Yüksekte Çalışmalarda Düşme Risklerine Karşı Korunma Tedbirlerinin Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemleri ile Belirlenmesi

Öz

Yüksekte yapılan çalışmalar özellikle inşaat gibi çok tehlikeli sektörlerde sıkça görülmektedir. İnşaat sektöründe en çok ölümlü iş kazası yüksekte yapılan çalışmalar olarak görülmektedir. Yüksekte yapılan çalışmalarda meydana gelebilecek tehlike ve risklere karşı alınacak tedbirlere ihtiyaç vardır. Bu sayede ölümlü iş kazalarının önüne geçilmiş olunacaktır. Bu risklere karşı alınacak tedbirler mevcuttur. Ancak hangi tedbirlerin daha öncelikli olduğu, daha önemli ve yararlı olduğu konusunda bazı durumlarda karışıklık olabilmektedir. İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği açısından önlemler değerlendirilmelidir. Proaktif yaklaşım sağlanması için önlemlerin net olması gerekmektedir. Bu çalışmada çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri ile en uygun önlemin seçimi yapılmıştır. Kriterler ve alternatifler belirlenerek en uygun önlem seçimi gerçekleşmiştir. Kriterler değerlendirilirken SWARA ve alternatifler değerlendirilirken SAW yöntemi entegre edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yüksekte Çalışma
• SWARA
• SAW
• Çok Kriterli Karar Verme
• İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği
• Risk Değerlendirmesi.

Determination of Protection Measures Against Fall Risks in Working at Heights by Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods

Abstract

Work at heights is common, especially in very dangerous sectors such as construction. The most fatal occupational accidents in the construction sector are seen as the work at height. There is a need for measures to be taken against the dangers and risks that may occur during work at height. In this way, fatal work accidents will be prevented. There are measures to be taken against these risks. However, in some cases there may be confusion about which measures are prioritized, more important and beneficial. Measures should be evaluated in terms of Occupational Health and Safety. To ensure a proactive approach, the measures need to be clear. In this study, the most appropriate measure was selected with multi-criteria decision making methods. Criteria and alternatives were determined and the most appropriate measure was chosen. SWARA method was integrated while evaluating the criteria and SAW method was integrated while evaluating the alternatives.

Keywords

• Working at Height
• Multi-Criteria Decision Making
• Occupational Health and Safety
• Risk Assessment
• SAW
• SWARA

Kaynakça

1. Abdelhamid, T.S., Everett, J.G. (2000). Identifying Root Causes of Construction Accidents, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126(1), 52–60.
2. Barisik, T., Guneri, A.F. (2021). Calculation The Environmental Impacts of BLEVE Using Artificial Neural Networks, Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 40, 9611-9616.
3. Barisik, T., Guneri, A.F. (2022). BLEVE Risk Effect Estimation Using The Levenberg-Marquardt Algorıthm in An Artificial Neural Network Model, Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 40(4), 877-893.
4. Cinar, U., Ugurlu, O.F., Cebi, S. (2020). Design of Noise-Canceling Earmuff with Quality Function Deployment, Customer Oriented Product Design, 279, 23-34.
5. Cinar, U., Cebi, S. (2022). A Novel Approach to Assess Occupational Risks and Prevention of Hazards: The House of Safety & Prevention, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 42(1), 517-528.
6. Choi, B., Ahn, S., Lee, S. (2017). Construction Workers’ Group Norms and Personal Standards Regarding Safety Behavior: Social Identity Theory Perspective, Journal of Management in Engineering, 33(4).
7. Choi, B., Lee, S. (2022). The Psychological Mechanism of Construction Workers’ Safety Participation: The Social Identity Theory Perspective, Journal of Safety Research, 82, 194–206.
8. Choo, H., Lee, B., Kim, H., Choi, B., (2023). Automated Detection of Construction Work at Heights and Deployment of Safety Hooks Using IMU with A Barometer, Automation in Construction, 147.

9. Erdem, I. (2013). Operational Research and WinQSB Practices, Seçkin Publishers, Ankara.
10. Gavcar, E., Coşkun, E., Paksoy, T., Eleren, A., Sulak, H., Özdemir, M., Aytemiz, T., Özceylan, E., Keskin, R. (2011). Operational Research, Lisans Publishers, Istanbul.
11. Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making – Methods and Applications – A State-of-the-Art Survey, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.
12. Keršuliene, V., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). Selection of Rational Dispute Resolution Method by Applying New Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (Swara), Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11(2),243–258.
13. Khan, M., Khalid, R., Anjum, S., Khan, N., Cho, S., Park, C. (2022). Tag and IoT Based Safety Hook Monitoring for Prevention of Falls from Height, Automation in Construction, 136.
14. Khosravi, Y., Asilian-Mahabadi, H., Hajizadeh, E., Hassanzadeh-Rangi, N., Bastani, H., Behzadan, A.H. (2014). Factors Influencing Unsafe Behaviors and Accidents on Construction Sites: A Review, International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 20(1), 111–125.
15. Loosemore, M., Malouf, N. (2019). Safety Training and Positive Safety Attitude Formation in the Australian Construction Industry, Safety Science, 113, 233–243.
16. Pimerol, J.C., Romero, S.B. (2000). Multi Criteria Decision in Management: Principles and Practic, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
17. Reason, J. (1990). Human Error, Cambridge University Press, BO9781139062367.
18. Savitha, K., Chandrasekar, C. (2011). Vertical Handover Decision Schemes Using SAW and VPM for Network Selection in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks, Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 11(9), 21-22.
19. Shin, M. Lee, H.S., Park, M., Moon, M., Han, S. (2014). A System Dynamics Approach for Modeling Construction Workers’ Safety Attitudes Behaviors, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 68, 95–105.
20. Tekin M. (2008). Numerical Methods, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Selcuk University, Konya.
21. Timor, M. (2010). Operational Research, Türkmen Bookstore, Istanbul.
22. Umer, W., Li, H., Lu, W., Szeto, G.P.Y., Wong, A.Y. (2018). Development of A Tool to Monitor Static Balance of Construction Workers for Proactive Fall Safety Management, Automation in Construction, 94, 438–448.
23. Wong, T.K.M., Man, S.S., Chan, A.H.S. (2020). Critical Factors for The Use or Non-Use of Personal Protective Equipment Amongst Construction Workers, Safety Science, 126.
24. Yang, K., Ahn, C.R., Vuran, M.C., Aria, S.S. (2016). Semi-Supervised Near Miss Fall Detection for Ironworkers with a Wearable Inertial Measurement Unit, Automation in Construction, 68, 194–202.
25. Yang, K., Ahn, C.R., Vuran, M.C., Kim, H. (2017). Collective Sensing of Workers’ Gait Patterns to Identify Fall Hazards in Construction, Automation in Construction, 82, 166–178.