VİDEO SURVEILLANCE IN THE IRANIAN LAW; CRIME PREVENTION OR ABUSE OF CIVIL RIGHTS

Öz

The use of special preventive methods with recourse to illegal initiatives by the police or other vigilantes on the pretext and in the name of providing security for people and properties jeopardizes personal liberties. This is while using closed circuit television (CCTV) cameras is not illegal in public places and for providing security; but the utilization of cameras in private sanctuaries of individuals is blatant violation of the personal sanctuaries and rights of individuals. Based on the rational option theory which is the foundation of this method, individuals’ incentive to commit crimes is impoverished upon noticing CCTVs due to fear of apprehension. Due to the intricacies of the issue, however, there is not a self-contained and comprehensive law currently in the Iranian law, considering how and why CCTVs are utilized; this underlines the need for further investigation to criminalize the cases of abuse and illegitimate intrusion into personal sanctuaries and penetration into civil rights of individuals through the installation of CCTV cameras. In this paper we will investigate the stance of such procedures in the Iranian judicial circle.

Kaynakça

1. Abbasi Hesam. (2013) Analysis of Preventive Crimes & an Attitude about the Basics and Its Concepts, NATIONALPARK-FORSCHUNG IN DER SCHWEIZ (Switzerland Research Park Journal), Volume 102, No 9
2. CUSSON, Maurice, (2010), la surveillance ET la contre – surveillance, op. cit., p. 429.
3. Ebrahimi Shahram, Crime Status quo Prevention, Edition Mizan Publication, Tehran 2012
4. Ekblom, P (1994) ' Proximal Circumstances: a mechanism –based Classification of Crime
5. Giessen, R. (1997) the relationship between crime control and prevention condition, translated by Ali Hosein Najafi Abrand Abad A, the Research Journal of Beheshti University, Tehran.
6. Ghoorchi Beigi, Majid, Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design CPTED, M.A. dissertation in Penal Law and Criminology, Tehran University (the Campus of Qom), 1386, pp. 163-164
7. Haggerty, K. D. and Ericson, R. V. (2000) ' The surveillant assemblage ‘, British Journal of Sociology.
8. Javanmard, Behrooz, (2009), the Zero Nonchalance, The Policy of Strict Punishment for Minor Offences, Tehran: Mizan Publications, first impression.

9. Katebi, Hossein gholi, (1982), Law and Industry, Bina Publications, Tehran.
10. NajafiAbrand-Abadi Ali Hussein, (2008), the writings of criminology, Shahid Beheshti University Publication, Tehran.
11. Najafipoor, Ebrahim, Citizen-Centered Disciplinary Prevention, the collection of papers of the first convention of crime prevention, first impression, Tehran: the Educational Assistance of NAJA, pp. 137-138
12. Oxford advanced learner’s dictionary, 1989
13. Oxford dictionary of law, 1997:354
14. Rajabi Pour Ebrahim, (2009) prevention-oriented national security, crime prevention Conference Proceedings, first published in Tehran, deputy police training.
15. Scott, J. (2000). Understanding Contemporary Society: Theories of the Present. Sage Publications
16. Sutton, Adam, (1994) Crime Prevention: Promise or Threat, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol. 27
17. Warren, Samuel D, Brandeis, Louis D, (1890) “The Right to Privacy”, Harvard Law Review, Vol. IV December 15, No. 5, P. 10