Research Article

COMPARISON BETWEEN MRAS AND SMO BASED SENSORLESS CONTROL METHODS OF PERMANENT MAGNET SYNCHRONOUS MOTOR

Volume: 11 Number: 1 June 1, 2021
EN

COMPARISON BETWEEN MRAS AND SMO BASED SENSORLESS CONTROL METHODS OF PERMANENT MAGNET SYNCHRONOUS MOTOR

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents a comparison between sliding mode observer and model reference adaptive system based sensorless position and speed control of permanent magnet synchronous motor. In traditional sliding mode observers, signum function which is used as switching function causes chattering effect. For reducing chattering effect low pass filter is used but this filter introduces a phase delay. In order to overcome these problems a sigmoid function is used instead of signum function in sliding mode observer based control method. In model reference adaptive system based control method, it is purposed to make zero error between the reference model and adjustable model. Popov’s super stability theorem is used for the stability of model reference adaptive system control method. Both of the control methods are simulated with Matlab/Simulink. Keywords- PMSM, MRAS, SMO, sensorless

Keywords

References

  1. [1] Blaschke, F. (1972). The principle of field-orientation as applied to the transvector closed loop control system for rotating-field machines:Siemens Rev. , vol.34, no.1, pp. 217-220
  2. [2] Pillay, P., Krishnan, R. (1989). Modelling, simulation and analysis of permanent magnet motor drives. I. The permanent magnet synchronous motor drive, IEEE Trans. Industry applications, v.40, no.3, pp.265-273
  3. [3] Vas, P. (1998). Sensorless vector and direct torque control, Oxford University Press, pp.768
  4. [4] Rahman, M. A. and Slemon, G.R. (1985). Promising Applications of NdBFe Iron Magnets in Electrical Machines (Invited), IEEE Trans. On Magnetics, Vol. MAG-21, No. 5, doi: 10.1109/TMAG.1985.1064113
  5. [5] Bojoi, R., Pastorelli, M., Bottomley, J., Giangrande, P., Gerada, C. (2013). Sensorless control of PM motor drives - A technology status review, Proc. - 2013 IEEE Work. Electr. Mach. Des. Control Diagnosis, WEMDCD , pp. 168–182, doi: 10.1109/WEMDCD.2013.6525177.
  6. [6] Briz, F., Degner, M. W., García, P., and Lorenz, R. D. (2004) Comparison of saliency-based sensorless control techniques for AC machines, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 1107–1115
  7. [7] Yongdong, L., Hao, Z. (2008). Sensorless control of permanent magnet synchronous motor - A survey, IEEE Veh. Power Propuls. Conf. VPPC doi: 10.1109/VPPC.2008.4677421
  8. [8] Holtz, J. (1996). Methods for speed sensorless control of AC drives, University of Wuppertal, Germany

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Electrical Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

June 1, 2021

Submission Date

October 16, 2020

Acceptance Date

May 23, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 11 Number: 1

APA
Aydın, Ç., Ünal, S., & Özdemir, M. (2021). COMPARISON BETWEEN MRAS AND SMO BASED SENSORLESS CONTROL METHODS OF PERMANENT MAGNET SYNCHRONOUS MOTOR. European Journal of Technique (EJT), 11(1), 53-59. https://doi.org/10.36222/ejt.811569
AMA
1.Aydın Ç, Ünal S, Özdemir M. COMPARISON BETWEEN MRAS AND SMO BASED SENSORLESS CONTROL METHODS OF PERMANENT MAGNET SYNCHRONOUS MOTOR. EJT. 2021;11(1):53-59. doi:10.36222/ejt.811569
Chicago
Aydın, Çağlar, Sencer Ünal, and Mehmet Özdemir. 2021. “COMPARISON BETWEEN MRAS AND SMO BASED SENSORLESS CONTROL METHODS OF PERMANENT MAGNET SYNCHRONOUS MOTOR”. European Journal of Technique (EJT) 11 (1): 53-59. https://doi.org/10.36222/ejt.811569.
EndNote
Aydın Ç, Ünal S, Özdemir M (June 1, 2021) COMPARISON BETWEEN MRAS AND SMO BASED SENSORLESS CONTROL METHODS OF PERMANENT MAGNET SYNCHRONOUS MOTOR. European Journal of Technique (EJT) 11 1 53–59.
IEEE
[1]Ç. Aydın, S. Ünal, and M. Özdemir, “COMPARISON BETWEEN MRAS AND SMO BASED SENSORLESS CONTROL METHODS OF PERMANENT MAGNET SYNCHRONOUS MOTOR”, EJT, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 53–59, June 2021, doi: 10.36222/ejt.811569.
ISNAD
Aydın, Çağlar - Ünal, Sencer - Özdemir, Mehmet. “COMPARISON BETWEEN MRAS AND SMO BASED SENSORLESS CONTROL METHODS OF PERMANENT MAGNET SYNCHRONOUS MOTOR”. European Journal of Technique (EJT) 11/1 (June 1, 2021): 53-59. https://doi.org/10.36222/ejt.811569.
JAMA
1.Aydın Ç, Ünal S, Özdemir M. COMPARISON BETWEEN MRAS AND SMO BASED SENSORLESS CONTROL METHODS OF PERMANENT MAGNET SYNCHRONOUS MOTOR. EJT. 2021;11:53–59.
MLA
Aydın, Çağlar, et al. “COMPARISON BETWEEN MRAS AND SMO BASED SENSORLESS CONTROL METHODS OF PERMANENT MAGNET SYNCHRONOUS MOTOR”. European Journal of Technique (EJT), vol. 11, no. 1, June 2021, pp. 53-59, doi:10.36222/ejt.811569.
Vancouver
1.Çağlar Aydın, Sencer Ünal, Mehmet Özdemir. COMPARISON BETWEEN MRAS AND SMO BASED SENSORLESS CONTROL METHODS OF PERMANENT MAGNET SYNCHRONOUS MOTOR. EJT. 2021 Jun. 1;11(1):53-9. doi:10.36222/ejt.811569

Cited By

All articles published by EJT are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This permits anyone to copy, redistribute, remix, transmit and adapt the work provided the original work and source is appropriately cited.Creative Commons Lisansı