PERSPECTIVES OF IRANIAN SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHERS TOWARDS THE APPLICATION OF INTERACTIVE WHITEBOARDS TECHNOLOGY IN MATH CLASSES

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 1 , 16 - 27, 30.05.2014

Morteza Bakhtıarvand Reza Golmoradi Mehdi Keyhani

Öz

This study explored the attitudes of teachers
towards the use of interactive whiteboards (IWBs) in English Language teaching
and learning contexts, and also sought insights into teachers' actual use of
IWBs in English language classes. The study also investigated possible factors
affecting teachers' positive and negative attitudes towards IWB
technology.  Data were collected through
questionnaires distributed to 82 teachers in different institutions across
Andimeshk, Iran, from Secondary schools. Questionnaire results revealed that
teachers have positive attitudes towards the use of IWBs in Math instruction
and are aware of the potential of this technology. Responses given in
interviews indicated that all Math teachers are supportive of IWB technology in
their classes, and observations revealed that IWBs are used with their basic
functions in Math classes. The statistical analysis revealed that the more
teachers use IWBs, the more they like this technology

Anahtar Kelimeler

Interactive whiteboard (IWB), attitude, Mathematic Teachers, Math Instruction

Kaynakça

• Arkın, E. Đ. (2003). Teachers' attitudes towards computer technology use in vocabulary instruction. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Bilkent University, Ankara. Bebell, D., O'Conner, K., O'Dwyer, L., & Russell, M. (2003). Examining teacher technology use implications for pre-service and in-service teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 54. BECTA (2003a). What the research says about ICT and motivation. Retrieved 20 January 2008 from www.becta.org.uk. BECTA (2003b). What the research says about interactive whiteboards. Retrieved 17 January 2008 from www.becta.org.uk. Bell, M. A. (2002). Why use an interactive whiteboard? A baker’s dozen reasons! Teachers.Net Gazette. Retrieved 25 March 2008 from http://teachers.net/gazette/JAN02/mabell.html Glover, D., & Miller, D. (2001). Running with technology: The pedagogic impact of the large scale introduction of interactive whiteboards in one secondary school. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10(3), 257-276. Gray, C., Hagger-Vaughan, L., Pilkington, R., & Tomkins, S.-A. (2005). The pros and cons of interactive whiteboards in relation to the key stage 3 strategy and framework. Language Learning Journal, 32(1), 38-44. Hall, I., & Higgins, S. (2005). Primary school students' perceptions of interactive whiteboards. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 102-117. Hodge, S., & Anderson, B. (2007). Teaching and learning with an interactive whiteboard: A teacher's journey. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 271-282. Kennewell, S. (2001). Interactive whiteboards – yet another solution looking for a problem to solve. Information Technology in Teacher Education, 39, 3-6. Lee, B., & Boyle, M. (2004). Teachers tell their story: Interactive whiteboards at Richardson Primary School. Levy, P. (2002). Interactive whiteboards in learning and teaching in two Sheffield schools: A developmental study. Retrieved 12 March 2008 from http://dis.shef.ac.uk/eirg/projects/wboards.htm. Moss, G., Jewitt, C., Levaãiç, R., Armstrong, V., Cardini, A., & Castle, F. (2007). The interactive whiteboards, pedagogy and pupil performance evaluation. Retrieved 12 January 2008 from www.dfes.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/RR816.pdf. Schmid, E. C. (2006). Investigating the use of interactive whiteboard technology in the English language classroom through the lens of a critical theory of technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning: An International Journal, 19(1), 47-62. Smith, A. (1999). Interactive whiteboard evaluation. Retrieved 27 May 2008 from http://www.mirandanet.ac.uk/pubs/smartboards.htm 107 Smith, H. (2001). Smart board evaluation: Final report. Retrieved from http://www.kented.org.uk/ngfl/ict/IWB/whiteboards/report.html Smith, H. J., Higgins, S., Wall, K., & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: Boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 91 101. Walker, D. (2002). White enlightening. Times Educational Supplement, p.19. Wall, K., Higgins, S., Smith, H., (2005). The visual helps me understand the complicated things: Pupil views of teaching and learning with interactive whiteboards. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(5), 851-867.