Laboratory Control System’s Effects on Student Achievement and Attitudes

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 64, 0 - 0, 15.07.2016

Fatma Gozalan Cıcek , Mehmet Taspınar

Öz

Problem Statement: The current study investigates whether the learning environment designed based on the laboratory control system affects the academic achievement, the attitude toward the learning-teaching process and the retention of the students in computer education. Purpose of Study: The study aims to identify the laboratory control system based learning environment’s effects on students’ academic success on computer education, the related attitudes in the learning-teaching process and the permanence of the information that is learned. Methods: The study was conducted with 66 10th grade students attending a state high school in Kayseri in the 2010-2011 school year. Out of 66 students, 33 were assigned to an experimental group and 33 were assigned to a control group. While the control group students were educated primarily based on lecturing and presentations reflected through a projector, the experimental group students were trained in an active learning environment that was designed based on the laboratory control system. Both of the groups were administered the “Scale of Attitudes towards Learning and Teaching Process” and the “Achievement Test” as a pretest and posttest. The Achievement test was applied again after five weeks to find out if the learning has permanence. Findings and Results: Findings show that the experiment/test group educated in an active learning environment created with the Laboratory Control System was more successful than the control group educated in a

Kaynakça

• Altun, E., Kisla, T. & Cobanoglu, I. (2009). Alana ozgu uygulamalar ve bilgisayar
• laboratuvar ortamlarinin incelenmesi. In E. Altun (Eds). Bilgisayar ve ogretim
• teknolojileri egitimi bolumleri icin ozel ogretim yontemleri I-II. Ankara: PegemA
• Yayincilik
• Atici, B. (2007). Sosyal bilgi insasina dayali sanal ogrenme cevrelerinin ogrenci
• basarisi ve tutumlarina etkisi, Eğitim ve Bilim, 32(143), 41-54.
• Briner, J.V., Roberts, J.E. & Worthy, F. (June 12-16, 2005). Teaching computer science at a
• small university. Presented at ASCUE Conference, Myrtle Beach, South
• Carolina.
• Business Wire (29 January,2008). Washington county public schools increase use of netop
• school software for more effective student ınstruction.Retrieved from
• http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2008_Jan_29/ai_n24237641
• /
• Communications News (2001). Remote Training - CrossTec NetOp School 2.0 Classroom
• Management Software - Brief Article – Product Announcement Find Articles.com.
• Retrieved from
• http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0CMN/is_7_38/ai_76769769/
• Cure, F., & Ozdener, N. (2008). Ogretmenlerin bilgi ve iletişim teknolojileri (BİT)
• uygulama basarilari ve BIT’e yonelik tutumlari. Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim
• Fakultesi Dergisi, 34, 41-53.
• Demirli, C. (2007). Elektronik portfolyo ogretim surecinin ogrenen tutumlarina ve ogrenme
• algilarina etkisi. Doktora tezi, Firat Universitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu,
• Elazig.
• Doslu, A. (2009). Ortaogretim 10. sınıf bilgi ve iletisim teknolojileri dersinde web tabanli
• portfolyo kullanimi -Adana Ilinde bir calisma. Yuksek lisans tezi, Cukurova
• Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu, Adana.
• Duffy, J.L., McDonald, J.B., & Mizell,A.P., (2005). Teaching and learning with
• technology. USA: Pearson Education.
• Hope, A. (2010). Seductions of risk, social control, and resistance to school
• surveillance. In T.Monahan & R.D. Torres (Eds.) Schools under surveillance:
• cultures of control in public education. USA: Rutgers University Press.
• Jelemenská, K., Koine, P., & Čičák, P. (2010). Enhanced classroom presenter. Paper
• presented at CISSE 2010, Philadelphia, USA.
• Jones, R., Peters, K. & Shields, E. (2007). Transform your training: practical
• approaches to interactive information literacy teaching. Journal of Information
• Literacy, 1(1), 35-42.
• Maharjan, K., & Falla J.D. (June 14-18 ,2009). The ethical application of technology in
• student decision-making. association of small users in education (ASCUE)
• Conference, North Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.
• Moor, S.S. (2006). Case Study: Renovating a computer teaching laboratory for active and
• cooperative learning. Paper presented at the Illinois – Indiana and North
• Central Joint Section Conference, Indiana.
• Nicholson, J., Nicholson, D., & Valacich, J. (2007). Computer-mediated learning:
• leveraging technology attributes to enhance learning outcomes. Presented at the AIS
• SIG- ED IAM 2007 Conference.
• Rawat, K.S., Elahi, M. & Massiha, G.H. (2008). A pilot project in evaluating the use of
• tablet –pcs and supporting technologies in sophomere electronic technology courses.
• IAJC-IJME International Conference, ISBN- 978-1-60643-379-9.
• Sigle, J., Critcher, A., & Agarwal, K. (November 4 ,2007). Experience with a fully
• colloborative classroom. Information Systems Education Conference (ISECON),
• Elwood
• Simpson, C., Crews,M., Rydl,L. & Roge,J.(2005). Teaching programming classes using
• net support school. Proc ISECON,V22 (Columbus OH).
• Smaldino, S.E., Lowther, D.L. & Russell, J.D. (2008). Instructional technology and media
• for learning. 9th Edition. Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Pearson Merrill Prentice
• Hall.
• Sulak, S.A. (2007). Dokuzuncu sinif bilgi ve iletisim teknolojisi dersi programinin
• değerlendirilmesi. Yuksek lisans tezi, Selcuk Universitesi, Sosyal Bilimler
• Enstitusu, Konya.
• Thai, C.N. (2008). A dual mode collaborative teaching and learning classroom
• enviroment., In M.Iskander (Eds.), Innovative tecniques in ınstruction technology,
• e-learning, e-assesment and education.USA:Springer Science+ Business Media
• B.V.
• Thilakarathna, K.,Keppitiyagama,C., Zoysa,K.D., Jasinghe, P. & Hansson, H. (2010).
• Design and evaluation of an application software for ınformal peer group
• learning. In Proceedings of 9th WSEAS International Conference on Education and
• Educational Technology (EDU’10), volume 1 (pp. 229 – 234). WSEAS Press,
• October 2010.
• Vural, B.(2004). Egitim ogretimde teknoloji ve materyal kullanimi. Istanbul: Hayat
• Yayincilik
• Webster, L., Murphy, D.(2008). Enhancing learning through technology: Challenges
• and responses. In R. Kwan, R. Fox, F.T. Chan and P. Tsang (Ed.), Enhancing
• learning through technology research on emerging technologies and pedagogies.
• Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
• Yildirim, A. (2009). Bilgisayar egitiminde aktif ogrenmenin ogrenci akademik basarisi,
• tutumu ve kaliciligina etkisi. Yuksek lisans tezi, Gazi Universitesi Egitim
• Bilimleri Enstitusu, Ankara.