THE EMBEDDEDNESS OF HIGH QUALITY SUSTAINABLE CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Öz

A model of corporate governance framework is constructed that may help businesses to create social value as well as financial value and an opportunity for researchers to measure and predict social value and financial value of businesses in the future. This model is only the first model employing the core dimensions of the Competing Values Framework that help identify ways in improving organisations performance, corporate value and corporate legality which addresses all stakeholders and shareholders needs and expectations under laws and regulations. The model contribute to our understanding of the embeddedness of high quality Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance that include orientation in Control, Compete, Create and Collaborate and corporate governance regulations that include orientation in Board of Directors and Managerial Incentives, Capital Structure Provisions and Control Systems, Laws and Regulations, and Capital Markets by considering all stakeholders and interact with the political environment. In short, the model span almost every attribute for corporates to establish effective and efficient governance system in terms of the modern legal environment. The study examines how embeddedness of high quality corporate social responsibility and corporate governance may help for better creation of a corporate culture that affects company performance and the society.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Corporate Social Responsibility
• Corporate Governance
• Social Value
• Stakeholders
• Competing Values Framework

Kaynakça

1. Aguilara, R.V., and Jackson, G. (2010). Comparative and International Corporate Governance. The Academy of Management Annals Vol. 4, No. 1, 2010, 485–556
2. Ararat, M., and Gocenoglu, C. (2012). Drivers for Sustainable Corporate Responsibility, Case of Turkey. Sabanci University, Faculty of Management. http://ssrn.com [Accessed at 25 MAY 2012 11:58]
3. Armstrong, S. A., Balakrishnan, K., and Cohen, D. (2012). Corporate governance and the information environment: Evidence from state antitakeover laws. Journal of Accounting and Economics 53 (2012) 185–20.
4. Bebchuk, L., Cohen, A., and Ferrell, A. (2004). What Matters in Corporate Governance. The Harvard John M. Olin Discussion Paper Series: http://www.law.harvard.edu/programs/olin_center/ The Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection: http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract_id=593423. [Accessed at 07 May 2012]
5. Cadbury Report (1992). The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance. Gee ( a division of Proffessional Publishing Ltd. ). London. [Accessed at 20 MAY 2014 11:58]
6. Cameron, K., Quinn, E., R., DeGraff, J., and Thakor, J., A. (2003). The Competing Values Framework: Creating Value Through Purpose, Practices, and People. Washington University, USA: New Horızons In Management.
7. Cameron, K., Quinn, E., R., DeGraff, J., and Thakor, J., A. (2006). Competing Values Leadership Creating Value in Organizations. Washington University, USA: New Horızons In Management.
8. Capital Markets Board of Turkey (2003). Corporate Governance Principles. Amended, February, 2005.

9. Claessens, S. and Yurtoglu, B. B. (2013). Corporate governance in emerging markets: A survey. Emerging Markets Review 15 (2013) 1–33
10. Crim, T., Neher, S., C., Grabowski, L., and Mathiassen, L. (2011). An Investigation of Competing Values in Development of Voluntary Organization. Proceeding of the First International Conference on Engaged Management Scholarship, Cleveland, Ohio. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1839832. [Accessed 07 April 2013].
11. Gillan, L., S., and Starks, T., L. (2000). Corporate governance proposals and shareholder activism: the role of institutional investors. Journal of Financial Economics 57 (2000) pp. 275-305
12. Gillan, L., S. (2006). Recent Developments in Corporate Governance. Journal of Corporate Finance 12, pp 381-402.
13. Gubta, K., Krishnamurti, C. and Tourani – Rad, A. (2013). Is corporate governance relevant during the financial crisis? Int. Fin. Markets, Inst. and Money 23 (2013) 85– 110
14. Heal, G. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility. An Economic and Financial Framework. Annual Conference Paper of the Monte Pachi Vita. http://ssrn.com [Accessed at 20 April 2013 21:54]. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=642762 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.642762
15. Linnenluecke, K., M. Griffiths, A., and (2010). Corporate sustainability and organizational culture. Journal of World Business, 45, pp.357–366.
16. Licht, N. A., Goldschmidt, C., and Schwartz, H., S. (2005). Culture, Law and Corporate Governance. International Review of Law and Economics 25 (2005) pp. 229–255.
17. Maignan, I., Ferrell, C., O., Ferrell, L. (2005). A Stakeholder model for implementing Social responsibility in marketing. European Journal of Marketing. 39, 9/10. ABI/Uniform global. p 956-977.
18. Martynova, M., and Renneboog, L. (2011). Evidence on the international evolution and convergence of corporate governance regulations. Journal of Corporate Finance 17 (2011) 1531–1557
19. McBarnet, D. (2009). Corporate Social Responsibility beyond Law, through law, for law. Working Paper Series, University of Edinburgh, School of Law. [Accessed at 17 June 2012 14:39]
20. Needles, Jr. E. B., Turel, A. Sengur, D. E. and Turel, A. (2012). CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN TURKEY: ISSUES AND PRACTICES OF HIGHPERFORMANCE COMPANIES. Accounting and Management Information Systems Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 510–531, 2012
21. Riggs, W., M., Hughey, W., A. (2011). Competing values in the culinary arts and hospitality industry. Leadership roles and managerial competencies. Industry & Higher Education, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 109–118.
22. Shih, C. C., and Huang, J., S., C. (2010). Exploring the relationship between Organizational Culture and Software Process Improvement Deployment. Information & Management, 47,pp 271–281.
23. Siegel, S. D., and Vitaliano, F., D. (2006). An Empirical Analysis of the Strategic Use of Corporate Social Responsibility. http://ssrn.com [Accessed at 16 APR 2014 17:50]. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com. JEL Codes: M14, D21
24. The European Commission COM (2011) 164 final. GREEN PAPER. The EU corporate governance framework. Brussels, 5.4.2011. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/company/modern/corporate-governance-framework_en.htm,
25. The European Commission COM (2012) 740 final. Action Plan: European company law and corporate governance - a modern legal framework for more engaged shareholders and sustainable companies. Strasbourg.
26. Turkcell. (2000). http://www.turkcell.com.tr. [Accessed at 12 April 2014 13:40].
27. Uzzi, B. (1999). EMBEDDEDNESS IN THE MAKING OF FINANCIAL CAPITAL: HOW SOCIAL RELATIONS AND NETWORKS BENEFIT FIRMS SEEKING FINANCING*. American Sociological Review, 1999, Vol. 64 (August: 481–505)