Türkiye'de İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği Eğitimlerinin Elektrik Dağıtım Sektörü Açısından Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

İş sağlığı ve güvenliği günümüz çalışma hayatının ve iş hukukunun önemli bir parçasını oluşturmaktadır. İşyerlerinde ilgili yasa ve yönetmeliklere uygun olarak alınan önlemler katı bir yaklaşımla uygulandığında iş kazaları ve meslek hastalıklarının azaltılması mümkündür. Bu uygulamalar sonucunda işçi, işveren ve sosyal güvenlik sistemlerinin sürdürülebilirliği açısından önemli sonuçlar elde edilmektedir. Bu çalışmada iş sağlığı ve güvenliği eğitiminin etkilerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu nedenle ÇEDAŞ AŞ çalışanlarına verilen eğitim, eğitim öncesi ve sonrası uygulanan anketler ile değerlendirilmiştir. Bu değerlendirme sonucunda iş güvenliği eğitiminin önemli bir başarı sağladığı kanıtlanacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Güvenlik
• Sağlık İş güvenliği
• Güvenlik eğitimi değerlendirmesi

Evaluation of Occupational Health and Safety Training in Turkey in terms of Electricity Distribution Sector

Öz

Occupational health and safety constitute an important part of today's working life and labor law. When the measures taken in line with the relevant laws and regulations in workplaces are implemented with a strict approach, it is possible to reduce work accidents and occupational diseases. As a result of these practices, important results are obtained in terms of the sustainability of workers, employers and social security systems. In this study, it is aimed to determine the effects of occupational health and safety training. Therefore, the training given to ÇEDAŞ AŞ employees was evaluated with the questionnaires applied before and after the training. As a result of this evaluation, it will be proven that occupational safety training has provided a significant success.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Safety
• Health Occupational safety
• Safety training evaluation

Kaynakça

1. Ajslev, J., Dastjerdi, E., Dyreborg, J., Kines, P., Jeschke, K., Sundstrup, E., . . . Andersen, L. (2017, 91). Safety climate and accidents at work: Cross-sectional study among 15,000 workers of the general working population. Safety Science, pp. 320-325.
2. Albert, A., & Hallowell, M. (2013). Safety risk management for electrical transmission and distribution line construction. Safety Science, pp. 118-126.
3. Asgary, A., Ghaffari, A., & Levy, J. (2010). Spatial and temporal analyses of structural fire incidents and their causes:A case of Toronto, Canada. Fire Safety Journal, s. 44-57.
4. Atsu, F., Adams, S., & Adjei, J. (2021). ICT, energy consumption, financial development, and environmental. Heliyon.
5. Aziz, S., & Selamat, M. (2016, 48). Stimulating Workplace Learning through Training Characteristics and Motivation to Learn. Jurnal Pengurusan, pp. 173-185.
6. Batlle, E., Palacio, J., Lora, E., Reyes, A., Moreno, M., & Morejon, M. (2020, January 20). A methodology to estimate baseline energy use and quantify savings in electrical energy consumption in higher education institution buildings: Case study, Federal University of Itajubá (UNIFEI). Journal of Cleaner Production.
7. Christian, M., Bradley, J., Wallace, J., & Burke, M. (2009, 94 5). Workplace Safety: A Meta-Analysis of the Roles of Person and Situation Factors . Journal of Applied Psychology, pp. 1103-1127.
8. Cordon, J., Mestre, J., & Walliser, J. (2017, 93). Human factors in seafaring: The role of situation awareness. Safety Science, pp. 256-265.

9. Curado, C., Henriques, P., & Ribeiro, S. (2015, 19 2). Voluntary or mandatory enrollment in training and the motivation to transfer training. International Journal of Training and Development, pp. 98-109.
10. Giangreco, A., Carugati, A., & Sebastiano, A. (2010). Are we doing the right thing? Food for thought on training evaluation and its context. Personnel Review, s. 162-177.
11. Grau, R., Martinez, I., Agut, S., & Salanova, M. (2002, 8 1). Safety Attitudes and Their Relationship to Safety Training and Generalised Self-Efficacy. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND ERGONOMICS (JOSE), pp. 23-35.
12. Holte, K., & Kjestveit, K. (2012). Young workers in the construction industry and initial OSH-training when entering work life. Work 41, pp. 4137-4141.
13. Kaya, Y., Günay , R., & Damgacı, F. (2015, Aralık). Kirkpatrick dört düzey program değerlendirme Modeli. Inesjournal, s. 89-97.
14. Kılıç, A. (2018, Temmuz-Ağustos). Gelişmiş ülkelerde ve Türkiye’de yangın nedenleri. Yangın ve Güvenlik, s. 8-10.
15. Kirkpatric, D. (1959, 13). Techniques for evaluating training programs. Journal of the American Society of Training Directors, pp. 21-26.
16. Kirkpatrick, D. (1996, 50). Great ideas revisited: revisiting Kirkpatrick's four-level model. Training & Development, pp. 54-57.
17. Li, K., & Yuan, W. (2021). The nexus between industrial growth and electricity consumption in China e New evidence from a quantile-on-quantile approach. Energy, p. 120991.
18. Marshall, P., Hirmas, A., & Singer, M. (2018). Heinrich's pyramid and occupational safety: A statistical validation methodology. Safety Science, s. 180-189.
19. Noe, R., & Kodwani, A. (2018). Employee training and development. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
20. Ricci, F., Chiesi, A., Bisio, C., Panari, C., & Pelosi, A. (2016, 28(6)). Effectiveness of occupational health and safety training: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Occupational health and safety, s. 355-377.
21. SGK. (2021). http://www.sgk.gov.tr/wps/portal/sgk/tr/kurumsal/istatistik/sgk_istatistik_yilliklari adresinden alındı
22. Tai, W. (2006, 35 1). Effects of training framing, general self-efficacy and training motivation on trainees' training eff ectiveness. Personnel Review, pp. 51-65.
23. Tharenou, P. (2001, 74). The relationship of training motivation to participation in training and development. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, pp. 509-621.
24. Wang, B., Yuan, Z., Liu, X., Sun, Y., Zhang, B., & Wang, Z. (2021). Electricity price and habits: Which would affect household electricity consumption? Energy & Buildings, p. 110888.