Laboratuvar koşullarında spinosad, azadirachtin ve kaolinin Stephanitis pyri (Fabricius, 1775) (Hemiptera: Tingidae) üzerine etkileri

Öz

Bu çalışma doğal insektisitlerden spinosad, azadirachtin ve kaolinin Stephanitis pyri (Fabricius, 1775) (Hemiptera: Tingidae)’nin dördüncü dönem nimfleri ve erginler üzerine olan etkilerini tespit etmek amacıyla 2019 yılında Diyarbakır (Türkiye)’da yürütülmüştür. Çalışma 25 ± 1ºC sıcaklık, %65 ± 5 orantılı nem ve 16:8 (A:K) aydınlatmalı laboratuvar koşullarında yürütülmüştür. Çalışma sonucunda spinosad, azadirachtin ve kaolin uygulaması sonrası toplam ölü nimf oranı üçüncü günde sırasıyla %49, %44 ve %11; altıncı günde sırasıyla %54, %51 ve %47 olarak gerçekleşmiştir. Spinosad, azadirachtin ve kaolin uygulaması sonrası toplam ölü ergin oranı üçüncü günde sırasıyla %75, %11 ve %14; altıncı günde sırasıyla %89, %18 ve %12 olarak gerçekleşmiştir. Yaprak yüzeyinde beslenme sonrası oluşan zarar oranını ifade eden zarar indeksi nimflerde spinosad, azadirachtin ve kaolinde sırasıyla 1.25, 1.50 ve 1.50; erginlerde sırasıyla 1.00, 2.00 ve 2.00 olarak tespit edilmiştir. Beslenme sonucu bıraktıkları dışkı sayısı spinosad, azadirachtin ve kaolinde sırasıyla nimflerde 55, 98 ve 75; erginlerde 15, 98 ve 93 olarak tespit edilmiştir. Bu veriler ışığında nimf zarar indeksi hariç çalışmada incelenen bütün parametrelerde spinosad en etkili ürün olarak tespit edilmiştir. Azadirachtin ve kaolin ise nimfleri baskı altına alma açısından ön plana çıkmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kontrol
• zarar indeksi
• Diyarbakır
• ölüm oranı
• doğal insektisitler

Effect of spinosad, azadirachtin and kaolin on Stephanitis pyri (Fabricius, 1775) (Hemiptera: Tingidae) under laboratory conditions

Abstract

This study was conducted in Diyarbakır (Turkey) in 2019 to determine the effects of natural insecticides, spinosad, azadirachtin and kaolin, on the fourth instar nymphs and adults of Stephanitis pyri (Fabricius, 1775) (Hemiptera: Tingidae). The study was conducted under the laboratory conditions; 25 ± 1ºC, 65 ± 5% humidity and 16:8 h L:D photoperiod. The mortality of nymphs 3 and 6 d after treatment with spinosad, azadirachtin and kaolin was 49, 44 and 11%, and 54, 51 and 47%, respectively. The mortality of adults 3 and 6 d after treatment with spinosad, azadirachtin and kaolin was 75, 11 and 14%, and 89, 18 and 12%, respectively. The damage index, feeding damage ratio on the upper surface of the leaf, after spinosad, azadirachtin and kaolin treatment of nymphs was 1.25, 1.50 and 1.50, and adults was 1.00, 2.00 and 2.00, respectively. After the application of spinosad, azadirachtin and kaolin, the number of droppings left by nymphs was 55, 98 and 75, and adults was 15, 98 and 93, respectively. Based these data, spinosad was determined as the most effective product in all parameters except for the fourth instar nymph damage index. However, azadirachtin and kaolin were somewhat inhibitory to nymphs.

Keywords

• Control
• damage index
• Diyarbakır
• mortality ratio
• natural insecticides

Kaynakça

1. Abbott, W. S., 1925. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. Journal of Economic Entomology, 18 (2): 265-267.
2. Akgül, B. & İ. Özgen, 2017. The application areas of clay minerals in agriculture. International Journal of Innovative Engineering Applications, 1 (2): 18-26.
3. Anonymous, 2020. Republic of Turkey Minister of Agriculture and Forestry, plant protection product database. (Web page: https://bku.tarim.gov.tr/Zararli/Details/379) (Date accessed: July 2020).
4. Aysal, T. & M. Kıvan, 2008. Development and population growth of Stephanitis pyri (F.) (Heteroptera: Tingidae) at five temperatures. Journal of Pest Science, 81 (3): 135-141.
5. Bodenheimer, F. S., 1958. Türkiye’de Ziraate ve Ağaçlara Zararlı Olan Böcekler ve Bunlarla Savaş Hakkında Bir Etüt. Bayur Matbaası, Ankara, 346 s (in Turkish).
6. Bolu, H., 2007. Population dynamics of Lacebugs (Heteroptera: Tingidae) and its natural enemies in almond orchards of Turkey. Journal of the Entomological Research Society, 9 (1): 33-37.
7. Çam, H., 1993. Some studies on the heteropterous species collected on mahalep, sweet and sour cherries trees in Tokat and surrounding area. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpasa University, 10 (1): 32-42.
8. Çınar, M., İ. Çimen & H. Bolu, 2004. The cherry pests, their natural enemies and observations on some important species in Elazığ and Mardin provinces of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Entomology, 28 (3): 213-220.

9. Demirsoy, A., 2006. Yaşamın Temel Kuralları-Entomoloji (Omurgasızlar-Böcekler). Meteksan Yayınları Cilt- II /Kısım- II, Ankara, 945 s (in Turkish).
10. Drake, C. J. & F. A. Ruhoff, 1965. Lagebugs of the World, A Catalog (Hemiptera: Tingidae). Smithsonian Institution, Washington, 710 pp.
11. Glenn, D. M., 2012. The mechanisms of plant stress mitigation by kaolin-based particle films and applications in horticultural and agricultural crops. Horticultural Science, 47 (6): 710-711.
12. Göksu, M. E, 1964. Sakarya ve Kocaeli Bölgeleri Meyve Ağaçlarında Zarar Yapan Armut Kaplanının (Stephanitis pyri Fabr.) Biyolojisi ve Mücadelesi Üzerinde Araştırmalar. T.C. Tarım Bakanlığı Göztepe Zirai Mücadele Enstitüsü Yayınları, İstanbul, 58 s (in Turkish).
13. Guilbert, E., 2001. Phylogeny and evolution of exaggerated traits among the Tingidae (Cimicomorpha, Heteroptera). Zoologica Scripta, 30 (4): 313-324.
14. Gülperçin, N. & F. Önder, 1999. Some investigations on the biology and natural enemies of Stephanitis pyri (F.) (Heteroptera: Tingidae) Bornova (Turkey). Turkish Journal of Entomology, 23 (1): 51-56.
15. Humeres, E. C., J. G. Morse, R. Stouthamer, W. Roltsch & M. S. Hoddle, 2009. Evaluation of natural enemies and insecticides for control of Pseudacysta perseae (Hemiptera: Tingidae) on avocados in Southern California. Florida Entomologist, 92 (1): 35-42.
16. Isman, M. B., 2006. Botanical insecticides, deterrents and repellents in modern agriculture and an increasingly regulated world. Annual Review of Entomology, 51 (1): 45-66.
17. Joseph, S. V., 2019. Transovarial effects of insect growth regulators on Stephanitis pyrioides (Hemiptera: Tingidae). Pest Management Science, 75 (8): 2182-2187.
18. Joseph, S. V., 2020. Repellent effects of insecticides on Stephanitis pyrioides Scott (Hemiptera: Tingidae) under laboratory conditions. Crop Protection, 127: 104985.
19. Lodos, N., 1982. Türkiye Entomolojisi II (Genel Uygulamalı ve Faunistik). Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları No: 429, Bornova İzmir, 580 s (in Turkish).
20. Lodos, N. & F. Önder, 1983. Preliminary List of Tingidae with Notes on Distribution and Importance of Species in Turkey. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları, İzmir, 51 s.
21. Maral, H., M. R. Ulusoy & H. Bolu, 2013. Faunistic studies on Tingidae (Hemiptera) species of Diyarbakir, Mardin and Elazığ provinces. Turkish Bulletin of Entomology, 3 (4): 139-155.
22. Marcotegui, A., I. Sánchez-Ramos, S. Pascual, C. E. Fernández, G. Cobos, I. Armendáriz, A. Cobo & M. González-Núñez, 2015. Kaolin and potassium soap with thyme essential oil to control Monosteira unicostata and other phytophagous arthropods of almond trees in organic orchards. Pest Management Science, 88 (4): 753-765.
23. Matthews, G. A., 2006. Pesticides: Health, Safety and the Environment. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK, 248 pp.
24. Murashige, T. & F. A. Skoog, 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Plant Physiology, 15 (3): 473-497.
25. Nizamlıoğlu, K., 1961. Türkiye Ziraatinde Zararlı Olan Böcekler ve Mücadelesi. Zirai Mücadele Enstitüsü, İstanbul, 510 s (in Turkish).
26. Pamela, G. M., 2019. Pesticidal natural products - status and future potential. Pest Management Science, 75 (9): 2325-2340.
27. Pavela, R., M. Žabka, V. Kalinkin, E. Gotenev, A. Gerus, A. Shchenikova & T. Chermenskaya, 2013. Systemic applications of azadirachtin in the aontrol of Corythucha ciliata (Say, 1832) (Hemiptera, Tingidae), a pest of Platanus sp. Plant Protection Science, 49 (1): 27-33.
28. Pener, M. P. & T. S. Dhadialla, 2012. Insect Growth Disruptors (An Overview of Insect Growth Disruptors; Applied Aspects). Academic Press, Elsevier, Oxford, UK, 533 pp.
29. Péricart, J., 1983. Hémiptéres Tingidae Euro-Méditerranéens. Fédération Française des Sociétés de Sciences Naturelles, Faune de France, Vol. 69, 626 pp.
30. Peshin, R. & D. Pimentel, 2014. Integrated Pest Management, Experiences with Implementation, Global Overview. Springer, Netherlands, Vol. 4, 574 pp.
31. Rakhimol, K. R., T. Sabu, V. Tatiana & K. Jayachandran, 2020. Controlled Release of Pesticides for Sustainable Agriculture. Springer Nature, Switzerland, 268 pp.
32. Saha, S., S. Walia & B. S. Parmar, 2011. Exploring the diversity of neem bio actives as economic benign pesticides: a reappraisal. Toxicological Enviromental Chemistry, 93 (8): 1508-1546.
33. Sánchez-Ramos, I., S. Pascual, A. Marcotegui, C. E. Fernández & M. González-Núñez, 2014. Laboratory evaluation of alternative control methods against the false tiger, Monosteira unicostata (Hemiptera: Tingidae). Pest Management Science, 70 (3): 454-461.
34. Schaefer, W. C. & A. R. Panizzi, 2000: Heteroptera of Economic Importance. CRC Press, Washington D.C., USA, 824 pp.
35. Srivastava, A. K. & P. C. Kesavachandran, 2019. Health Effects of Pesticides. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, USA, 182 pp.
36. Vacante, V. & S. Kreiter, 2018. Handbook of Pest Management in Organic Farming. CAB International, Boston, USA, 577 pp.