Innovation, Relatedness and Complexity in Turkey: A Regional Analysis for 1978-2017

Mert Abay; Sedef Akgüngör; Yağmur Tuçe Akyıldız

EN TR

Innovation, Relatedness and Complexity in Turkey: A Regional Analysis for 1978-2017

Öz

The paper aims to explore innovations and smart specialization opportunities in Turkey’s regions. Patent applications measure innovations. Relatedness density and regional complexity measure prospects for smart specialization. The data is from OECD RegPat data (January 2020) for the 1978 – 2017 period. Following the approach outlined in smart specialization literature, the paper demonstrates geographic distribution of patents, average relatedness density and complexity of Turkey’s regions. There are four main results of the paper. Firstly, patent applications in Turkey during the 1978-2017 period are mostly low-tech products. Secondly, regional distribution of patent applications and relatedness density is uneven. Thirdly, regional knowledge complexity index became uniform over time, indicating that creating unique regional positions became harder. Fourthly, the potential of regions for smart specialization is higher in west of Istanbul-Ankara-Adana axis.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Türkiye'de Yenilik, İlişkililik ve Karmaşıklık: 1978-2017 için Bölgesel Bir Analiz

Öz

Bu makalenin amacı, Türkiye'de bölgesel yenilik ve akıllı uzmanlaşma fırsatlarını ortaya koymaktır. Yenilikler, patent başvuruları ile ölçülmüştür. Akıllı uzmanlaşma fırsatları ise, ilişki yoğunluğu ve bölgesel karmaşıklık değişkenleri ile ölçülmüştür. Veriler, 1978–2017 dönemi için OECD RegPat’den (Ocak 2020) alınmıştır. Çalışma, akıllı uzmanlaşma literatürü yaklaşımı çerçevesinde Türkiye bölgelerinde patent başvurularını, ilişki yoğunluğunu ve karmaşıklığını göstermektedir. Makalede dört ana sonuca varılmaktadır. İlk olarak, 1978-2017 döneminde Türkiye'deki patent başvuruları çoğunlukla düşük teknolojili ürünlerdir. İkinci olarak, patent başvuruları ve ilişki yoğunluğu düzensiz bir bölgesel dağılım göstermektedir. Üçüncü olarak, bölgesel bilgi karmaşıklığı endeksi zamanla bölgeler arasında tek tip hale gelmiş ve rekabet eden bölgeler arasında özgün konumlar yaratmak zorlaşmıştır. Dördüncü olarak, bölgelerin akıllı uzmanlaşma potansiyeli İstanbul-Ankara-Adana ekseninin batısında daha yüksektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

ilişkililik, karmaşıklık, akıllı uzmanlaşma, patentler, Türkiye

Kaynakça

Abay, M & Akgüngör, S. (2021). Knowledge Space, Relatedness and Complexity: A Regional Analysis in Turkey. Yıldız Social Science Review. Forthcoming.
Acs, Z. J., Anselin, L., & Varga, A. (2002). Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Research Policy, 31, 1069–1085.
Adak, M. (2015). Technological progress, innovation and economic growth : The case of Turkey. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 776–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.478
Akgüngör, S., Y. KUştepeli & Y. Gülcan (2021). Türkiye’de Akıllı Uzmanlaşma Stratejileri ve Üniversiteler. in T. Şahin and F. Altuğ (eds). Yerel ve Bölgesel Kalkınmada Değişen Dinamikler. Nobel.
Antonelli, C. (2003). The digital divide : Understanding the economics of new information and communication technology in the global economy. Information Economics and Policy, 15, 173–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6245(02)00093-8
Asheim, B. T., Boschma, R., & Cooke, P. (2011). Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional Studies, 45(7), 893-904. doi:10.1080/00343404.2010.543126
Asheim, B. T., & Coenen, L. (2005). Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems : Comparing Nordic clusters. Research Policy, 34, 1173–1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.013
Asheim, B. T., Coenen, L., Moodysoon, J. & Vang, J. (2007). Constructing knowledge-based regional advantage: Implications for regional innovation policy. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 7(2/3/4/5), 140-155.
Balland, P. A. (2017). Economic geography in R: Introduction to the EconGeo package. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, 17(09), 1-75.
Balland, P. A., Boschma, R., Crespo, J., & Rigby, D. L. (2019). Smart specialization policy in the European Union : Relatedness, knowledge complexity and regional diversification. Regional Stıdies, 53(9), 1252–1268. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1437900

Balland, P. A., & Rigby, D. (2017). The geography of complex knowledge. Economic Geography, 93(1), 1-23. doi:10.1080/00130095.2016.1205947
Balland, P. A., Rigby, D., & Boschma, R. (2015). The technological resilience of US cities. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(2), 167-184.
Basberg, L. (1987). Patents and the measurement of technological change : A survey of the literature. Elsevier Science Publisher, 16, 131–141.
Boschma, R. (2017). Relatedness as driver of regional diversification : A research agenda. Regional Studies, 51(3), 351–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1254767
Boschma, R. (2014). Constructing regional advantage and smart specialisation: comparison of two european policy concepts. Italian Journal of Regional Science (Scienze Regionali), 13(1), 51-68.
Boschma, R., Balland, P. A. & Kogler, D. F. (2015). Relatedness and technological change in cities: The rise and fall of technological knowledge in US metropolitan areas from 1981 to 2010. Industrial and Corporate Change, 24(1), 223-250. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtu012
Breschi, S. and F. Malerba, (1997) “Sectoral Innovation Systems: Technological Regimes, Schumpeterian Dynamics, and Spatial Boundaries”, in C Edquist (ed.), Systems Of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions, And Organizations, Pinter, London s. 130-56.
Buerger, M., Brokel, T. & Coad, A. (2012). Regional dynamics of innovation: investigating the co-evolution of patents, research and development (R&D), and employment. Regional Studies, 46(5), 565-582.
Camagni, R. P. (1991). Technological change, uncertanity and innovation networks: Towards a dynamic theory of economic space. In: Boyce D.E., Nijkamp P. & Shefer D. (eds). Regional Science. Berlin, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76311-3_10
Carvalho, D. T. De, Beijo, L. A., & Salgado, E. G. (2020). Factors that influence the number of patent deposited in some countries of the American continent. Revista GEINTEC, 10(2), 5471–5485.
Cooke, N. J. (1994). Varieties of knowledge elicitation techniques. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 41(6), 801-849. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1994.1083
Cooke, P. (2005). Regionally asymmetric knowledge capabilities and open innovation exploring ‘Globalisation 2’— A new model of industry organisation. Research Policy, 34, 1128–1149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.12.005
Cooke, P. (2005). Regional Knowledge Capabilities and Open Innovation: Regional Innovation Systems and Clusters in the Asymmetric Knowledge Economy. In: Breschi, S & Franco, M. (eds). Clusters, Networks and Innovation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 80-109.
Cooke, P. & Morgan, K. (1994). The regional innovation system in Baden- Württemberg. International Journal of Technology Management, 9(3-4), 394-429.
Cooke, P., Uranga, M. G., & Etxebarria, G. (1997). Regional innovation systems: institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policy, 26(4-5), 475-491. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5
Çelik, N., Akgüngör, S., & Kumral, N. (2019). An assessment of the technology level and knowledge intensity of regions in Turkey. European Planning Studies, 27(5), 952-973. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1579301
Dereli, T., & Durmus, A. (2009). Patenting activities in Turkey : The case of the textile industry. World Patent Information, 31, 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2008.07.003
Dosi, G. (1988). Sources , procedures , and microeconomic effects of innovation. American Economic Association, 26(3), 1120–1171.
Dulupcu, M. & Govdere, B. (2005). Bölgesel gelişme stratejileri için bir perspektif: yerel bilgi ağbağlari yaklaşimi. In: H. Erlat (Ed.) Bölgesel Gelişme Stratejileri ve Akdeniz Ekonomisi. Ankara, Turkey: Türkiye Ekonomi Kurumu.
Ejermo, O. (2009). Regional innovation measured by patent data—Does quality matter? Industry and Innovation, 16 (2), 141-165.
Encaoua, D., Guellec, D., & Mart, C. (2006). Patent systems for encouraging innovation : Lessons from economic analysis. Research Policy, 35, 1423–1440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.07.004
Ernst, D. & Kim, L. (2002). Global production networks, knowledge diffusion, and local capability formation. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1417–1429. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00072-0
European Commission (2021). Smart Specialisation Platform. Retrieved May 2021, from https://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/turkey
European Commission (2017). HORIZON 2020 - Work Programme 2016 - 2017 Part 15. Spreading Excellence and Widening Participation.
European Commission (2006). Country Profile : Turkey. https://ec.europa.eu/invest-in-research/pdf/download_en/psi_countryprofile_turkey.pdf
EUROSTAT (2020). High-tech industry and knowledge-intensive services (htec). Retrieved April 21, 2021, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/FR/htec_esms.htm
Feldman, M.P. (1994). The Geography of Innovation. Boston, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Foray, D., David, P. A., & Hall, B. H. (2011). Smart specialization from academic idea to political instrument, the surprising career of a concept and the difficulties involved in its implementation. MTEI Working Paper(001).
Foray, D., David, P. A., & Hall, B. H. (2009). Smart specialisation – The concept. Knowledge Economists Policy, Brief 9.
Foray, D., & Van Ark, B. (2007). Smart specialisation in a truly integrated research area is the key to attracting more R&D to Europe. Knowledge Economists Policy Brief n 1.
Freeman, C. (1995). The ‘national system of ınnovation’ in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 5-24.
Frenken, K., & Boschma, R. A. (2007). A theoretical framework for evolutionary economic geography: Industrial dynamics and urban growth as a branching process. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(5), 635-649.
Gezici, D., Müderrisoğlu, B., Salihoğlu, G. & Başarır, G. (2021). What is The role of techno-parks on regional innovation in Turkey? Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning, 9(1), 43-59.
Gezici, F., Walsh, B.Y. & Kacar, S.M. (2017). Regional and structural analysis of the manufacturing industry in Turkey. The Annals Regional of Sciences, 59, 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-017-0827-4
Ginarte, J. C., & Park, W. G. (1997). Determinants of patent rights : A cross-national study. Research Policy, 26, 283–301.
Gómez Prieto , J., Demblans , A., & Palazuelos Martínez, M. (2019). Smart specialisation in the world, an EU policy approach helping to discover innovation globally. JRC Science for Policy Report.
Griliches, Z. (1998). R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence, R&D, Patents, and Productivity. Cambridge, UK: NBER Books.
Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators : A survey. American Economic Association, 28(4), 1661–1707.
Guerrero, D.C & Sero, M.A. (2010). Spatial distribution of patents in spain: determining factors and consequences on regional development. Regional Studies, 31(4), 381-390. DOI: 10.1080/00343409750132982
Hagedoorn, J., & Cloodt, M. (2003). Measuring innovative performance : Is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? Research Policy, 32, 1365–1379.
Hassink, R., & Gong, H. (2019). Six critical questions about smart specialization. European Planning Studies. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1650898
Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 9– 30. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393549
Hidalgo, C. A., Balland, P. A., Boschma, R., Delgado, M., Feldman, M., Frenken, K., Glaeser, E., He, C., Kogler, D. F., Morrison, A., Neffke, F., Rigby, D., Stern, S., Zheng,
S. & Zhu, S. (2018). The principle of relatedness. In: Morales A., Gershenson C., Braha D., Minai A., Bar-Yam Y. (eds) Unifying Themes in Complex Systems IX. ICCS 2018. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96661-8_46
Hidalgo, C. A. & Hausmann, R. (2009). The building blocks of economic complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10570–10575.
Jaffe, A.B., Trajtenberg, M. & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577–598. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118401
Johnson, B. (2008) . Cities, systems of innovation and economic development, Innovation, 10:2-3, 146-155, DOI: 10.5172/impp.453.10.2-3.146
Karaöz, M. & Albeni, M. (2004). Türkiye’de teknoloji çabalarina ilişkin bir değerlendirme: Türkiye’de patent aktivitesi. Pamukkale Üniveristesi III. Bilgi Teknolojileri Kongresi BİLGİTEK, 1–14.
Kaygalak, İ. (2013). Türkiye sanayi coğrafyasında endüstriyel kümelenme ve bölgesel yoğunlaşma eğilimi. Beşeri Coğrafya Dergisi, 1(1), 67-81.
Kaygalak, İ. & Reid, N. (2016). The geographical evolution of manufacturing and industrial policies in Turkey. Applied Geography, 70, 37-48. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.01.001
Kleiner‐Schäfer, T. & Liefner, I. (2021). Innovation success in an emerging economy: A differentiated comparison of R&D‐oriented companies in Turkey. Growth and Change, 1– 27. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12479
Kroll, H. (2015). Exploring pathways of regional technological development in China through patent analysis. Arbeitspapiere Unternehmen Und Region, No. R1/201.
Kumrali N, Güçlü, M. (2018). Akıllı Uzmanlaşmaya Yönelik Bölgesel Araştırma ve Yenilik Stratejisi Hazırlama Kılavuzu. Doğu Anadolu Kalkınma Ajansı. (https://www.daka.org.tr/panel/files/files/yayinlar/Akilli-uzmanlasma-stratejisi.pdf)
Kuştepeli, Y, Gülcan, Y & Akgüngör, S. (2013). The innovativeness of the Turkish textile industry within similar knowledge bases across different regional innovation systems European Urban and Regional Studies, 2013. DOI: 10.1177/0969776412448088
Lagendijk A., Kayasu S. & Yasar S. (2009). The role of regional development agencies in Turkey. European Urban and Regional Studies, 16(4), 383-396.
Lenger, A. (2008). Regional innovation systems and the role of state: Institutional design and state universities in Turkey, European Planning Studies, 16(8), 1101-1120. doi: 10.1080/09654310802315781
Lin, C., Tan, B., & Chang, S. (2002). The critical factors for technology absorptive capacity. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 102(6), 300-308. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570210431993
Lo Turco, A., & Maggioni, D. (2017). Local discoveries and technological relatedness: The role of foreign firms. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (17.10).
Löfsten, H., Klofsten, M. & Cadorin, E. (2020). Science parks and talent attraction management: university students as a strategic resource for innovation and entrepreneurship. European Planning Studies. 28(12), 2465-2488. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1722986
Lundvall, B. Ä. & Johnson, B. (1994). The learning economy. Journal of industry Studies, 1(2), 23-42. doi:10.1080/13662719400000002
Malecki, E. J. (1991). Technology and Economic Development: The Dynamics of Local, Regional, and National Change. Harlow, UK: Longman Scientific & Technical.
Morgan, K. (1997). The learning region: institutions, innovation and regional renewal. Regional Studies, 31(5), 491-503.
Narin, F., Noma, E. & Perry, R. (1987). Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength. Research Policy, 16(2-4), 145-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(87)90028-X
Neffke, F., Henning, M. & Boschma, R. (2011). How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography, 87(3), 237-265
OECD (2013). Innovation-Driven Growth in Regions: The Role of Smart Specialisation. Paris, France: OECD Publications.
Oğuz, M. Ö. (2019). Potential regions for smart specialization: a taxonomy of Turkish nuts 2 regions [Thesis (M.S.) -- Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences. City and Regional Planning.]. Middle East Technical University.
Özkaya, A. (2014). Türkiye’de rekabet, Ar-Ge, inovasyon ve ekonomik büyüme: Nasil bir ilişki söz konusudur?, Maliye Dergisi, 166, 17-38.
Pekkarinen, S. & Harmaakorpi, V. (2006). Building regional innovation networks : The definition of an age business core process in a regional innovation system. Regional Studies, 40(4), 401–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400600725228
Pekol, Ö. & Erbaş, B. Ç. (2011). Patent sisteminde Türkiye’deki teknoparklarin yeri. Ege Akademik Bakış, 11(1), 39–58.
Raghupathi, V. & Raghupathi, W. (2017). Innovation at country-level : Association between economic development and patents. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-017-0065-0
Rigby, D. L. (2015). Technological relatedness and knowledge space: Entry and exit of US cities from patent classes. Regional Studies, 49(11), 1922-1937. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2013.854878
Schäfer, T. K. & Liefner, I. (2021). Innovation success in an emerging economy : A comparison of R & D - oriented companies in Turkey. Growth and Change, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12479
Schmoch, U. (2008). Concept of a technology classification for country comparisons. Final Report to the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO).
Siegel, D. S., Westhead, P. & Wright, M. (2003). Science parks and the performance of new technology based firms: A review of recent UK evidence and an agenda for future research. Small Business Economics, 20(2), 177-184.
Stancova, K. C. & Cavicchi, A. (2017). Dynamics of smart specialisation agri-food trans-regional cooperation. JRC Technical Reports (JRC107257). doi:10.2760/020864
Stehr, N. (2007). Societal transformations, globalisation and the knowledge society . International Journal of Knowledge and Learning (IJKL), Vol. 3, No. 2/3, 2007; https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKL.2007.015548
Stöhr, W , 1988, “Regional policy, technology complexes and research/science parks”, in Informatics and Regional Development Eds Giaoutzi, M, Nijkamp, P, (Gower, Aldershot, Hants) pp 201–214
Şahin, M. T. & Altuğ, F. (2017). Türkiye'de yenilik faaliyetlerinde yenilikçi uzmanlaşma eğilimleri : İstanbul, Ankara ve İzmir bölgeleri imalat sanayi patent göstergeleri. Coğrafi Bilimler Dergisi, 15(2), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1501/Cogbil
Şahin, M.T. & Ertürk, M (2021). Akilli Bölgesel Kalkınma İçin Akl-ıllı Uzmanlaşma Stratejisi, Ölçümü ve Kalkınma Ajansları Üzerinden bir Değerlendirme. in T.
Şahin and F. Altuğ (eds). Yerel ve Bölgesel Kalkınmada Değişen Dinamikler. Nobel.
T.C. Kalkınma Bakanlığı (2014). National Strategy on Regional Development: 2014-2023. https://www.sanayi.gov.tr/bolgesel-kalkinma-faaliyetleri/strateji-belgeleri/01135b
Technology Transfer Accelerator (2021). Competitive Sectors Programme. TTA Turkey Advisory Services and Networking. http://ttaturkey.org/
Tödtling, F., Trippl, M. & Lengauer, L. (2008). Towards regional knowledge economics. Routes and policy options. SRE - Discussion Papers, 2008/05. Vienna: Institut für Regionalund Umweltwirtschaft, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
TUBITAK - Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey (2010). Science and Technology Human Resource Strategy and Action Plan (2011-2016). https://www.tubitak.gov.tr/tubitak_content_files//BTYPD/strateji_belgeleri/BT_IK_STRATEJI_BELGESI_2011_2016.pdf
TUBITAK (2004). Ulusal Bilim ve Teknoloji Politikaları 2003-2023 Strateji Belgesi. Ankara: TUBITAK Publications.
Türkcan, B. & Çelik, N. (2020). Türkiye'de Bölgesel İktisat - Teori, Uygulama, Politika, Ankara: Turkey: Orion Publishing.
Uzun, A. (2001). Technological innovation activities in Turkey : The case of manufacturing industry, 1995 – 1997. Technovation, 21, 189–196. Üniversite Sanayi İşbirliği Merkezleri Platformu (2021, 8 February). Genel Bilgi. Retrieved from https://www.usimp.org.tr/icerik/genel-bilgi-8
Widuto, A. (2019). Regional inequalities in the EU. In European Parliamentary Research Service (Issue May). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2019/637951/EPRS_BRI(2019)637951_EN.pdf.
Yavan, N. (2011). Teşviklerin bölgesel ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkisi: Ampirik bir analiz. Ekonomik Yaklaşım, 22(June), 65–104.
Yılmaz, Ö. (2019). Türkiye’de İl Bazında Patent Başvuruları-Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: Ekonometrik Bir Analiz. Kırıkkale, Turkey: Kırıkkale University Publishing.
Zeschky, M., Widenmayer, B. & Gassmann, O. (2011). Frugal innovation in emerging markets. Research-Technology Management, 54(4), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.5437/08956308X5404007

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Ekonomi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Mert Abay
0000-0003-3941-3200
Türkiye

Sedef Akgüngör ^*
0000-0002-5178-8948
Türkiye

Yağmur Tuçe Akyıldız
0000-0002-6962-9785
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

1 Aralık 2021

Gönderilme Tarihi

4 Ağustos 2021

Kabul Tarihi

26 Eylül 2021

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2021 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 3

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA89DT99AZ

APA

Abay, M., Akgüngör, S., & Akyıldız, Y. T. (2021). Innovation, Relatedness and Complexity in Turkey: A Regional Analysis for 1978-2017. Ekonomi-tek, 10(3), 135-171. https://izlik.org/JA89DT99AZ

AMA

1.Abay M, Akgüngör S, Akyıldız YT. Innovation, Relatedness and Complexity in Turkey: A Regional Analysis for 1978-2017. Ekonomi-tek. 2021;10(3):135-171. https://izlik.org/JA89DT99AZ

Chicago

Abay, Mert, Sedef Akgüngör, ve Yağmur Tuçe Akyıldız. 2021. “Innovation, Relatedness and Complexity in Turkey: A Regional Analysis for 1978-2017”. Ekonomi-tek 10 (3): 135-71. https://izlik.org/JA89DT99AZ.

EndNote

Abay M, Akgüngör S, Akyıldız YT (01 Aralık 2021) Innovation, Relatedness and Complexity in Turkey: A Regional Analysis for 1978-2017. Ekonomi-tek 10 3 135–171.

IEEE

[1]M. Abay, S. Akgüngör, ve Y. T. Akyıldız, “Innovation, Relatedness and Complexity in Turkey: A Regional Analysis for 1978-2017”, Ekonomi-tek, c. 10, sy 3, ss. 135–171, Ara. 2021, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA89DT99AZ

ISNAD

Abay, Mert - Akgüngör, Sedef - Akyıldız, Yağmur Tuçe. “Innovation, Relatedness and Complexity in Turkey: A Regional Analysis for 1978-2017”. Ekonomi-tek 10/3 (01 Aralık 2021): 135-171. https://izlik.org/JA89DT99AZ.

JAMA

1.Abay M, Akgüngör S, Akyıldız YT. Innovation, Relatedness and Complexity in Turkey: A Regional Analysis for 1978-2017. Ekonomi-tek. 2021;10:135–171.

MLA

Abay, Mert, vd. “Innovation, Relatedness and Complexity in Turkey: A Regional Analysis for 1978-2017”. Ekonomi-tek, c. 10, sy 3, Aralık 2021, ss. 135-71, https://izlik.org/JA89DT99AZ.

Vancouver

1.Mert Abay, Sedef Akgüngör, Yağmur Tuçe Akyıldız. Innovation, Relatedness and Complexity in Turkey: A Regional Analysis for 1978-2017. Ekonomi-tek [Internet]. 01 Aralık 2021;10(3):135-71. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA89DT99AZ

Innovation, Relatedness and Complexity in Turkey: A Regional Analysis for 1978-2017

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Türkiye'de Yenilik, İlişkililik ve Karmaşıklık: 1978-2017 için Bölgesel Bir Analiz

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

IZ

Kaynak Göster