Implementation of Teaching Skills Learned by Trained Teachers for Teaching Science Subjects at Secondary School level

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 11 , 63 - 69, 01.12.2018

Shahida Sajjad

Öz

The given study aimed collecting facts and information
about the state of professional competence of science teachers in secondary
schools, and its effectiveness to communicate the requisite knowledge; where in
the extent of the training given to the teachers for teaching science in
secondary school is to be determined. The data was collected from nine private
and nine public secondary schools located in Karachi by interviewing 54 trained
teachers selected through convenience sampling, having a Bachelor of Education
(B.Ed.) degree and who were teaching science subjects at secondary level of
school. The results reveal that there is less coordination between the actual
teaching of science in secondary schools in Karachi and the training given to
the teachers for teaching science although the government spent a lot of money
on this training.  The ineffective
teaching is due to lack of; teaching aids, laboratory facilitates in schools,
and lesson planning by teacher. Mostly teachers explain the experiments through
text book only. It is recommended that the schools should be supplied with
audio visual aids and necessary laboratory equipment, and the teaching load on
the science teacher is reduced to have enough free.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Teaching skills, Trained teachers, Teaching science

Kaynakça

• Al-Rawi, I. (2013). Teaching methodology and its effects on quality learning. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(6), 100-105. Berry, W. (2008). Surviving lecture: A pedagogical alternative. College Teaching, 56(3), 149-153. Dorman, J. P. (2000a). Using academics' perceptions of university environment to distinguish between Australian universities. Educational Studies, 26, 205-212. Dorman, J. P. (2000b). Validation and use of an instrument to assess university-level psychological environment in Australian universities. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 21, 25-38. Fagen, A. P., & Mazur, E. (2003). Assessing and enhancing the introductory science courses in physics and biology: Peer Instruction, classroom demonstration, and genetic vocabulary. Ph.D thesis, Harvard University. Franklin, S.V., Sayre, E. C. & Clark, J.W. (2014). Traditional taught students learn; actively engaged students number. American Journal of Physics. 82(8),798-801. Fraser, B. J. (1994). Classroom and school climate. In D. Gable (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning. National Science Teachers Associations, Australia: Macmillan. Hatim, A. H. (2001). Toward more objective teaching. Iraqi Journal of Medical Science. 9(2), 99-101. Miles, R. (2015). Tutorial instruction in science education. Cypriot Journal of Educational Science, 10(2), 168-179. McKee, E., Williamson, V. M., & Ruebush, L. E. (2007). Effects of a demonstration laboratory on student learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16, 395–400. Nguyen, N, Williams, J & Nguyen, T. (2012). The use of ICT in teaching tertiary physics: Technology and pedagogy. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 13 (2), 1-19. Tobin K.G., (1990), Research on science laboratory activities; in pursuit of better questions and answers to improve learning, School Science and Mathematics, 90, 403-418. Walberg, H.J. (2001). A psychological theory of educational productivity. In F. Farley & N. Gordon (Eds.). Psychology and education. Berkely, CA: McCutchan Walberg, H.J. (2004). Improving the productivity of America's schools. Educational Leadership, 41(8), 19-27. Walberg, H.J., Fraser, B.J., & Welch, W.W. (2006). A test of a model of educational productivity among senior high school students. Journal of Educational Research, 79, 133-139.