Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2020, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 85, 23 - 44, 05.02.2020

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Abu-Lughod, L. (1991). Writing against culture. In R. E. Fox (Ed.), Recapturing anthropology: Working in the present (pp. 137–162). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
  • Abu-Lughod, L. (1993). Writing women’s worlds: Bedouin stories. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Asch, S. E. (1952). Social psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Banas, K. A. (2019). Revisiting Moral Reasoning in the Context of NCAA Sport. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Toronto, Canada.
  • Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development: Theory, research, and applications (Vol. 1, pp. 71-129). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Bandura, A. (2016). Moral disengagement: How people do harm and live with themselves. New York: Worth Publishers.
  • Baumrind, D. (1989). Rearing competent children. In W. Damon (Ed.), Child development today and tomorrow (pp. 349–378). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Boardley, I., & Kavussanu, M. (2010). Effects of goal orientation and perceived value of toughness on antisocial behavior in soccer: The mediating role or moral disengagement. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 32, 176-192.
  • Bok, S. (1978). Lying: Moral choice in public and private life. New York: Vintage Books.
  • Bredemeier, B. J., & Shields, D. L., (1984). Divergence in moral reasoning about sport and everyday life. Sociology of Sport Journal, 1, 348-357.
  • Bredemeier, B. J., & Shields, D. L. (1986). Moral growth among athletes and nonathletes: A comparative analysis. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 147(1), 7-18.
  • Conry-Murray, C. (2009). Adolescent and adult reasoning about gender roles and fairness in Benin, West Africa. Cognitive Development, 24, 207-219.
  • Cushman, F., Young, L., & Hauser, M. (2006). The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1082–1089.
  • Dahl, A., Gingo, M., Uttich, K., & Turiel, E. (2018). Moral reasoning about human welfare in adolescents and adults: Judging conflicts involving sacrificing and saving lives. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 83 (3, Serial No. 330).
  • Day, K. (2014). The right to literacy and cultural change: Zulu adolescents in post-apartheid rural South Africa. Cognitive Development, 29, 81–94.

  • Dworkin, R. M. (1977). Taking rights seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Frankena, W. K. (1963). Ethics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  • Freeman, V. G., Rathore, S. S., Weinfurt, K. P., Schulman, K. A., & Sulmasy, D. P. (1999). Lying for patients: Physician deception of third-party payers. Archives of Internal Medicine, 159, 2263-2270.
  • Freud, S. (1930). Civilization and its discontents. New York: Norton.
  • Gewirth, A. (1982). Human rights: Essays on justification and applications. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Gingo, M., Roded, A. D., & Turiel, E. (2017). Authority, autonomy, and deception: Evaluating the legitimacy of parental directives and adolescent deceit. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 27, 862-877.
  • Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105–2108.
  • Güvenç, G. (2014). Construction of wife and mother identities in women’s talk of intrafamily violence in Saraycık-Turkey. International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation, 3, 76-92.
  • Habermas, J. (1993). Justification and application. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitinist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review. 108, 814-834.
  • Hatch, E. (1983). Culture and morality: The relativity of values in anthropology. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Helwig, C. C. (1995). Adolescents’ and young adults’ conceptions of civil liberties: Freedom of speech and religion. Child Development, 66, 152–166.
  • Helwig, C. C. (1997). The role of agent and social context in judgments of freedom of speech and religion. Child Development, 68, 484-495.
  • Helwig, C. C., Arnold, M. L., Tan, D., & Boyd, D. (2003). Chinese adolescents’reasoning about democratic and authority-based decision making in peer, family, and school contexts. Child Development, 74, 783-800.
  • Helwig, C. C., Hildebrandt, C., & Turiel, E. (1995). Children’s judgments about psychological and physical harm in social contexts. Child Development, 66, 1680-1693.
  • Helwig, C. C., & Turiel, E. (2017). The psychology of children’s rights. In M. D. Ruck, Peterson-Badali, M., & Freeman, M. (Eds.), Handbook of children’s rights: Global and multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 132-148). New York: Routledge.
  • Killen, M., Lee-Kim, J., McGlothlin, H., & Stagnor, C. (2002). How children and adolescents value gender and racial exclusion. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development. Serial No. 271, Vol. 67, No. 4. Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishers.
  • Killen, M., Pisacane, K., Lee-Kim, J., Ardila-Rey, A. (2001). Fairness or stereotypes? Young children’s priorities when evaluating group exclusion and inclusion. Developmental Psychology, 37, 587-596.
  • Killen, M, & Smetana, J. G. (2007). The biology of morality: Human development and moral neuroscience. Human Development, 50, 241-243.
  • Koenigs, M., Young, L. Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., Cushman, F., Hauser, M., Damasio, A. (2007). Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements. Nature, 446, 908-911.
  • Kohlberg, L. (1963). Moral development and identification. In H. W. Stevenson (Ed.), Child psychology: 62nd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 277–332). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lahat, A., Helwig, C. C., Yang, S., Tan, D., & Liu, C. (2009). Mainland Chinese adolescents’ judgments and reasoning about self-determination and, nurturance rights. Social Development, 18, 690–710.
  • Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.
  • Mensing, J. F. (2002). Collectivism, individualism, and interpersonal responsibilities in families: Differences and similarities in social reasoning between individualsin poor, urban families in Colombia and the United States. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.
  • Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 371-378.
  • Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Mill, J. S. (1963). On liberty. London: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1863)
  • Neff, K. D. (2001). Judgments of personal autonomy and interpersonal responsibility in the context of Indian spousal relationships: An examination of young people's reasoning in Mysore, India. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 19, 233-257.
  • Nucci, L. (1981). Conceptions of personal issues: A domain distinct from moral or societal concepts. Child Development, 52, 114- 21.
  • Nucci, L. P. (1982). Conceptual development in the moral and conventional domains: Implications for values education. Review of Educational Research, 49, 93-122.
  • Nucci, L. P. (2001). Education in the moral domain. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nucci, L. P., & Turiel, E. (1993). God’s word, religious rules and their relation to Christian and Jewish children’s concepts of morality. Child Development, 64, 1485–1491.
  • Nucci, L., Turiel, E., & Roded, A. D. (2017). Continuities and discontinuities in the development of moral judgments. Monograph as Special Double Issue of Human Development, 60, 279-341.
  • Nussbaum, M.C. (1999). Sex and social justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Perkins, S. A. & Turiel, E. (2007). To lie or not to lie: To whom and under what circumstances. Child Development, 78, 609-621.
  • Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Piaget, J. (1947). The psychology of intelligence. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Piaget, J. (1970). Structuralism. New York: Basic Books.
  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Robinson, J. & Smetana, J. G. (2019). Emerging adults’ judgments of gender norms and gender inequality in relation to Mormon religious beliefs. Cognitive Development, 50, 118-129.
  • Ruck, M.D., Tenenbaum, H. I. & Willenberg, I. (2011). Mixed Race South African children’s and mother’s judgments and reasoning about nurturance and self-determination rights. Social Development, 20, 431-643.
  • Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Sen, A. (2006). Identity and violence: The illusion of destiny. New York, NY: Norton.

  • Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Shields, D. L. & Bredemeier, B. L. (2001). Moral development and behavior in sport. In R. N. Singer et al., (Eds.), Handbook of Sports Psychology, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley & Sons.
  • Shweder, R. A., & Bourne, E. J. (1982). Does the concept of person vary cross-culturally? In A. J. Marsella & G. M. White (Eds.), Cultural conceptions of mental health and therapy (pp. 97–137). Boston: Reidel.
  • Shweder, R. A., Mahapatra, M., & Miller, J. G. (1987). Culture and moral development. In J. Kagan & S. Lamb (Eds.), The emergence of morality in young children (pp. 1–83). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Shweder, R. A., Much, N. C., Mahapatra, M., & Park, L. (1997). The “Big Three” of morality (Autonomy, Community, and Divinity) and the “Big Three” explanations of suffering. In A. Brandt & P. Rozin (Eds.), Morality and health (pp. 119–169).
  • Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Knopf.
  • Smetana, J. G. (2006). Social domain theory: Consistencies and variations in children’s moral and social judgments. In M. Killen & J. G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 119–153). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Smetana, J. G. (2018, Ed.), Early moral development. Human Development, 16, 205-310.
  • Srinivasan, M., Kaplan, E., & Dahl, A. (in press). Reasoning about the scope of religious norms: Evidence from Hindu and Muslim children in India. Child Development.
  • Stoll, S. & Beller, J. (1994). Sport participation and its effect on moral reasoning of high school student athletes and general students. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 65.
  • Triandis, H. C. (1990). Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism. In J. J. Berman (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on motivation: 1989, Vol. 37. Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 41–133). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
  • Turiel, E. (1983a). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Turiel, E. (1983b). Domains and categories in social-cognitive development. In W. Overton (Ed.), The relationship between social and cognitive development (pp. 53-89). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
  • Turiel, E. (2002). The culture of morality: Social development, context, and conflict. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
  • Turiel, E. (2010). The relevance of moral epistemology and psychology for neuroscience. In P. Zelazo, M. Chandler, & E. Crone (Eds.), Developmental social cognitive neuroscience (pp. 313-331). New York: Taylor & Francis.
  • Turiel, E. (2015). Moral development. In W. F. Overton & P. C. Molenaar (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 1: Theory & method, 7th edition Editor-in-chief: R. M. Lerner (pp. 484-522). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Turiel, E. (in press). The Development of Moral Judgments, Emotions, and Sentiments. In D. Dukes, A. Samson, & E. Walle (Eds.), Emotion Development. Oxford University Press.
  • Turiel, E. & Gingo, M. (2017). Development in the moral domain: Coordination and the need to consider other domains of social reasoning. In N. Budwig, E.
  • Turiel, & P. Zelazo (Eds.), New Perspectives on Human Development (pp. 209-228). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Turiel, E., Hildebrandt, C., & Wainryb, C. (1991). Judging social issues: Difficulties, inconsistencies and consistencies. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 56(Serial No. 224).
  • Turiel, E., & Killen, M. (2010). Taking emotions seriously: The role of emotions in moral development. In W. Arsenio & E. Lemerise (Eds.), Emotions, aggression, and morality in children: Bridging development and psychopathology (pp. 33-52). Washington, D.C.: APA.
  • Turiel, E., Killen, M., & Helwig, C. C. (1987). Morality: Its structure, functions and vagaries. In J. Kagan & S. Lamb (Eds.), The emergence of moral concepts in young children (pp. 155–244). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Turiel, E., & Perkins, S. A. (2004). Flexibilities of mind: Conflict and Culture. Human Development, 47, 158-178.
  • Turiel, E., & Wainryb, C. (1994). Social reasoning and the varieties of social experience in cultural contexts. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 25, pp. 289–326). New York: Academic Press.
  • Turiel, E., & Wainryb, C. (1998). Concepts of freedoms and rights in a traditional, hierarchically organized society. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16, 375-395.
  • Turiel, E., & Wainryb, C. (2000) Social life in cultures: Judgments, conflicts, and subversion. Child Development, 71, 250-256.
  • Wainryb, C. (1991). Understanding differences in moral judgments: The role of informational assumptions. Child Development, 62, 840–851.
  • Wainryb, C., Brehl, B. A., & Matwin, S. (2005). Being hurt and hurting others: Children’s narrative accounts and moral judgments of their own interpersonal conflicts. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 70, No. 3, Serial No. 281.
  • Wainryb, C., & Recchia, H. E. (2012). Emotion and the moral lives of adolescents: Vagaries and complexities in the emotional experience of doing harm. In T. Malti (Ed.), Adolescent emotions: Development, morality, and adaptation. New directions in youth development (pp. 13–26). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Wainryb, C., & Turiel, E. (1994). Dominance, subordination, and concepts of personal entitlements in cultural contexts. Child Development, 65, 1701–1722.
  • Wikan, U. (1982). Behind the veil in Arabia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Wikan, U. (1996). Tomorrow, God willing: Self-made destinies in Cairo. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Wynia, M. K., Cummins, D. S., VanGeest, J. B., & Wilson, I. B. (2000). Physician manipulation of reimbursement rules for patients: Between a rock and a hard place. Journal of the American Medical Association, 283, 1858-1865.

The Development of Moral and Social Judgments: Social Contexts and Processes of Coordination

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 85, 23 - 44, 05.02.2020

Öz

The research presented in this essay is grounded in Social Domain Theory. Research provides substantial evidence that children’s social development is characterized by the formation of distinctly different systems of thought, including those in the moral, social-conventional, and personal domains. A main focus here is on morality, defined as involving understandings of welfare, justice, and rights, which are applied across societal contexts.

Social conventions are uniformities within social systems, serving to provide uniform expectations. The domains constitute different configurations of thinking and developmental changes occur within each domain. However, decisions in social situational contexts often involve coordination, which is a process of weighing and balancing different and sometimes conflicting considerations. Such social contexts can include conflicts between different moral goals or between moral and societal goals. Processes of coordination are examined in social psychological experiments, as well as developmental studies of topics like honesty, rights, and social inclusion. Coordination is also considered in people’s perspectives on cultural practices of unfairness and inequality. Psychological research in patriarchal societies shows that females, who are subjected to inequalities evaluate those cultural practices as unfair. Anthropological research documents that females engage in acts of opposition and moral resistance regarding perceived unfair cultural practices.

Kaynakça

  • Abu-Lughod, L. (1991). Writing against culture. In R. E. Fox (Ed.), Recapturing anthropology: Working in the present (pp. 137–162). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
  • Abu-Lughod, L. (1993). Writing women’s worlds: Bedouin stories. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Asch, S. E. (1952). Social psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Banas, K. A. (2019). Revisiting Moral Reasoning in the Context of NCAA Sport. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Toronto, Canada.
  • Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development: Theory, research, and applications (Vol. 1, pp. 71-129). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Bandura, A. (2016). Moral disengagement: How people do harm and live with themselves. New York: Worth Publishers.
  • Baumrind, D. (1989). Rearing competent children. In W. Damon (Ed.), Child development today and tomorrow (pp. 349–378). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Boardley, I., & Kavussanu, M. (2010). Effects of goal orientation and perceived value of toughness on antisocial behavior in soccer: The mediating role or moral disengagement. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 32, 176-192.
  • Bok, S. (1978). Lying: Moral choice in public and private life. New York: Vintage Books.
  • Bredemeier, B. J., & Shields, D. L., (1984). Divergence in moral reasoning about sport and everyday life. Sociology of Sport Journal, 1, 348-357.
  • Bredemeier, B. J., & Shields, D. L. (1986). Moral growth among athletes and nonathletes: A comparative analysis. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 147(1), 7-18.
  • Conry-Murray, C. (2009). Adolescent and adult reasoning about gender roles and fairness in Benin, West Africa. Cognitive Development, 24, 207-219.
  • Cushman, F., Young, L., & Hauser, M. (2006). The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1082–1089.
  • Dahl, A., Gingo, M., Uttich, K., & Turiel, E. (2018). Moral reasoning about human welfare in adolescents and adults: Judging conflicts involving sacrificing and saving lives. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 83 (3, Serial No. 330).
  • Day, K. (2014). The right to literacy and cultural change: Zulu adolescents in post-apartheid rural South Africa. Cognitive Development, 29, 81–94.

  • Dworkin, R. M. (1977). Taking rights seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Frankena, W. K. (1963). Ethics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  • Freeman, V. G., Rathore, S. S., Weinfurt, K. P., Schulman, K. A., & Sulmasy, D. P. (1999). Lying for patients: Physician deception of third-party payers. Archives of Internal Medicine, 159, 2263-2270.
  • Freud, S. (1930). Civilization and its discontents. New York: Norton.
  • Gewirth, A. (1982). Human rights: Essays on justification and applications. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Gingo, M., Roded, A. D., & Turiel, E. (2017). Authority, autonomy, and deception: Evaluating the legitimacy of parental directives and adolescent deceit. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 27, 862-877.
  • Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105–2108.
  • Güvenç, G. (2014). Construction of wife and mother identities in women’s talk of intrafamily violence in Saraycık-Turkey. International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation, 3, 76-92.
  • Habermas, J. (1993). Justification and application. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitinist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review. 108, 814-834.
  • Hatch, E. (1983). Culture and morality: The relativity of values in anthropology. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Helwig, C. C. (1995). Adolescents’ and young adults’ conceptions of civil liberties: Freedom of speech and religion. Child Development, 66, 152–166.
  • Helwig, C. C. (1997). The role of agent and social context in judgments of freedom of speech and religion. Child Development, 68, 484-495.
  • Helwig, C. C., Arnold, M. L., Tan, D., & Boyd, D. (2003). Chinese adolescents’reasoning about democratic and authority-based decision making in peer, family, and school contexts. Child Development, 74, 783-800.
  • Helwig, C. C., Hildebrandt, C., & Turiel, E. (1995). Children’s judgments about psychological and physical harm in social contexts. Child Development, 66, 1680-1693.
  • Helwig, C. C., & Turiel, E. (2017). The psychology of children’s rights. In M. D. Ruck, Peterson-Badali, M., & Freeman, M. (Eds.), Handbook of children’s rights: Global and multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 132-148). New York: Routledge.
  • Killen, M., Lee-Kim, J., McGlothlin, H., & Stagnor, C. (2002). How children and adolescents value gender and racial exclusion. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development. Serial No. 271, Vol. 67, No. 4. Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishers.
  • Killen, M., Pisacane, K., Lee-Kim, J., Ardila-Rey, A. (2001). Fairness or stereotypes? Young children’s priorities when evaluating group exclusion and inclusion. Developmental Psychology, 37, 587-596.
  • Killen, M, & Smetana, J. G. (2007). The biology of morality: Human development and moral neuroscience. Human Development, 50, 241-243.
  • Koenigs, M., Young, L. Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., Cushman, F., Hauser, M., Damasio, A. (2007). Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements. Nature, 446, 908-911.
  • Kohlberg, L. (1963). Moral development and identification. In H. W. Stevenson (Ed.), Child psychology: 62nd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 277–332). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lahat, A., Helwig, C. C., Yang, S., Tan, D., & Liu, C. (2009). Mainland Chinese adolescents’ judgments and reasoning about self-determination and, nurturance rights. Social Development, 18, 690–710.
  • Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.
  • Mensing, J. F. (2002). Collectivism, individualism, and interpersonal responsibilities in families: Differences and similarities in social reasoning between individualsin poor, urban families in Colombia and the United States. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.
  • Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 371-378.
  • Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Mill, J. S. (1963). On liberty. London: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1863)
  • Neff, K. D. (2001). Judgments of personal autonomy and interpersonal responsibility in the context of Indian spousal relationships: An examination of young people's reasoning in Mysore, India. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 19, 233-257.
  • Nucci, L. (1981). Conceptions of personal issues: A domain distinct from moral or societal concepts. Child Development, 52, 114- 21.
  • Nucci, L. P. (1982). Conceptual development in the moral and conventional domains: Implications for values education. Review of Educational Research, 49, 93-122.
  • Nucci, L. P. (2001). Education in the moral domain. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nucci, L. P., & Turiel, E. (1993). God’s word, religious rules and their relation to Christian and Jewish children’s concepts of morality. Child Development, 64, 1485–1491.
  • Nucci, L., Turiel, E., & Roded, A. D. (2017). Continuities and discontinuities in the development of moral judgments. Monograph as Special Double Issue of Human Development, 60, 279-341.
  • Nussbaum, M.C. (1999). Sex and social justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Perkins, S. A. & Turiel, E. (2007). To lie or not to lie: To whom and under what circumstances. Child Development, 78, 609-621.
  • Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Piaget, J. (1947). The psychology of intelligence. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Piaget, J. (1970). Structuralism. New York: Basic Books.
  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Robinson, J. & Smetana, J. G. (2019). Emerging adults’ judgments of gender norms and gender inequality in relation to Mormon religious beliefs. Cognitive Development, 50, 118-129.
  • Ruck, M.D., Tenenbaum, H. I. & Willenberg, I. (2011). Mixed Race South African children’s and mother’s judgments and reasoning about nurturance and self-determination rights. Social Development, 20, 431-643.
  • Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Sen, A. (2006). Identity and violence: The illusion of destiny. New York, NY: Norton.

  • Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Shields, D. L. & Bredemeier, B. L. (2001). Moral development and behavior in sport. In R. N. Singer et al., (Eds.), Handbook of Sports Psychology, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley & Sons.
  • Shweder, R. A., & Bourne, E. J. (1982). Does the concept of person vary cross-culturally? In A. J. Marsella & G. M. White (Eds.), Cultural conceptions of mental health and therapy (pp. 97–137). Boston: Reidel.
  • Shweder, R. A., Mahapatra, M., & Miller, J. G. (1987). Culture and moral development. In J. Kagan & S. Lamb (Eds.), The emergence of morality in young children (pp. 1–83). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Shweder, R. A., Much, N. C., Mahapatra, M., & Park, L. (1997). The “Big Three” of morality (Autonomy, Community, and Divinity) and the “Big Three” explanations of suffering. In A. Brandt & P. Rozin (Eds.), Morality and health (pp. 119–169).
  • Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Knopf.
  • Smetana, J. G. (2006). Social domain theory: Consistencies and variations in children’s moral and social judgments. In M. Killen & J. G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 119–153). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Smetana, J. G. (2018, Ed.), Early moral development. Human Development, 16, 205-310.
  • Srinivasan, M., Kaplan, E., & Dahl, A. (in press). Reasoning about the scope of religious norms: Evidence from Hindu and Muslim children in India. Child Development.
  • Stoll, S. & Beller, J. (1994). Sport participation and its effect on moral reasoning of high school student athletes and general students. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 65.
  • Triandis, H. C. (1990). Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism. In J. J. Berman (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on motivation: 1989, Vol. 37. Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 41–133). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
  • Turiel, E. (1983a). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Turiel, E. (1983b). Domains and categories in social-cognitive development. In W. Overton (Ed.), The relationship between social and cognitive development (pp. 53-89). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
  • Turiel, E. (2002). The culture of morality: Social development, context, and conflict. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
  • Turiel, E. (2010). The relevance of moral epistemology and psychology for neuroscience. In P. Zelazo, M. Chandler, & E. Crone (Eds.), Developmental social cognitive neuroscience (pp. 313-331). New York: Taylor & Francis.
  • Turiel, E. (2015). Moral development. In W. F. Overton & P. C. Molenaar (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 1: Theory & method, 7th edition Editor-in-chief: R. M. Lerner (pp. 484-522). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Turiel, E. (in press). The Development of Moral Judgments, Emotions, and Sentiments. In D. Dukes, A. Samson, & E. Walle (Eds.), Emotion Development. Oxford University Press.
  • Turiel, E. & Gingo, M. (2017). Development in the moral domain: Coordination and the need to consider other domains of social reasoning. In N. Budwig, E.
  • Turiel, & P. Zelazo (Eds.), New Perspectives on Human Development (pp. 209-228). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Turiel, E., Hildebrandt, C., & Wainryb, C. (1991). Judging social issues: Difficulties, inconsistencies and consistencies. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 56(Serial No. 224).
  • Turiel, E., & Killen, M. (2010). Taking emotions seriously: The role of emotions in moral development. In W. Arsenio & E. Lemerise (Eds.), Emotions, aggression, and morality in children: Bridging development and psychopathology (pp. 33-52). Washington, D.C.: APA.
  • Turiel, E., Killen, M., & Helwig, C. C. (1987). Morality: Its structure, functions and vagaries. In J. Kagan & S. Lamb (Eds.), The emergence of moral concepts in young children (pp. 155–244). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Turiel, E., & Perkins, S. A. (2004). Flexibilities of mind: Conflict and Culture. Human Development, 47, 158-178.
  • Turiel, E., & Wainryb, C. (1994). Social reasoning and the varieties of social experience in cultural contexts. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 25, pp. 289–326). New York: Academic Press.
  • Turiel, E., & Wainryb, C. (1998). Concepts of freedoms and rights in a traditional, hierarchically organized society. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16, 375-395.
  • Turiel, E., & Wainryb, C. (2000) Social life in cultures: Judgments, conflicts, and subversion. Child Development, 71, 250-256.
  • Wainryb, C. (1991). Understanding differences in moral judgments: The role of informational assumptions. Child Development, 62, 840–851.
  • Wainryb, C., Brehl, B. A., & Matwin, S. (2005). Being hurt and hurting others: Children’s narrative accounts and moral judgments of their own interpersonal conflicts. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 70, No. 3, Serial No. 281.
  • Wainryb, C., & Recchia, H. E. (2012). Emotion and the moral lives of adolescents: Vagaries and complexities in the emotional experience of doing harm. In T. Malti (Ed.), Adolescent emotions: Development, morality, and adaptation. New directions in youth development (pp. 13–26). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Wainryb, C., & Turiel, E. (1994). Dominance, subordination, and concepts of personal entitlements in cultural contexts. Child Development, 65, 1701–1722.
  • Wikan, U. (1982). Behind the veil in Arabia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Wikan, U. (1996). Tomorrow, God willing: Self-made destinies in Cairo. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Wynia, M. K., Cummins, D. S., VanGeest, J. B., & Wilson, I. B. (2000). Physician manipulation of reimbursement rules for patients: Between a rock and a hard place. Journal of the American Medical Association, 283, 1858-1865.
Toplam 93 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Elliot Turıel Bu kişi benim 0000-0002-6987-3681

K. Amy Banas Bu kişi benim 0000-0002-3488-7063

Yayımlanma Tarihi 5 Şubat 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2020 Cilt: 20 Sayı: 85

Kaynak Göster

APA Turıel, E., & Banas, K. A. (2020). The Development of Moral and Social Judgments: Social Contexts and Processes of Coordination. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 20(85), 23-44.
AMA Turıel E, Banas KA. The Development of Moral and Social Judgments: Social Contexts and Processes of Coordination. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research. Şubat 2020;20(85):23-44.
Chicago Turıel, Elliot, ve K. Amy Banas. “The Development of Moral and Social Judgments: Social Contexts and Processes of Coordination”. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research 20, sy. 85 (Şubat 2020): 23-44.
EndNote Turıel E, Banas KA (01 Şubat 2020) The Development of Moral and Social Judgments: Social Contexts and Processes of Coordination. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research 20 85 23–44.
IEEE E. Turıel ve K. A. Banas, “The Development of Moral and Social Judgments: Social Contexts and Processes of Coordination”, Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, c. 20, sy. 85, ss. 23–44, 2020.
ISNAD Turıel, Elliot - Banas, K. Amy. “The Development of Moral and Social Judgments: Social Contexts and Processes of Coordination”. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research 20/85 (Şubat 2020), 23-44.
JAMA Turıel E, Banas KA. The Development of Moral and Social Judgments: Social Contexts and Processes of Coordination. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research. 2020;20:23–44.
MLA Turıel, Elliot ve K. Amy Banas. “The Development of Moral and Social Judgments: Social Contexts and Processes of Coordination”. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, c. 20, sy. 85, 2020, ss. 23-44.
Vancouver Turıel E, Banas KA. The Development of Moral and Social Judgments: Social Contexts and Processes of Coordination. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research. 2020;20(85):23-44.