MR Sönümleyicili Yarı Aktif Ayarlı Kütle Sönümleyicisinin Uyarlamalı Kontrolü

Yıl 2022, , 68 - 73, 31.01.2022

Mahmut Paksoy , Hüseyin Aggümüş

https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.1020498

Cited By: 1

Öz

Bu çalışmada çok serbestlik dereceli bir bina modelinin bozucu girişler etkisindeki cevaplarını iyileştirmek için yarı-aktif ayarlı kütle sönümleyicisi (YAKS) kullanılmıştır. Tasarlanan YAKS’de yarı-aktifliği sağlayan kontrol elemanı olarak Magnetorheological (MR) sönümleyici kullanılmıştır. MR sönümleyiciler uygulanan gerilimle sönüm oranı ayarlanabilen kontrol elemanlarıdır. Uygun bir kontrol algoritmasıyla bu gerilim değerlerini belirlemek mümkündür. MR sönümleyici oldukça nonlineer bir karaktere sahiptir ve çalışması esnasında ısınır. Bu ısınmadan dolayı sahip olduğu parametre değerleri çalışma sırasında değişebilir. Bu yüzden hem nonlineerliklerin hem de parametrik belirsizliklerin üstesinden gelebilecek bir kontrolör kullanılması performansı arttıracaktır. Bu amaçla, bu çalışmada nonlineer uyarlamalı kontrol algoritması tasarlanmıştır. Kontrolcü performansı, pasif kontrol uygulaması olan ayarlı kütle sönümleyicisi (AKS) ile YAKS karşılaştırılarak incelenmiştir. Sonuçlar, uyarlamalı kontrol uygulamasıyla YAKS’nin AKS’den daha iyi performans gösterdiğini kanıtlamıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Uyarlamalı kontrol, Yapısal titreşim kontrolü, MR sönümleyici, Yarı aktif kütle sönümleyicisi (YAKS)

Adaptive Control of Semi Active Tuned Mass Damper with MR Damper

Öz

In this study, a semi active tuned mass damper (STMD) is used to improve the responses of a multi-degree-of-freedom building model under disturbance input. In the designed STMD, MR damper is employed in the system as a semi active control element. MR damper is a control element whose damping force can be adjusted to applied voltage. It is possible to determine the required voltage with a convenient control algorithm. Required voltage can be determined with a convenient control algorithm. The MR damper has a nonlinear hysteresis character, and its temperature increases during operation. Due to this temperature variance, its parameters may change during operation. Therefore, in order to obtain better performance, the designed controller must be able to overcome both nonlinearity and parametric uncertainties. That's why a nonlinear adaptive control algorithm is designed in this study. For analysis of controller performance, TMD and STMD results are compared. The results showed that the performance of STMD, which is the application of adaptive control better than the TMD situation.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Adaptive control, Structural vibration control, MR damper, Semi active tuned mass damper (STMD)

Kaynakça

• Guclu, R., & Sertbas, A. (2005). Evaluation of sliding mode and proportional-integral-derivative controlled structures with an active mass damper. Journal of Vibration and Control, 11(3), 397-406.
• Guclu, R., & Yazici, H. (2008). Vibration control of a structure with ATMD against earthquake using fuzzy logic controllers. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 318(1-2), 36-49.
• Guclu, R., & Yazici, H. (2009). Self-tuning fuzzy logic control of a non-linear structural system with ATMD against earthquake. Nonlinear Dynamics, 56(3), 199-211.
• Guclu, R., & Yazici, H. (2009). Seismic-vibration mitigation of a nonlinear structural system with an ATMD through a fuzzy PID controller. Nonlinear Dynamics, 58(3), 553-564.
• Aggümüş, H. (2020) “Simülasyon çevriminde donanım yöntemiyle yarı aktif ayarlı kütle sönümleyicilerinin performans analizi,” Doktora tezi, YTÜ Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü,2020.
• U. Aldemir, “Optimal control of structures with semiactive-tuned mass dampers,” J. Sound Vib., vol. 266, no. 4, pp. 847–874, 2003.
• Lin, P. Y., Chung, L. L., & Loh, C. H. (2005). Semiactive control of building structures with semiactive tuned mass damper. Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 20(1), 35-51.
• Tse, K. T., Kwok, K. C. S., Hitchcock, P. A., Samali, B., & Huang, M. F. (2007). Vibration control of a wind-excited benchmark tall building with complex lateral-torsional modes of vibration. Advances in Structural Engineering, 10(3), 283-304.
• Bathaei, A., Zahrai, S. M., & Ramezani, M. (2018). Semi-active seismic control of an 11-DOF building model with TMD+ MR damper using type-1 and-2 fuzzy algorithms. Journal of Vibration and Control, 24(13), 2938-2953.
• Aly, Aly Mousaad, “Control of wind-induced motion in high-rise buildings with hybrid TM/MR dampers,” Wind Struct., vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 565–595, 2015.
• M. Setareh, J. K. Ritchey, T. M. Murray, J.-H. Koo, and M. Ahmadian, “Semiactive Tuned Mass Damper for Floor Vibration Control,” J. Struct. Eng., vol. 133, no. 2, pp. 242–250, 2007
• Lin, P. Y., Lin, T. K., & Hwang, J. S. (2013). A semi-active mass damping system for low-and mid-rise buildings. Earthquakes and Structures, 4(1), 63-84.
• Weber, F., Distl, H., Fischer, S., & Braun, C. (2016, December). MR damper controlled vibration absorber for enhanced mitigation of harmonic vibrations. In Actuators (Vol. 5, No. 4, p. 27). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.
• Aggumus, H., & Cetin, S. (2018). Experimental investigation of semiactive robust control for structures with magnetorheological dampers. Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control, 37(2), 216-234.
• Aggumus, H., & Guclu, R. (2020, September). Robust H∞ control of STMDs used in structural systems by hardware in the loop simulation method. In Actuators (Vol. 9, No. 3, p. 55). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.
• Aggümüş, H. Güçlü R. (2020) "Yarı-aktif kütle sönümleyici kullanarak bina titreşimlerinin hibrit simülasyon yöntemiyle azaltılması," 3. Uluslararası Bilim, Teknoloji ve Sosyal Bilimlerde Güncel Gelişmeler Sempozyumu, Adana, Türkiye, 19-20 Haziran 2020, cilt.2, no.34, ss.391-397.
• Paksoy, M., & Metin, M. (2019). Nonlinear semi-active adaptive vibration control of a half vehicle model under unmeasured road input. Journal of Vibration and Control, 25(18), 2453-2472.
• Paksoy, M., & Metin, M. (2020). Nonlinear adaptive semiactive control of a half-vehicle model via hardware in the loop simulation. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, 28(3), 1612-1630.
• Nassani, D. E. & Ali, K. (2020). Lateral Load Resisting Systems in High-Rise Reinforced Concrete Buildings . Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi , (20) , 397-403 .
• Sadek, F., Mohraz, B., Taylor, A. W., & Chung, R. M. (1997). A method of estimating the parameters of tuned mass dampers for seismic applications. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 26(6), 617-635.
• Spencer Jr, B., Dyke, S. J., Sain, M. K., & Carlson, J. (1997). Phenomenological model for magnetorheological dampers. Journal of engineering mechanics, 123(3), 230-238.
• Sakai, C., Ohmori, H., & Sano, A. (2003, December). Modeling of MR damper with hysteresis for adaptive vibration control. In 42nd IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control (IEEE Cat. No. 03CH37475) (Vol. 4, pp. 3840-3845). IEEE.
• Krstic, M., Kokotovic, P. V., & Kanellakopoulos, I. (1995). Nonlinear and adaptive control design. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.