Güvenlik İkliminin Güvenlik Performansına Olan Etkisi: Türkiye’deki Çalışanlar Arasında Bir Çalışma

Öz

Güvenlik iklimi, güvenlik kültürünün bir alt boyutu olarak işletmelerde güvenli davranışları ve güvenlik tutumlarını etkileyen bir olgudur. Güvenlik performansı ise güvenlik ikliminin sonucu olarak işletmenin güvenlik seviyesini nicel olarak gösteren bir kavramdır. Literatürde yer alan çalışmalar incelendiğinde güvenli olmayan davranış, kazaların meydana gelmesindeki belirleyici faktörlerden biridir. Bu bağlamda, Neal, Griffin ve Hart tarafından geliştirilen güvenlik iklimi ve güvenlik performansı ölçeklerinin çeviri çalışması ve faktör analizi yöntemi ulusal literatürde ilk defa kullanılmıştır. Bununla birlikte yapısal eşitlik modeli (SEM) ve yol analiz yöntemleri kullanılarak iki kavram arasındaki korelasyonun incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Eğitim, sağlık, hizmet, sanayi-üretim ve diğer olmak üzere toplam 6 sektörden 317 katılımcı katılım göstermiştir. Faktör analizi sonuçlarına bakıldığında faktör yüklerinin 0,40 ile 0,95 arasında olduğu görülmektedir. Güvenilirlik analizi sonuçları 0,91 ve 0,97 arasında görülmektedir. Orijinal ölçekten farklı olarak, yapılan analizler sonucunda ölçeğin toplam 36 soru ve 4 faktör oluştuğu sonucuna varılmıştır. Sonuç olarak, yapılan ölçek uyarlaması ve analizler, gelecekte yapılacak çalışmalara ışık tutabilecek niteliktedir. Bununla birlikte Türkiye’de İSG eğitimlerinin eğitim ve öğretimin her derecesinde yer verilmesi ve nitelik ve nicelik bakımından artırılması gerektiği ortaya çıkmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Güvenlik kültürü
• Güvenlik iklimi
• Güvenlik performansı

The Impact of Safety Performance of The Safety Climate: Between Employees in Turkey

Abstract

Safety climate, as a sub-dimension of safety culture, is a phenomenon that affects safe behaviors and safety attitudes in businesses. Safety performance, on the other hand, is a concept that quantitatively shows the safety level of the enterprise as a result of the safety climate. When the studies in the literature are examined, unsafe behavior is one of the determining factors in the occurrence of accidents. In this context, the translation study and factor analysis method of safety climate and safety performance scales developed by Neal, Griffin and Hart were used for the first time in the national literature. In addition, it is aimed to examine the correlation between the two concepts by using the structural equation model (SEM) and path analysis methods. 317 participants from 6 sectors including education, health, service, industry-production and other participated. Considering the results of factor analysis, it is seen that factor loads are between 0.40 and 0.95. Reliability analysis results are seen between 0.91 and 0.97. Unlike the original scale, as a result of the analysis, it was concluded that the scale consisted of 36 questions and 4 factors. In conclusion, the scale adaptation and analyzes can shed light on future studies. However, it has emerged that OHS trainings in Turkey should be included in all levels of education and training and should be increased in terms of quality and quantity.

Keywords

• Safety culture
• Safety climate
• Safety performance

Kaynakça

1. Alruqi, W. M., Hallowell, M. R., & Techera, U. (2018). Safety Climate Dimensions And Their Relationship To Construction Safety Performance: A Meta-Analytic Review. Safety Science, 109, 165-173.
2. Barbaranelli, C., Petitta, L., & Probst, T. M. (2015). Does Safety Climate Predict Safety Performance İn Italy And The USA? Cross-Cultural Validation Of A Theoretical Model Of Safety Climate. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 77, 35-44.
3. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator–Mediator Variable Distinction İn Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, And Statistical Considerations. Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173.
4. Bayram, N. (2010). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesine Giriş AMOS Uygulamaları. Ezgi Kitabevi.
5. Beus, J. M., Payne, S. C., Bergman, M. E., & Arthur Jr, W. (2010). Safety Climate And İnjuries: An Examination Of Theoretical And Empirical Relationships. Journal Of Applied Psychology, 95(4), 713.
6. Brislin, Richard W.- LonnerWalter J.- Thorndike Robert M, (1973), Cross Cultural Research Methods, New York, John Wiley- SonsPub.
7. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative Ways Of Assessing Model Fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230-258.
8. Bouargane, L., & Cherkaoui, A. (2015, October). Towards an explicative model of human cognitive process in a hidden hazardous situation and a cognitive ergonomics intervention in railway environment. In 2015 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management (IESM) (pp. 968-976). IEEE.

9. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Faktör Analizi: Temel Kavramlar ve Ölçek Geliştirmede Kullanımı. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 32(32), 470-483.
10. Campbell, J.P., Gasser, M.B. & Oswald, F.L. 1996, ‘The Substantive Nature Of Performancevariability’, İn Individual Differences And Behavior İn Organizations, Ed. K.R. Murphy,Jossey-Bass, San Fancisco.
11. Cattell, R. B. (1978). The Scientific Use Of Factor Analysis. New York: Plenum.
12. Chen, Q., Jin, R., & Soboyejo, A. (2013). Understanding A Contractor’s Regional Variations in Safety Performance. Journal Of Construction Engineering And Management, 139(6), 641-653.
13. Child, D. (2006). The Essentials of Factor Analysis. A&C Black.
14. Christian, M. S., Bradley, J. C., Wallace, J. C., & Burke, M. J. (2009). Workplace Safety: A Meta-Analysis Of The Roles Of Person And Situation Factors. Journal Of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1103.
15. Clarke, S. (2006). The Relationship Between Safety Climate And Safety Performance: A Meta-Analytic Review. Journal Of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(4), 315.
16. Clarke, S. (2010). An İntegrative Model Of Safety Climate: Linking Psychological Climate And Work Attitudes To İndividual Safety Outcomes Using Meta‐Analysis. Journal Of Occupational And Organizational Psychology, 83(3), 553-578.
17. Clarke, S., & Ward, K. (2006). The Role Of Leader İnfluence Tactics And Safety Climate İn Engaging Employees' Safety Participation. Risk analysis, 26(5), 1175-1185.
18. Clarke, S., Probst, T. M., Guldenmund, F. W., & Passmore, J. (2015). The Wiley Blackwell Handbook Of The Psychology Of Occupational Safety And Workplace Health. John Wiley & Sons.
19. Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (2013). A First Course İn Factor Analysis. Psychology press.
20. Cooper, M. D. (2000). Towards A Model Of Safety Culture. Safety Science, 36(2), 111-136.
21. Cooper, M. D., & Phillips, R. A. (2004). Exploratory Analysis Of The Safety Climate And Safety Behavior Relationship. Journal Of Safety Research, 35(5), 497-512.
22. Cox, S., & Cox, T. (1991). The Structure Of Employee Attitudes To Safety: A European Example. Work & Stress, 5(2), 93-106.
23. Doğan, N., Soysal, S., & Karaman, H. (2017). Aynı Örnekleme Açımlayıcı ve Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi Uygulanabilir Mi? Pegem Atıf İndeksi, 373-400.
24. Ensari Özay, M , Yılmaz, A , Uçan, R . (2020). Occupational Safety Culture Of Accommodation Sector Employees İn Balıkesir Province: NOSACQ-50 Survey . International Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences , 6 (2) , 186-193 .
25. Eskandari, D., Gharabagh, M. J., Barkhordari, A., Gharari, N., Panahi, D., Gholami, A., & Teimori-Boghsani, G. (2020). Development of a Scale for Assessing the Organization's Safety Performance Based Fuzzy ANP. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 104342.
26. Fang, D., Chen, Y., & Wong, L. (2006). Safety Climate İn Construction Industry: A Case Study İn Hong Kong. Journal Of Construction Engineering And Management, 132(6), 573-584.
27. Geller, E. Scott (1994), “Ten Principles for Achieving a Total Safety Culture”, Professional Safety, 39 (9), American Society of Safety Engineers, pp. 18-25.
28. Givehchi, S., Hemmativaghef, E., & Hoveidi, H. (2017). Association Between Safety Leading Indicators and Safety Climate Levels. Journal Of Safety Research, 62, 23-32.
29. Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor Analysis. Hillsdale,NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Griffin, M. A., & Curcuruto, M. (2016). Safety Climate in Organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, 191-212.
31. Griffin, M. A., & Neal, A. (2000). Perceptions Of Safety At Work: A Framework for Linking Safety Climate To Safety Performance, Knowledge, and Motivation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(3), 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.3.347
32. Guldenmund, Frank W. (2000), “The Nature of Safety Culture: A Review of Theory and Research”, Safety Science, Vol. 34, pp. 215-257.
33. He, C., McCabe, B., Jia, G., & Sun, J. (2020). Effects Of Safety Climate And Safety Behavior On Safety Outcomes Between Supervisors and Construction Workers. Journal Of Construction Engineering And Management, 146(1), 04019092.
34. Hofmann, D. A., & Stetzer, A. (1996). A Cross‐Level İnvestigation Of Factors Influencing Unsafe Behaviors And Accidents. Personnel Psychology, 49(2), 307-339.
35. Hogarty, K. Y., Hines, C. V., Kromrey, J. D., Ferron, J. M., & Mumford, K. R. (2005). The Quality Of Factor Solutions in Exploratory Factor Analysis: The Influence of Sample Size, Communality, and Overdetermination. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65(2), 202-226.
36. Hon, C. K., Chan, A. P., & Yam, M. C. (2014). Relationships Between Safety Climate And Safety Performance Of Building Repair, Maintenance, Minor Alteration, and Addition (RMAA) Works. Safety science, 65, 10-19.
37. Hoyle, R. H. (1995). Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications. Sage.
38. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff Criteria For Fit Indexes In Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
39. International Business Machine (IBM), IBM Support, https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/when-amos-will-not-provide-fit-measures [Last Access: 31.01.2021]
40. Insag- 15 Report (2002), Key Practical Issues in Strenghtening Safety Culture, A Report by the International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group (Uluslararası Nükleer Güvenlik Danışma Grubu), International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.
41. Jackson, D. L., Gillaspy Jr, J. A., & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009). Reporting Practices in Confirmatory Factor Analysis: An Overview And Some Recommendations. Psychological methods, 14(1), 6.
42. Kaynak, Z. N. (2012). Yapısal Eşitlik Modelleri, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul, 27-28.
43. Khandan, M., Maghsoudipour, M., Vosoughi, S., & Kavousi, A. (2013). Safety climate and prediction of ergonomic behavior. International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics, 19(4), 523-530.
44. Kim, E., Sok, S. R., & Won, C. W. (2021). Factors Affecting Frailty Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Multi-Group Path Analysis According To Nutritional Status. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 115, 103850.
45. Kim, S., Kim, P. B., & Lee, G. (2021). Predicting Hospitality Employees’ Safety Performance Behaviors in The COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 93, 102797.
46. Kline, P. (1979). Psychometrics and Psychology. London: Acaderric Press.
47. Kline, P. (2014). An Easy Guide to Factor Analysis. Routledge.
48. Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles And Practice Of Structural Equation Modeling. Guilford Publications.
49. Lingard, H., Cooke, T., & Blismas, N. (2011). Coworkers' Response to Occupational Health and Safety. Engineering, Construction And Architectural Management.
50. Lu, C. S., & Yang, C. S. (2011). Safety Climate And Safety Behavior İn The Passenger Ferry Context. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43(1), 329-341.
51. MacCallum, R. C., & Hong, S. (1997). Power Analysis in Covariance Structure Modeling Using GFI and AGFI. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(2), 193-210.
52. McSween TE. Values based safety processes. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley; 2003
53. Mearns, K. J., & Flin, R. (1999). Assessing the state of organizational safety—culture or climate?. Current psychology, 18(1), 5-17.
54. Neal, A., & Griffin, M. A. (2002). Safety Climate And Safety Behaviour. Australian Journal Of Management, 27(1_suppl), 67-75.
55. Neal, A., & Griffin, M. A. (2006). A Study Of The Lagged Relationships Among Safety Climate, Safety Motivation, Safety Behavior, and Accidents at the Individual and Group Levels. Journal Of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 946.
56. Neal, A., Griffin, M. A., & Hart, P. M. (2000). The Impact Of Organizational Climate On Safety Climate And Individual Behavior. Safety Science, 34(1-3), 99-109.
57. Norusis, M. J. (1994). SPSS Advanced Statistics 6.1. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc
58. Olcay, Z. F., Temur, S., & Sakalli, A. E. (2021). A Research on the Knowledge Level and Safety Culture of Students Taking Occupational Health And Safety Course. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(1), 187-200.
59. Öner, N. (1996). Türkiye’de Kullanılan Psikolojik Testler: Bir Başvuru Kaynağı, İstanbul: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 56-63.
60. Patankar, M. S., & Sabin, E. J. (2010). The Safety Culture Perspective. In Human Factors in Aviation (pp. 95–122). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374518-7.00004-3
61. Pidgeon, N. 1991. Safety Culture and Risk Management in Organizations. Cross-Cultural Psychology 22: 129–140.
62. Pordanjani, T. R., & Ebrahimi, A. M. (2015). Safety Motivation and Work Pressure As Predictors Of Occupational Accidents in the Petrochemical Industry. Health Scope, 4(4).
63. Reason, J. (1995). A Systems Approach to Organizational Error. Ergonomics, 38(8), 1708-1721.
64. Sakallı, A. E. (2019). A Tipi ve B Tipi Kişilik Özelliğine Sahip Bireylerde İş Doyumu Ve Kazalanma Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi. OHS Academy, 2 (1) , 11-31 .
65. Sardeshmukh, S. R., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2017). Integrating Moderation and Mediation: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 721-745.
66. Schumacker, R.E.- R.G. Lomax, (2010), A Beginners’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey.
67. Uca, N., & Sümen, H. (2016). Ülkelerin Yolsuzluk Algısının, Lojistik Performansının, Dış Ticaret Hacminin ve Küresel Rekabet İlişkisinin Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli İle İncelenmesi: Kavramsal Model Önerisi (Master's thesis, Maltepe Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü).
68. Seo, D. C., Torabi, M. R., Blair, E. H., & Ellis, N. T. (2004). A Cross-Validation Of Safety Climate Scale Using Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach. Journal Of Safety Research, 35(4), 427-445.
69. Sue Cox & Tom Cox (1991) The Structure Of Employee Attitudes To Safety: A European Example, Work & Stress, 5:2, 93-106,
70. Tabachnick, B. G. ve Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
71. Temur, S., Mertoğlu, B. ( ) Türkiye ve Çekya Arasındaki Güvenlik Kültürüne Bakış Açısı Üzerine İrdeleme. Ohs Academy, 2.2: 67-76.
72. Uzunsakal, E., & Yıldız, D. (2018). Alan Araştırmalarında Güvenilirlik Testlerinin Karşılaştırılması ve Tarımsal Veriler Üzerine Bir Uygulama. Uygulamalı Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(1), 14-28.
73. Velicer, W. F., & Fava, J. L. (1998). Affects Of Variable and Subject Sampling On Factor Pattern Recovery. Psychological Methods, 3(2), 231.
74. Wallace, J. C., Popp, E., & Mondore, S. (2006). Safety Climate As A Mediator Between Foundation Climates and Occupational Accidents: A Group-Level Investigation. Journal Of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 681.
75. Weston, R., & Gore, P. A. (2006). A Brief Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(5), 719–751.
76. Ying, L., Zhijia, H., & Lianbao, L. (2012). Motivation Mechanism Of Accident Prevention in Coal Mine. Procedia Engineering, 43, 174-179.
77. Zohar, D. (1980). Safety Climate in İndustrial Organizations: Theoretical And Applied Implications. Journal Of Applied Psychology, 65(1), 96.
78. Zohar, D. (1980). Safety Climate in Industrial Organizations: Theoretical And Applied Implications. Journal Of Applied Psychology, 65(1), 96.
79. Türkmenoğlu, C. (2015). Türkçe Metinlerde Duygu Analizi. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
80. Ye, X. Li, S. Yang, X. Qin, C. (2016). Use of Social Media For The Detection and Analysis of Aınfectious Diseases in China. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 5, 156.
81. Widener, M.J. Li, W. (2014). Using Geolocated Twitter Data To Monitor The Prevalence of Healthy and Unhealthy Food References Across The US. Appl. Geogr., 54, 189–197.
82. Wilson, T., Wiebe, J. Hoffmann, Pmesa. (2005). Recognizing Contextual Polarity in Phrase-Level Sentiment Analysis. In Proceedings of The Conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 347-354. Association for Computational Linguistics.