Why Can Smes Not Adopt Green Innovation? An Assessment Via Fuzzy ISM-MICMAC-DEMATEL

Öz

Innovation has become an important competitive tool as it increases the efficiency and profitability of enterprises and provides the opportunity to enter new markets and grow in the existing market area. The important thing is not to harm the environment while the businesses continue their activities. Therefore, the innovations and activities carried out are happened to be environmentally friendly and have an aspect that will reduce the negative effects on the environment. However, Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) cannot adopt green practices due to various barriers. In this context, this study aims to analyze and solve the factors that hinder green innovation and green initiatives in SMEs. In the study, firstly, the literature was searched, and six main barriers were determined as "economic barriers", "market barriers", "political barriers", "lack of information", "technological barriers" and "administrative barriers". Barriers were analyzed using Fuzzy ISM-MICMAC and Fuzzy DEMATEL methods by taking expert opinions from 18 SMEs in the Electrical and Electronics sector. The structural relationship model between the barriers was revealed with the Fuzzy ISM-MICMAC analysis methods. The effect-importance degree of the barriers was determined by the Fuzzy DEMATEL method, and their weights were calculated. As a result of the research, the most influential barriers to other barriers were determined as "economic barriers", "political" barriers" and "lack of information".

Anahtar Kelimeler

• SME
• Green Innovation
• Multi-Criteria Decision Making
• Fuzzy ISM-MICMAC
• Fuzzy DEMATEL

Kaynakça

1. Abbasnejad, T., Khaksar, E., Gashtasbi, M., and Darabi, S. A. (2015). Prioritizing barriers to implement green supply chain in Shiraz oil refining company by fahp method. Jurnal UMP Social Sciences and Technology Management, 3 (3), 824-833. google scholar
2. AlKhidir, T., and Zailani, S. (2009). Going green in supply chain towards environmental sustainability. Global Journal of Environmental Research, 3 (3), 246-251. google scholar
3. Aksakal E., and Dağdeviren, M. (2010), ANP ve DEMATEL Yöntemleri İle Personel Seçimi Problemine Bütünleşik bir Yaklaşım. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 25 (4), 905-910. google scholar
4. Ansari, M. F., Kharb, R. K., Luthra, S., Shimmi, S. L., and Chatterji, S. (2013). Analysis of barriers to implement solar power installations in India using interpretive structural modeling technique. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 27, 163-174. google scholar
5. Atay, L., Dilek, S. E. (2013). Konaklama İşletmelerinde Yeşil Pazarlama Uygulamaları: IBIS Otel Örneği, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 18 (1), 203219. google scholar
6. Balasubramanian, S. (2012). A hierarchiacal framework of barriers to green supply chain management in the construction sector. Journal of Sustainable Development, 5 (10), 15-27. google scholar
7. Bansal, P., and Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of management journal, 43 (4), 717-736. google scholar
8. Beamon, B. M. (1999). Designing the green supply chain. Logistics information management. 12 (4), 332-342. google scholar

9. Chander, M., Jain, S. K., and Shankar, R. (2013). Modeling of information security management parameters in Indian organizations using ISM and MICMAC approach. Journal of Modelling in Management, 8 (2), 171-189. google scholar
10. Christmann, P. (2000). Effects of “best practices” of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (4), 663-680. google scholar
11. Dalalah, D., Hayajneh, M., and Batieha, F. (2011). A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making model for supplier selection. Expert systems with applications, 38 (7), 8384-8391. google scholar
12. Fussler, C., and James, P. (1996). A breakthrough discipline for innovation and sustainability. Pitman Publishing. google scholar
13. Gabus, A., and Fontela, E. (1972). World problems, an invitation to further thought within the framework of DEMATEL. Battelle Geneva Research Center, Geneva, Switzerland. google scholar
14. Gabus, A., and Fontela, E. (1973). Perceptions of the world problematique: Communication procedure, communicating with those bearing collective responsibility. Battelle Geneva Research Center, Geneva, Switzerland. google scholar
15. Holt, D., and Ghobadian, A. (2009). An empirical study of green supply chain management practices amongst UK manufacturers. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 20 (7), 933-956. google scholar
16. Hsu, C. W., and Hu, A. H. (2008). Green supply chain management in the electronic industry. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 5 (2), 205-216. google scholar
17. Joshi, R., Banwet, D. K. and Shankar, R. (2009), “Indian cold chain: modeling the inhibitors”, British Food Journal, 111 (11), 1260-1283. google scholar
18. Khanam, S., Siddiqui, J., and Talib, F. (2015). Modelling the TQM enablers and IT resources in the ICT industry: an ISM-MICMAC approach. International Journal of Information Systems and Management, 1 (3), 195-218. google scholar
19. Khiewnavawongsa, S., and Schmidt, E. K. (2013, December). Barriers to green supply chain implementation in the electronics industry. In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (226-230). IEEE. google scholar
20. Kumar, S., Chattopadhyaya, S., and Sharma, V. (2012). Green supply chain management: A case study from Indian electrical and electronics industry. International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering, 1 (6), 275-281. google scholar
21. Li, R. J. (1999). Fuzzy Method in Group Decision Making, Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 38 (1), 91-101. google scholar
22. Lin, C. J., and Wu, W. W. (2008). A causal analytical method for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 34 (1), 205-213. google scholar
23. Luthra, S., Kumar, S., Kharb, R., Ansari, M. F., and Shimmi, S. L. (2014). Adoption of smart grid technologies: An analysis of interactions among barriers. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 33, 554-565. google scholar
24. Mangla, S., Madaan, J., and Chan, F. T. (2013). Analysis of flexible decision strategies for sustainability-focused green product recovery system. International Journal of Production Research, 51 (11), 3428-3442. google scholar
25. Muhammad, M. N., and Cavus, N. (2017). Fuzzy DEMATEL method for identifying LMS evaluation criteria. Procedia computer science, 120, 742-749. google scholar
26. Nakıboğlu, G. (2017). Sürdürebilirlik İçin Yeşil Tedarik Zincirlerine Bütünsel Yaklaşım. Detay Yayıncılık, Ankara. google scholar
27. OECD (2009), Sustainable Manufacturing and Eco-innovation: Towards a Green Economy google scholar
28. Öztürk, O. (2009). Kazaların Çevresel ve Teknik Araştırması (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara. google scholar Peker, D. (2010) Çevresel Performansın Geliştirilmesinde Yeşil Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi, (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Uludağ Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Bursa. google scholar
29. Ravi, V., and Shankar, R. (2005). Analysis of interactions among the barriers of reverse logistics. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72 (8), 1011-1029. google scholar
30. Russo, M. V., and Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of management Journal, 40 (3), 534-559. google scholar
31. Sarkar, A., and Mohapatra, P. K. (2006). Evaluation of supplier capability and performance: A method for supply base reduction. Journal of Purchasing and supply management, 12 (3), 148-163. google scholar
32. Sarkis, J. (2012). A boundaries and flows perspective of green supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17 (2), 202-216. google scholar
33. Saxena J. P., Sushil and P. Vrat (2005) Policy and Strategy Formulation: An Application of Flexible Systems Methodology, Prime Publishing, New Delhi. google scholar
34. Scupola, A. (2003). The adoption of Internet commerce by SMEs in the south of Italy: An environmental, technological and organizational perspective. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 6 (1), 52-71. google scholar
35. Seuring, S., and Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of cleaner production, 16 (15), 1699-1710. google scholar
36. Shieh, J. I., Wu, H. H., and Huang, K. K. (2010). A DEMATEL method in identifying key success factors of hospital service quality. Knowledge-Based Systems, 23 (3), 277-282. google scholar
37. Smith, A., VoB, J. P., and Grin, J. (2010). Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges. Research policy, 39 (4), 435-448. google scholar
38. Srivastav, P., and Gaur, M. K. (2015). Barriers to implement green supply chain management in small scale industry using interpretive structural modeling technique-a north Indian perspective. European journal of advances in engineering and technology, 2 (2), 6-13. google scholar
39. Srivastava, S. K. (2007). Green supply-chain management: A state-of-the-art literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9 (1), 53-80. google scholar
40. Şenocak, B., and Mohan, Y. B. (2018). İşletmelerde Çevresel Sürdürülebilirlik Bilinci Ve Yeşil İşletmecilik Uygulamalari İle İşletme Başarisi Arasindaki İlişki. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 23 (1), 161-183. google scholar
41. Tseng, M. L. (2009). A causal and effect decision making model of service quality expectation using grey-fuzzy DEMATEL approach. Expert systems with applications, 36 (4), 7738-7748. google scholar
42. Walker, H., Di Sisto, L., and McBain, D. (2008). Drivers and barriers to environmental supply chain management practices: Lessons from the public and private sectors. Journal of purchasing and supply management, 14 (1), 69-85. google scholar
43. Wu, W. W., and Lee, Y. T. (2007). Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Expert systems with applications, 32 (2), 499-507. google scholar
44. Yu Lin, C. and Hui Ho, Y. (2008). An empirical study on logistics services provider, intention to adopt green innovations. Journal of Technology, Management and Innovation, 3 (1), 17-26. google scholar