Ethical Codes and Sustainability in Turkey

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 7 - 5TH ORGANIZATIONAL GOVERNANCE CONFERENCE 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY - Ways of Realizing the High Quality Sustainable CSR and CG Dream Conference, 1 - 3, 04.08.2023

Aydem Çiftçioğlu

Öz

The aim of this study is to investigating scope and content of Turkish firms’ code of conducts. Nowadays main problem of the organizations is to reach sustainable performance among market, environment, social and governance issues for gaining social approve among society. Thus several firms announced some sort of reports which are consisting on their knowledge, practice and awareness of these issues. Hence in Turkey, Borsa İstanbul has signed a cooperation agreement with Ethical Investment Research Services Limited (EIRIS) to create BIST Sustainability Index. BIST Sustainability Index has been completed and announced on the 4th November 2015 with the code XUSRD and enclosed only fifteen firm. Indexed companies evaluated by EIRIS with the criteria of firm policy and activities in areas of environment, biodiversity, climate change, structure of management, countering bribery, human rights, supply chain, health and safety for create an instrument which allows investors to select and invest in companies that adapt principles of sustainability, corporate governance and risk management.

Anahtar Kelimeler

ethics, sustainability, Turkey

Kaynakça

• Adam, MA., & D. Rachman-Moore (2004), “The methods used to implement an ethical code of conduct and employee attitudes, Journal of Business Ethics 54, 225-244.
• Berenbeim, R. (2000). Global Ethics. Executive Excellence 17 (5): 7.
• Carroll, A. B. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders’’, Business Horizons, July/August, 225-235.
• Ciulla, J. B. (2002). Business Ethics and Work: Questions fort the Twenty-first century, ed.Robert E.Frederick, A Companion to Business Ethics, UK: Blackell Publishers Ltd., 269-279
• Hurst E.N.(2004), Corporate Ethics, Governance and Social REsponsibility comparing European Business Practices to those in the United States. http://www.scu.edu/ethics/publications/submitted/hurst/comparitive_study.pdf.
• Ferrell, O.C., Fraedrich, J. ve Ferrell, L., (2009). Business Ethics: Ethical Decision Making and Cases, 7th Edition, Suth-Western Cengage Learning, USA.
• Kaptein M. (2004), Business Codes of Multinational Firms: What do they say? Journal of Business Ethics 50, 13-31.
• Kaptein, M. & Schwartz, M. (2008). The effectiveness of business codes: A critical examination of existing studies and the development of an integrated research model.” Journal of Business Ethics, 77, 111-127.
• Laufer, W & Robinson, D.C. (1997), Corporate ethics initiatives as social control. Journal of Business Ethics.16, 10, 1029-1048
• Marnburg, E. (2000), The behavioural effects of corporate ethical codes: Empirical findings and discussion. Business Ethics: A European review 9 (3), 200-210.
• Singh JB (2006) A comparison of the content of the codes of ethics of Canada’s largest corporations in 1992 and 2003, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol 64, Issue 1, 17-29
• Stevens B.(2009) Corporate Ethical Codes as Strategic documents: An analysis of success and failures, Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organizational Studies, Vol 14, No 2,1-20.