kullanimi. Istanbul: Hayat
70. Yayincilik
71. Webster, L., Murphy, D.(2008). Enhancing learning through technology: Challenges
72. and responses. In R. Kwan, R. Fox, F.T. Chan and P. Tsang (Ed.), Enhancing
73. learning through technology research on emerging technologies and pedagogies.
74. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
75. Yildirim, A. (2009). Bilgisayar egitiminde aktif ogrenmenin ogrenci akademik basarisi,
76. tutumu ve kaliciligina etkisi. Yuksek lisans tezi, Gazi Universitesi Egitim
77. Bilimleri Enstitusu, Ankara.