ÖRGÜTSEL DİKOTOMİ KAVRAMININ YÖNETİM AÇISINDAN ÖNEMİ

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2, 141 - 155, 29.12.2020

Gülşen Kırpık

https://doi.org/10.46737/emid.833019

Öz

Çok eskiden beri yönetim açısından önemsenen örgütsel dikotomi kavramının son yıllarda makale, bildiri, tez, kitap ya da kitap bölümlerinde sıklıkla kullanılır hale geldiği görülmektedir. Temel örgütsel dikotomi kavramı ile, içinde belirli kişilikleri ve ihtiyaç eğilimleri olan bireyler ile belirli rolleri ve beklentileri olan örgütlerden bahsedilmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, örgütsel dikotomi kavramının yönetim açısından öneminin ortaya konulmasıdır. Bu bağlamda Google Scholar veri tabanında yayınlanan çeşitli akademik yayınlar kapsamlı literatür taraması ile değerlendirilmiştir. Örneklem olarak incelenen 125 uluslararası akademik çalışma SPSS 22.0 programında çözümlenmiştir. Dolayısıyla bu çalışmada hem nitel hem nicel yöntem birlikte kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın amacına ulaşmak için istatistiki programda frekans ve yüzde dağılım analizleri ile ki-kare analizlerinden yararlanılmıştır. Genel olarak, betimsel analiz sonuçlarına göre örgütsel dikotomi kavramı ile ilgili çalışmaların, büyük çoğunluğunun (%62,4’ünün) 2000-2020 yılları arasında yayınlandığı, iktisadi ve idari bilimler alanı (%36) ile ilgili olduğu ve çoğunlukla Amerika Birleşik Devletleri’nde (%63,2) yayınlandığı bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır. Ayrıca, örgütsel dikotomi ile ilgili çalışmaların yapıldığı ülkeler ile söz konusu çalışmaların yayın yılları arasında bir ilişki olup olmadığına yönelik yapılan ki-kare testi sonucunda, çalışmaların yayınlandığı ülkeler ile çalışmaların yayın yılları arasında anlamlı bir ilişki olduğu (0,024<0,05) ortaya konulmuştur. Ancak, örgütsel dikotomi kavramının her ne kadar iktisadi ve idari bilimlerde çok fazla kullanılmış olduğu görülse de söz konusu kavramın ilgili olduğu bilim dalı ile hem yayınlanan ülke (p= 0,831>0,005) hem de yayın yılları (p=0,5417>0,005) açısından anlamlı bir ilişkiye sahip olmadığı belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dikotomi, Örgütsel Dikotomi, Yönetim, Literatür Taraması

THE IMPORTANCE OF THE CONCEPT OF ORGANIZATIONAL DICHOTOMY FOR MANAGEMENT

Öz

It is seen that the concept of organizational dichotomy, which has been considered important in terms of management for a long time, has become frequently used in articles, papers, theses, books or book chapters in recent years. With the basic organizational dichotomy concept, individuals with specific personalities and tendencies of need and organizations with specific roles and expectations are mentioned. The aim of this study is to reveal the importance of the concept of organizational dichotomy for management. In this context, various academic publications published in the Google Scholar database have been evaluated with a comprehensive literature review. 125 international academic studies examined as samples were analyzed in the SPSS 22.0 program. Therefore, both qualitative and quantitative methods were used together in this study. In order to achieve the aim of the study, frequency and percentage distribution analysis and chi-square analysis were used in the statistical program. In general, according to the descriptive analysis results, the majority (62.4%) of the studies on the concept of organizational dichotomy were published between 2000 and 2020, were related to the field of economic and administrative sciences (36%) and were mostly in the United States (63.2%), it was found that it was published. In addition, as a result of the chi-square test conducted to determine whether there is a relationship between the countries where the studies on organizational dichotomy were conducted and the publication years of these studies, it was revealed that there was a significant relationship (0.024 <0.05) between the countries where the studies were published and the publication years of the studies. However, although it is seen that the concept of organizational dichotomy has been used extensively in economic and administrative sciences; It was determined that it does not have a meaningful relationship in terms of both the published country (p=0.831> 0.005) and the publication years (p=0.5417> 0.005).

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dichotomy, Organizational Dichotomy, Management, Literature Review

Kaynakça

• Adachi, Y. (2007). An examination of the trans-nationality and applicability of Nonaka's theory of organizational knowledge creation to urban regeneration in UK. Doctoral thesis, University of London. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1444337/
• Adams, N. (2020). Magnet Schools and the Quest for Equity. University of California San Diego, PhD Thesis. 21.11.2020 tarihinde http://csusm-dspace.calstate.edu/bitstream/handle/10211.3/216876/AdamsNicole_Summer2020.pdf?sequence=1
• Ajeigbe, D. O. (2012). Nurse-Physician Teamwork in the Emergency Department. PhD Thesis in Nursing, University of California, Los Angeles.
• Akamatsu, T., Dominicus, D. A. R., Takashima, Y. & Ariizumi, M. (1992). The Need for High Priorities in Preventive Health Care Administrations in Both Developed and Developing Countries. Journal of The Kyorin Medical Society, 23(3), 389-400.
• Auvinen, T. (2001). Why is It Difficult to Manage an Opera House? The Artistic-Economic Dichotomy and Its Manifestations in the Organizational Structures of Five Opera Organizations, The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 30:4, 268-282.
• Bake, J. (2018). Interventionsalltag: Zu den Selbst- und Fremdverständnissen deutscher Intervenierender in Kriegs- und Krisengebieten, Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript Verlag.
• Bean, W. C. (1993). Strategic planning that makes things happen: Getting from where you are to where you want to be. Amherst, MA: HRD Press, Inc.
• Behnam, B., Majid, S. & Siroos, A. (2019). The Effect of Organizational Inertia on Organizational Hypocrisy with the Mediator of Social Undermining and Working Low (Case Study in the Tehran Municipality Sports Organization). Organizational Behavior Management in Sport Studies, Volume 6, Number 2 (22), 85-99.
• Burke, F., Blodgett, M. & Carlson, P. (1998). Corporate Ethics Codes: A New Generations’ Tool for Strategic Global Management and Decision-Making. International Journal of Value-Based Management, 11, 201-213.
• Campos, Lester & Piore (1999). Organizational Integration in Situations of Uncertainty: A Case Study of MITRE Corporation. The MIT Industrial Performance Center or the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. MIT IPC Working Paper 99-006. 151 Pages.
• Casavant, M. D. (2001). Reliance Structures of Neophyte Principals in Rural Contexts. University of Saskatchewan, Phd Thesis, Saskatoon.
• Cohan, D. L. (1992). Strategies and Structures for Institutional Real Estate Investors With Troubled Assets. Master of Science in Real Estate Development at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, University of Pennsylvania. https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/65216/27903376-MIT.pdf?sequence=2
• Davies, J. C. (2003). The Red Book Committee: Creative Conflict, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 9:5, 1113-1118.
• Dimitriades, Z. S. (2005). Creating strategic capabilities: organizational learning and knowledge management in the new economy. European Business Review, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 314-324.
• Dokter, A. (2010). Kpando Woodcarvers and Potters. A Baseline Study and Value Chain Analysis of Craft Artisans in Kpando District in Ghana. Utrecht University, Faculty of Geosciences Theses (Master thesis). https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/179916
• Duffey, T. (2000). Cultural issues in contemporary peacekeeping. International Peacekeeping, 7(1), 142-168.
• Eaton, S. D. (2020). Perceptions of Stress and Coping in the First Year of Police Work. Walden University, PhD Thesis, USA.
• Eisele, S. (2020). What Do Unions Do to Work Design? Computer Use, Union Presence, and Tayloristic Jobs in Britain. Industrial Relations. https://doi.org/10.1111/irel.12266
• Elsner, W., Hocker, G. & Schwardt, H. (2009). Simplistic vs. Complex Organization: Markets, Hierarchies, and Networks in an Organizational Triangle. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1476314
• Elsner, W., Hocker, G. & Schwardt, H. (2010). Simplistic vs. Complex Organization: Markets, Hierarchies, and Networks in an Organizational Triangle- A Simple Heuristic to Analyze Real-World Organizational Forms, Journal of Economic Issues, 44:1, 1-30.
• Getzels,1. W. & Guba, E. (1957). Social behaviour and the administrative process. School Review, 65, 423-441.
• Güler, G. A. (2016). Konaklama İşletmelerinde Mobbingin Personel Devir Hızına Etkisi: İzmir Örneği. İzmir Kâtip Çelebi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Turizm İşletmeciliği Anabilim Dalı Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İzmir.
• Hagan, C. R. & Campbell, C. F. (1968). Team Classification in Federal Institutions. 32 Fed. Probation 30. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/fedpro32&div=11&id=&page=
• Hauslein, P. L. & Smith, M. U. (1995). Knowledge structures and successful problem solving. In: Toward a Cognitive-Science Perspective for Scientific Problem Solving, Ed. Derrick R. Lavoie, Chapter-3, 51-79. National Association for Research in Science Teaching: Iowa.
• Hestad, D., Tabara, J. D. & Thornton, T. F. (2020). Transcending unsustainable dichotomies in management: Lessons from Sustainability-Oriented Hybrid Organisations in Barcelona, Journal of Cleaner Production, 244, 118766
• Hunt, E. B. & Rowe, R. R. (1960). Group and Individual Economic Decision Making in Risk Conditions. In: Experiments on Decision Making and Other Studies, Ed. Donald W. Taylor, Pages 21-25.
• Kırpık, G. (2020). Örgütsel Davranış Çalışmalarında Yeni Kavramlar: Google Akademik (2019) ve SCI (2020) Veri Tabanlarına Yönelik Sistematik Literatür Taraması. Ed.: M. Avcı & E. Kara, Örgütsel Davranış Üzerine Güncel Çalışmalar, 1. Baskı, 1. Bölüm, ss. 13-51, Hiper Yayın: İstanbul.
• Laing, M. T. B. (2010). The Calling of the Church to Mission and to Unity”: Bishop Lesslie Newbigin and the Integration of the International Missionary Council with the World Council of Churches. University of Edinburgh, PhD Thesis. https://era.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/4503
• Lal, D. (1995). Why Growth Rates Differ: The Political Economy of Social Capability in 21 Developing Countries. In: Koo B.H., Perkins D.H. (eds) Social Capability and Long-Term Economic Growth. Palgrave Macmillan, London.
• Lewkowicz, D. J. (2011). “The Biological Implausibility of the Nature–Nurture Dichotomy and What It Means for the Study of Infancy, International Society on Infant Studies (ISIS), 16(4), 331–367.
• Leinonen, T. (2019). How to Make Sense of Enabling vs. Coercive Formalization? Turku School of Economics, Master’s Thesis, Finland.
• Lindbeck, A. & Snower, D. J. (2000). Multitask Learning and the Reorganization of Work: From Tayloristic to Holistic Organization. Journal of Labor Economics, 18(3): 353–76
• Mars, M. M. & Rhoades, G. (2012). Socially Oriented Student Entrepreneurship: A Study of Student Change Agency in the Academic Capitalism Context, The Journal of Higher Education, 83(3), 435-459.
• Michaud, E. M. (2009). A Case Study of Consecutive Reorganizations of the Science Laboratories at the Nasa-Goddard Space Flight Center. The State University of New Jersey, PhD thesis, Newark, New Jersey.
• Oliveira, L. Barbosa de, Junior Moreno, Valter de A., & Gonçalves, R. C. (2020). Individual and Situational Antecedents of Counterproductive Work Behaviors. BAR- Brazilian Administration Review, 17(3), e190126.
• Özdemir, B. (2006). Örgütsel Öğrenme, Çevre ve Örgütsel Performans İlişkisi: Otel Yöneticilerinin Algılamaları Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Akdeniz Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü İşletme Ana Bilim Dalı Doktora Tezi, Antalya.
• Pavlin, S. (2006). Community of practice in a small research institute. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(4), 136-144.
• Pavlin, S. (2004). Cultivating A Community of Practice in A Small Research Organization. https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/9789812702081_0010
• Plale, B. (2001). Performance Impact of Streaming Doppler Radar Data on a Geospatial Visualization System. https://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/6563
• Pronovost, P. J., Miller, M., Wachter, R., Meyer, G. S. (2009). Perspective: Physician Leadership in Quality, Academic Medicine, Volume 84, Issue 12, Pages 1651-1656.
• Quinley, J. W. (1996). The Use of Influence Tactics.among Mid-Level Managers in the Community College. Paper presented at the Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research (36th, Albuquerque, NM, May 5-8). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED397750.pdf
• Raina, R. S. (1999). Patronage and Evaluation in the Indian Council of Agricultural Research. Evaluation, 5(3), 278–302.
• Ridge-Newman A. (2017). Churchill’s Conservatives and Television 1951–55. In: The Tories and Television, 1951-1964. Palgrave Studies in the History of the Media. Palgrave Pivot, London.
• Rogers, R. M. (2013). Pity, Manifestos, and the Left. Solidarité: Journal of the Radical Left. http://libcom.org/files/solissue2.pdf
• Rolle, A. (2004). An Empirical Discussion of Public School Districts As Budget-Maximizing Agencies. Journal of Education Finance, 29(4), 277-297.
• Rowntree, L. B. (1988). Orthodoxy and new directions: cultural/humanistic geography. Progress in Human Geography, 12(4), 575-586.
• Sargut, A. (1994). Bireycilik ve Ortaklaşa Davranış İkileminde Yönetim ve Örgüt Kuramları. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 49 (01).
• Scholten, P., Edelenbos, J., Groot, W. & Meijerink, S. (2010). Political leadership in environmental change: influences on local leadership in Dutch water management. Berlin Conference on Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change.
• Schnelle, H. (1997). Linguistic structure, brain topography, and cerebral process. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia, 29:1, 271-303, DOI: 10.1080/03740463.1997.10429464
• Stanković, B. (2011). Opera Houses Facing the Global Economic Crisis-Adaptable managerial strategies. Master Thesis, University of Arts in Belgrade.
• Steiner, L. (1998). Organizational Dilemmas As Barriers To Learning, The Learning Organization, 5 (4): 193-201.
• Tennant, S. & Fernie, S. (2011). An Alternative Form of Supply Chain Governance: Construction Clans. 27th. Annual ARCOM Conference, 5-7 September, UWE, Bristol. Association of Researchers in Construction Management, Vol. 1, pp. 475-484.
• Van Doorn, J. A. A. (1965). Conflict in Formal Organizations. Mens en Maatschappij, 40(4), 265-279.
• Vigneaux, G. J. (2016). An organizational perspective on U.S. wildland firefighting operations: Opening the black box (Order No. 10195159).
• Warner, K. A. R. (2010). Leadership for learning: the principal and instruction. The University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy, Degree of Doctor of Education.
• URL-1: http://web.shgm.gov.tr/documents/sivilhavacilik/files/pdf/saglik_birimi/SMS-Chapter-3-TR-PDF.pdf 10.11.2020
• URL-2: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=tr&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=%22%C3%B6rg%C3%BCtsel+dikotomi%22&btnG= 09.11.2020
• URL-3: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=tr&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=%22organizational+dichotomy%22&btnG= 09.11.2020