ANALYSIS OF GOVERNANCE AND CIVIL SOCIETY SUBJECTS IN TRAKYA REGION

Öz

.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• xx

ANALYSIS OF GOVERNANCE AND CIVIL SOCIETY SUBJECTS IN TRAKYA REGION

Öz

Governance and civil society subjects, which acquired more importance in new ordinary settlement and which takes participation as mutual point, are mentioned in this study. The group which is taken as base in scope of evaluation is “Governance and Civil Society Commission” which is one of 16 specialization commission created by Trakya Development Agency in scope of 2014-2023 Region Plans. The commission’s working progress and used methods were analyzed step by step in this study. The members in the commission are consistent of 30 individuals who served in public and civil society establishments in Edirne, Tekirdag and Kirklareli provinces which are named as Trakya Region. Besides, a moderator and a reporter worked actively during the meeting. The members made totally 4 meetings under the presidency of moderator with 2 weeks intervals on 6 circle tables as groups of 5 people in each. The region’s vision, SWOT analysis, targets, strategies, activities and actions were determined under the title of governance and civil society as the result of meetings which were made on a democratic base

Anahtar Kelimeler

• governance,civil society,Trakya

Kaynakça

1. Cope, S., & Leishman F. & Storie, P. (1991). “Globalization, New Public Management And The Enabling
2. State, International Journal of Public Sector Management”, Vol. 10, no. 6. Evans, B. & Kate T. (2003). “Policy and Practice Lasala: Evaluating Local Agenda 21 in Europe”, Journal of
3. Environmental Planning and Management”, 46 (5), pp. 781-794. Fowler, A. (1996). “Strengthing Civil Society in Transition Economies From Concept to Strategy", NGOs,
4. Civil Society and the State, Andrew Clayton (Ed.), Oxford: Intrac Publication. Freedom in the World 2012 (2012). The Arab Uprisings and Their Global, http://www.freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/FIW%202012%20Booklet_0.pdf
5. Graham, J. & Amos B. & Plumptre T. (2003). Principles for Good Governance in the 21st Century,
6. Policy Brief No. 15, http://www.growourregion.ca/images/file/governance/policybrief15_0.pdf Huther, J. & Shah A. (1998). “Applying a Simple Measure of Good Governance to the Debate on Fiscal
7. Decentralization, World Bank Research Paper”, No: 1894, Washington DC: World Bank.
8. İçduygu, A.& Meydanoğlu Z. & Sert D. Ş. (2011). Türkiye’de Sivil Toplum: Bir Dönüm Noktası, CIVICUS

9. Uluslararası Sivil Toplum Endeksi Projesi, Türkiye Ülke Raporu II, TÜSEV Yayınları, No: 51. Kuzgun, Ş. (2013). Yönetişim ve Sivil Toplum Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu, Trakya Kalkınma Ajansı, http://www.trakya2023.com/uploads/docs/28062013UiBd0-.pdf,
10. Schout, A. & Jordan A. (2005). “Coordinated European Governance: Self-Organizing or Centrally
11. Steered?, Public Administration”, Vol. 83, no.1, pp. 201-220. Sen, S. (1999). “Some Aspects of State-NGO Relationships in India in the Post-Independence Era,
12. Development and Change”, Vol. 30, pp. 327- 355. Sobacı, M. (2007). “Yönetişim Kavramı ve Türkiye’de Uygulanabilirliği Üzerine Değerlendirmeler,
13. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi”, Vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 219-235. The World Bank (2009). Governance Matters 2009: Release of Worldwide Governance Indicators 1996- 2008, http://www.worldbank.org.tr/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/ECAEXT/TURKEYEXTN/0,,content
14. MDK:22231979~pagePK:1497618~piPK:217854~theSitePK:361712,00.html
15. Trakya Kalkınma Ajansı (2010). TR21 Trakya Bölge Planı 2010-2013. Transparency International the Global Coalition Againts Corruption, (2012). http://www.transparency.org/cpi2012/results.
16. Sivil Toplum İzleme Raporu 2012 (2012). TÜSEV Yayınları, No: 58, ISBN: 978-605-62694-2-4, World global Giving İndex 2012, A https://www.cafonline.org/PDF/WorldGivingIndex2012WEB.pdf view of giving trends, December 2012,