Views of Academicians on Design Thinking Skills in Different Disciplines in Higher Education

Öz

Design thinking is a human-oriented and creative problem-solving skill that can empathize with the user's emotions. Today, traditional problem-solving approaches are replaced by design thinking practices that include multidimensional thinking skills. The mission of higher education curricula is to enable students to use their design thinking skills effectively in higher education. In this study, the views of academicians on design thinking skills in different disciplines in higher education were consulted. A qualitative research method was used in the study and data were collected by interview technique. The research was carried out in İstanbul in the fall semester of the 2021-2022 academic year, with the participation of academic staff from two state universities (n=15). In this context, a six-question semi-structured interview form developed by the researchers was used as a data collection tool. The data were analyzed with thematic coding and content analysis techniques, which are among the qualitative analysis methods. According to the research findings, academics think that there is a "high, versatile and complementary relationship" between design and thinking skills. They express the concept of design thinking as "people-based, user-need-based, solution-oriented and creativity-based". They express the concept of design thinking as "human-based, user-need-based, solution-oriented and creativity-based". It is stated that design thinking individuals should have characteristics such as "empathy, analysis, openness to innovations, high imagination, attention to details and creative thinking". It is seen that academicians use design thinking in their courses in practices such as "problem solving method, design project, searching real-life problems, developing thinking skills". In addition, the academicians stated that "they do not have knowledge about design thinking skills, some of them have theoretical knowledge, but those who have knowledge have weak practice levels". Finally, it is seen that they make suggestions that "design thinking practices should be added to the course content, applied training should be increased, thinking skills should be developed and innovative thoughts should be included".

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Design thinking
• Higher education curricula
• Academicians

Kaynakça

1. Aflatoony, L. (2015). Development, implementation, and evaluation of an interaction design thinking course in the context of secondary education (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://summit.sfu.ca/item/16524
2. Anderson, N. (2012). Design Thinking: Employing an Effective Multidisciplinary Pedagogical Framework To Foster Creativity and Innovation in Rural and Remote Education. Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, 22(2), 43–52.
3. Asquith, L., Dorst, C. H., Kaldor, L. & Watson, R. (2013). Design+Crime: Introduction to a special issue of Crime Prevention and Community Safety. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 15, 169-174.
4. Arcan, A. (2019). Sosyal bilgilerde tasarım odaklı düşünme yaklaşımı. Doktora tezi, Gazi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
5. Atacan, B. (2020). 7. sınıf fen bilgisi dersinde tasarım odaklı düşünmeye yönelik etkinliğin öğrencilerin motivasyon, ekip çalışması ve derse ilişkin bakış açılarına etkisi. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
6. Aydemir, A. (2019). Sosyal bilgilerde tasarım odaklı düşünme yaklaşımı (Doktora tezi). Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi veri tabanından erişildi (Tez No. 538473).
7. Bates, T. (2016). Teaching in a digital age, Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia.
8. Blizzard, J., Klotz, L., Potvin, G., Hazari, Z., Cribbs, J. and Godwin, A. (2015). Using survey questions to identify and learn more about those who exhibit design thinking traits. Design Studies, 38, 92-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.02.002

9. Brown, T. (2008.). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84.
10. Brown, T. (2009), Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York: Harper Business.
11. Brown, T. (2015). When Everyone Is Doing Design Thinking, Is It Still a Competitive Advantage. Harvard Business Review, 27.
12. Bruffee, K. A. (1999). Collaborative learning: Higher education, interdependence, and the authority of knowledge (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press
13. Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design issues, 8(2), 5-21.
14. Bürotime (2021). Tasarım odaklı düşünme. 03. 12.2021 tarihinde https://blog.burotime.com/tasarim-odakli-dusunme-design-thinking/ adresinden alınmıştır.
15. Chen, C. (2013). Immersive learning: A creative pedagogy. The International Journal of Pedagogy and Curriculum, 19(2), 41–52.
16. Çiftçi, A. (2020). Tasarım odaklı düşünme temelli bir enerji dönüşümleri modülünün geliştirilmesi ve uygulanması. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü/Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi.
17. Cabello Llamas, A. (2015). Human-centered innovation processes, the case of design thinking in nascent and large firm. Programme Doctoral en Management de la Technologie, École Polytechnıque Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne.
18. Chesson, D. (2017). "Design Thinker Profile: Creating and Validating a Scale for Measuring Design Thinking Capabilities” Dissertations & Theses. 388.
19. Curedale, R. (2013). Design Thinking: Process and Methods Manual, CA: Design Community.
20. Dosi, C., Rosati, F. & Vignoli, M. (2018). Measuring design thinking mindset. In DS 92: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference (pp. 1991-2002).
21. Efeoglu, A., Møller, C., Sérié, M. & Boer, H. (2013). Design thinking: characteristics and promises. In Proceedings of 14th International CINet Conference on Business Development and Co-creation (pp. 241-256).
22. Enstitü, (2021). Tasarım odaklı düşünme. 03.12.2021 tarihinde https://www.iienstitu.com/blog/tasarim-odakli-dusunme-design-thinking adresinden alınmıştır.
23. Gibbons, S. (2016). Design thinking 101. (https://www.nngroup.com/articles/design-thinking/ sayfasından erişilmiştir.
24. Girgin, D. (2020). 21. yüzyılın öğrenme deneyimi: öğretmenlerin tasarım odaklı düşünme eğitimine ilişkin görüşleri. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 49 (226), 53-91.
25. Greene, M., Gonzalez, R. & Papalambros, P. (2019). Measuring Systems Engineering and Design Thinking Attitudes. Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, 1(1), 3939-3948. doi:10.1017/dsi.2019.401
26. Groeger, L. & Schweitzer, J. (2014, July). Transformational leadership, design thinking and the innovative organization. In European Group for Organizational Studies Conference, At Rotterdam, Netherlands.
27. Herrington, A. & Herrington, J. (2006). What is an authentic learning environment? 25 Ocak 2019 tarihinde http://www.igi-global.com/viewtitlesample. aspx?id=27373 adresinden erişildi.
28. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.
29. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G. & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Seller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107.
30. Hung, D., Lim, K. Y. T. & Lee, S.-S. (Eds.). (2014). Adaptivity as a transformative disposition for learning in the 21st century. Singapore: Springer.
31. IDEOU, (2021). What is design thinking. Accessed in January 11 from https://www.ideou.com/blogs/inspiration/what-is-design-thinking webpage.
32. İlke Analiz, (2021). Dijital çağda beceri eğitimi. 07.12.2021 tarihinde https://www.ilkeanaliz.net/2021/11/01/dijital-cagda-beceri-egitimi-ve-yuksekogretim/ adresinden alınmıştır.
33. İstanbul Boğaziçi Enstitü (2021). Tasarım odaklı düşünme. 07.12.2021 tarihinde https://istanbulbogazicienstitu.com/tasarim-odakli-dusunme-design-thinking-ne-demek adresinden alınmıştır.
34. İşbank. (2021). Tasarım odaklı düşünme. 10.01.2022 tarihinde https://www.isbank.com.tr/blog/tasarim-odakli-dusunme adresinden ulaşılmıştır.
35. Jobst, B., Köppen, E., Lindberg, T., Moritz, J., Rhinow, H. & Meinel, C. (2012). The faith-factor in design thinking: Creative confidence through education at the design thinking schools Potsdam and Stanford. In Design thinking research (pp. 35-46). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
36. Johansson‐Sköldberg, U., Woodilla, J. and Çetinkaya, M. (2013). Design thinking: past, present and possible futures. Creativity and innovation management, 22(2), 121-146. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12023
37. Kelley, T. & Kelley, D. (2013). Creative confidence: Unleashing the creative potential within us all. Currency.
38. Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Wong, B. & Hong, H. (2015). Design thinking for education: conceptions and applications in teaching and learning. Singapore: Springer.
39. Kolb, A. Y. & Kolb, D. A. (2008). Experiential learning theory: A dynamic, holistic approach to management learning, education and development. In S. J. Armstrong, & C. Fukami (Eds.). Handbook of management learning, education and development (pp. 42–68). London: Sage Publications.
40. Liedtka, J. (2015). Perspective: Linking design thinking with innovation outcomes through cognitive bias reduction. Journal of product innovation management, 32(6), 925-938. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12163
41. MEB. (2007). İlköğretim düşünme eğitimi dersi (6, 7 ve 8. sınıf) öğretim programı. Ankara: Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı.
42. MEB. (2017). Millî eğitim istatistikleri: Örgün eğitim 2016-2017. Mayıs 2020, http://sgb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2017_09/08151328_meb_istatistikleri_orgun_egitim_2016_2017.pdf
43. MEB. (2018a). 2023 eğitim vizyonu. Mayıs 2020, http://2023vizyonu.meb.gov.tr/doc/2023_EGITIM_VIZYONU.pdf
44. MEB. (2021). 2023 vizyonu. (07.12.2021) tarihinde https://2023vizyonu.meb.gov.tr/doc/2023_EGITIM_VIZYONU.pdf adresinden alınmıştır.
45. Noel, L. A. & Liub, T. L. (2017). Using design thinking to create a new education paradigm for elementary level children for higher student engagement and success. Design and Technology Education, 22(1), n1.
46. Öğretmen Ağı. (2021). Tasarım odaklı düşünme. 03.12.2021 tarihinde https://ogretmenagi.medium.com/ibm-tasar%C4%B1m odakl%C4%B1 d%C3%BC%C5%9F%C3%BCnme eri%C5%9Filebilir ya%C5%9Fam-%C3%A7al%C4%B1%C5%9Ftay%C4%B1-69b587e2da4b sayfasından alınmıştır.
47. Rauth, I., Köppen, E., Jobst, B. and Meinel, C. (2010). Design thinking: an educational model towards creative confidence. In DS 66-2: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on design creativity (ICDC 2010).
48. Razzouk, R. & Shute, V. (2012). Design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research, 82, 330–348.
49. Royalty, A., Oishi, L. & Roth, B. (2012). “I Use It Every Day”: Pathways to Adaptive Innovation After Graduate Study in Design Thinking. In Design thinking research (pp. 95-105). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
50. Rusmann, A. and Bundsgaard, J. (2019, October). Developing a Test to Measure Design Thinking. In European Conference on Games Based Learning (pp. 587-XXII). Academic Conferences International Limited. doi: 10.34190/GBL.19.071
51. Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and discussions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(1), 9-20.
52. Scheer, A. & Plattner, H. (2011). Transforming Constructivist Learning into Action: Design Thinking in education. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 17(3), 8–19.
53. Scheer, A., Noweski, C. and Meinel, C. (2012). Transforming constructivist learning into action: Design thinking in education. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 17(3), 8-19.
54. Skaggs, P., Fry, R. & Howell, B. (2009). Innovations Unlimited: Thinking About Design Thinking. In The NCIIA 13th Annual Meeting (p. 2009). Washington, D.C.
55. Soyupak, O. (2019). Endüstri ürünleri tasarımı eğitimi ve girişimcilik arasında kurulabilecek etkileşim ve iş birlikleri: İTÜ ekosistemi üzerinden deneysel bir çalışma (Doktora Tezi)., ITU, İstanbul.
56. Sürmelioğlu, Y. & Erdem, M. (2021). Öğretimde Tasarım Odaklı Düşünme Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 18 (39), 223-254. DOI: 10.26466/opus.833362
57. Şahin, E. (2019). Tasarım odaklı düşünme yönteminin benlik saygısı ve yaratıcılık ile bilişsel ve duygusal bağlamda ilişkilendirilmesi: bir etkinlik çalışması (Yüksek lisans tezi). 03.12.2021 tarihinde Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi veri tabanından erişildi (Tez No. 591397).
58. Taşkıran, A. (2017). Dijital çağda yükseköğretim. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3 (1), 96-109.
59. Von Thienen, J.P.A., Royalty, A. & Meinel, C. (2017). Design thinking in higher education: How students become dedicated creative problem solvers. In C. Zhou (ed.), Handbook of research on creative problem-solving skill development in higher education (pp. 306-328). Hershey: IGI Global.
60. Watson, A. D. (2015). Design Thinking for Life. Art Education, 68(3), 12–18.
61. Yang, C. M. (2018). Applying design thinking as a method for teaching packaging design. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(5), 52-61.
62. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (10. baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.