Riskin Nicel Ölçümü ve Bayesçi Kalibrasyon: Piyasa Rejimleri Arasında Kuyruk Riskinin Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Küresel finansın kriz sonrası yapısal değişiminde, artan jeopolitik oynaklık ve algoritmik işlem karmaşıklığıyla karakterize edilen statik risk yönetimi ile dinamik nicel ölçüm arasındaki ikilem kritik bir kırılganlık haline gelmiştir. Bu makale, klasik optimizasyonu Bayesçi çıkarımla entegre eden sentezlenmiş bir risk yönetimi çerçevesi önererek bu boşluğu doldurmaktadır. İlk olarak, kredi, piyasa ve operasyonel risklerin teorik bir sınıflandırmasını tanımlıyoruz. İkinci olarak, ortalama-varyans kısıtlamaları altında optimal portföy oluşturma için analitik çözümler elde etmek üzere Lagrangian optimizasyonunu titizlikle uyguluyoruz. Üçüncü olarak, geleneksel Değer-Risk (VaR) yönteminin sınırlamalarını ele alarak, daha tutarlı bir risk ölçüsü olarak Beklenen Açık (ES) kavramının matematiksel bir türetimini sunuyoruz. En önemlisi, Bayesçi Eşlenik Önsel çerçevesini tanıtarak ampirik analizi standart geriye dönük testin ötesine genişletiyoruz. S&P 500'ün tarihsel verilerini kullanarak elde ettiğimiz sonuçlar, önemli bir "volatilite kümelenmesi" (teorik beklenti %1,0 iken ihlal oranı %2,0) ortaya koymakta ve risk modelinin epistemik belirsizliğini nicelleştirmektedir. Bayesçi sonradan analiz, Gauss varsayımları altında düzenleyici başarısızlığın %99,85 olasılığını göstermekte ve 1,93x'lik bir sermaye düzeltme çarpanı gerektirmektedir. Makale, modern finans piyasalarında var olan "parametre belirsizliğini" azaltmak için dinamik, Bayesçi kalibrasyonlu bir iç kontrol sistemi önererek sona ermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Portföy Optimizasyonu
• Beklenen Kayıp
• Riske Maruz Değer (VaR)
• Bayesçi Kalibrasyon
• Kuyruk Riski

Risk Quantification and Bayesian Calibration: Assessing Tail Risk across Market Regimes

Öz

Post-pandemic volatility clustering highlights the gap between static governance and quantitative risk measurement. This paper proposes a synthesized framework utilizing complementary components of classical risk measurement and Bayesian inference. First, applying Lagrangian optimization, we illustrate the sensitivity of static mean-variance allocations to regime-specific sample moments. Second, we introduce Expected Shortfall as a complementary theoretical measure and GARCH specifications to account for time-varying conditional variance. Crucially, we complement standard VaR backtesting with a Beta-Binomial conjugate prior framework to calibrate risk exposures. Utilizing S&P 500 daily returns, we demonstrate how this mechanism quantifies the uncertainty surrounding the VaR violation probability. Relative to the 1.0% expectation, the traditional 21-Day Rolling VaR yields a Bayesian breach-rate adjustment factor of 2.40x, whereas the GARCH(1,1) specification lowers this to 1.80x. Ultimately, by bridging the gap between ex-ante predictions and realized shocks, this Bayesian recalibration loop may provide a data-driven approach to ex-post risk calibration.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Portfolio Optimization
• Expected Shortfall (ES)
• Value-at-Risk (VaR)
• Bayesian Calibration
• Tail Risk

Kaynakça

1. Acerbi, C. and Tasche, D. (2002). Expected shortfall: A natural coherent alternative to value at risk. Economic Notes, 31(2), 379-388. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0300.00091
2. Arfaoui, N. and Yousaf, I. (2022). Impact of COVID-19 on volatility spillovers across international markets: Evidence from VAR asymmetric BEKK GARCH model. Annals of Financial Economics, 17(01), 2250004. https://doi.org/10.1142/S201049522250004X
3. Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.M. and Heath, D. (1999). Coherent measures of risk. Mathematical Finance, 9(3), 203–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9965.00068 Babic, B. (2019). A theory of epistemic risk. Philosophy of Science, 86(3), 522-550. https://doi.org/10.1086/703552
4. Balakrishnan, K. and Ertan, A. (2021). Credit information sharing and loan loss recognition. The Accounting Review, 96(4), 27-50. https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2017-0244
5. Beckmann, J., Belke, A. and Dubova, I. (2022). What drives updates of inflation expectations? A Bayesian VAR analysis for the G‐7 countries. The World Economy, 45(9), 2748-2765. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.13241
6. Blue, G., Faraji, O., Khotanlou, M. and Rezaee, Z. (2024). A corporate risk assessment and reporting model in emerging economies. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 25(4), 783-811. https://doi.org/10.1108/jaar-02-2023-0047
7. Carriero, A., Clark, T.E. and Marcellino, M. (2024). Capturing macro‐economic tail risks with Bayesian vector autoregressions. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 56(5), 1099-1127. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmcb.13121
8. Chen, C.W.S, Chen, P.H. and Hsu, Y.L. (2025). Bayesian forecasting of value‐at‐risk and expected shortfall in cryptocurrency markets: A nonlinear semi‐parametric framework. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 41(1), 2926. https://doi.org/10.1002/asmb.2926

9. Dimitriadis, K.A., Koursaros, D. and Savva, C.S. (2025). The influential impacts of international dynamic spillovers in forming investor preferences: A quantile-VAR and GDCC-GARCH perspective. Applied Economics, 57(45), 7175-7195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2024.2387868
10. Fabozzi, F.J., Markowitz, H.M. and Gupta, F. (2008). Portfolio selection. Handbook of Finance, 2, 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470404324.hof002001
11. Feldkircher, M., Huber, F., Koop, G. and Pfarrhofer, M. (2022). Approximate Bayesian inference and forecasting in huge‐dimensional multicountry VARs. International Economic Review, 63(4), 1625-1658. https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.12577
12. Fukui, M. and Basso, L.F.C. (2026). The relevance of expected shortfall models in different time window sizes. International Journal of Financial Studies, 14(2), 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs14020042
13. Gudiño, J.J.C. and Mora, J.A.N. (2022). Machine learning models, risk management current regulation and perspectives. In J.A.N. Mora & M.B.M. Aragón (Eds.), Data analytics applications in emerging markets (pp. 49-73). Singapore: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4695-0_3
14. Huang, Y., Wang, H., Chen, Z., Feng, C., Zhu, K., Yang, X. and Yang, W. (2024). Evaluating cryptocurrency market risk on the blockchain: An empirical study using the ARMA-GARCH-VaR model. IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society, 5, 83-94. https://doi.org/10.1109/ojcs.2024.3370603
15. Jui, F.N., Hossain, M.J., Das, A., Sultana, N. and Islam, M.K. (2024). Analyzing the impact of remittance, FDI and inflation rate on GDP: A comparative study of Bangladesh, Pakistan and Sri-Lanka using VAR and BEKK-GARCH approach. Heliyon, 10(11), e31381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31381
16. Kakade, K., Jain, I. and Mishra, A.K. (2022). Value-at-risk forecasting: A hybrid ensemble learning GARCH-LSTM based approach. Resources Policy, 78, 102903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102903
17. Kan, R. and Lassance, N. (2025). Optimal portfolio choice with fat tails and parameter uncertainty. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 60(8), 3753-3790. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022109025101622
18. Kuang, W. (2024). High-frequency enhanced VaR: A robust univariate realized volatility model for diverse portfolios and market conditions. PLOS one, 19(5), 0303962. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303962
19. Lam, M.D. (2025). Estimation and backtesting of financial risk measures in the Vietnamese stock market: The debate between value-at-risk and expected shortfall. Global Business and Economics Review, 33(3-4), 423-443. https://doi.org/10.1504/gber.2025.148351
20. Le, T.H. (2024). Forecasting VaR and ES in emerging markets: The role of time‐varying higher moments. Journal of Forecasting, 43(2), 402-414. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.3039
21. Maharana, N., Panigrahi, A.K. and Chaudhury, S.K. (2024). Volatility persistence and spillover effects of Indian market in the global economy: A pre-and post-pandemic analysis using VAR-BEKK-GARCH model. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(7), 294. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17070294
22. Maharana, N., Panigrahi, A.K., Chaudhury, S.K., Uprety, M., Barik, P. and Kulkarni, P. (2025). Economic resilience in post-pandemic India: Analysing stock volatility and global links using VAR-DCC-GARCH and wavelet approach. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18010018
23. Mallela, J. and Gupta, M. (2024). Value at risk performance and backtesting of cryptocurrencies. Management Quest, 6, 51-73. Retrieved from https://www.dsims.org.in/
24. Marcellino, M. and Pfarrhofer, M. (2024). Bayesian nonparametric methods for macroeconomic forecasting. In M.P. Clements & A.B. Galvão (Eds.), Handbook of research methods and applications in macroeconomic forecasting (pp. 90-125). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035310050.00009
25. Martín, J., Parra, M.I., Pizarro, M.M. and Sanjuán, E.L. (2025). A new Bayesian method for estimation of value at risk and conditional value at risk. Empirical Economics, 68(3), 1171-1189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-024-02664-2
26. Mufaridho, L.M.W., SH, K.N., Jalaludin, P. and Pratama, M.I. (2026). Backtesting of the Value-at-Risk based on GARCH model (VaR-GARCH) in measuring stock market risk. Journal of Mathematics, Computations and Statistics, 9(1), 39-47. https://doi.org/10.35580/eyqd4722
27. Muhtarulloh, F., Humairo, R.I.S. and Meiza, A. (2026). Option pricing for exchange rate hedging: Evaluation of value at risk, sharpe ratio, and backtesting with Kupiec and Christoffersen tests. JINAV: Journal of Information and Visualization, 7(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.jinav4667
28. Naifar, N. (2025). Mapping systemic tail risk in crypto markets: Defi, stablecoins, and infrastructure tokens. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(6), 329. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18060329
29. Nasrudin, M., Setyowati, E. and Wara, S.S.M. (2024). Application of VAR-GARCH for modeling the causal relationship of stock prices in the mining sub-sector. Jurnal Varian, 8(1), 89-96. https://doi.org/10.30812/varian.v8i1.4239
30. Papamarkou, T., Hinkle, J., Young, M.T. and Womble, D. (2022). Challenges in Markov chain Monte Carlo for Bayesian neural networks. Statistical Science, 37(3), 425-442. https://doi.org/10.1214/21-sts840
31. Yao, Y. (2025). Applications of Bayesian inference in financial econometrics: A review. Economics and Management Innovation, 2(2), 45-52. https://doi.org/10.71222/mz71ts21
32. Zhu, Y., Taasim, S.I. and Daud, A. (2025). Volatility modeling and tail risk estimation of financial assets: Evidence from gold, oil, Bitcoin, and stocks for selected markets. Risks, 13(7), 138. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks13070138