Investigation of Self-handicapping Behaviours Among Preservice Teachers of EFL

Öz

While self-handicapping has been extensively studied in the literature, there is limited research in the field of teaching English as a foreign language (EFL). This current study addresses this gap by investigating self-handicapping behaviours among EFL preservice teachers at a state university. The research focused on examining the frequency of self-handicapping behaviours among participants and identifying the factors influencing these. This quantitative study utilized a survey design and involved 106 participants who completed the abridged Self-Handicapping Scale. The descriptive statistics of the responses revealed a moderate level of self-handicapping among preservice teachers, with procrastination and insufficient study habits being the most common behaviours. To identify the factors affecting self-handicapping, various inferential analyses were conducted. Independent samples t-tests were employed to assess the impact of gender and grade, neither of which yielded statistically significant differences. However, there was a notable statistical significance in the participants’ GPA categorizations, as determined by ANOVA, and their external self-handicapping behaviours. Additionally, Pearson correlation analyses indicated a negative relationship between overall self-handicapping and achievement levels. Furthermore, participants’ self-reported achievement levels were found to be significant factors in the manifestation of self-handicapping behaviours. The findings of this study corroborate the results of similar research in the field.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Academic success
• attribution theory
• educational psychology
• preservice teachers
• self-handicapping

İngilizce Öğretmen Adaylarında Kendini Sabote Davranışlarının İncelenmesi

Öz

Kendini sabote, literatürde kapsamlı bir şekilde çalışılmış olsa da yabancı dil olarak İngilizce öğretimi alanında sınırlı sayıda araştırma bulunmaktadır. Bu çalışma, bir devlet üniversitesindeki İngilizce öğretmen adayları arasında kendini sabote davranışlarını araştırarak bu boşluğu ele almaktadır. Araştırma, katılımcılar arasında kendini sabote davranışlarının sıklığını incelemeye ve bunları etkileyen faktörleri belirlemeye odaklanmıştır. Bu nicel çalışmada bir anket tasarımı kullanılmıştır. Toplamda 106 katılımcının yer aldığı bu araştırmada Kendini Sabote Ölçeğinin kısaltılmış versiyonu kullanılmıştır. Yanıtların betimsel istatistikleri, öğretmen adayları arasında orta düzeyde kendini sabote olduğunu ortaya koymuş, erteleme ve yetersiz çalışma alışkanlıklarının en yaygın davranışlar olduğunu göstermiştir. Kendini saboteyi etkileyen faktörleri belirlemek için çeşitli çıkarımsal analizler yapılmıştır. Cinsiyet ve sınıfın etkisini değerlendirmek için bağımsız örneklem t-testleri kullanılmış fakat her iki faktör için istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılıklar ortaya çıkmamıştır. Bununla birlikte, katılımcıların ANOVA ile belirlenen not ortalaması kategorileri ile dışsal kendini sabote davranışları arasında kayda değer bir istatistiksel anlamlılık bulunmuştur. Ayrıca, Pearson korelasyon analizleri, genel olarak kendini sabote ile başarı düzeyleri arasında negatif bir ilişki olduğunu göstermiştir. İlaveten, katılımcıların kendi bildirdikleri başarı düzeylerinin, kendini sabote davranışlarının ortaya çıkmasında önemli faktörler olduğu bulunmuştur. Bu çalışmanın bulguları, alandaki benzer araştırmaların sonuçlarını desteklemektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Akademik başarı
• eğitim psikolojisi
• kendini sabote
• öğretmen adayları
• yükleme kuramı

Kaynakça

1. Akça, F. (2012). An investigation into the self-handicapping behaviors of undergraduates in terms of academic procrastination, the locus of control and academic success. Journal of Education and Learning, 1(2), 288-298. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v1n2p288
2. Akpur, U. (2020). The effect of procrastination on academic achievement: A meta-analysis study. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 6(4), 681-690. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.6.4.681
3. Anlı, G. (2011). Examining the relationship between self-handicapping and psychological well-being in terms of different variables [Master’s thesis, Sakarya University]. CHE Theses Database. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/TezGoster?key=rcbWnuqW6HxCZ_98ARapgnmGWEeAuRNq2T47ko45-UypH3Y0pJYkLQfNSbZ1dqxd
4. Berglas, S., & Jones, E. E. (1978). Drug choice as a self-handicapping strategy in response to noncontingent success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(4), 405-417. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.36.4.405
5. Büyükgöze, H., & Gün, F. (2015). An investigation of research assistants’ self-handicapping tendencies. Hitit University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 8(2), 689-704. https://doi.org/10.17218/husbed.11352
6. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and self-regulation: A control-theory approach to human behavior. Springer.
7. Clarke, I. E., & MacCann, C. (2016). Internal and external aspects of self-handicapping reflect the distinction between motivations and behaviours: Evidence from the self-handicapping scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 100, 6–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.080
8. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.

9. Dietrich, D. (1995). Gender differences in self-handicapping: Regardless of academic or social competence implications. Social Behavior and Personality, 23(4), 402-410. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1995.23.4.403
10. Feick, D. L., & Rhodewalt, F. (1997). The double-edged sword of self-handicapping: Discounting, augmentation, and the protection and enhancement of self-esteem. Motivation and Emotion, 21(2), 147-163. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024434600296
11. Ferrari, J. R., & Tice, D. M. (2000). Procrastination as a self-handicap for men and women: A task-avoidance strategy in a laboratory setting. Journal of Research in Personality, 34(1), 73-83. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1999.2261
12. Ferrari, J. R., O’Callaghan, J., & Newbegin, I. (2005). Prevalence of procrastination in the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia: Arousal and avoidance delays among adults. North American Journal of Psychology, 7(1), 1-6.
13. Glazier, R. A., Hamann, K., Pollock, P. H., & Wilson, B. M. (2019). Age, gender, and student success: Mixing face-to-face and online courses in political science. Journal of Political Science Education, 16(2), 142–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2018.1515636
14. Gündoğdu, R. (2013). Investigation of self-handicapping tendencies of teacher candidates according to demographic variables by controlling self-esteem scores. Turkish Studies: International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish and Turkic, 8(3), 263-277. https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.4398
15. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2013). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson Education Limited.
16. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. John Wiley & Sons.
17. Hirt, E. R., Deppe, R. K., & Gordon, L. J. (1991). Self-reported versus behavioral self-handicapping: Empirical evidence for a theoretical distinction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(6), 981–991. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.6.981
18. Jones, E. E., & Berglas, S. (1978). Control of attributions about the self through self-handicapping strategies: The appeal of alcohol and the role of underachievement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4(2), 200-206. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616727800400205
19. Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 219–266). Academic Press.
20. Jones, E. E., & Rhodewalt, F. (1982). Self-handicapping scale [Database record]. APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t09528-000
21. Kaya, Ç., Uğur, E., Şar, A. H., & Ercengiz, M. (2017). Self-handicapping and irrational beliefs about approval in a sample of teacher candidates. Kastamonu Education Journal, 25(3), 869-880.
22. Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 192–238). University of Nebraska Press.
23. Kelley, H. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28(2), 107-128. https://doi.org/10.1037/2Fh0034225
24. Kimble, C. E., Kimble, E. A., & Croy, N. A. (1998). Development of self-handicapping tendencies. The Journal of Social Psychology, 138(4), 524-534.
25. Kolditz, T. A., & Arkin, R. M. (1982). An impression management interpretation of the self-handicapping strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(3), 492-502. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.3.492
26. Lammers, W. J., Onweugbuzie, A. J., & Slate, J. R. (2001). Academic success as a function of gender, class, age, study habits, and employment of college students. Research in the Schools, 8(2), 71–81.
27. Leary, M. R., & Shepperd, J. A. (1986). Behavioral self-handicaps versus self-reported self-handicaps: A conceptual note. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1265-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224549809600406
28. Leondari, A., & Gonida, E. (2007). Predicting academic self-handicapping in different age groups: The role of personal achievement goals and social goals. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 595-611. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709906X128396
29. Mamaril, N. A., Usher, E. L., & Coyle, B. A. (2013). Academic self-handicapping and self-efficacy as predictors of mathematics achievement of African American middle school students. P20 Motivation and Learning Lab, University of Kentucky, College of Education, Kentucky, USA. https://motivation.uky.edu/files/2013/08/MamarilUsherCoyle.pdf
30. McCrea, S. M., Hirt, E. R., & Milner, B. J. (2008). She works hard for the money: Valuing effort underlies gender differences in behavioral self-handicapping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(2), 292-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.05.006
31. Midgley, C., & Urdan, T. (2001). Academic self-handicapping and achievement goals: A further examination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(1), 61-75. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2000.1041
32. Midgley, C., Arunkumar, R., & Urdan, T. C. (1996). “If I don’t do well tomorrow, there’s a reason”: Predictors of adolescents’ use of academic self-handicapping strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(3), 423–434. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.88.3.423
33. Myers, D. G. (2010). Social psychology (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
34. Özlü, G., & Topkaya, N. (2020). Gender, age, and different perfectionist styles as predictors of self-handicapping among university students. Kastamonu Education Journal, 28(3), 1220-1232. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.3757
35. Pal, G. C. (2007). Is there a universal self-serving attribution bias? Psychological Studies, 52(1), 85-89.
36. Rhodewalt, F. (1990). Self-handicappers: Individual differences in the preference for anticipatory, self-protective acts. In R. L. Higgins, C. R. Snyder & S. Berglas (Eds.), Self-handicapping: The paradox that isn’t (pp. 69-106). Springer.
37. Rhodewalt, F. (2008). Self-handicapping: On the self-perpetuating nature of defensive behavior. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(3), 1255-1268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00117.x
38. Rhodewalt, F., & Davison, J., Jr. (1986). Self-handicapping and subsequent performance: Role of outcome valence and attributional certainty. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 7(4), 307-323. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp0704_5
39. Rhodewalt, F., & Fairfield, M. (1991). Claimed self-handicaps and the self-handicapper: The relation of reduction in intended effort to performance. Journal of Research in Personality, 25(4), 402-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(91)90030-T
40. Rhodewalt, F., & Hill, K. (1995). Self-handicapping in the classroom: The effects of claimed self-handicaps on responses to academic failure. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 16(4), 397-416. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1604_1
41. Rhodewalt, F., & Vohs, K. D. (2005). Defensive strategies, motivation, and the self. In A. Elliot & C. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 548-565). Guilford Press.
42. Şahin, F., & Çoban, Ö. (2020). Effect of school climate, students’ self-handicapping behaviours and demographic characteristics on students’ achievement. Inquiry in Education, 12(2), Article 6. https://digitalcommons.nl.edu/ie/vol12/iss2/6/
43. Schwinger, M., Wirthwein, L., Lemmer, G., & Steinmayr, R. (2014). Academic self-handicapping and achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(3), 744-761. https://doi.org/1037/a0035832
44. Steel P. (2007). The nature of procrastination: a meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychological bulletin, 133(1), 65–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.65
45. Tanrıöğren, Z. M., & Sertel, G. (2019). The relationship between teachers’ level of self-handicapping and perceived organizational support level. Trakya Journal of Education, 9(3), 506-526. https://doi.org/10.24315/tred.498537
46. Urdan, T. (2004). Predictors of academic self-handicapping and achievement: Examining achievement goals, classroom goal structures, and culture. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.251
47. Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2001). Academic self-handicapping: What we know, what more there is to learn. Educational Psychology Review, 13(2), 115-138. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009061303214
48. Weiner, B. (1972). Attribution theory and the psychology of motivation. General Learning Press.
49. Yavuzer, Y. (2015). Investigating the relationship between self-handicapping tendencies, self-esteem, and cognitive distortions. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(4), 879-890. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.4.2434
50. Yusuf, M. A., & Adigun, J. T. (2010). The influence of school sex, location and type on students’ academic performance. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(2), 81–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2010.11889