The effects of altitude and rearing period on some characteristics of honey bee queens, Apis mellifera caucasica Gorbachev, 1916 (Hymenoptera: Apidae)

Yıl 2023, , 295 - 306, 09.10.2023

Nazlı Canverdi , Gonca Özmen Özbakır , Soner Çankaya , Muzaffer Duman , Ümit Kayaboynu , Fatih Yılmaz , Hasan Ese , Belgin Günbey

https://doi.org/10.16970/entoted.1207868

Öz

In the study, some characteristics of honey bee queens, Apis mellifera caucasica Gorbachev, 1916 (Hymenoptera: Apidae), reared at two different altitudes (140 m vs 920 m) and three rearing seasons (May, June-I, June-II) in 2019-2020 were examined in Ordu. These are larvae grafting, length of the queen cell, weight of queens at various periods, and spermathecae parameters of queens. One-day old 50 larvae were grafted at each period and altitude. The effect of period and period*altitude interaction on the weight at emergence of queen was significant (p<0.001) while the effect of altitude and year was nonsignificant. Weights at emergence of queens were lower in May at high altitudes and in June-II at low altitudes. The effects of year, period and altitude were significant (p<0.001) in the terms of the diameter and volume of the spermathecae, and the number of spermatozoa in the spermathecae. When the two-year data was evaluated together, the number of spermatozoa in the spermathecae was higher in the queen bees reared in May. It is recommended to pay attention to the period and altitude when pollen and nectar flow is intense in queen rearing in Ordu and similar climatic conditions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Honeybee, queen, rearing period, spermathecae, number of spermatozoa

Proje Numarası

TAGEM/HAYSUD/B/19/A4/P5/01

Rakım ve yetiştirme döneminin ana arıların, Apis mellifera caucasica Gorbachev, 1916 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) bazı özellikleri üzerine etkileri

Öz

Çalışmada, Ordu ilinde, 2019-2020 yıllarında iki farklı rakım (140 m ile 920 m) ve üç yetiştirme döneminde (Mayıs, Haziran-I, Haziran-II) yetiştirilen ana arıların, Apis mellifera caucasica Gorbachev, 1916 (Hymenoptera: Apidae), bazı özellikleri incelenmiştir. Bu özellikler; larva kabul oranı, yüksük uzunluğu, ana arı çıkış ağırlığı, ana arının yumurtlama başlangıcındaki ağırlığı, yumurtlamaya başladıktan sonraki 3. gün ağırlığı, spermateka çapı ve hacmi ve spermatozoa sayısıdır. Her dönem ve rakımda bir günlük yaşta 50’şer adet larva aşılanmıştır. Ana arı çıkış ağırlığı üzerine dönem ve dönem*rakım interaksiyon etkisi önemli (p<0.001), rakım ve yıl etkisi önemsiz bulunmuştur. Yüksek rakımda Mayıs döneminde, düşük rakımda ise Haziran-II döneminde ana arı çıkış ağırlıkları daha düşüktür. Spermateka çapı, spermateka hacmi ve spermatozoa sayısı bakımından yıl, dönem ve rakımın etkisi önemli bulunmuştur (p<0.001). İki yıl verileri birlikte değerlendirildiğinde spermatozoa sayısı Mayıs dönemi yetiştirilen ana arılarda daha yüksektir. Ordu ve benzer iklim koşullarında ana arı yetiştiriciliğinde polen ve nektar akımının yoğun olduğu dönem ve rakıma dikkat edilmesi önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bal arısı, ana arı, yetiştirme dönemi, sperm kesesi, sperm sayısı

Destekleyen Kurum

Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı Tarımsal Araştırmalar ve Politikalar Genel Müdürlüğü

Proje Numarası

TAGEM/HAYSUD/B/19/A4/P5/01

Kaynakça

• Akyol, E., H. Yeninar & O. Kaftanoğlu, 2008. Live weight of queen honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) predicts reproductive characteristics. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 81 (2): 92-100.
• Al‐Ghzawi, A. A. M. & S. Zaitoun, 2008. Origin and rearing season of honeybee queens affect some of their physiological and reproductive characteristics. Entomological Research, 38 (2): 139-148.
• Amiri, E., M. K. Strand, O. Rueppell & D. R. Tarpy, 2017. Queen quality and the impact of honey bee diseases on queen health: Potential for interactions between two major threats to colony health. Insects, 8 (2): 48.
• Anonymous, 2022. Businesses with queen bee production permit. (Web page https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/Konular/ Hayvancilik/Aricilik) (Date accessed: Oct 2022) (in Turkish).
• Anonymous, 2023. Honey Forest action plan. 2013-2017. (Web page: https://kutuphane.tarimorman.gov.tr/vufind/ Record/1205514) (Date accessed: Oct 2022) (in Turkish).
• Arslan, S. & M. M. Cengiz, 2020. Evaluation of the quality criteria of queens produced in different provinces of Turkey in autumn. Uludag Bee Journal, 20 (1): 62-71.
• Arslan, S., M. M. Cengiz, A. Gül & S. Sayed, 2021. Evaluation of the standards compliance of the queen bees reared in the Mediterranean region in Turkey. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 28 (5): 2686-2691.
• Büchler, R., S. Andonov, K. Bienefeld, C. Costa, F. Hatjina, N. Kezic, P. Kryger, M. Spivak, A. Uzunov & J. Wilde, 2013. Standard methods for rearing and selection of Apis mellifera queens. Journal of Apicultural Research 52 (1): 1-30.
• Burucu, V., 2021. Product report beekeeping 2021. (Web page https://arastirma.tarimorman.gov.tr/tepge) (Date accessed: October 2022) (in Turkish).
• Carreck, N. L., M. Andree, C S. Brent, D. Cox-Foster, H A. Dade, J D. Ellıs, F. Hatjına & D. van Engelsdorp, 2013. Standard methods for Apis mellifera anatomy and dissection. In: The COLOSS BEEBOOK, Volume I: standard methods for Apis mellifera research (Eds. V. Dietemann, J. D. Ellis & P. Neumann). Journal of Apicultural Research, 52 (4): http://dx.doi.org/10.3896/IBRA.1.52.4.03
• Cengiz, M. M., K. Yazıcı & S. Arslan, 2019. The effect of the supplemental feeding of queen rearing colonies on the reproductive characteristics of queen bees (Apis mellifera L.) reared from egg and different old of larvae. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 25 (6): 849-855.
• Cınbırtoğlu, Ş., 2014. Determination of some morphological and quality characteristics of pollen of preferred plant species by pollen collecting activity of honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) in spring period. Ordu University, Institute of Science and Technology, (Unpublished) Master Thesis, Ordu, 77 pp (in Turkish with abstract in English).
• Cınbırtoğlu, Ş., 2021. Important Plants and Pollens of Flora of Turkey for Honey Bees (Apis mellifera L.). Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı, Eğitim ve Yayın Dairesi Başkanlığı, Enstitü Yayın No: AAEM/38. ISBN: 978-625-8451-04-7, Ankara, 195 pp (in Turkish).
• Collins, A. M. & J. S. Pettis, 2013. Correlation of queen size and spermathecal contents and effects of miticide exposure during development. Apidologie, 44 (3): 351-356.
• De Souza, A. D., M. H. Huang & D. R. Tarpy, 2019. Experimental improvement of honey bee (Apis mellifera) queen quality through nutritional and hormonal supplementation. Apidologie, 50 (1): 14-27.
• Delaney, D. A., J. J. Keller, J. R. Caren & D. R. Tarpy, 2011. The physical, insemination, and reproductive quality of honey bee queens (Apis mellifera L.). Apidologie, 42 (1): 1-13.
• Dodoloğlu, A. & F. Genç, 1997. The effect of rearing and mating methods on some characteristics of queen honeybees (Apis mellifera L.). Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 21 (5): 379-385.
• Dodoloğlu, A., B. Emsen & F. Genç, 2004. Comparison of some characteristics of queen honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) reared by using doolittle method and natural queen cells. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 26 (2): 113-115.
• Facchini, E., M. G. De Iorio, F. Turri, F. Pizzi, D. Laurino, M. Porporato, R. Rizzi & G. Pagnacco, 2021. Investigating genetic and phenotypic variability of queen bees: Morphological and reproductive traits. Animals, 11 (11): 3054.
• Frost, E. A., N. C. Chapman, R. G. Banks & S. Hermesch, 2021. “Breeding for Improved Fertility of Honey Bees, 97-109”. In: Breeding Focus 2021-Improving Reproduction (Eds. S. Hermesch & S. Dominik), Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia, 205 pp.
• Gencer, H. V. & C. Fıratlı, 1999. Comparison of some internal and external structural characteristics of queen bees (Apis mellifera anatoliaca) reared from one and two day old larvae. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 5 (3): 13-16 (in Turkish with abstract in English).
• Genç, F., 1996. The effects of rearing months and larval transfer methods on the characteristics of queen bees (Apis mellifera L.) reared in Erzurum conditions. TÜBİTAK Project Final Report No. VHAG-1032.
• Gençer, H. V., S. Q. Shah & Ç. Fıratlı, 2000. Effects of supplemental feeding of queen rearing colonies and larval age on the acceptance of grafted larvae and queen traits. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 3 (8): 1319-1322.
• Guler, A. & H. Alpay, 2005. Reproductive characteristics of some honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) genotypes. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 4 (10): 864-870.
• Hatch, S., D. R. Tarpy & D. J. C. Fletcher, 1999. Worker regulation of emergency queen rearing in honey bee colonies and the resultant variation in queen quality. Insectes Sociaux, 46 (4): 372-377.
• Hatjina, F., M. Bieńkowska, L. Charistos, R. Chlebo, C. Costa, M. M. Dražić & J. Kopernicky, 2014. A review of methods used in some European countries for assessing the quality of honey bee queens through their physical characters and the performance of their colonies. Journal of Apicultural Research, 53 (3): 337-363.
• Kaftanoglu, O. & U. Kumova, 1992. The effects of queen (Apis mellifera L.) breeding season on the quality of queen bees in Çukurova Region conditions, Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 16: 569-577.
• Kahya, Y., H. V. Gençer & J. Woyke, 2008. Weight at emergence of honey bee (Apis mellifera caucasica) queens and its effect on live weights at the pre and post mating periods. Journal of Apicultural Research, 47 (2): 118-125.
• Kumar, J. & P. Mall, 2016. Assessment of colony performance through brood and honey measurement in Apis mellifera ligustica. Journal of Experimental Zoology India, 19 (1): 1355-1358.
• Laidlaw, H. H. Jr., 1985. Contemporary Queen Rearing. Hamilton, Illinois, USA, Dadant Publication, 199 pp.
• Mackensen, O. & K. W. Tucker, 1970. Instrumental Insemination of Queen Bees. Agricultural Handbook (No. 390), US Agricultural Research Service, Washington, D.C., U.S.A, 28 pp.
• Onk, K., M. M. Cengiz, K. Yazıcı & T. Kırmızıbayrak, 2016. Effects of rearing periods on some reproductive characteristics of Caucasian (Apis mellifera caucasica) queen bees. Atatürk Üniversitesi Veteriner Bilimleri Dergisi, 11 (3): 259-266.
• Ozmen Ozbakır, G., 2021. Effects of rearing method on some morphological and reproductive characteristics of queen honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). Medycyna Weterynaryjna, 77 (2): 89-94.
• Oztokmak, A. & G. Ozmen Ozbakır, 2017. Effects of queen emergence weight on some behavioral characteristics and colony performance parameters in Şanlıurfa local honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). Harran Journal of Agricultural and Food Sciences, 21 (4): 385-393.
• Porporato, M., G. Grillone, A. Patetta, A. Manino & D. Laurino, 2015. Survey of the health status of some honey bee queens in Italy. Journal of Apicultural Science, 59 (2): 27-36.
• Rangel, J., J. J. Keller & D. R. Tarpy, 2013. The effects of honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) queen reproductive potential on colony growth. Insect Sociaux, 60 (1): 65-73.
• Skowronek, W., M. Bieñkowska & C. Kruk, 2004. Changes in body weight of honey bee queens during their maturation. Journal of Apicultural Science, 48 (2): 61-68.
• Tarpy, D. R., J. J. Keller, J. R. Caren & D. A. Delaney, 2011. Experimentally induced variation in the physical reproductive potential and mating success in honey bee queens, Insectes Sociaux, 58 (4): 569-574.
• Tarpy, D. R., J. J. Keller, J. R. Caren & D. A. Delaney, 2012. Assessing the mating ‘health’ of commercial honey bee queens. Journal of Economic Entomology, 105 (1): 20-25.
• Tarpy, D. R., S. Hatch & D. J. C. Fletcher, 2000. The influence of queen age and quality during queen replacement in honey bee colonies. Animal Behaviour, 59 (1): 97-101.
• Uçak Koç, A. & M. Karacaoğlu, 2011. Effects of queen rearing period on reproductive features of Italian (Apis mellifera ligustica), Caucasian (Apis mellifera caucasica), and Aegean ecotype of Anatolian honey bee (Apis mellifera anatoliaca) queens. Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, 35 (4): 271-276.
• Uçak Koç, A. & M. Karacaoglu, 2004. Effects of rearing season on the quality of queen honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) raised under the conditions of Aegean region. Mellifera. 4 (7): 34-37.
• Uçak Koç, A. & M. Karacaoglu, 2005. Anadolu arısı Ege ekotipi (Apis mellifera anatolica) ana arılarında üreme özellikleri. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 2 (1): 73-77 (in Turkish with abstract in English).
• Winston, M. L., 1987. The Biology of the Honey Bee. Harvard University Press, 281 pp.
• Woyke, J., 1971. Correlations between the age at which honeybee brood was grafted, characteristics of the resultant queens and result of insemination. Journal Apicultural Research, 10 (1): 45-55.