Türkiye’nin Yönetişim Performansı: OECD, AB ve BRICS Ülkeleri ile Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analiz

Öz

Bu çalışma, Türkiye’nin yönetişim performansını Dünya Bankası göstergeleri üzerinden değerlendirmeyi ve OECD, AB ve BRICS ülkeleriyle karşılaştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Analizler, Türkiye’nin yönetişim performansında son yıllarda düşüş olduğunu, OECD ve AB ülkelerine kıyasla düşük seviyelerde yer aldığını, ancak BRICS ülkelerine göre ortalamanın üzerinde performans sergilediğini ortaya koymuştur. Çalışmada kriter ağırlıkları belirlenmiş ve çok kriterli karar verme teknikleri kullanılarak tutarlı sonuçlar elde edilmiştir. Korelasyon analizi, farklı yöntemler arasında yüksek uyum olduğunu doğrulamıştır. Dünya Bankası göstergelerinin metodolojik sınırlamaları vurgulanırken, tek tip kurumsal reformlar yerine bağlama duyarlı ve tarihsel dinamikleri dikkate alan yaklaşımlar önerilmiştir. Türkiye’nin AB üyelik sürecindeki kurumsal beklentilerle BRICS üyeliğinin siyasi-ekonomik etkileri tartışılmış, kısa vadede AB perspektifine odaklanmanın daha gerçekçi olabileceği sonucuna varılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yönetişim
• Kurumsal Faktörler
• Kalkınma
• Çok Kriterli Karar Verme
• Türkiye

Governance Performance of Türkiye: A Comparative Analysis with OECD, EU, and BRICS Countries

Abstract

This study evaluates Türkiye’s governance performance using World Bank indicators and compares it with OECD, EU, and BRICS countries. Analyses reveal a decline in Türkiye’s governance metrics in recent years, with performance significantly lagging behind OECD and EU countries but exceeding the average among BRICS countries. In the study, criteria weights were determined and multi-criteria decision-making techniques yielded consistent rankings. Correlation analysis confirmed strong alignment across methodologies. While highlighting methodological limitations of World Bank indicators, the study advocates context-sensitive governance reforms over one-size-fits-all institutional models, emphasizing the need to account for historical and socio-political dynamics. The implications of Türkiye’s potential BRICS membership versus its prolonged EU accession process were critically examined, with findings suggesting that short-term alignment with EU institutional expectations remains pragmatic. However, long-term strategic decisions should holistically evaluate political, economic, and cultural dimensions.

Keywords

• Governance
• Institutional Factors
• Development
• Multi-Criteria Decision Making
• Türkiye

Kaynakça

1. Acaravcı, A., Artan, S., Erdoğan, S., & Bostan Göktürk, T. (2018). Türkiye’de kurumsal kalite, reel gelir ve doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar ilişkisi [Institutional quality, real income and foreign direct investment relationship in Turkey]. Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty, 5(2), 132–145. https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.409819
2. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown Business.
3. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. American Economic Review, 91(5), 1369–1401. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.5.1369
4. Aidt, T. S. (2009). Corruption, institutions, and economic development. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25(2), 271–291. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grp012
5. Andrews, M. (2008). The good governance agenda: Beyond indicators without theory. Oxford Development Studies, 36(4), 379–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600810802455120
6. Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
7. Aron, J. (2000). Growth and institutions: A review of the evidence. World Bank Research Observer, 15(1), 99–135. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/15.1.99
8. Aytekin, A., & Gündoğdu, H. G. (2021). OECD ve AB üyesi ülkelerin sürdürülebilir yönetişim düzeylerine göre SWARA tabanlı TOPSIS-Sort-B ve WASPAS yöntemleriyle incelenmesi [Investigation of OECD and EU member countries By SWARA-based TOPSIS-Sort-B and WASPAS methods according to sustainable governance levels]. Öneri, Journal of Marmara University Institute of Social Sciences, 16(56), 943–971. https://doi.org/10.14783/maruoneri.862996

9. Bevir, M. (2011). Public administration as storytelling. Public Administration, 89(1), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01908.x
10. Binay, M., & Atalay, N. (2019). Global governance: Economic growth and income distribution. The Journal of Turkish Court of Accounts, (112), 137–158. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/sayistay/issue/61568/919326
11. Boateng, A., Wang, Y., Ntim, C. G., & Elmagrhi, M. (2024). Institutions and corruption relationship: Evidence from African countries. Journal of International Management, 30(3), 101136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2024.101136
12. Bokpin, G. A. (2017). Foreign direct investment and environmental sustainability in Africa: The role of institutions and governance. Research in International Business and Finance, 39(Part A), 239–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2016.07.038
13. Chang, H. J. (2011). Institutions and economic development: Theory, policy and history. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(4), 473–498. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137410000378
14. Chinoda, T., & Kapingura, F. M. (2024). Digital financial inclusion and economic growth in Sub-Saharan Africa: The role of institutions and governance. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 15(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJEMS-09-2022-0372
15. Chong, A., & Calderón, C. (2000). Causality and feedback between institutional measures and economic growth. Economics & Politics, 12(1), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0343.00069
16. Dreher, A., & Schneider, F. (2010). Corruption and the shadow economy: An empirical analysis. Public Choice, 144(1–2), 215–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9513-0
17. Dryzek J. S. (2016). Institutions for the Anthropocene: Governance in a changing earth system. British Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 937–956. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123414000453
18. Durgun S., & Aydın, A. H. (2019). Türkiye’nin yönetişim performansına ilişkin bir değerlendirme [An assessment of Turkey’s governance performance]. The Journal of Social Sciences, 6(43), 538–550. http://doi.org/10.29228/SOBIDER.39561
19. Easterly, W. (2007). Inequality does cause underdevelopment: Insights from a new instrument. Journal of Development Economics, 84(2), 755–776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2006.11.002
20. Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011
21. Fukuyama, F. (2011). The origins of political order: From prehuman times to the French Revolution. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
22. Fukuyama, F. (2013). What is governance? Governance, 26(3), 347–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12035
23. Fukuyama, F. (2016). Governance: What do we know, and how do we know it? Annual Review of Political Science, 19, 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-042214-044240
24. Glaeser, E. L., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2004). Do institutions cause growth? Journal of Economic Growth, 9(3), 271–303. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOEG.0000038933.16398.ed
25. Glass, L. M., & Newig, J. (2019). Governance for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals: How important are participation, policy coherence, reflexivity, adaptation and democratic institutions?. Earth System Governance, 2, 100031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2019.100031
26. Globerman, S., & Shapiro, D. (2003). Governance infrastructure and US foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400001
27. Grindle, M. S. (2007). Good enough governance: Poverty reduction and reform in developing countries. Governance, 17(4), 525–548. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0952-1895.2004.00256.x
28. Gündoğdu, H., & Aytekin, A. (2020). Yönetişim göstergeleri bağlamında ülkelerin kümeleme analizi ve ARAS ile değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of governance indicators of countries by clustering analysis and ARAS]. Dumlupınar University Journal of Social Sciences, (66), 301–318. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/dpusbe/issue/57463/786260
29. Güzel, S., & Murat, D. (2019). Yönetişim ve ekonomik performans bağlamında OECD ülkelerinin konumları [Positions of OECD countries in the context of governance and economic performance]. Journal of Academic Inquiries, 14(1), 315–344. https://doi.org/10.17550/akademikincelemeler.466146
30. Hall, R. E., & Jones, C. I. (1999). Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(1), 83–116. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355399555954
31. Holland-Lulewicz, J., Thompson, V. D., Birch, J., & Grier, C. (2022). Keystone institutions of democratic governance across Indigenous North America. Frontiers in Political Science, 4, 840049. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2022.840049
32. Honeybun-Arnolda, E., Turner, R. A., Mukhopadhyay, R., Collins, C., & Wills, J. (2024). Localising and democratising goal-based governance for sustainability. Environmental Science & Policy, 151, 103638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.103638
33. Hossain, I., Haque, A. M., & Ullah, S. A. (2023). Role of government institutions in promoting sustainable development in Bangladesh: An environmental governance perspective. Journal of Current Social and Political Issues, 1(2), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.15575/jcspi.v1i2.485
34. Jessop, B. (1998). The rise of governance and the risks of failure: The case of economic development. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.00107
35. Kapçak, S. (2023). Türkiye’de demokrasi ile doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar arasındaki ilişki: Toda-Yamamoto nedensellik testi [The relationship between democracy and foreign direct investment in Turkey: Toda-Yamamoto causality test]. Eurasian Journal of Researches in Social and Economics, 10(1), 138–148. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/asead/issue/75724/1218135
36. Kaufmann, D., & Kraay, A. (2008). Governance indicators: Where are we, where should we be going? The World Bank Research Observer, 23(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkm012
37. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2011). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3(2), 220–246. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1876404511200046
38. Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1995). Institutions and economic performance: Cross-country tests using alternative institutional measures. Economics & Politics, 7(3), 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0343.1995.tb00111.x
39. Köstekçi, A., Yıldız, A., Gülcü, Y., & Çakır, M. A. (2023). İyi yönetişimin seçilmiş sosyal ve ekonomik göstergeler üzerindeki etkileri: Orta Asya Türk Cumhuriyetleri ve Türkiye örneği [The effects of good governance on selected social and economic indicators: The case of Central Asian Turkish Republics and Türkiye]. EKEV Academy Journal, 27(Special Issue), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.17753/sosekev.1307154
40. Kurtz, M. J., & Schrank, A. (2007). Growth and governance: Models, measures, and mechanisms. Journal of Politics, 69(2), 538–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00549.x
41. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1999). The quality of government. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 15(1), 222–279. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/15.1.222
42. Langbein, L., & Knack, S. (2010). The worldwide governance indicators: Six, one, or none? Journal of Development Studies, 46(2), 350–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380902952399
43. Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 681–712. https://doi.org/10.2307/2946696
44. Méon, P. G., & Weill, L. (2010). Is corruption an efficient grease? World Development, 38(3), 244–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.06.004
45. Niesten, E., Jolink, A., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., Chappin, M., & Lozano, R. (2017). Sustainable collaboration: The impact of governance and institutions on sustainable performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 155(Part 2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.085
46. Norris, P. (2012). Making democratic governance work: How Regimes Shape Prosperity, Welfare, and Peace. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139061902
47. North D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
48. O’Donnell, G. (2004). The quality of democracy: Why the rule of law matters. Journal of Democracy, 15(4), 32–46. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2004.0076
49. Özşahin, Ş. (2016). Kurumsal kalite doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar için ne kadar önemli? Türkiye üzerine ekonometrik bir analiz [How important is institutional quality for foreign direct investment? An econometric analysis on Turkey]. Journal of Yasar University, 11(44), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.19168/jyu.76581
50. Özşahin, Ş., Üçler, G., & Uysal, D. (2022). Jeopolitik risk ve yolsuzluğun doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar için önemi: Türkiye için ampirik bulgular [The importance of geopolitical risk and corruption for foreign direct investments: Empirical findings for Turkey]. Bingöl University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 6(2), 257–286. https://doi.org/10.33399/biibfad.1120293
51. Peters, B. G. (2011). Governance as political theory. Critical Policy Studies, 5(1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2011.555683
52. Rachid, Y., & Khalid, H. (2025). Institutions and FDI: How does institutional quality amplify economic gains?. Revue Internationale de la Recherche Scientifique (Revue-IRS), 3(3), 3078–3093. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15715424
53. Rauch, J. E., & Evans, P. B. (2000). Bureaucratic structure and bureaucratic performance in less developed countries. Journal of Public Economics, 75(1), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00044-4 Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652–667. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x
54. Rodrik, D. (2004). Getting institutions right. CESifo DICE Report, 2(2), 10–15. https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/dicereport204-forum2.pdf
55. Rodrik, D. (2008). Second-best institutions. American Economic Review, 98(2), 100–104. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.2.100
56. Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., & Trebbi, F. (2004). Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth, 9(2), 131–165. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOEG.0000031425.72248.85
57. Rotberg, R. I. (2014). Good governance means performance and results. Governance, 27(3), 511–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12084
58. Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2008). What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions. Governance, 21(2), 165–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00391.x
59. Sabry, M. I. (2015). Good governance, institutions and performance of public private partnerships. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 28(7), 566–582. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-01-2015-0005
60. Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.00106
61. Svensson, J. (2005). Eight questions about corruption. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(3), 19–42. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533005774357860
62. Thomas, M. A. (2010). What do the worldwide governance indicators measure? The European Journal of Development Research, 22(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2009.32
63. Treisman, D. (2000). The causes of corruption: A cross-national study. Journal of Public Economics, 76(3), 399–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00092-4
64. Ünlükaplan, İ., Arısoy, İ., & Canıkalp, E. (2018). Yönetişim kalitesi ve iktisadi büyüme: Türkiye ekonomisi için bir ampirik analiz [The quality of governance, composition of public expenditures, and economic growth: An empirical analysis on Turkey]. International Journal of Economics and Administrative Studies, 11(Special Issue), 487–508. https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.441213
65. Williamson, C. R. (2009). Informal institutions rule: Institutional arrangements and economic performance. Public Choice, 139(3-4), 371–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9399-x World Bank. (2025). Worldwide governance indicators. https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/worldwide-governance-indicators
66. Yıldırım, A. (2019). İyi yönetişim ve Türkiye performansı [Good governance and the performance of Turkey]. Journal of Academic Value Studies, 5(5), 818–835. http://doi.org/10.29228/javs.38755
67. Yürükoğlu, B. (2021). Yönetişim ve ekonomik performans: Türkiye ve G7 ülkeleri için bir değerlendirme [Governance and economic evaluation of governance: Turkey’s good governance indicators]. Journal of Applied and Theoretical Social Sciences, 3(3), 244–262. https://doi.org/10.37241/jatss.2021.35
68. Zattoni, A., Dedoulis, E., Leventis, S., & Van Ees, H. (2020). Corporate governance and institutions-A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance-An International Review, 28(6), 465–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12347