A Systematic Review of Research on English Language Teacher Education Published in Three Flagship Journals (1997-2016)

Öz

Systematic reviews of research with a focus on methodological and thematic concerns are being increasingly popular considering their roles in helping researchers keep track of recent topical trends and up-to-date research tendencies in a particular field. This review of research probes into the research studies on English language teacher education (ELTE) published in three flagship teacher education journals (Teaching and Teacher Education, European Journal of Teacher Education, Journal of Teacher Education, N=139) in the last two decades (1997-2016). The articles were classified and analyzed on a collaborative coding basis through a paper classification template designed by the researchers in order to reveal the research design, sampling, data collection tools and data analysis procedures as well as the thematic trends. The prominent findings are as follows: (i) there is a significant increase in the number of ELTE articles in the second decade in comparison to the first ten years, (ii) qualitative research has been the evergreen paradigm adopted in these articles, and (iii) identity construct is highlighted as the most established area of research on English language teachers.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Teacher Education,Second Language Teacher Education,English Language Teaching,Systematic Review

İngilizce Öğretmeni Eğitimi Alanında Yayımlanmış Araştırma Makalelerinin İncelenmesi: Önde Gelen Üç Dergi Özelinde Sistematik Bir Analiz (1997-2016)

Öz

Metodoloji ve tema odaklı yapılan sistematik derleme çalışmalarının sayısı gün geçtikçe artmaktadır. Bu tür çalışmaların sayısının artması, araştırmacıların kendi alanlarında yapılan çalışmaların konusal yönelimlerinin ve dağılımlarının takibini kolaylaştırması bakımından önemlidir. Ayrıca, sistematik derlemeler, bir alanda yapılan çalışmaların metodolojik eğilimlerinin belirli bir zaman içinde uğradığı potansiyel değişimleri de araştırmacılara etkin bir şekilde sunar. Bu çalışma, öğretmen eğitimi alanında uluslararası düzeyde öne çıkan üç önemli dergide son 20 yılda (1997-2016) yayımlanmış olan İngilizce öğretmeni eğitimi alanındaki araştırma makalelerinin sistematik bir incelemesidir (N=139). Elde edilen makaleler araştırma deseni, örneklem, veri toplama araçları, veri analiz yöntemleri ve konu dağılımları bakımından incelenmiştir. Makaleler, araştırmacılar tarafından hazırlanan makale sınıflama şablonu kullanılarak işbirlikli kodlama yöntemiyle sınıflandırılmış ve analiz edilmiştir. İncelenen çalışmalara ilişkin ortaya çıkan temel bulgular şunlardır: (i) ilk on yıla kıyasla, ikinci on yılda (2007-2016) söz konusu dergilerde İngilizce öğretmeni eğitimi ile ilgili yayımlanan çalışmaların sayısında önemli bir artış görülmüştür. (ii) Nitel araştırmanın, incelenen makalelerde 20 yıllık dönemde her zaman en çok benimsenen paradigma olduğu belirlenmiştir. (iii) Kimlik kavramının İngilizce öğretmenleri üzerinde en çok çalışılan konu olduğu saptanmıştır. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Öğretmen Eğitimi,Yabancı Dil Öğretmeni Eğitimi,İngiliz dili eğitimi,Sistematik analiz

Kaynakça

1. Adıgüzel, O. C., & Ergünay, O. (2012). An investigation of dissertations on values in Turkey from the perspective of educational science and teacher training. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 11(41), 18-33.
2. Alptekin, C., & Tatar, S. (2011). Research on foreign language teaching and learning in Turkey (2005-2009). Language Teaching, 44, 328-353. doi:10.1017/S026144481100005X
3. Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher Education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 10-20, doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007.
4. Benson, P., Chik, A., Gao, X., Huang, J., & Wang, W. (2009). Qualitative research in language teaching and learning journals, 1997-2006. The Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 79-90.
5. Bernhardt, E., & Hammadou, J. (1987). A decade of research in foreign language teacher education. The Modern Language Journal, 71(3), 289-299.
6. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative research journal, 9(2), 27-40.
7. Cavas, B. (2015). Research trends in science education international: A content analysis for the last five years (2011-2015). Science Education International, 25(4), 573-588.
8. Erdoğan, M., Marcinkowski, T., & Ok, A. (2009). Content analysis of selected features of K‐8 environmental education research studies in Turkey, 1997-2007. Environmental Education Research, 15(5), 525-548 doi: 10.1080/13504620903085776.

9. Freeman, D., & Richards, J. C. (eds.) (1996). Teacher learning in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Freeman, D., & Johnson, K. E. (1998). Reconceptualizing the knowledge‐base of language teacher education. Tesol Quarterly, 32(3), 397-417.
11. Gao, Y., Li, L., & Lü, J. (2001). Trends in research methods in applied linguistics: China and the West. English for Specific Purposes, 20, 1-14.
12. Gao, A. X., Liao, Y., & Li, Y. (2014). Empirical studies on foreign language learning and teaching in China (2008-2011): A review of selected research. Language Teaching, 47, 56-79, doi:10.1017/S0261444813000414.
13. Göktaş, Y., Hasançebi, F., Varışoğlu, B., Akçay, A., Bayrak, N., Baran, M., & Sözbilir, M. (2012). Trends in educational research in Turkey: A content analysis. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12(1), 443-460.
14. Guba, E. G. (1990). The alternative paradigm dialog. In E. G. Guba (Ed.), The paradigm dialog (pp. 17-27). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15. Gül, S., & Sözbilir, M. (2016). International trends in biology education research from 1997 to 2014: A content analysis of papers in selected journals. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(6), 1631-1651, doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2015.1363a.
16. Gülmez, D., & Yavuz, M. (2016). The evaluation of the articles related with educational leadership and administration published in 2012 in terms of aim and method. Elementary Education Online, 15(2), 318-329. DOI: 10.17051/io.2016.35708
17. Hallinger, P. (2013). A conceptual framework for systematic reviews of research in educational leadership and management. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(2), 126-149.
18. Harklau, L. (2011). Approaches and methods in recent qualitative research. Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, 2, 175-189.
19. Hrastinski, S., & Keller, C. (2007). An examination of research approaches that underlie research on educational technology: a review from 2000 to 2004. J. Educational Computing Research, 36(2), 175-190.
20. Hsu, T. C. (2005). Research methods and data analysis procedures used by educational researchers. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 28(2), 109-133.
21. Hussein, G. (2015). A content analysis evaluation of The Journal of Teaching English with Technology (TEwT) between the years of 2008 & 2013. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 31-36.
22. Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational researcher, 33(7), 14-26.
23. Karadağ, E. (Ed.). (2015). Leadership and organizational outcomes: meta-analysis of emprical studies. Springer: Switzerland.
24. Keselman, H. J., Huberty, C. J., Mix, L. M., Olejnik, S., Cribbie, R. A., Donahue, B., Kowalchuk, R. K., Lowman, L. L., Petoskey, M. D., Keselman, J. C., & Levin J. R. (1998). Statistical practices of educational researchers: an analysis of their ANOVA, MANOVA and ANCOVA analyses. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 350-386.
25. Kılıç, S. & Arslan, S. (2016). A meta-evaluation of published articles on adult education in Turkey. Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty, 18(2), 865-899. DOI=10.17556/jef.35782.
26. Kleinsasser, R. C. (2013). Language teachers: Research and studies in language(s) education, teaching, and learning in Teaching and Teacher Education, 1985-2012. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 86-96, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.08.011.
27. Lazaraton, A. (1995). Qualitative research in applied linguistics: A progress report. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 455-472.
28. Lazaraton, A. (2005). Quantitative research methods. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language learning (pp. 209-224). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Lee, M. H., Wu, Y. T., & Tsai, C. C. (2009). Research trends in science education from 2003 to 2007: A content analysis of publications in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 31(15), 1999-2020, doi: 10.1080/09500690802314876.
30. Magnan, S. S. (2005). From the editor: Presenting the special issue. Modern Language Journal, 89, 315-316.
31. Mutlu, G. (2015). Strategy training in language learning: A review of available research in Turkey. Necmettin Erbakan University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 1(1), 35-58.
32. Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2011). Identity, language learning, and social change. Language Teaching, 44(4), 412-446.
33. Özmen, K. S., Cephe, P. T., & Kınık, B. (2016). Trends in doctoral research on English language teaching in Turkey. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16, 1737-1759.
34. Pennington, M. C., & Richards, J. C. (2016). Teacher identity in language teaching: integrating personal, contextual, and professional factors. RELC Journal, 47(1), 5-23.
35. Reimer, B. (1996). Qualitative research and the post-positivist mind. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 123-126.
36. Ryan, A. B. (2006). Post-positivist approaches to research. Researching and writing your thesis: a guide for postgraduate students, 12-26.
37. Seçer, İ., Ay, İ., Ozan, C., & Yılmaz, B. Y. (2014). Research trends in the field of guidance and psychological counseling: A content analysis]. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 5(41), 49-60.
38. Tsai, C-C., & Wen, M. L. (2005). Research and trends in science education from 1998 to 2002: A content analysis of publication in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 27(1), 3-14.
39. Turan, S., Karadağ, E., Bektaş, F., & Yalçın, M. (2014). Knowledge production in educational administration in Turkey: an overview of researches in journal of educational administration: theory and practice-2003 to 2013. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 20(1), 93-119.
40. Varghese, M., Morgan, B., Johnston, B., & Johnson, K. A. (2005). Theorizing language teacher identity: Three perspectives and beyond. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 4(1), 21-44.
41. Vélez-Rendón, G. (2002). Second language teacher education: A review of the literature. Foreign Language Annals, 35(4), 457-467.
42. Wright, T. (2010). Second language teacher education: Review of recent research on practice. Language teaching, 43(3), 259-296.
43. Yıldız, N. G., Melekoğlu, M. A., & Paftalı, A. T. (2016). Special Education Research in Turkey. Elementary Education Online, 15(4), 1076-1089.
44. Yılmaz, K., & Altınkurt, Y. (2012). An examination of articles published on preschool education in Turkey. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice. Special Issue (Autumn), 3227-3241.
45. Yücedağ, T., & Erdoğan, A. (2011). Investigation of mathematics education studies according to some variables studied between 2000-2009 years in Turkey. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 10(2), 825-838.