Araştırma Makalesi

Current genetic status of honey bees in Anatolia in terms of thirty polymorphic microsatellite markers

Cilt: 44 Sayı: 3 1 Eylül 2020
PDF İndir
TR EN

Current genetic status of honey bees in Anatolia in terms of thirty polymorphic microsatellite markers

Öz

Turkey, having three phytogeographical floristic regions, is a natural bridge among three continents. A lot of subspecies and ecotypes of honey bees have been reported within Turkey. However, hybridization due to informal cultivation and uncontrolled migratory beekeeping practices are thought to affect the genetic diversity of local honey bee populations, and this may result the loss of allele combinations resulting from long evolutionary processes. Numerous identification and conservation studies on honey bee subspecies have been conducted in many countries to determine the loss of genetic variability. On this basis, genetic causes and phylogenetic relationships of four common honey bee subspecies [Apis mellifera anatoliaca Maa, 1953, Apis mellifera carnica Pollmann, 1879, Apis mellifera caucasica Pollmann, 1889, Apis mellifera syriaca Skorikov, 1829 (Hymenoptera: Apidae)] from five provinces (Artvin, Düzce, Hatay, Kırklareli and Muğla) selected based on their importance in apicultural activities were studied using 30 microsatellite loci in 2018. The genetic distances of populations ranged from 0.30 to 0.70. Genetic variation was 8.96% among the populations, 44.9% among the individuals within the populations and 46.1% for all individuals. Further genetic researches on the honey bee populations will be of advantage for anticipating potential future problems.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Destekleyen Kurum

Agriculture Ministry of Turkey

Proje Numarası

TAGEM-15/ARGE/19

Teşekkür

We thank to Agriculture Ministry of Turkey. The project was supported by TAGEM-15/ARGE/19.

Kaynakça

  1. Agra, M. N., C. A. Conte, P. M. Corva, J. L. Cladera, S. B. Lanzavecchia & M. A. Palacio, 2018. Molecular characterization of Apis mellifera colonies from Argentina: genotypic admixture associated with ecoclimatic regions and apicultural activities. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 166 (9): 724-738.
  2. Akyol, E., A. Unalan, H. Yeninar, D. Ozkok & C. Ozturk, 2014. Comparison of colony performances of Anatolian, Caucasian and Carniolan honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) genotypes in temperate climate conditions. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 13 (3): 637-640.
  3. Alburaki, M., B. Bertrand, H. Legout, S. Moulin, A. Alburaki, W. S. Sheppard & L. Garnery, 2013. A fifth major genetic group among honeybees revealed in Syria. BMC Genetics, 14 (1): 117-127.
  4. Amakpe, F., L. De Smet, M. Brunain, F. J. Jacobs, B. Sinsin & D. C. de Graaf, 2018. Characterization of Native Honey Bee Subspecies in Republic of Benin Using Morphometric and Genetic Tools. Journal of Apicultural Science, 62 (1): 47-60.
  5. Belkhir, K., P. Borsa, L. Chikhi, N. Raufaste & F. Bonhomme, 1996-2004. GENETIX 4.05, logiciel sous Windows pour la ge´ne´tique des populations. Laboratoire Ge ́nome, Populations, Interactions,CNRS UMR 5000, Universite ́de Montpellier II, Montpellier (France).
  6. Bodur, C., M. Kence & A. Kence, 2007. Genetic structure of honey bee, Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) populations of Turkey inferred from microsatellite analysis. Journal of Apicultural Research, 46 (1): 50-56.
  7. Bouga, M., C. Alaux, M. Bienkowska, R. Büchler, N. L. Carreck, E. Cauia & A. Gregorc, 2011. A review of methods for discrimination of honey bee populations as applied to European beekeeping. Journal of Apicultural Research, 50 (1): 51-84.
  8. Cánovas, F., P. De la Rua, J. Serrano & J. Galián, 2011. Microsatellite variability reveals beekeeping influences on Iberian honeybee populations. Apidologie, 42 (3): 235-251.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

1 Eylül 2020

Gönderilme Tarihi

22 Ocak 2020

Kabul Tarihi

11 Mayıs 2020

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2020 Cilt: 44 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA
Karabağ, K., İvgin Tunca, R., Tüten, E., & Doğaroğlu, T. (2020). Current genetic status of honey bees in Anatolia in terms of thirty polymorphic microsatellite markers. Turkish Journal of Entomology, 44(3), 333-346. https://doi.org/10.16970/entoted.678808
AMA
1.Karabağ K, İvgin Tunca R, Tüten E, Doğaroğlu T. Current genetic status of honey bees in Anatolia in terms of thirty polymorphic microsatellite markers. TED. 2020;44(3):333-346. doi:10.16970/entoted.678808
Chicago
Karabağ, Kemal, Rahşan İvgin Tunca, Emel Tüten, ve Taylan Doğaroğlu. 2020. “Current genetic status of honey bees in Anatolia in terms of thirty polymorphic microsatellite markers”. Turkish Journal of Entomology 44 (3): 333-46. https://doi.org/10.16970/entoted.678808.
EndNote
Karabağ K, İvgin Tunca R, Tüten E, Doğaroğlu T (01 Eylül 2020) Current genetic status of honey bees in Anatolia in terms of thirty polymorphic microsatellite markers. Turkish Journal of Entomology 44 3 333–346.
IEEE
[1]K. Karabağ, R. İvgin Tunca, E. Tüten, ve T. Doğaroğlu, “Current genetic status of honey bees in Anatolia in terms of thirty polymorphic microsatellite markers”, TED, c. 44, sy 3, ss. 333–346, Eyl. 2020, doi: 10.16970/entoted.678808.
ISNAD
Karabağ, Kemal - İvgin Tunca, Rahşan - Tüten, Emel - Doğaroğlu, Taylan. “Current genetic status of honey bees in Anatolia in terms of thirty polymorphic microsatellite markers”. Turkish Journal of Entomology 44/3 (01 Eylül 2020): 333-346. https://doi.org/10.16970/entoted.678808.
JAMA
1.Karabağ K, İvgin Tunca R, Tüten E, Doğaroğlu T. Current genetic status of honey bees in Anatolia in terms of thirty polymorphic microsatellite markers. TED. 2020;44:333–346.
MLA
Karabağ, Kemal, vd. “Current genetic status of honey bees in Anatolia in terms of thirty polymorphic microsatellite markers”. Turkish Journal of Entomology, c. 44, sy 3, Eylül 2020, ss. 333-46, doi:10.16970/entoted.678808.
Vancouver
1.Kemal Karabağ, Rahşan İvgin Tunca, Emel Tüten, Taylan Doğaroğlu. Current genetic status of honey bees in Anatolia in terms of thirty polymorphic microsatellite markers. TED. 01 Eylül 2020;44(3):333-46. doi:10.16970/entoted.678808

Cited By