Araştırma Makalesi

COMPARISON BETWEEN MRAS AND SMO BASED SENSORLESS CONTROL METHODS OF PERMANENT MAGNET SYNCHRONOUS MOTOR

Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1 1 Haziran 2021
PDF İndir
EN

COMPARISON BETWEEN MRAS AND SMO BASED SENSORLESS CONTROL METHODS OF PERMANENT MAGNET SYNCHRONOUS MOTOR

Öz

Abstract This paper presents a comparison between sliding mode observer and model reference adaptive system based sensorless position and speed control of permanent magnet synchronous motor. In traditional sliding mode observers, signum function which is used as switching function causes chattering effect. For reducing chattering effect low pass filter is used but this filter introduces a phase delay. In order to overcome these problems a sigmoid function is used instead of signum function in sliding mode observer based control method. In model reference adaptive system based control method, it is purposed to make zero error between the reference model and adjustable model. Popov’s super stability theorem is used for the stability of model reference adaptive system control method. Both of the control methods are simulated with Matlab/Simulink. Keywords- PMSM, MRAS, SMO, sensorless

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. [1] Blaschke, F. (1972). The principle of field-orientation as applied to the transvector closed loop control system for rotating-field machines:Siemens Rev. , vol.34, no.1, pp. 217-220
  2. [2] Pillay, P., Krishnan, R. (1989). Modelling, simulation and analysis of permanent magnet motor drives. I. The permanent magnet synchronous motor drive, IEEE Trans. Industry applications, v.40, no.3, pp.265-273
  3. [3] Vas, P. (1998). Sensorless vector and direct torque control, Oxford University Press, pp.768
  4. [4] Rahman, M. A. and Slemon, G.R. (1985). Promising Applications of NdBFe Iron Magnets in Electrical Machines (Invited), IEEE Trans. On Magnetics, Vol. MAG-21, No. 5, doi: 10.1109/TMAG.1985.1064113
  5. [5] Bojoi, R., Pastorelli, M., Bottomley, J., Giangrande, P., Gerada, C. (2013). Sensorless control of PM motor drives - A technology status review, Proc. - 2013 IEEE Work. Electr. Mach. Des. Control Diagnosis, WEMDCD , pp. 168–182, doi: 10.1109/WEMDCD.2013.6525177.
  6. [6] Briz, F., Degner, M. W., García, P., and Lorenz, R. D. (2004) Comparison of saliency-based sensorless control techniques for AC machines, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 1107–1115
  7. [7] Yongdong, L., Hao, Z. (2008). Sensorless control of permanent magnet synchronous motor - A survey, IEEE Veh. Power Propuls. Conf. VPPC doi: 10.1109/VPPC.2008.4677421
  8. [8] Holtz, J. (1996). Methods for speed sensorless control of AC drives, University of Wuppertal, Germany

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Elektrik Mühendisliği

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

1 Haziran 2021

Gönderilme Tarihi

16 Ekim 2020

Kabul Tarihi

23 Mayıs 2021

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2021 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Aydın, Ç., Ünal, S., & Özdemir, M. (2021). COMPARISON BETWEEN MRAS AND SMO BASED SENSORLESS CONTROL METHODS OF PERMANENT MAGNET SYNCHRONOUS MOTOR. European Journal of Technique (EJT), 11(1), 53-59. https://doi.org/10.36222/ejt.811569
AMA
1.Aydın Ç, Ünal S, Özdemir M. COMPARISON BETWEEN MRAS AND SMO BASED SENSORLESS CONTROL METHODS OF PERMANENT MAGNET SYNCHRONOUS MOTOR. EJT. 2021;11(1):53-59. doi:10.36222/ejt.811569
Chicago
Aydın, Çağlar, Sencer Ünal, ve Mehmet Özdemir. 2021. “COMPARISON BETWEEN MRAS AND SMO BASED SENSORLESS CONTROL METHODS OF PERMANENT MAGNET SYNCHRONOUS MOTOR”. European Journal of Technique (EJT) 11 (1): 53-59. https://doi.org/10.36222/ejt.811569.
EndNote
Aydın Ç, Ünal S, Özdemir M (01 Haziran 2021) COMPARISON BETWEEN MRAS AND SMO BASED SENSORLESS CONTROL METHODS OF PERMANENT MAGNET SYNCHRONOUS MOTOR. European Journal of Technique (EJT) 11 1 53–59.
IEEE
[1]Ç. Aydın, S. Ünal, ve M. Özdemir, “COMPARISON BETWEEN MRAS AND SMO BASED SENSORLESS CONTROL METHODS OF PERMANENT MAGNET SYNCHRONOUS MOTOR”, EJT, c. 11, sy 1, ss. 53–59, Haz. 2021, doi: 10.36222/ejt.811569.
ISNAD
Aydın, Çağlar - Ünal, Sencer - Özdemir, Mehmet. “COMPARISON BETWEEN MRAS AND SMO BASED SENSORLESS CONTROL METHODS OF PERMANENT MAGNET SYNCHRONOUS MOTOR”. European Journal of Technique (EJT) 11/1 (01 Haziran 2021): 53-59. https://doi.org/10.36222/ejt.811569.
JAMA
1.Aydın Ç, Ünal S, Özdemir M. COMPARISON BETWEEN MRAS AND SMO BASED SENSORLESS CONTROL METHODS OF PERMANENT MAGNET SYNCHRONOUS MOTOR. EJT. 2021;11:53–59.
MLA
Aydın, Çağlar, vd. “COMPARISON BETWEEN MRAS AND SMO BASED SENSORLESS CONTROL METHODS OF PERMANENT MAGNET SYNCHRONOUS MOTOR”. European Journal of Technique (EJT), c. 11, sy 1, Haziran 2021, ss. 53-59, doi:10.36222/ejt.811569.
Vancouver
1.Çağlar Aydın, Sencer Ünal, Mehmet Özdemir. COMPARISON BETWEEN MRAS AND SMO BASED SENSORLESS CONTROL METHODS OF PERMANENT MAGNET SYNCHRONOUS MOTOR. EJT. 01 Haziran 2021;11(1):53-9. doi:10.36222/ejt.811569

Cited By