Dorcadion anatolicum Pic, 1900 (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)’ un Türkiye’deki izole popülasyonlarında pronotum şekil değişiminin geometrik morfometri analizleri

Öz

Dorcadion Dalman, 1817 (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) cinsi türleri toprak yüzeyinde yaşayan ve uçma kabiliyetleri olmayan türlerdir. Ancak bu türlerin popülasyonları birbirlerinden kolayca izole olabilirler. Bu tarz biyolojik özellikler türleşme sürecini hızlandıran önemli faktörler olarak düşünülebilir. İzole popülasyon en etkileri örneklerin morfolojik karakterleri üzerinden ölçülebilir. Taksonomistlerin cinsin tanımlamasında kullandığı morfolojik karakterler genel olarak özneldir. Bu durum bazı sistematik problemlere neden olmaktadır. Türkiye’ye endemik olan Dorcadion anatolicum Pic, 1900 (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) türünün bazı popülasyonlarının alttür statüsü tartışmalıdır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, iki izole lokaliteden alınan örneklerin pronotum şekil farklılıklarını geometrik morfometri analizleri ile belirlemek ve D. anatolicum'un taksonomik ve evrimsel durumuna katkıda bulunmaktır. Çalışmada kullanılan örnekler Türkiye’nin iki farklı popülasyonundan (Kahramanmaraş ve Konya) 2018 yılı mart ve nisan aylarında toplanmıştır. Morfometrik analiz sonuçları örneklerin pronotum şekil değişikliklerinin, popülasyonların morfolojik anlamda ayrımına izin verdiğini ortaya koymuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Coleoptera,Dorcadion anatolicum,geometrik morfometri,homolog referans noktası,pronotum

Geometric morphometric analysis of pronotum shape in two isolated populations of Dorcadion anatolicum Pic, 1900 (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in Turkey

Öz

The genus Dorcadion Dalman, 1817 (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) comprises species living at ground surface and having lost the ability to fly. Hence the populations of the species are easily isolated from each other. These biological features are considered to be important factors for the acceleration of speciation in this genus. The effects of population isolation can be measured through the morphological characters of samples. The morphological characters that enabled the taxonomists to identify this genus are mainly subjective.This situation causes some systematic problems. Dorcadion anatolicum Pic, 1900 (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) is an endemic species in Turkey and the subspecies status of some populations is debated. The aim of this study was to determine pronotum shape variation via geometric morphometrics from two isolated localities and to contribute to knowledge of the taxonomic and evolutionary status of D. anatolicum. The samples were collected from two different localities of Turkey (Kahramanmaraş and Konya Provinces) in March-April 2018. Results of morphometric analysis revealed that the pronotum shape variations of the samples allowed morphological discriminations of populations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Coleoptera,Dorcadion anatolicum,geometric morphometrics,landmark,pronotum

Kaynakça

1. Alibert, P., B. Moureau, J. Dommergues & B. David, 2001. Differentiation at a microgeographical scale within two species of ground beetle, Carabus auronitens and C. nemoralis (Coleoptera, Carabidae): a geometrical morphometric approach. Zoologica Scripta, 30: 299-311.
2. Anonymous, 2019. Survey areas of Dorcadion. (Web page: https://earth.google.com) (Date accessed: February 2019).
3. Baur, B., S. Zschokke, A. Coray, M. Schläpfer & A. Erhardt, 2002. Habitat characteristics of the endangered flightless beetle Dorcadion fuliginator (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae): implications for conservation. Biological Conservation, 105: 133-142.
4. Benitez, H. A., 2013. “Sexual dimorphism using geometric morphometric approach, 35-50”, In: Sexual Dimorphism (Ed: H. Moriyama). Intech, Rijeka Croatia, 140 pp. Bookstein, F. L., 1991. Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 435 pp.
5. Bookstein, F. L., 1996. “Combining the Tools of Geometric Morphometrics, 131-152”. In: Advances in Morphometrics (Eds. L. F. Marcus, M. Corti, A. Loy, G. J. P. Naylor & D. E. Slice). Plenum Press, New York, USA, 284 pp.
6. Butlin, R. K., J. Galindo & J. W. Grahame, 2008. Review. Sympatric, parapatric or allopatric: the most important way to classify speciation? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 363 (1506): 2997-3007.
7. Dascălu, M. & L. Fusu, 2012. Dorcadion axillare Küster, 1847 (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae): distribution, morphometrics, karyotype and description of a new subspecies from Romania. Zootaxa, 3322: 35-48.
8. Eldred, T., C. Meloro, C. Scholtz, D. Murphy, K. Fincken & M. Hayward, 2016. Does size matter for horny beetles? A geometric morphometric analysis of interspecific and intersexual size and shape variation in Colophon haughtoni Barnard, 1929, and Colophon kawaii Mizukami, 1997 (Coleoptera: Lucanidae). Organisms Diversity & Evolution, 16 (4): 821-833.

9. Klingenberg, C. P., 2011. MorphoJ: An integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Molecular Ecology Resources, 11: 353-357.
10. Kumral, N., A. U. Bilgili & E. Açıkgöz, 2012. Türkiye’de yeni bir çim zararlısı, Dorcadion pseudopreissi (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), biyo-ekolojisi, popülasyon dalgalanması ve farklı çim türlerindeki zararı. Türkiye Entomoloji Dergisi, 36 (1): 123-133.
11. Li, S., E. Ricchiardi, E. M. Bai & X. Yang, 2016, A taxonomy review of Oreoderus Burmeister, 1842 from China with a geometric morphometric evaluation (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Zookeys, 13 (552): 67-89.
12. Ober, K. A. & T. C. Connolly, 2015, Geometric morphometric and phylogenetic analyses of Arizona Sky Island populations of Scaphinotus petersi Roeschke (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 175: 107-118.
13. Önalp, B., 1990. Systematic researches on Dorcadion Dalman, 1817 species in Turkey (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Lamiinae). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 5: 57-102.
14. Özdikmen, H., 2010. The Turkish Dorcadiini with zoogeographical remarks (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Lamiinae). Munis Entomology & Zoology, 5: 380-498.
15. Özdikmen, H., 2016. Dorcadionini of Turkey (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Journal of Natural History, 50: 37-38.
16. Pizzo, A., D. Mercurio, C. Palestrini, A. Roggero & A. Rolando, 2006. Male differentiation patterns in two polyphenic sister species of the genus Onthophagus Latreille, 1802 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae): a geometric morphometric approach. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 44 (1): 54-62.
17. Qubaiova, J., J. Ruzicka. & H. Sipkova, 2015. Taxonomic revision of genus Ablattaria Reitter (Coleoptera: Silphidae) using geometric morphometrics. ZooKeys, 477: 79-142.
18. Rieseberg, L. H., S. A. Church & C. L. Morjan, 2004. Integration of populations and differentiation of species. New Phytologist, 161 (1): 59-69.
19. Rohlf, F. J., 1993. “Feature extraction applied to systematics, 375-392”. In: Advances in Computer Methods for Systematic Biology (Ed. R. Fortuner) Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD, USA, 560 pp.
20. Rohlf, F. J., 1999. Shape statistics: Procrustes superimpositions and tangent spaces. Journal of Classification, 16: 197-223.
21. Rohlf, F. J., 2013. tpsDig, 2.17 (Web page: http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph) (Date accessed:11.02.2019).
22. Rohlf, F. J. & L. F. Marcus, 1993. Geometric morphometrics: Reply to M. Corti. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 8: 339-339.
23. Sama, G., 1982. Contributo allo studio dei coleotteri Cerambycidae di Grecia e Asia Minore. Fragmenta Entomologica, 16 (2): 205-227.
24. Viscosi, V. & A. Cardini, 2011. Leaf morphology, taxonomy and geometric morphometrics: a simplified protocol for beginners. PloS ONE, 6 (10): e25630.
25. Zuniga-Reinoso, A. & H. A. Benitez, 2015. The overrated use of the morphological cryptic species concept: An example with Nyctelia dark beetles (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) using geometric morphometrics. Journal of Comparative Zoology, 255: 47-53.