NO YOUTH LEFT BEHIND: REFLECTIONS FROM UNDERGRADUATE MATHEMATICS

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 1 , 52 - 56, 01.09.2014

Ersin İlhan

Öz

With the initiative of
Council of Higher Education (HEC), all graduates from high schools almost have
a chance to take a place in undergraduate programs because of the newly founded
universities in all cities in Türkiye. The problems arise in the first year of
higher education for the students who have not enough competences in
mathematics. The program’s courses in universities are similar but the enrolled
students in programs are not homogeneous in their mathematics backgrounds. No
Youth Left Behind (NYLB) in placement is achieved for schooling purposes, but
is it reasonable to say NYLB in first year mathematics is achieved. Thus, the
aim of study is to find the way for achievement in transition and first year
mathematics in higher education. In order to accomplish
the aim, the head of mathematics department in citywide should be co-head with
the head of departments at university.  

Anahtar Kelimeler

Undergraduate Mathematics, Function, Transition

Kaynakça

• Baki, A. (2006). Kuramdan Uygulamaya Matematik Eğitimi. Trabzon: Derya Kitabevi. Blum, W. (1993). Mathematical modelling in mathematics education and instruction. Inside Teaching and learning mathematics in context, Edited by Breiteig (etc.), (pp.3–14). Ellis Horwood Limited, Chichester. Brandel, G., Hemmi, K., & Thunberg, H. (2008). The Widening Gap – A Swedish Perspective. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(2), 38–56. Clark, M. & Lovric, M. (2008). Suggestions for a Theoretical Model for secondary –Tertiary Transition in Mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(2), 25–37. HEC (2007). Türkiye’nin Yükseköğretim Stratejisi. Ankara: Yükseköğretim Kurulu. Hoffman, N., Vargas, J., & Santos, J. (2009). New Directions for Dual Enrollment: Creating Stronger Pathways from High School Through College. New Directions For Community Colleges, 145: 43–58. Mori, R. (2002). Entrance examination and remedial education in Japanese higher education. Higher Education, 43, 27–42. Mutch, C. (2005). The Transiton from High School to University: An Analysis of Advice for Students, Faculty and Administration. Received March 24, 2014 from http://www.cshe.nagoya-u.ac.jp/ publications/ journal/no5/10.pdf NME (2005). Matematik Dersi Öğretim Programı ve Kılavuzu. Ankara: Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanığı. Psacharopoulo, G. & Tassoulas, S. (2004). Achievement at the higher education entry examinations in Greece: A Procrustean approach. Higher Education, 47, 241–252. Sewell, H. W. & Hauser, R. M. (1972). Causes and Consequences of Higher Education: Models of the Status Attainment Process. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 54(5), 851–861. Sewell, H. W. (1971). Inequality of Opportunity for Higher Education. American Sociological Review, 36(5), 793–809. Stevenson, D. L. & Baker, D. P. (1992). Shadow Education and Allocation in Formal Schooling: Transition to University in Japan. The American Journal of Sociology, 97(6), 1639–1657. Stewart, J. (2009). Calculus. USA: Cagne Publication. Tanrıkulu, D. (2011). Türkiye’de Yükseköğretime Erişim. Ankara: Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Toplum Araştırmaları Vakfı Yayını. TUİK (2014). Öğretim Yılı ve Seviyelerine Göre Okullaşma Oranı. Received March 24, 2014 from http:// www.tuik.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1018