Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yıl 2025, Sayı: 43, 269 - 284, 26.12.2025
https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2025.43.1832195
https://izlik.org/JA64CF92XT

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical data analysis (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. google scholar
  • Agresti, A. (2010). Analysis of ordinal categorical data (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. google scholar
  • Anderson, C. J., & Reichert, M. S. (1995). Economic benefits and support for membership in the E.U.: A cross-national analYsis. Journal of Public Policy, 15(3), 231-249. [suspicious link removed] google scholar
  • Arıkan, G. (2012). Attitudes towards the European Union in TurkeY: The role of perceived threats and benefits. Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs, 17(3), 81-103. google scholar
  • AYdın, M., Çelikpala, M., Akgül-Açıkmeşe, S., Canan-Sokullu, E., Güvenç, S., ŞenYuva, Ö., & KaYa-Sönmez, S. (2022). Kantitatif araştırma raporu: Türk dış politikası kamuoyu algıları araştırması 2022. İstanbul: Kadir Has Üniversitesi TürkiYe Çalışmaları Grubu, Global Akademi, Akademetre. google scholar
  • AYdın-Düzgit, S., Kaliber, A. (2016). Encounters with Europe in an era of domestic and international turmoil: Is TurkeY a de-Europeanising candidate countrY? South European Society and Politics, 21(1), 1-14. doi:10.1080/13608746.2016.1155282 google scholar
  • Brussels European Council. (2004). Presidency conclusions 16 and 17 December 2004. Retrieved from https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/83201.pdf.google scholar
  • CareY, S. (2002). Undivided loYalties: Is national identitY an obstacle to European integration? European Union Politics, 3(4), 387-413. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116502003004001 google scholar
  • Çarkoğlu, A. (2003). Who wants full membership? Characteristics of Turkish public support for EU membership. Turkish Studies, 4(1), 171-194. doi:10.1080/714005717 google scholar
  • Çarkoğlu, A., & Glüpker-Kesebir, G. (2016). Comparing public attitudes on EU membership in candidate countries: The cases of Croatia, Macedonia, and TurkeY from 2004 to 2011. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 16(2), 257-277. doi:10.1080/14683857.2016.1147743 google scholar
  • Çarkoğlu, A., Kentmen, C. (2011). Diagnosing trends and determinants in public support for TurkeY's EU membership. South European Society and Politics, 16(3), 365-379. doi:10.1080/13608746.2011.598348google scholar
  • De Vries, C. E. (2018). Euroscepticism and the future of European integration. Oxford, UK: Oxford UniversitY Press. google scholar
  • Dimitriadi, A., KaYa, A., Kale, B., & Zurabishvili, T. (2018). EU-Turkey relations and irregular migration: Transnational cooperation in the making (FEUTURE Online Paper No. 16). Retrieved from https://feuture.uni-koeln.de/sites/feuture/user_upload/FEUTURE_Online_Paper_No_16_D6.3.pdf google scholar
  • Erder, N. (2004). Türkiye’de seçmen eğilimlerinde yeni açılımlar (1994-2004). İstanbul: Tüses YaYınları. google scholar
  • Esmer, Y. (1996). The Turkish public opinion and Europe. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 10(1), 79-87. doi:10.1080/09557579608400127 google scholar
  • European Commission. (2025). Special Eurobarometer survey on enlargement & perception surveys in candidate countries and potential candidates. Retrieved from https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/news/special-eurobarometer-and-perception-surveYs-2025-09-02_en. google scholar
  • European Council. (2016, March 18). EU-Turkey statement (Press release). Retrieved from https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/ press-releases/2016/03/18/eu-turkeY-statement/ google scholar
  • European Union. (2025). Eurobarometer: Public opinion in the European Union. Retrieved from https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/ screen/homegoogle scholar
  • Favero, A. (2020). The influence of gender on attitudes towards the EU among the Polish ‘winners of European integration’. European Political Science Review, 12(1), 19-34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773919000304 google scholar
  • Gabel, M. (1998). Public support for European integration: An empirical test of five theories. Journal of Politics, 60(2), 333-354. doi:10.2307/2647912. google scholar
  • Helsinki European Council. (1999). Presidency conclusions 10 and 11 December 1999. Retrieved from https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/21046/helsinki-european-council-presidencY-conclusions.pdf https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/21046/helsinki-european-council-presidencY-conclusions.pdf.google scholar
  • Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2005). Calculation, communitY and cues: Public opinion on European integration. European Union Politics, 6(4), 419-443. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116505057816 google scholar
  • Inglehart, R. F. (1970). Cognitive mobilization and European identitY. Comparative Politics, 3(1), 45-70.google scholar
  • Kardaş, Ş. (2013). TurkeY: A regional power facing a changing international sYstem. Turkish Studies, 14(4), 637-660. doi:10.1080/14683849.2013.861111. google scholar
  • Kentmen, C. (2008). Determinants of support for EU membership in TurkeY: Islamic attachments, utilitarian considerations, and national identitY. European Union Politics, 9(4), 487-510. doi:10.1177/1465116508095148 google scholar
  • KeYman, E. F., & Tulus Turk, C. (2023). DemocracY in TurkeY. In A. Özerdem & A. E. Öztürk (Eds.), A companion to modern Turkey’s centennial: Political, sociological, economic, and institutional transformations since 1923 (pp. 107-120). Edinburgh: Edinburgh UniversitY Press. google scholar
  • KutlaY, M., & Öniş, Z. (2021). Turkish foreign policY in a post-Western order: strategic autonomY or new forms of dependence? Interna-tional Affairs, 97(4), 1085-1104. doi:10.1093/ia/iiab094. google scholar
  • Lindgaard, J. (2018). EU public opinion on Turkish EU membership: Trends and drivers (FEUTURE Online Paper No. 25). Retrieved from https://feuture.uni-koeln.de/sites/feuture/user_upload/Online_Paper_No_25_final.pdf. google scholar
  • Lubbers, T., Haverland, M., & ZhelYazkova, A. (2025). National satisfaction vs. European support? Explaining attitudes towards the EU in candidate member states. Journal of European Integration, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2025.2489160 google scholar
  • McLaren, L. M. (2002). Public support for the European Union: Cost/benefit analYsis or perceived cultural threat? Journal of Politics, 64(2), 551-566. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.00139 google scholar
  • Nas, Ç., & Özer, Y. ((Eds.). (2016). Turkey and the European Union: Process of Europeanization. Oxon: Routledge. google scholar
  • Nelsen, B. F., Guth & Guth, J. L. (2000). Exploring the gender gap: Women, men and public attitudes toward European integration. Euro-pean Union Politics, 1(3), 267-291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116500001003001 google scholar
  • Öniş, Z. (2008). Turkey and the EU: Still committed? A new cold war in the Caucasus, Cyprus: Solution or separation? Insight Turkey, 10(4), 35-50. google scholar
  • Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (7th ed.). London: Routledge. https://doi. org/10.4324/9781003117452 google scholar
  • Saatçioğlu, B. (2019). The European Union’s refugee crisis and rising functionalism in EU-Turkey relations. Turkish Studies, 21(2), 169-187. doi:10.1080/14683849.2019.1586542 google scholar
  • Shorrocks, R. (2018). Cohort change in political gender gaps in Europe and Canada: The role of modernisationmodernization. Politics & Society, 46(2), 135-175. google scholar
  • Soler, i Lecha, E. (2014). Crises and elections: What are the consequences for Turkey’s EU bid? In S. AYdın-Düzgit, D. Huber, M. Müftüler-Baç, E. F. KeYman, J. Tasci, & N. Tocci (Eds.), Global Turkey in Europe II: Energy, migration, civil society and citizenship issues in Turkey-EU relations (pp. 203-214). Rome: Edizioni Nuova Cultura. google scholar
  • ŞenYuva, Ö. (2006). Turkish public opinion and European Union membership: The state of the art in public opinion studies in TurkeY. Perceptions, 11(1), 19-32. google scholar
  • ŞenYuva, Ö. (2018). Turkish public opinion and the EU membership: Between support and mistrust (FEUTURE Online Paper No. 26). Retrieved from https://feuture.uni-koeln.de/sites/feuture/user_upload/Online_Paper_No_26_final.pdf. google scholar
  • Şenyuva, Ö. (2024). Unwavering aspirations: An exploratory analysis of the resilience of Turkish public support for EU membership. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, 51(2), 233-259. google scholar
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: AllYn & Bacon/Pearson Education. google scholar
  • Tocci, N. (2014). Turkey and the European Union: A journey in the unknown (TurkeY Project PolicY Paper No. 5). Brookings Institution. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/articles/turkey-and-the-european-union-a-journeY-in-the-unknown/ google scholar
  • Yaka, Ö. (2016). WhY not EU? DYnamics of the changing Turkish attitudes towards EU membership. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 24(1), 149-170. doi:10.1080/14782804.2015.1056726 google scholar
  • Yılmaz, H. (2011). Euroscepticism in Turkey: Parties, elites, and public opinion. South European Society and Politics, 16(1), 185-208. doi:10.1080/13608741003594353 google scholar

Determinants of Public Support for the European Union Membership in Türkiye in 2025

Yıl 2025, Sayı: 43, 269 - 284, 26.12.2025
https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2025.43.1832195
https://izlik.org/JA64CF92XT

Öz

This study examines the contemporary determinants of public support for Türkiye’s membership of the European Union (EU) based on original micro-level survey data from 2025. While most existing studies rely on pre-2015 datasets, this article focuses on the post-stagnation and de-Europeanization period and offers a reassessment of public support for EU membership in Türkiye. The research draws on data from the KONDA Barometer Survey conducted with 2,106 respondents in 29 provinces across Türkiye and employs a binary logistic regression model to analyse the effects of economic expectations, identity (lifestyle), demographic characteristics, and political attitudes on support for EU membership within a single integrative framework. The findings reveal that, as of 2025, support for EU membership in Türkiye is shaped predominantly by identity-based cleavages and political positioning more strongly than by economic considerations alone. In particular, support is particularly high among individuals who define their lifestyle as “modern” and among voters of the CHP and the DEM Party. Women and younger cohorts display relatively higher levels of support, whereas support is comparatively lower in metropolitan areas. These patterns indicate that public attitudes towards EU membership have become increasingly embedded in domestic political polarisation and value-based identity divisions. The findings have important implications for understanding the future trajectory of EU-Türkiye relations, emphasising the central role of domestic political and societal dynamics in shaping contemporary public support for European integration.

Kaynakça

  • Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical data analysis (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. google scholar
  • Agresti, A. (2010). Analysis of ordinal categorical data (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. google scholar
  • Anderson, C. J., & Reichert, M. S. (1995). Economic benefits and support for membership in the E.U.: A cross-national analYsis. Journal of Public Policy, 15(3), 231-249. [suspicious link removed] google scholar
  • Arıkan, G. (2012). Attitudes towards the European Union in TurkeY: The role of perceived threats and benefits. Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs, 17(3), 81-103. google scholar
  • AYdın, M., Çelikpala, M., Akgül-Açıkmeşe, S., Canan-Sokullu, E., Güvenç, S., ŞenYuva, Ö., & KaYa-Sönmez, S. (2022). Kantitatif araştırma raporu: Türk dış politikası kamuoyu algıları araştırması 2022. İstanbul: Kadir Has Üniversitesi TürkiYe Çalışmaları Grubu, Global Akademi, Akademetre. google scholar
  • AYdın-Düzgit, S., Kaliber, A. (2016). Encounters with Europe in an era of domestic and international turmoil: Is TurkeY a de-Europeanising candidate countrY? South European Society and Politics, 21(1), 1-14. doi:10.1080/13608746.2016.1155282 google scholar
  • Brussels European Council. (2004). Presidency conclusions 16 and 17 December 2004. Retrieved from https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/83201.pdf.google scholar
  • CareY, S. (2002). Undivided loYalties: Is national identitY an obstacle to European integration? European Union Politics, 3(4), 387-413. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116502003004001 google scholar
  • Çarkoğlu, A. (2003). Who wants full membership? Characteristics of Turkish public support for EU membership. Turkish Studies, 4(1), 171-194. doi:10.1080/714005717 google scholar
  • Çarkoğlu, A., & Glüpker-Kesebir, G. (2016). Comparing public attitudes on EU membership in candidate countries: The cases of Croatia, Macedonia, and TurkeY from 2004 to 2011. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 16(2), 257-277. doi:10.1080/14683857.2016.1147743 google scholar
  • Çarkoğlu, A., Kentmen, C. (2011). Diagnosing trends and determinants in public support for TurkeY's EU membership. South European Society and Politics, 16(3), 365-379. doi:10.1080/13608746.2011.598348google scholar
  • De Vries, C. E. (2018). Euroscepticism and the future of European integration. Oxford, UK: Oxford UniversitY Press. google scholar
  • Dimitriadi, A., KaYa, A., Kale, B., & Zurabishvili, T. (2018). EU-Turkey relations and irregular migration: Transnational cooperation in the making (FEUTURE Online Paper No. 16). Retrieved from https://feuture.uni-koeln.de/sites/feuture/user_upload/FEUTURE_Online_Paper_No_16_D6.3.pdf google scholar
  • Erder, N. (2004). Türkiye’de seçmen eğilimlerinde yeni açılımlar (1994-2004). İstanbul: Tüses YaYınları. google scholar
  • Esmer, Y. (1996). The Turkish public opinion and Europe. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 10(1), 79-87. doi:10.1080/09557579608400127 google scholar
  • European Commission. (2025). Special Eurobarometer survey on enlargement & perception surveys in candidate countries and potential candidates. Retrieved from https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/news/special-eurobarometer-and-perception-surveYs-2025-09-02_en. google scholar
  • European Council. (2016, March 18). EU-Turkey statement (Press release). Retrieved from https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/ press-releases/2016/03/18/eu-turkeY-statement/ google scholar
  • European Union. (2025). Eurobarometer: Public opinion in the European Union. Retrieved from https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/ screen/homegoogle scholar
  • Favero, A. (2020). The influence of gender on attitudes towards the EU among the Polish ‘winners of European integration’. European Political Science Review, 12(1), 19-34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773919000304 google scholar
  • Gabel, M. (1998). Public support for European integration: An empirical test of five theories. Journal of Politics, 60(2), 333-354. doi:10.2307/2647912. google scholar
  • Helsinki European Council. (1999). Presidency conclusions 10 and 11 December 1999. Retrieved from https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/21046/helsinki-european-council-presidencY-conclusions.pdf https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/21046/helsinki-european-council-presidencY-conclusions.pdf.google scholar
  • Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2005). Calculation, communitY and cues: Public opinion on European integration. European Union Politics, 6(4), 419-443. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116505057816 google scholar
  • Inglehart, R. F. (1970). Cognitive mobilization and European identitY. Comparative Politics, 3(1), 45-70.google scholar
  • Kardaş, Ş. (2013). TurkeY: A regional power facing a changing international sYstem. Turkish Studies, 14(4), 637-660. doi:10.1080/14683849.2013.861111. google scholar
  • Kentmen, C. (2008). Determinants of support for EU membership in TurkeY: Islamic attachments, utilitarian considerations, and national identitY. European Union Politics, 9(4), 487-510. doi:10.1177/1465116508095148 google scholar
  • KeYman, E. F., & Tulus Turk, C. (2023). DemocracY in TurkeY. In A. Özerdem & A. E. Öztürk (Eds.), A companion to modern Turkey’s centennial: Political, sociological, economic, and institutional transformations since 1923 (pp. 107-120). Edinburgh: Edinburgh UniversitY Press. google scholar
  • KutlaY, M., & Öniş, Z. (2021). Turkish foreign policY in a post-Western order: strategic autonomY or new forms of dependence? Interna-tional Affairs, 97(4), 1085-1104. doi:10.1093/ia/iiab094. google scholar
  • Lindgaard, J. (2018). EU public opinion on Turkish EU membership: Trends and drivers (FEUTURE Online Paper No. 25). Retrieved from https://feuture.uni-koeln.de/sites/feuture/user_upload/Online_Paper_No_25_final.pdf. google scholar
  • Lubbers, T., Haverland, M., & ZhelYazkova, A. (2025). National satisfaction vs. European support? Explaining attitudes towards the EU in candidate member states. Journal of European Integration, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2025.2489160 google scholar
  • McLaren, L. M. (2002). Public support for the European Union: Cost/benefit analYsis or perceived cultural threat? Journal of Politics, 64(2), 551-566. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.00139 google scholar
  • Nas, Ç., & Özer, Y. ((Eds.). (2016). Turkey and the European Union: Process of Europeanization. Oxon: Routledge. google scholar
  • Nelsen, B. F., Guth & Guth, J. L. (2000). Exploring the gender gap: Women, men and public attitudes toward European integration. Euro-pean Union Politics, 1(3), 267-291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116500001003001 google scholar
  • Öniş, Z. (2008). Turkey and the EU: Still committed? A new cold war in the Caucasus, Cyprus: Solution or separation? Insight Turkey, 10(4), 35-50. google scholar
  • Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (7th ed.). London: Routledge. https://doi. org/10.4324/9781003117452 google scholar
  • Saatçioğlu, B. (2019). The European Union’s refugee crisis and rising functionalism in EU-Turkey relations. Turkish Studies, 21(2), 169-187. doi:10.1080/14683849.2019.1586542 google scholar
  • Shorrocks, R. (2018). Cohort change in political gender gaps in Europe and Canada: The role of modernisationmodernization. Politics & Society, 46(2), 135-175. google scholar
  • Soler, i Lecha, E. (2014). Crises and elections: What are the consequences for Turkey’s EU bid? In S. AYdın-Düzgit, D. Huber, M. Müftüler-Baç, E. F. KeYman, J. Tasci, & N. Tocci (Eds.), Global Turkey in Europe II: Energy, migration, civil society and citizenship issues in Turkey-EU relations (pp. 203-214). Rome: Edizioni Nuova Cultura. google scholar
  • ŞenYuva, Ö. (2006). Turkish public opinion and European Union membership: The state of the art in public opinion studies in TurkeY. Perceptions, 11(1), 19-32. google scholar
  • ŞenYuva, Ö. (2018). Turkish public opinion and the EU membership: Between support and mistrust (FEUTURE Online Paper No. 26). Retrieved from https://feuture.uni-koeln.de/sites/feuture/user_upload/Online_Paper_No_26_final.pdf. google scholar
  • Şenyuva, Ö. (2024). Unwavering aspirations: An exploratory analysis of the resilience of Turkish public support for EU membership. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, 51(2), 233-259. google scholar
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: AllYn & Bacon/Pearson Education. google scholar
  • Tocci, N. (2014). Turkey and the European Union: A journey in the unknown (TurkeY Project PolicY Paper No. 5). Brookings Institution. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/articles/turkey-and-the-european-union-a-journeY-in-the-unknown/ google scholar
  • Yaka, Ö. (2016). WhY not EU? DYnamics of the changing Turkish attitudes towards EU membership. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 24(1), 149-170. doi:10.1080/14782804.2015.1056726 google scholar
  • Yılmaz, H. (2011). Euroscepticism in Turkey: Parties, elites, and public opinion. South European Society and Politics, 16(1), 185-208. doi:10.1080/13608741003594353 google scholar
Toplam 44 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular İstatistik (Diğer)
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Adviye Damla Ünlü Bektaş 0000-0002-5902-4096

Gönderilme Tarihi 28 Kasım 2025
Kabul Tarihi 5 Aralık 2025
Yayımlanma Tarihi 26 Aralık 2025
DOI https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2025.43.1832195
IZ https://izlik.org/JA64CF92XT
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Sayı: 43

Kaynak Göster

APA Ünlü Bektaş, A. D. (2025). Determinants of Public Support for the European Union Membership in Türkiye in 2025. EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, 43, 269-284. https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2025.43.1832195