ÖĞRETMEN EĞİTİMİNE KLİNİK DENEYİMLERİ ENTEGRE ETMEK İÇİN MÜFRADAT HARİTASI

Öz

K-12 çevrelerinde müfredat uyumu yaratmak için kullanılan bir araç olan haritalama, teori ve pratiği birbirine bağlamada uygun bir araç olmasına rağmen, yüksek öğretim ortamlarında seyrek olarak uygulanmaktadır. Bu çalışma, dört adet öğretmen eğitimi programının klinik deneyimleri arasında bir tutarlılık yaratmak için yeniden-araçlandırma dahilinde akademisyenlerce desteklenen müfredat haritalandırma yollarını rapor etmektedir. Müfredat haritalandırma aşamasının belge analizleri, bu haritalandırmanın, akademisyenler için yapılandırılmış fırsatların, gelişmekte olan iyi tanımlanmış klinik faaliyetlerine yatay ve dikey ders aktiveleri akışını geliştiren araçlar yoluyla entegre edilebilmesi için faydalı bir araç olduğunu göstermektedir.

Anahtar Sözcükler: Klinik deneyimler, hizmet öncesi öğretmen eğitimi, müfredat tasarımı, akademisyen gelişimi.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Klinik deneyimler, hizmet öncesi öğretmen eğitimi, müfredat tasarımı, akademisyen gelişimi

Kaynakça

1. American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education. (2010). The clinical preparation of teachers: A policy brief. Washington, D.C.: AACTE. Retrieved Clinical%20Prep%20Paper_03-11-2010.pdf.
2. http://www.aacte.org/pdf/Government_Relations/
3. Bath, D., Smith, C., Stein, S., & Swann, R. (2004). Beyond mapping and embedding graduate attributes: Bringing together quality assurance and action learning to create a validated and living curriculum. Higher Education Research and Development, 23, 313-328.
4. Beck, C., & Kosnick, C. (2002). Professors and the practicum: Involvement of university faculty in preservice practicum supervision. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 6-19.
5. Blanton, L. P., & Pugach, M. (2007). Collaborative programs in general and special teacher education: An action guide for higher education and state policymakers. Washington, D.C.: Center for Improving Teacher Quality, Chief State School Officers.
6. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
7. Boyd, D., Grossman, P., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2008). Teacher preparation and student achievement. Albany, NY: Teacher Policy Research, SUNY-Albany.
8. Cibulka, J. G. (2009). Meeting urgent national needs in P-12 education: Improving relevance, evidence, and performance in teacher preparation. National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. Retrieved from http://www.ncate.org/public/062309_TeacherEdRequirements.asp

9. Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013-1055.
11. Gabriel, R. (2010). The case for differentiated professional support: Toward a phase theory of teacher development. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 4(1): 86-95.
12. Goe, L., Bell, C., & Little, O. (2008). Approaches to evaluating teacher effectiveness: A research synthesis. Washington DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. Retrieved on June 18, 2009, http://www.tqsource.org/publications/EvaluatingTeachEffectiveness.pd f from
13. Hardman, M. (2009). Redesigning the preparation of all teachers within the framework of an integrated program model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 583-587.
14. Hennessy, S., & Deaney, R. (2009). ―Intermediate theory‖ building: Integrating multiple teacher and researcher perspectives through in- depth video analysis of pedagogic strategies. Teachers College Record, 111(7), 1753-1795.
15. Jacobs, H. H. (1997). Mapping the big picture: Integrating curriculum and assessment K-12. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
16. Smith, E., & Evans, C. (2008). Providing effective mentoring for alternate route beginning teachers. The Teacher Educator, 43, 249-278.
17. Sumsion, J., & Goodfellow, J. (2004). Identifying generic skills through curriculum mapping: A critical evaluation. Higher Education Research and Development, 23, 329-346.
18. Tierney, W. G. (1999). Faculty productivity and academic culture. In W. G. Tierney (Ed.), Faculty productivity: Facts, fictions, and issues (pp. 39– 54). New York, NY: Falmer Press.
19. Uchiyama, K. P., & Radin, J. L. (2009). Curriculum mapping in higher education: A vehicle for collaboration. Innovations in Higher Education, 33, 271-280.
20. Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis (2nd ed). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
21. Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college- and university- based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 89-99.