Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2018, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 77, 129 - 144, 20.09.2018

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Akbari, R. (2007). Reflections on reflection: A critical appraisal of reflective practices in L2 teacher education. System, 35(2), 192-207.
  • Akbari, R. (2008a). Postmethod discourse and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 42(4), 641-652.
  • Akbari, R. (2008b). Transforming lives: Introducing critical pedagogy into ELT classrooms. ELT Journal, 62(3), 276-283.
  • Akbari, R., Behzadpour, F., & Dadvand, B. (2010). Development of English language teaching reflection inventory. System, 38(2), 211-227.
  • Akbari, R., Kiany, G. R., Naeeni, M., & Allvar, N. (2008). Teachers’ teaching styles, sense of efficacy and reflectivity as correlates of students’ achievement outcomes. IJAL, 11(1), 1-27.
  • Allwright, R. L. (1991). The death of the method. Lancaster, England: The Exploratory Practice Centre.
  • Aukland, R. (1991). A review of the peer coaching literature. Journal of Staff Development, 12(1), 22–27.
  • Bailey, K. M. (1997). Reflective teaching: Situating our stories. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(1), 1-19.
  • Baleghizadeh, S., & Javidanmehr, Z. (2014). Exploring EFL teachers' reflectivity and their sense of self-efficacy. E-International Journal of Educational Research, 5(3), 19-38.
  • Bartlett, L. (1990). Teacher development through reflective teaching. Second Language Teacher Education, 202-214.
  • Bolton, G. (2010). Reflective practice: Writing and professional development. London: Sage.
  • Brandt, C. (2008). Integrating feedback and reflection in teacher preparation. ELT Journal, 62(1), 37–46.
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
  • Crandall, J. (2000). Language teacher education. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 34-55.
  • Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Boston: D.C. Heath.
  • Eslami, Z. R., & Fatahi, A. (2008). Teachers' sense of self-efficacy, English proficiency, and instructional strategies: A study of nonnative EFL teachers in Iran. TESL-EJ, 11(4), 1-19.
  • Farrell, T. S. C. (1998). ESL/EFL teacher development through journal writing. RELC, 29(1), 92-109.
  • Farrell, T. S. C. (2008). Teaching reading to English language learners: A reflective guide. CA: Corwin Press.
  • Farrell, T. S. C. (2016). Surviving the transition shock in the first year of teaching through reflective practice. System, 61, 12-19.
  • Freeman, D., & Richards, J. C. (1993). Conceptions of teaching and the education of second language teachers. TESOL Quarterly, 27(2), 193-216.
  • Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth, United Kingdom: Penguin Books.
  • Giroux, H. A. (1988). Schooling and the struggle for public life: Critical pedagogy in the modern age. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Gore, J. M., & Zeichner, K. M. (1991). Action research and reflective teaching in pre-service teacher education: A case study from the United States. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7(2), 119-136.
  • Jay, J. K., & Johnson, K. L. (2002). Capturing complexity: A typology of reflective practice for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(1), 73-85.
  • Johnson, K. E. (2006). The sociocultural turn and its challenges for second language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 235-257.
  • Johnson, K. E. (2009). Second language teacher education. NY: Routledge.
  • Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond methods: Macrostrategies for language teaching. London: Yale University Press.
  • Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Lee, I. (2007). Preparing pre-service English teachers for reflective practice. ELT Journal, 61(4), 321-329.
  • Liou, H. C. (2001). Reflective practice in a pre-service teacher education program for high school English teachers in Taiwan, ROC. System, 29(2), 197-208.
  • Mälkki, K. & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2012). From reflection to action? Barriers and bridges between higher education teachers’ thoughts and actions. Studies in Higher Education, 37(1), 33-50.
  • McLaren. P. (1995). Critical pedagogy and predatory culture. London: Routledge.
  • Mehrmohammadi, M. (2004). Teacher classroom research: Reflection on a nation-wide experience in Iran. Journal of Humanities, 11(3), 133-144.
  • Minott, M. A. (2010). Reflective teaching and how it aids in coping with heavy workloads, mandated Policies and disagreements with colleagues. Current Issues in Education, 13(1). 1-29.
  • Moradkhani, S., & Shirazizadeh, M. (2017). Context-based variations in EFL teachers’ reflection: The case of public schools versus private institutes in Iran. Reflective Practice, 18(2), 206-218.
  • Pacheco, A. Q. (2005). Reflective teaching and its impact on foreign language teaching. Revista Electrónica “Actualidades Investigativas en Educación”, 5, 1-19.
  • Pennycook, A. (1989). The concept of method, interested knowledge, and the politics of language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 23(4), 589-618.
  • Prabhu, N. S. (1990). There is no best method, why. TESOL Quarterly, 24(2), 161-176.
  • Rahimi, A., & Chabok, S. (2013). EFL teachers’ levels of reflective teaching and their conceptions of teaching and learning. Journal of Advanced Social Research, 3(1), 12-29.
  • Richards, J. C., & Lockhart, C. (1994). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. Cambridge University Press.
  • Sangani, H. R., & Stelma, J. (2012). Reflective practice in developing world contexts: A general review of literature and a specific consideration of an Iranian experience. Professional Development in Education, 38(1), 113-129.
  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. NY: Basic Books.
  • Simon, R. (1984). Signposts for a critical pedagogy. Educational Theory, 34(4), 379-388.
  • Simon, R. (1987). Empowerment as a pedagogy of possibility. Language Arts, 6, 370-383.
  • Soodmand Afshar, H., & Farahani, M. (2018). Inhibitors to EFL teachers’ reflective teaching and EFL learners’ reflective thinking and the role of teaching experience and academic degree in reflection perception. Reflective Practice, 19(1), 46-67.
  • Sowa, P. A. (2009). Understanding our learners and developing reflective practice: Conducting action research with English language learners. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(8), 1026-1032.
  • Stern, H. H. (1992). Issues and options in language teaching. Oxford University Press.
  • Taghilou, M. R. (2007). From reflective teaching to effective learning: A new class order. Iranian Journal of Language Studies, 1(2), 15-26.
  • Valencia, S. W., & Killion, J. P. (1988). Overcoming obstacles to teacher change: Direction from school-based efforts. Journal of Staff Development, 9(2), 168–174.
  • Wallace, M. J. (1991). Training foreign language teachers: A reflective approach. Cambridge University Press.

Reflective EFL Education in Iran: Existing Situation and Teachers’ Perceived Fundamental Challenges

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 77, 129 - 144, 20.09.2018

Öz

Purpose: The significance of reflective teaching has been widely underscored in
the literature. A primary consideration concerning the actualization of teacher
reflection is seeking existing challenges to the approach and planning to
handle them. This study sought to explore the current status of reflective
teaching among Iranian EFL teachers and their perception of fundamental
challenges to teacher reflection. Methods: Adopting a mixed-method
approach, this study took advantage of questionnaire and open-ended survey. The
data were collected from 176 high school teachers. To indicate whether any
significant discrepancy existed between the expected and observed behaviours,
chi-square goodness-of-fit test was run at item level. Concerning



the data collected through the
open-ended survey, the recurrent themes were identified, and the major
categories of challenges, subcategories, and their frequency of being mentioned
were extracted. Findings: The results of chi-square goodness-of-fit test
were statistically significant in 28 items out of 29, that is, there were
significant discrepancies between the expected and observed behaviours in case
of 28 dimensions of teacher reflection included in the instrument. Following
the thematic analysis, five main categories of obstacles were extracted,
including the obstacles relevant to teachers, students, educational system
(macro and micro level), political system, and parents. In terms of frequency,
the categories of educational system and teacher-relevant obstacles were the
first and second most frequently mentioned categories. Implications for
Research and Practice
: Indicating an inappropriate situation, the results
implied the necessity for change in teacher education programs and highlighted
the role of the Ministry of Education in facilitating teacher reflection.   

Kaynakça

  • Akbari, R. (2007). Reflections on reflection: A critical appraisal of reflective practices in L2 teacher education. System, 35(2), 192-207.
  • Akbari, R. (2008a). Postmethod discourse and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 42(4), 641-652.
  • Akbari, R. (2008b). Transforming lives: Introducing critical pedagogy into ELT classrooms. ELT Journal, 62(3), 276-283.
  • Akbari, R., Behzadpour, F., & Dadvand, B. (2010). Development of English language teaching reflection inventory. System, 38(2), 211-227.
  • Akbari, R., Kiany, G. R., Naeeni, M., & Allvar, N. (2008). Teachers’ teaching styles, sense of efficacy and reflectivity as correlates of students’ achievement outcomes. IJAL, 11(1), 1-27.
  • Allwright, R. L. (1991). The death of the method. Lancaster, England: The Exploratory Practice Centre.
  • Aukland, R. (1991). A review of the peer coaching literature. Journal of Staff Development, 12(1), 22–27.
  • Bailey, K. M. (1997). Reflective teaching: Situating our stories. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(1), 1-19.
  • Baleghizadeh, S., & Javidanmehr, Z. (2014). Exploring EFL teachers' reflectivity and their sense of self-efficacy. E-International Journal of Educational Research, 5(3), 19-38.
  • Bartlett, L. (1990). Teacher development through reflective teaching. Second Language Teacher Education, 202-214.
  • Bolton, G. (2010). Reflective practice: Writing and professional development. London: Sage.
  • Brandt, C. (2008). Integrating feedback and reflection in teacher preparation. ELT Journal, 62(1), 37–46.
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
  • Crandall, J. (2000). Language teacher education. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 34-55.
  • Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Boston: D.C. Heath.
  • Eslami, Z. R., & Fatahi, A. (2008). Teachers' sense of self-efficacy, English proficiency, and instructional strategies: A study of nonnative EFL teachers in Iran. TESL-EJ, 11(4), 1-19.
  • Farrell, T. S. C. (1998). ESL/EFL teacher development through journal writing. RELC, 29(1), 92-109.
  • Farrell, T. S. C. (2008). Teaching reading to English language learners: A reflective guide. CA: Corwin Press.
  • Farrell, T. S. C. (2016). Surviving the transition shock in the first year of teaching through reflective practice. System, 61, 12-19.
  • Freeman, D., & Richards, J. C. (1993). Conceptions of teaching and the education of second language teachers. TESOL Quarterly, 27(2), 193-216.
  • Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth, United Kingdom: Penguin Books.
  • Giroux, H. A. (1988). Schooling and the struggle for public life: Critical pedagogy in the modern age. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Gore, J. M., & Zeichner, K. M. (1991). Action research and reflective teaching in pre-service teacher education: A case study from the United States. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7(2), 119-136.
  • Jay, J. K., & Johnson, K. L. (2002). Capturing complexity: A typology of reflective practice for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(1), 73-85.
  • Johnson, K. E. (2006). The sociocultural turn and its challenges for second language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 235-257.
  • Johnson, K. E. (2009). Second language teacher education. NY: Routledge.
  • Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond methods: Macrostrategies for language teaching. London: Yale University Press.
  • Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Lee, I. (2007). Preparing pre-service English teachers for reflective practice. ELT Journal, 61(4), 321-329.
  • Liou, H. C. (2001). Reflective practice in a pre-service teacher education program for high school English teachers in Taiwan, ROC. System, 29(2), 197-208.
  • Mälkki, K. & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2012). From reflection to action? Barriers and bridges between higher education teachers’ thoughts and actions. Studies in Higher Education, 37(1), 33-50.
  • McLaren. P. (1995). Critical pedagogy and predatory culture. London: Routledge.
  • Mehrmohammadi, M. (2004). Teacher classroom research: Reflection on a nation-wide experience in Iran. Journal of Humanities, 11(3), 133-144.
  • Minott, M. A. (2010). Reflective teaching and how it aids in coping with heavy workloads, mandated Policies and disagreements with colleagues. Current Issues in Education, 13(1). 1-29.
  • Moradkhani, S., & Shirazizadeh, M. (2017). Context-based variations in EFL teachers’ reflection: The case of public schools versus private institutes in Iran. Reflective Practice, 18(2), 206-218.
  • Pacheco, A. Q. (2005). Reflective teaching and its impact on foreign language teaching. Revista Electrónica “Actualidades Investigativas en Educación”, 5, 1-19.
  • Pennycook, A. (1989). The concept of method, interested knowledge, and the politics of language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 23(4), 589-618.
  • Prabhu, N. S. (1990). There is no best method, why. TESOL Quarterly, 24(2), 161-176.
  • Rahimi, A., & Chabok, S. (2013). EFL teachers’ levels of reflective teaching and their conceptions of teaching and learning. Journal of Advanced Social Research, 3(1), 12-29.
  • Richards, J. C., & Lockhart, C. (1994). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. Cambridge University Press.
  • Sangani, H. R., & Stelma, J. (2012). Reflective practice in developing world contexts: A general review of literature and a specific consideration of an Iranian experience. Professional Development in Education, 38(1), 113-129.
  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. NY: Basic Books.
  • Simon, R. (1984). Signposts for a critical pedagogy. Educational Theory, 34(4), 379-388.
  • Simon, R. (1987). Empowerment as a pedagogy of possibility. Language Arts, 6, 370-383.
  • Soodmand Afshar, H., & Farahani, M. (2018). Inhibitors to EFL teachers’ reflective teaching and EFL learners’ reflective thinking and the role of teaching experience and academic degree in reflection perception. Reflective Practice, 19(1), 46-67.
  • Sowa, P. A. (2009). Understanding our learners and developing reflective practice: Conducting action research with English language learners. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(8), 1026-1032.
  • Stern, H. H. (1992). Issues and options in language teaching. Oxford University Press.
  • Taghilou, M. R. (2007). From reflective teaching to effective learning: A new class order. Iranian Journal of Language Studies, 1(2), 15-26.
  • Valencia, S. W., & Killion, J. P. (1988). Overcoming obstacles to teacher change: Direction from school-based efforts. Journal of Staff Development, 9(2), 168–174.
  • Wallace, M. J. (1991). Training foreign language teachers: A reflective approach. Cambridge University Press.
Toplam 50 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Mohammad Alıakbarı Bu kişi benim

Maryam Adıbpour Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 20 Eylül 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2018 Cilt: 18 Sayı: 77

Kaynak Göster

APA Alıakbarı, M., & Adıbpour, M. (2018). Reflective EFL Education in Iran: Existing Situation and Teachers’ Perceived Fundamental Challenges. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 18(77), 129-144.
AMA Alıakbarı M, Adıbpour M. Reflective EFL Education in Iran: Existing Situation and Teachers’ Perceived Fundamental Challenges. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research. Eylül 2018;18(77):129-144.
Chicago Alıakbarı, Mohammad, ve Maryam Adıbpour. “Reflective EFL Education in Iran: Existing Situation and Teachers’ Perceived Fundamental Challenges”. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research 18, sy. 77 (Eylül 2018): 129-44.
EndNote Alıakbarı M, Adıbpour M (01 Eylül 2018) Reflective EFL Education in Iran: Existing Situation and Teachers’ Perceived Fundamental Challenges. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research 18 77 129–144.
IEEE M. Alıakbarı ve M. Adıbpour, “Reflective EFL Education in Iran: Existing Situation and Teachers’ Perceived Fundamental Challenges”, Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, c. 18, sy. 77, ss. 129–144, 2018.
ISNAD Alıakbarı, Mohammad - Adıbpour, Maryam. “Reflective EFL Education in Iran: Existing Situation and Teachers’ Perceived Fundamental Challenges”. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research 18/77 (Eylül 2018), 129-144.
JAMA Alıakbarı M, Adıbpour M. Reflective EFL Education in Iran: Existing Situation and Teachers’ Perceived Fundamental Challenges. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research. 2018;18:129–144.
MLA Alıakbarı, Mohammad ve Maryam Adıbpour. “Reflective EFL Education in Iran: Existing Situation and Teachers’ Perceived Fundamental Challenges”. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, c. 18, sy. 77, 2018, ss. 129-44.
Vancouver Alıakbarı M, Adıbpour M. Reflective EFL Education in Iran: Existing Situation and Teachers’ Perceived Fundamental Challenges. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research. 2018;18(77):129-44.