Comparison of Simulation Results for 25 kW Power Output Rooftop PV System

Yıl 2022, , 176 - 181, 30.12.2022

Taner Dindar , Vedat Esen , Ali Samet Sarkın

https://doi.org/10.36222/ejt.1175023

Cited By: 2

Öz

The use of electrical energy from renewable energy sources has increased considerably in recent years. Photovoltaic (PV) solar energy, which is one of the renewable energy sources, takes its source from the sun, which is considered an unlimited source. With the widespread use of photovoltaic systems, some legal regulations by governments have been made for their installation. Simulation programs are used for the design, layout, technical and economic analysis of PV systems.
In this study, the design was made using the PVsyst, PV*SOL, Solarius programs, and the PVGIS website used in PV systems. The projects are designed to have an output power of 25 kW. According to the simulation results, the PVGIS website provides approximate data, since technical details cannot be entered. In the results of PVGIS and all simulation programs, it has been calculated that the system can produce 42-48 MWh of electrical energy annually. Power Ratio (PR) results of the system were in the range of 78-85%. Annual electrical energy production per installed kW has been calculated to be 1436-1635 kWh/year. It is stated that the annual saved CO2 will be 18.66-22.226 tons /year. When the simulation results are analyzed monthly, the differences between the months are remarkable. The reason for these deviations can be explained by the annual solar radiation (kWh/m2) data and databases used by the programs. It has been observed that the simulation programs consider the monthly average temperatures and sunshine durations of the region.
It is thought that there is a need to compare real-time data with simulation results in future studies. It is considered that this study will be helpful for future studies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Photovoltaic, Solar energy, PV simulation, Solarius, PVsyst, PVGIS, PV*SOL

Kaynakça

• Hoegh-Guldberg O. et. al., “Impacts of 1.5°C global warming on natural and human systems”, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), France, 2022.
• https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf
• Battle C. et. al., Regulatory design for RES-E support mechanisms: learning curves, market structure and burden-sharing, Energy Policy, 41 (2012), pp. 212-220. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.10.039
• Jordan D.C., Kurtz S.R., Photovoltaic degradation rates-an analytic review. Progress Photovoltaics, 21 (2013), pp. 12–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.1182
• Cervantes-Ortiz C.A. et. al., The effect of parameters and irradiance estimation techniques on PV potential quantification: The case of Mexico, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 45 (2021), pp.101131 DOI:10.1016/j.seta.2021.101131
• Besharat F. et. al., Empirical models for estimating global solar radiation: a review and case study, Renew. Sustain. Energy. Rev., 21 (2013), pp.798–821 doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.043
• Kanters, J. et. al., Tools and methods used by architects for solar design, Energy and Buildings, 68 (2014), pp. 721–731 DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.05.031
• Ozcan, H. G. et. al., A comprehensive evaluation of PV electricity production methods and life cycle energy-cost assessment of a particular system, Journal of Cleaner Production, 238 (2019), pp. 117883 DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117883
• Ahmed A. et. al., Investigation of PV utilizability on university buildings: A case study of Karachi, Pakistan, Renewable Energy, 195 (2022), pp. 238-251 doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.06.006
• Anang N. et. al., Performance analysis of a grid-connected rooftop solar PV system in Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia, Energy & Buildings, 248 (2021), pp. 111182 doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111182
• Kumar R. et. al., Design and simulation of standalone solar PV system using PVsyst Software: A case study, Proceedings, (Dwivedi G., Verma P.), MaterialsToday: Proceedings, International Conference on Innovations in Clean Energy Technologies (ICET2020), Madhya Pradesh, India, 2020, Vol. 46, pp. 5322-5328
• Haydaroglu, C., Gumus, B., Examination of Web-Based PVGIS and SUNNY Design Web Photovoltaic System Simulation Programs and Assessment of Reliability of the Results, Journal of Engineering and Technology, 1 (2017), pp. 32-38.
• Barua S. et. al., Rooftop solar photovoltaic system design and assessment for the academic campus using PVsyst software, J. Electr. Electron. Eng., 5 (2017), 1, pp. 76–83
• Al‑Zoubi H. et. al., Design and feasibility study of an on‑grid photovoltaic system for green electrification of hotels: a case study of Cedars hotel in Jordan, International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 12 (2021), pp. 611–626 doi.org/10.1007/s40095-021-00406-z
• Enerji Piyasası Düzenleme Kurumu (EPDK), 25 KW’a Kadar Güneş Enerjisine Dayalı Elektrik Üretim Tesisler İçin Usul Ve Esaslar, https://www.epdk.gov.tr/Detay/Icerik/3-0-92/elektriklisanssiz-uretim
• Ahmad E.Z. et. al., Outdoor performance evaluation of a novel photovoltaic heat sinks to enhance power conversion efficiency and temperature uniformity, Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 31 (2022), pp. 101811 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2022.101811
• Lara E.G., Garcia F.S., Review on viability and implementation of residential PV-battery systems: Considering the case of Dominican Republic, Energy Reports, 7 (2021), pp. 8868-8899, doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.11.208
• https://mgm.gov.tr/veridegerlendirme/il-ve-ilceler-istatistik.aspx?k=A&m=OSMANIYE
• Sarniak M.T., Researches of the Impact of the Nominal Power Ratio and Environmental Conditions on the Efficiency of the Photovoltaic System: A Case Study for Poland in Central Europe, Sustainability, 12 (2020), 15, pp. 6162; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156162
• Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TÜİK), Greenhouse Gas Emission Statistics-1990-2020, https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Sera-Gazi-Emisyon-Istatistikleri-1990-2020-45862