Isparta (Türkiye) Gölcük Doğal Parkı'nda Hymenoptera çeşit ve bolluğu

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Hymenoptera, yeni kayıt, Türkiye, Gölcük, biyoçeşitlilik

Hymenopteran diversity and abundance in Gölcük Natural Park in Isparta, Turkey

Abstract

, Turkey during 2008 vegetation period. Twenty one families were recorded during our study. Four species are new records from Turkey. This paper compares Hymenopteran communities in four sampling sites from Gölcük Natural Park. The highest Hymenoptera family level diversity was found near the Natural Park entrance, where the ShannonWeaver index of diversity was 2.5. Hymenopterans were most abundant in the site close to the old apple orchard, where 33% of all individuals were collected. Most of less frequently recorded families were found in the xeric natural plant site. Hymenopteran families were found to be almost equally partitioned in all four sampling sites. The highest percentage similarity index (0.79) was found between the “close to entrance” and “mesophilic” plant sites. The study revealed that the site close to the old apple orchard provides a special micro-habitat for Hymenoptera

Keywords

• -

Kaynakça

1. Anonymous, 1992. United Nation Conservation on Biological Diversity. The United Nation Conference on Environment and Development, the Rio Earth Summit. United Nations Programme, Nairobi, http://dsp-psd.pwgsc.gc.ca/Collection- R/LoPBdP/BP/bp317-e.htm.
2. Anonymous, 2005. Millennium ecosystem assessment. Ecosystems and human well- being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington DC. http://www.millenniumassessment.org/ en/index.aspx.
3. Anonymous, 2008. Conservation International. Biodiversity Hotspots. http://www.biodiversityhotspots.org.
4. Anonymous, 2009. Fauna Europea. http://www.faunaeur.org.
5. Bartlet, T., 2009. BugGuide. http://www.bugguide.net.
6. Borror, D., Ch. Triplehorn & N. Johnson, 1989. An introduction to the study of Insects. Saunders College Publishing, 870 pp.
7. Bulte, E, A. Hector & A. Larigauderie, 2005. Ecoservices assessing the impact of biodiversity changes on ecosystem functioning and services. Swcience Plan and Implementation Strategy. DIVERSITAS Report No. 3.
8. Cincotta, R. P. & R. Engelman, 2000. Nature’s Place: Human Populationand the Future of Biological Diversity. Population Action International, Washington DC, 80 pp.

9. Dufrene, M. & P. Legendre, 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monographs, 67: 345-366.
10. Fakir, H., 1998. Research on the flora of Isparta Gölcük lake district. MSc thesis, İstanbul University, 89 pp.
11. Fakir, H. & I. Dutkuner, 1999. Floristic studies on Isparta Gölcük Natural Reserve. Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Natural Environment Protection & Black Pine (Pinus nigra Arnold. ssp. pallasiana (Lamb.) Holmboe var. pyramidata (Acat.) Yaltırık, Kütahya, Turkey, 77-87 (In Turkish).
12. Gayubo, S., J. Nieves-Aldrey, J. Gonzalez, J. Tormos, C. Rey del Castillo & J. Asis, 2004. Diversity of Spheciformes wasps (Hymenoptera, Apoidea, Ampulicidae, Sphecidae and Crabronidae) collected by means of Malaise trap from the Monte de El Pardo (Madrid, Spain).Boletín de la Real Sociedad Española de Historia Natural. Sección biológica, 99 (1-4): 105-113.
13. Gul, A., O. Orucu & O. Karaca, 2005. Determination of Potential Regions by Using Recreation Suitabilty Analaysis (Reference Gölcük Reserve). Symposium of Protected Natural Areas. 8-10 September 2005, S.D.Ü., Isparta, Turkey.(In Turkish)
14. Haila, Y. & J. Kouki, 1994. The phenomenon of biodiversity in conservation biology. Biodiversity in the Fennoscandian boreal forest: Natural variation and its management. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 31: 5-18.
15. Karatepe, Y., H. Suel & I. Yetut, 2005. An ecological examination of Taurus Cedar (Cedrus Libani A. RICH.) growth on soils developed from different parent material in Isparta Gölcük Natural Park. Journal of Forest Faculty, SDU, A (1): 64-75 (In Turkish).
16. Kovach, W. L., 1999. A Multi variate Statistical Package. United Kingdom: KovachComputing Services.
17. Magurran, A. 2005. Measuring Biological Diversity. Blackwell Publishing, 256 pp.
18. Medvedev, G., 1978. Key to the insects of the European part of the USSR. Vol. III(1) (In Russian), 583 pp.
19. Medvedev, G., 1988. Key to the insects of the European part of the USSR. Vol. III(6) (In Russian), 267 pp.
20. Mertz, O, Ravnborg, H., Lovei, G., I. Nielsen & C. Konijnendijk, 2007. Ecosystem services and biodiversity in developing countries. Biodiversity and Conservation, 16: 2729-2737.
21. Murguia, L., M. Vazquez & J. Nieves-Aldrey, 2001. The families of Hymenotpera (Insecta) in an heterogenous acidofolous forest in Artikutza (Navarra, Spain). Frustula entomologica, 24 (37), 81-98.
22. Nieves-Aldrey J. & F. Fontal-Cazalla, 1997. Inventory of Parasitic Hymenoptera (Cynipoidea and Chalcidoidea, Hymenoptera, Insects). Flora y Fauna del Parque Nacional de Coiba (Panama): Inventario Preliminar. AECI, Madrid, 329-361.
23. Pickering, J., 2009. Discover life. http://www.discoverlife.org
24. Sahdubak, A. & N. Cengiz, 2007. The past, present, future of wash control and afforestation studies in Isparta city streams and Gölcük Lake basin. Journal of Turkish Forest Engineer Society, 1-2-3 (44): 43-48.
25. Shaw, M. & M. Hochberg, 2001. The neglect of parasitic Hymenoptera in insect conservation strategies: The British fauna as a prime eample. Journal of Insect Conservation, 5: 153-263.
26. Tilman, D., May, R., C. Lehman & M. Nowak, 1994. Habitat destruction and extinction debt. Nature, 371: 65-66.
27. Zilihona, I. & M. Nummelin, 2001. Hymenopteran diversity and abundance in different Sampling Sites near Kihansi waterfall in the Udzungwa Mountain, Tanzania. Biodiversity and Conservation, 10: 769-777.