DÖRDÜNCÜ SANAYİ DEVRİMİ, KÜRESELLEŞME VE ULUSAL GELİR MUHASEBESİ

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2, 1 - 34, 01.05.2016

Yücel Candemir

Öz

21. Yüzyıl 4. Sanayi Devrimi (4SD) ile başladı. Tarihsel, coğrafi, bilimsel, teknolojik ve toplumsal – iktisadi gelişmelerin iç içe geçtiği / örtüştüğü bir etkileşim süreci içinde olup bitenler, ancak çok geniş bir çerçevede bir büyük resmin ele alınması durumunda anlaşılabilir. Ama bizim burada yapmak istediğimiz, o büyük resmin bir parçasını ele almak: Sanayi Devrimi denilen olayın dönüştürdüğü bir dilim – İktisat Kuramı ve onun da bir alt dilimi. 4SD’nin şunları yapmakta olduğunu söyleyebiliriz: Kendisiyle koşut olarak gelişen bir küreselleşme olgusu ile birlikte küresel toplumu ve kendisini de dönüştürmek. Tıpkı 1. Sanayi Devriminde (1SD) olduğu gibi, değişen ve dönüşen yalnız toplumsal çevre değil, o çevreyi inceleyen bilim değişkeni de bu süreçten etkilenmiş ve etkilenmektedir. İktisat biliminin buhar gücünün kullanıma girmesiyle es-anlı ve bağımsızlığını ilan etmiş olarak ortaya çıkmış olması bir rastlantı sayılmamalıdır. Büyük-çap üretim, sermaye birikimi, işgücü, tüketim, talep ve piyasa parametrelerinin bu çok büyük boyutlu değişim – dönüşüm süreci içinde yerelmasıyla birlikte İktisat bilimi de bu süreçte yerini almıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Girdi-çıktı analizi, küresel arz ve değer zincirleri, küresellesme, makroiktisadi analiz, sanayi devrimi, teknolojik gelisme

THE FOURTH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION, GLOBALIZATION, AND NATIONAL INCOME ACCOUNTING

Öz

The 21st century began with a new Industrial Revolution, which we term the fourth one and denote as 4IR. Within this broad category are countless separate developments taking place within an interactive process where historic, geographical, scientific, technological, and socio-economic phenomena intermingle and overlap with each other. This is far too big a picture for us to analyze; therefore, our aim here is to confine ourselves to a small portion of that picture: the part of it that is being molded by the phenomenon called Industrial Revolution-Economic Theory—and even there we will limit ourselves to just a sub-section of it. It is easy to observe what the 4IR is doing: transforming global society as well as its own course of action as the ongoing process of globalization evolves. We comment on the parallels between our era and that of the First Industrial Revolution, which coincided with the publishing of Adam Smith’s groundbreaking The Wealth of Nations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Input-output analysis, global supply and value chains, globalization, macroeconomic analysis, industrial revolution, technological development

Kaynakça

• Amador, J. and S. Cabral, (2014), “Global Value Chains: Surveying Drivers and Measures”, WP 1739, European Central Bank.
• Attali, J., (2006), A Brief History of the Future. New York: Arcade Publishing. English-language Translation Copyright 2009.
• Baldwin, Richard, (2012), “Global Supply Chains: Why They Emerged, Why They Matter, and Where They are Going,” The Graduate Institute, Centre for Trade and Economic Integration WP. Geneva.
• Bos, Frits, (2006a), “A History of National Accounting – André Vanoli”. The Economic History Review, February, 59(4), pp. 872-873.
• Bos, Frits, (2006b), “The National Accounts as a Tool for Analysis and Policy; Past, Present and Future”, SSRN Electronic Journal, January.
• Bos, Frits, (2017), “Uses of National Accounts from the 17th Century Till Present and Three Suggestions for the Future”, European Journal for Macro-Economic Indicators and National Accounts (EURONA; free access journal), pp. 40-71.
• Candemir, Yücel, (2018), “4. Sanayi Devriminin Esiğinde Makroiktisadi Analiz ve Ulusal Gelir Hesapları” Nihat Falay’a Armağan. ss. 373-406. DER Yayınları: 478.
• Dicken, Peter, (2011), Global Shift: Mapping the Changing Contours of the World Economy. Sixth Edition. New York: The Gilford Press.
• Dietzenbacher, E. and I. Romero, (2007), “Production Chains in an Interregional Framework: Identification by Means of Average Propagation Lengths”, International Regional Science Review, 30(4), October. pp. 362-383.
• Dietzenbacher, Eric, Bart Los, Robert Stehrer, Marcel P. Timmer and Gaaitzen J. de Vries, (2013), “The Construction of World Input- Output Tables in the WIOD Project”, Economic Systems Research, 25 (1), pp. 71-98.
• Dietzenbacher, Eric, Bart Los, Robert Stehrer, Marcel P. Timmer and Gaaitzen J. de Vries, (2014), “The World Input-Output Database: Content, Concepts and Applications”, GGDC Research Memorandum 144, Groningen Growth and Development Centre, University of Groningen.
• Eurostat, (2016), “Consistency Between National Accounts and Balance of Payments Statistics”, ISBN 978-92-79-54707-2, Luxembourg Publications Office of the EU, pp. 38.
• Franklin, Daniel, (2017, Ed.), Megatech-Technology in 2050. The Economist Books 2017.
• Friedman, Thomas, (2005), The World Is Flat. New York: Farrar, Straus, Giroux.
• Ginsburg, Helen Lachs, (2010), “Freefall: America, Markets and the Sinking of the World Economy - Joseph E. Stiglitz.” The Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, December, 37 (4), pp.200 - 203 (Book Review).
• Harrison, J. M., (2014), Finding a New Macroeconomics: The Flawed Keynesian Model. A Civil American Debate – http://acivilamericandebate.com/2013/04/27.
• Krugman, Paul, (2009), “What Went Wrong With Economics”, The Economist, 16 July, 2009.
• Leontief, W.W, (1973), “Explanatory Power of the Comparative Cost Theory of International Trade and its Limits” in H.C. Bos (Ed.) Economic Structure and Development: Essays in Honor of Jan Tinbergen. Amsterdam, North Holland. pp. 153-160.
• Maddison, Angus, (2010), “Statistics on World Population, GDP and Per Capita GDP, 1-2008 AD – http://www.ggdc.net/MADDISON/oriindex.htm
• McCann, Philip, (2008), “Globalization and Economic Geography: The World is Curved, Not Flat”, Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society 2008, 1, pp. 351-370.
• McKinsey & Company, (2014a), Global Flows in a Digital Age: How Trade, Finance, People, and Data Connect the World Economy. McKinsey Global Institute, April.
• McKinsey & Company, (2014b), Disruptive Technologies: Advances That Will Transform Life, Business, and the Global Economy. September.
• Porter, M., (1985), Competitive Advantage-Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: The Free Press.
• Quiggin, John, (2010), Zombie Economics: How Dead Ideas Still Walk Among Us. Princeton University Press.
• Stone, R., (1951), ”The Role of Measurement in Economics”. The New March Lectures 1948-1949. Cambridge University Press.
• Stone et. al., (1962), A Social Accounting Matrix for 1960. Vol.2 of ‘A Programme of Growth. Cambridge: Chapman and Hall.
• Sturgeon, Timothy J., (2013), Global Value Chains and Economic Globalization – Towards a New Measurement Framework. Report to Eurostat.
• Tukker, Arnold and Eric Dietzenbacher (2013), “Global Multiregional Input- Output Frameworks: An Introduction and Outlook”, Economic Systems Research, Vol.25, No.1, pp. 1-19.
• UNECE, (2011), The Impact of Globalization on National Accounts. NewYork and Geneva: United Nations.
• World Bank, (2009), World Development Report. Reshaping Economic Geography