A study on morphological variations of male Helophorus (Helophorus) aquaticus (L., 1758) (Coleoptera: Helophoridae) in Türkiye

Öz

The geographic structure of Türkiye is well-suited for determining species diversity and interspecific variation as Türkiye has many regions with different altitudes and ecological characteristics. A large number of specimens belonging to the Helophoridae family belonging to the order Coleoptera were collected from different regions of Turkey between 2007-2021, examined and kept as museum material. Among the museum materials evaluated in terms of variation, Helophorus (Helophorus) aquaticus (L., 1758) species were seen to be both more common and more diverse in each region. In this study, male specimens varying in color, size, pronotum, tarsi, and genital structure were selected among the samples collected from different regions and geographic locations within the same locality. A total of 17 different morphological variations were identified and listed by examining the pronotum, elytra, tarsi, and aedeagophore structures. The relationships of these variations with altitude have been evaluated. As a result of this study, it has been determined that variations of the same species can coexist in the same locality, as well as similar variations in localities in different geographical regions. In addition, it was determined that the size of the insects increased as the altitude increased.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Altitude
• Coleoptera
• Helophoridae
• Helophorus aquaticus
• variation

Türkiye’deki erkek Helophorus (Helophorus) aquaticus (L., 1758) (Coleoptera: Helophoridae)’un morfolojik varyasyonları üzerine bir araştırma

Öz

Türkiye'nin coğrafi yapısı tür çeşitliliğini ve türler arası varyasyonu belirlemeye oldukça elverişlidir ve Türkiye'nin farklı rakımlara ve farklı ekolojik özelliklere sahip birçok bölgesi vardır. Coleoptera takımı Helophoridae familyasına ait çok sayıda örnek 2007-2021 yılları arasında Türkiye'nin farklı yörelerinden toplanmış, incelenmiş ve müze materyali olarak saklanmıştır. Varyasyon açısından değerlendirilen müze materyalleri arasında, Helophorus (Helophorus) aquaticus (L., 1758) türlerinin her bölgede hem daha yaygın hem de daha çeşitli olduğu görülmüştür. Bu çalışmada, farklı bölgelerden ve farklı coğrafi konumlardan toplanan ve aynı lokasyonu paylaşan erkek örnekler arasından farklı renk, boyut, pronotum, tarsi ve genital yapılara sahip bireyler seçilmiştir. Pronotum, elytra, tarsi ve aedeagophore yapıları incelenerek toplam 17 farklı morfolojik varyasyon tanımlanmış ve listelenmiştir. Bu varyasyonların rakım ile ilişkileri değerlendirilmiştir. Bu çalışma sonucunda, aynı türün varyasyonlarının aynı lokalitede bir arada bulunabileceği gibi, farklı coğrafi bölgelerdeki lokalitelerde de benzer varyasyonların olabileceği tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca rakım arttıkça böceklerin boyutlarının da arttığı tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Rakım
• kınkanatlılar
• Helophoridae
• Helophorus aquaticus
• varyasyon

Kaynakça

1. Allen, J. S., 1877. The influence of Physical conditions in the genesis of species. Radical Review, 1 (1877): 108-140.
2. Angus, R., 1988. Notes on the Helophorus (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae) occurring in Turkey, Iran and neighbouring territories. Revue Suisse de Zoologie, 95 (1): 209-248.
3. Bergmann, C., 1847. Über die Verhältnisse der wärme ökonomie der Thiere zu ihrer Grösse. Göttinger Studien, 3 (1): 595-708 (in German with abstract in English).
4. Blake, S., G. N. Foster, M. D. Eyre & M. L. Luff, 1994. Effects of habitat type and grassland management practices on the body size distribution of carabid beetles. Pedobiologia, 38 (6): 502-512.
5. Blanckenhorn, W. U. & M. Demont, 2004. Bergmann and converse Bergmann latitudinal clines in arthropods: two ends of a continuum? Integrative and Comparative Biology, 44 (6): 413-424.
6. Bonacci, T., P. Brandmayr, A. Giglio, A. Massolo, A. Mazzei, R. Odoguardi, M. Romeo, F. Talarico & T. Brandmayr, 2006. Agonistic behaviour of Scarites buparius (Forster, 1771) (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in relation to body size. Entomologica Fennica, 17 (3): 340-344.
7. Brandmayr, P. & R. Pizzolotto, 2016. Climate change and its impact on epigean and hypogean carabid beetles. Periodicum biologorum, 118 (3): 147-162.
8. Cepeda-Pizarro, J., H. Vásquez, H. Veas & G. Colon, 1996. Relaciones entre tamaño corporal y biomasa en adultos de Tenebrionidae (Coleoptera) de la estepa costera del margen meridional del desierto chileno. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, 69 (1996): 67-76 (in Spanish with abstract in English).

9. Cepeda-Pizarro, J., V. Solange & M. Hernan Elgueta, 2003. Morfometría y dimorfismo sexual de Elasmoderus wagenknechti (Liebermann) (Orthoptera: Tristiridae) en dos eventos de irrupción poblacional. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, 76 (3): 417-435 (in Spanish with abstract in English).
10. Chown, S. L. & K. J. Gaston, 2010. Body size variation in insects: a macroecological perspective. Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 85 (1): 139-169.
11. Daly, H. V., 1985. Insect morphometrics. Annual Review of Entomology, 30 (1): 415-438.
12. Garnier, S., N. Gidaszewski, M. Charlot, J. Y. Rasplus & P. Alibert, 2006. Hybridization, developmental stability, and functionality of morphological traits in the ground beetle Carabus solieri (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 89 (1): 151-158.
13. Hansen, M., 1987. The Hydrophilidae (Coleoptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. Entomologica Scandinavica, EJ Brill, Denmark, 253 pp.
14. Hukushima, S. & H. Kajita,1960. Note on the elytral dimension in the fieabeetle, Phyllotreta striolata Fabricius in Gifu Prefecture. Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology & Zoolology, 4: 182 (in Japanese with abstract in English).
15. Kingsolver, J. G. & R. B. Huey, 2008. Size, temperature, and fitness: three rules. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 10 (2): 251-268.
16. Krasnov, B., D. Ward & G. Shenbrot, 1996. Body size and leg length variation in several species of darkling beetles (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) along a rainfall and altitudinal gradient in the Negev Desert (Israel). Journal of Arid Environments, 34 (4): 477-489.
17. Lestrel, P. E., 1997. Fourier Descriptors and Their Applications İn Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 44 pp.
18. Mackinder, H. J., 2004. The geographical pivot of history (1904). The Geographical Journal, 170 (4): 298-321.
19. Masaki, S., 1967. Geographic variation and climatic adaptation in a field cricket (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Evolution, 21 (4): 725-741.
20. McPeek, M. A. & J. M. Brown, 2007. Clade age and not diversification rate explains species richness among animal taxa. The American Naturalist, 169 (4): 97-106.
21. Møller, A. P. & C. Zamora-Munoz, 1997. Antennal asymmetry and sexual selection in a cerambycid beetle. Animal Behaviour, 54 (6): 1509-1515.
22. Mousseau, T. A., 1997. Ectotherms follow the converse to Bergmann's rule. Evolution, 51 (2): 630-632.
23. Novotny, V. & M. R. Wilson, 1997. Why are there no small species among xylem-sucking insects? Evolutionary Ecology, 11 (4): 419-437.
24. Nudds, R. L. & S. A. Oswald, 2007. An interspecific test of Allen's rule: evolutionary implications for endothermic species. Evolution: International Journal of Organic Evolution, 61 (12): 2839-2848.
25. Palmer, M., 1994. Ecological factors associated with body size in populations of Macrothorax morbillosus (F.) (Carabidae, Coleoptera). Acta Oecologica (France), 15 (6): 689-699.
26. Park, O., 1949. Application of the converse Bergmann principle to the carabid beetle, Dicaelus purpuratus. Physiological Zoology, 22 (4): 359-372.
27. Polat, A., M. C. Darılmaz & Ü. İncekara, 2021. An annotated checklist of the Hydrophiloidea (Coleoptera) of Turkey. Munis Entomology & Zoology, 16 (1): 151-178.
28. Rabosky, D. L., 2009. Ecological limits and diversification rate: alternative paradigms to explain the variation in species richness among clades and regions. Ecology Letters, 12 (8): 735-743.
29. Rabosky, D. L., 2010. Primary controls on species richness in higher taxa. Systematic Biology, 59 (6): 634-645.
30. Ratcliffe, B. C. & A. C. Deloya, 1992. The biogeography and phylogeny of Hologymnetis (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae) with a revision of the genus. The Coleopterists' Bulletin, 46 (2): 161-202.
31. Roff, D., 1980. Optimizing development time in a seasonal environment: The 'ups and downs' of clinal variation. Oecologia, 45 (2): 202-208.
32. Shelomi, M., 2012. Where are we now? Bergmann’s rule sensu lato in insects. The American Naturalist, 180 (4): 511-519.
33. Shiokawa, T. & O. Iwahashi, 2000. Mandible dimorphism in males of a stag beetle, Prosopocoilus dissimilis okinawanus (Coleoptera: Lucanidae). Applied Entomology & Zoology, 35 (4): 487-494.
34. Sukhodolskaya, R. A., T. L. Ananina & A. A Saveliev, 2021. Variation in body size and sexual size dimorphism of ground beetle Pterostichus montanus Motsch. (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in altitude gradient. Contemporary Problems of Ecology, 14 (1): 62-70.
35. Talarico, F., M. Romeo, A. Massolo, P. Brandmayr & T. Zetto, 2007. Morphometry and eye morphology in three species of Carabus (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in relation to habitat demands. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 45 (1): 33-38.
36. Tsuchiya, Y., Y. Takami, Y. Okuzaki & T. Sota, 2012. Genetic differences and phenotypic plasticity in body size between high‐and low‐altitude populations of the ground beetle C arabus tosanus. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 25 (9): 1835-1842.
37. Williams, B. L., 2001. Patterns of morphological variation in Speyeria idalia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) with implications for taxonomy and conservation. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 94 (2): 239-243.
38. Yom‐Tov, Y. & E. Geffen, 2011. Recent spatial and temporal changes in body size of terrestrial vertebrates: probable causes and pitfalls. Biological Reviews, 86 (2): 531-541.
39. Yurtsever, S., S. Korkmaz & H. Ardali, 2005. Pigmentation variation in the 14-spot ladybird Propylea quatuordecimpunctata (Linnaeus, 1758) in the Edirne populations, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Zoology, 29 (1): 107-110.