Augmenting Reality Simulation to be Used in PNL (Perkütan Nefrolitotomi) Surgeries

Abstract

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is a minimally invasive treatment method recommended for kidney stones larger than 2 cm and complex kidney stones. Complications that may result in failure may develop in highly sensitive operations. For these reasons, staff training is critical in these types of surgical operations. Learning theoretical knowledge about these types of surgical operations is insufficient for a successful operation process. For this reason, the cost of training is high and limited with cadaver and animal models. In this study, the appropriateness of the use of augmented reality (AR) technology, which has been used in many areas today, in new generation training systems of surgical personnel to increase the success in PNL has been revealed.

Keywords

• Augmented Reality (AR)
• Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PNL)
• Kidney
• Treatment
• Education

PNL (Perkütan Nefrolitotomi) Ameliyatlarında Kullanılacak Artırılmış Gerçeklik Simülasyonu

Öz

Perkütan nefrolitotomi (PNL), 2 cm üzerindeki böbrek taşlarında ve karmaşık böbrek taşları için önerilen minimal invaziv tedavi yöntemidir. Oldukça hassas olan operasyonlarda başarısızlıkla sonuçlanabilecek komplikasyonlar gelişebilir. Bu sebeplerden dolayı, bu çeşit cerrahi operasyonlarda personel eğitimi oldukça kritiktir. Bu tür cerrahi operasyonlar hakkında teorik bilgi edinmek, başarılı bir operasyon süreci için yetersizdir. Bu sebeple yapılan kadavra ve hayvan modelleriyle eğitimin maliyeti yüksek ve sınırlıdır. Bu çalışmada günümüzde birçok alanda kullanım yeri bulan artırılmış gerçeklik (AR) teknolojisinin, PNL’de başarıyı artırmak için cerrahi personelin yeni nesil eğitim sistemlerinde kullanımının uygunluğu ortaya konmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Artırılmış Gerçeklik (AR)
• Perkütan nefrolitotomi (PNL)
• Böbrek
• Tedavi
• Eğitim

Kaynakça

1. Howells N, Gill H, Carr A, Price A, Rees J. Transferring simulated arthroscopic skills to the operating theatre. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008; 90: 494-9)
2. Cannon WD, Eckhoff DG, Garrett Jr WE, Hunter RE, Sweeney HJ. Report of a group developing a virtual reality simulator for arthroscopic surgery of the knee joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 442: 21-9.)
3. Gomoll AH, O'toole RV, Czarnecki J, Warner JJ. Surgical experience correlates with performance on a virtual reality simulator for shoulder arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 2007; 35: 883-8.
4. Modi CS, Morris G, Mukherjee R. Computer-simulation training for knee and shoulder arthroscopic surgery. Arthroscopy. 2010; 26: 832-40.
5. Michelson JD. Simulation in orthopaedic education: an overview of theory and practice. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88: 1405-11.
6. Rosenberg BH, Landsittel D, Averch TD. Can video games be used to predict or improve laparoscopic skills? J Endourol. 2005; 19: 372-6.
7. Gomoll AH, Pappas G, Forsythe B, Warner JJ. Individual skill progression on a virtual reality simulator for shoulder arthroscopy a 3-year follow-up study. Am J Sports Med. 2008; 36: 1139-42.
8. Phillips L, Cheung JJ, Whelan DB, Murnaghan ML, Chahal J, Theodoropoulos J, et al. Validation of a Dry Model for Assessing the Performance of Arthroscopic Hip Labral Repair. Am J Sports Med. 2017; 45: 2125-2130.

9. Martin RK, Gillis D, Leiter J, Shantz JS, MacDonald P. A porcine knee model is valid for use in the evaluation of arthroscopic skills: a pilot study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016; 474: 965-70
10. Pedowitz RA, Esch J, Snyder S. Evaluation of a virtual reality simulator for arthroscopy skills development. Arthroscopy. 2002; 18: 1-6.
11. Gomoll AH, O'toole RV, Czarnecki J, Warner JJ. Surgical experience correlates with performance on a virtual reality simulator for shoulder arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 2007; 35: 883-8.
12. Modi CS, Morris G, Mukherjee R. Computer-simulation training for knee and shoulder arthroscopic surgery. Arthroscopy. 2010; 26: 832-40.
13. Henn RF, Shah N, Warner JJ, Gomoll AH. Shoulder arthroscopy simulator training improves shoulder arthroscopy performance in a cadaveric model. Arthroscopy. 2013; 29: 982-5.
14. Sorokin I, Mamoulakis C, Miyazawa K, et al. Epidemiology of stone disease across the World. World J Urol. 2017;35(9):1301-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-017-2008-6.
15. Hasan Turgut1, Akif Diri2, Murat Bağcıoğlu3, Tolga Karakan4, Cankon Germiyanoğlu5 Perkütan nefrolitotomi operasyonlarında kullanılan balon ve amplatz dilatasyon tekniklerinin karşılaştırılması Yeni Üroloji Dergisi - The New Journal of Urology 2014; 9 (3): 31-37
16. Alken P, Hutschenreiter G, Guenther R. Percutaneous kidney stone removal. EurUrol. 1982; 8:304–11. https://doi.org/10.1159/000473540
17. Tefekli A, Cezayirli F. The history of urinary stones: in parallel with civilization. Scientific World J 2013;423964. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/423964
18. Taylor E, Miller J, Chi T, et al. Complications associated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Transl Androl Urol. 2012;1(4):223-8. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223- 4683.2012.12.01
19. Türk C, Knoll T, Petrik A et al. European association of urology, guidelines on urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2015;69:468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.021
20. Taylor E, Miller J, Chi T, et al. Complications associated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Transl Androl Urol. 2012;1(4):223-8. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223- 4683.2012.12.01
21. Coleman CC. Percutaneous nephrostomy: Renal anatomy. In Amplatz K, Lange PH, eds. Atlas of endourology. Chiago: Year book, 1987, pp13-32.
22. Sampaio FJB, Lacerda CAM. Morphometrie du rein. Etude appliquee a I’urologie et a I’imagerie. J Urol (Paris) 95:77-80, 1989.
23. Perkütan Nefrolit Operasyonu Sonrası Kanamaya Etki Eden Faktörler Uzmanlık Tezi Dr. Mehmet Caner Gülten Tez Danışmanı Prof. Dr. Ömer Levent Tuncay Denizli-2016
24. Yusuf Özlülerden, Ömer Levent Tuncay, Prone Percutaneous Nephrolitotomy Endourol Bull 2020;12(1);35-44 e-ISSN:2148-0532
25. Ibarluzea G, Scoffone CM, Cracco CM, Poggio M, Porpiglia F, Terrone C, et al. Supine Valdivia and modified lithotomy position for simultaneous anterograde and retrograde endourological access. BJU Int 2007;100:233-6.).
26. Hasan Turgut1 , Akif Diri2 , Murat Bağcıoğlu3 , Tolga Karakan4 , Cankon Germiyanoğlu5 Yeni Üroloji Dergisi - The New Journal of Urology 2014; 9 (3): 31-37
27. G. Telli Yamamoto, N. Zümrüt, D. Altun, “İş Kazalarının Önlenmesinde Sanal Gerçeklik Teknolojisi İle Deneyimsel Öğrenme,” Maltepe Üniversitesi Uluslararası İşletme ve Pazarlama Kongresi, İstanbul 2018
28. N.D. Macchiarella, D. Liu, S.N. Gangadharan, “Augmented Reality as a Training Medium for Aviation/Aerospace Application,” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2005
29. J.A. Erkoyuncu, M. Alrashed, M.M. Dalle, R. Michela, D.G. Rajkumar, “Real life augmented reality for maintenance,” Int'l Conf. Modeling, Sim. and Vis. Methods (MSV'16), 64-69, 2016