Artistic Research: Theoretical Foundations, Epistemological Debates and Methodological Directions

Öz

Artistic research constitutes an interdisciplinary mode of inquiry in which the artist merges the creative process with knowledge production, thereby interweaving theoretical and practical dimensions. Emerging prominently in the final quarter of the twentieth century, this approach gained theoretical and methodological traction particularly through the integration of art schools into universities and the academic recognition of artistic production at the postgraduate level within the framework of the Bologna Process. Artistic research challenges the conventions of traditional scientific paradigms by proposing an alternative epistemological model of knowledge generation. Within this framework, it advocates for epistemological pluralism, embracing not only objective and text-based forms of knowledge but also embodied, intuitive, and experiential modes as legitimate forms of inquiry. Three key theorists have played a pivotal role in shaping the discourse of artistic research: Christopher Frayling provided an initial taxonomy that laid the groundwork for a theoretical framework; Henk Borgdorff articulated the philosophical foundations of artistic research as a mode of knowledge production; and Robin Nelson proposed a reflexive, practice-based methodological structure for its implementation. This study undertakes a comparative analysis of these three theoretical perspectives, examining their epistemological premises and methodological approaches through selected examples of artistic practice. In doing so, it aims to elucidate the institutional and conceptual contours of artistic research

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Artistic Research
• Art Practice
• Art Education
• Knowledge Production
• Pedagogy

Sanatsal Araştırma: Kuramsal Temeller, Epistemolojik Tartışmalar ve Metodik Yönelimler

Öz

Sanatsal araştırma (artistic research), sanatçının yaratıcı sürecini bilgi üretimiyle birleştirdiği, teorik ve pratik süreçlerin iç içe geçtiği disiplinler arası bir araştırma biçimidir. Özellikle 20. yüzyılın son çeyreğinde, sanat okullarının üniversitelerle bütünleşmesi ve Bologna Süreci’nde lisansüstü düzeyinde sanat üretimlerinin akademik tanınırlık kazanması, bu yaklaşımın kuramsal ve metodolojik olarak tartışılmasına zemin hazırlamıştır. Sanatsal araştırma, geleneksel bilimsel paradigmaların dışında işleyen alternatif bir bilgi üretim biçimi önerir. Bu bağlamda, epistemolojik çeşitliliği savunur; sadece nesnel ve metinsel bilgi üretimini değil, bedensel, sezgisel ve deneyimsel bilgi biçimlerini de araştırma nesnesi olarak kabul eder. Sanatsal araştırmanın gelişiminde önemli rol oynamış üç temel kuramcıdan söz etmek gerekir: Christopher Frayling, bu alanı sınıflandırarak teorik bir çerçeve sunmuş; Henk Borgdorff, sanatsal araştırmanın bilgi üretme kapasitesini felsefi bir düzlemde temellendirmiş; Robin Nelson ise bu üretimin nasıl metodolojik olarak kurgulanabileceğine dair dönüşlü ve uygulama temelli bir yapı önermiştir. Bu çalışma, söz konusu üç kuramsal yaklaşımı karşılaştırmalı bir biçimde analiz etmekte; kuramların dayandığı epistemolojik varsayımları ve araştırma yöntemlerini örnek sanat çalışmalarıyla birlikte ele alarak sanatsal araştırmanın kurumsal ve kavramsal çerçevesini detaylandırmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sanatsal Araştırma,
• Sanat Pratiği,
• Sanat Eğitimi,
• Bilgi Üretimi,
• Pedagoji

Kaynakça

1. Association Européenne des Conservatoires. (2015). Artistic research: An AEC Council ‘white paper’. https://aec-music.eu/services/artistic-research
2. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Clarendon Press.
3. Avrupa Komisyonu. (2022). The Bologna Process and the European Higher Education Area. https://education.ec.europa.eu/education-levels/higher-education/inclusive-and-connected-higher-education/bologna-process
4. Bishop, C. (2012). Artificial hells: Participatory art and the politics of spectatorship. Verso.
5. Borgdorff, H. (2012). The conflict of the faculties: Perspectives on artistic research and academia. Leiden University Press.
6. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
7. Candy, L., & Edmonds, E. (2018). Practice-based research in the creative arts. Leonardo, 51(1), 63–69.
8. Carlson, M. (2014). Performans: Eleştirel bir giriş (B. Güçbilmez, Çev.). Dost Kitabevi.

9. Duxbury, L., Grierson, E., & Waite, D. (Ed.). (2007). Thinking through practice. RMIT Publishing.
10. Eliasson, O. (2007). Experience and the project. Olafur Eliasson: Your Lighthouse içinde. Hatje Cantz.
11. European Council. (2000). Lisbon European Council 23-24.03.2000: Conclusions of the Presidency. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/lis1_en.htm
12. Eviner, İ. (2009). Harem [Video]. https://incieviner.net/tr/work/harem-2/
13. Foucault, M. (1977). Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews (D. Bouchard, Ed.; D. Bouchard & S. Simon, Çev.). Cornell University Press.
14. Frayling, C. (1993). Research in art and design. Royal College of Art Research Papers, 1(1), 1–5.
15. Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and method (D. G. Marshall, Çev.). Continuum.
16. Habermas, J. (1993). “İdeoloji” olarak teknik ve bilim (M. Tüzel, Çev.). Yapı Kredi Yayınları. (Orijinal eserin yayımlanma tarihi: 1968)
17. Hanisch, C. (1970). The personal is political. S. Firestone & A. Koedt (Ed.), Notes from the second year: Women’s liberation içinde (ss. 76–78). Radical Feminism.
18. Haseman, B. (2006). A manifesto for performative research. Media International Australia incorporating Culture and Policy, 118, 98–106.
19. Hohenstein, F. T. (2009). ‘Art knowledge’ at the Academy of Fine Arts Vienna. Arts & Research: A Journal of Ideas, Context and Methods, 2(2).
20. Hug, J. (2020). Propositions for unfinished thinking: The research score as a medium of artistic research [Doktora tezi, University of the Arts Helsinki]. Research Catalogue. https://www.researchcatalogue.net/view/433112/596407
21. Järviluoma, H., Lilja-Viherlampi, L., & Vilkko, A. (2021). Multimodality: Art as a meaning-making process. A. C. Bundy, S. Välisari & S. Tanskanen (Ed.), Arts-based research, resilience and well-being across the lifespan içinde (ss. 41–57). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89236-4_3
22. Kuru, A. Ş. (2016). Bilgi üretim formu olarak sanat ve pedagojik projeler. Yedi: Sanat, Tasarım ve Bilim Dergisi, (15), 1–10.
23. Lesage, D. (2009). The academy is back: On education, the Bologna Process, and the doctorate in the arts. e-flux Journal, (4).
24. Nelson, R. (2013). Practice as research in the arts: Principles, protocols, pedagogies, resistances. Palgrave Macmillan.
25. Parviainen, J. (2006). The choreography of learning: Knowledge of movement in the age of mobile technology. Leisure Studies, 25(4), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614360600896358
26. Peters, G. (2017). Knowledge production in artistic research: Opportunities and challenges. Music & Practice, 3. https://www.musicandpractice.org/knowledge-production-in-artistic-research-opportunities-and-challenges/
27. Platon. (2021). Şölen-Dostluk (S. Eyüboğlu & E. Erhat, Çev.). Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
28. Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Doubleday.
29. Putnam, H. (1995). Pragmatism. Blackwell.
30. Rogoff, I. (2011). Academy as potentiality. F. Allen (Ed.), Education (Documents of Contemporary Art) içinde (ss. 132–133). Whitechapel Gallery & MIT Press.
31. Schwab, M. (2019). Artistic research and the academic borderlands. Journal for Artistic Research (JAR). https://www.jar-online.net/en/artistic-research-academic-borderlands
32. Štech, S. (2011). The Bologna Process as a New Public Management tool in higher education. Journal of Pedagogy, 2(2), 123-142.
33. Sullivan, G. (2005). Art practice as research: Inquiry in the visual arts. SAGE.
34. Tolstoy, L. (1904). What is art? (A. Maude, Çev.). Funk & Wagnalls Company.
35. Görsel 1. Hugh Lane Gallery. Francis Bacon's studio, 2024. https://hughlane.ie/arts_artists/francis-bacons-studio
36. Görsel 2-3. Olafur Eliasson. Din blinde passager, 2010. Arken Modern Sanat Müzesi, Kopenhag. Foto: Thilo Frank / Studio Olafur Eliasson.
37. Görsel 4. İnci Eviner. Harem, 2009. Video, 3' döngü.
38. Görsel 5. Ai Weiwei. Sunflower Seeds, 2010. Tate Modern Turbine Hall.