2008 Krizi ve İşsizliğe Etkisi Üzerine Bir Uygulama: N-11 Ülkeleri

Öz

Küresel finansal kriz tüm dünya ekonomilerini olumsuz etkilemiştir. 2008’de meydana gelen küresel finansal kriz nedeniyle sadece ekonomik sistem olumsuz etkilenmemiş, aynı zamanda sosyal ve kültürel hayatta da son derece yıkıcı etkiler oluştuğu gözlemlenmiştir. Bu çalışmada büyük durgunluğa neden olan küresel finansal krizin işsizlik üzerine etkileri ve büyük durgunluk döneminden sonra işsizlik histerisi etkisi araştırılmıştır. Bu çalışmanın amacı gelecekte dünya ekonomisinde önemli bir paya sahip olacağı düşünülen N-11 ülkelerinde büyük durgunluk öncesi ve sonrası işsizlik oranlarındaki değişimi incelemektir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda Bangladeş, Mısır, Endonezya, İran, Güney Kore, Meksika, Pakistan, Nijerya, Filipinler, Vietnam ve Türkiye’nin de aralarında bulunduğu onbir ülke için 1991-2017 yılları işsizlik verileri kullanılarak Kırılmalı Genişletilmiş Dickey Fuller (ADF) testi yapılmıştır. Araştırmada uygulanan testler sonucunda İran, Pakistan, Filipinler ve Nijerya’nın işsizlik oranlarının durağan olduğu, söz konusu ülkeler için büyük durgunluktan sonra işsizlik oranlarındaki artışın kalıcı etkisini koruduğu bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır. Bangladeş, Meksika ve Güney Kore’nin işsizlik oranlarının ise durağan olmadığı, serilerin birim kök içerdiği tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Büyük Durgunluk,Kırılmalı Birim Kök Testi,İşsizlik,2008 Krizi

An Application on the Impact of 2008 Crisis and Unemployment: N-11 Countries

Öz

The global financial crisis has adversely affected all world economies. Due to the global financial crisis that took place in 2008, not only did the economic system not be adversely affected, but at the same time it was observed to have had extremely devastating effects on social and culturel life. The effects of the global financial crisis on the Unemployment and the unemployment hysteria effect after the great recession were investigated in this study. The aim of this study is to examine the change in before and after the great Recession were unemployment rates in the N-11 countries, which are expected to have a significant share in the world economy in the future. For this purpose Bangladesh, Egypt, Indonesia, Iran, South Korea, Mexico, Pakistan, Nigeria, Philippines, Vietnam and Turkey among them  found found to be broken using the 1991-2017 year of Unemployment data for eleven countries Augmented Dickey Fuller (ADF) test was applied. As a result of the carried out in the research, it has been found that the Unemployment rates of Iran, Pakistan, Philippines and Nigeria are stable and that the increase in Unemployment rates after the great Recession for countries has a lasting effect. Bangladesh, Mexico and South Korea have Unemployment rates that are not stationary, and that the series contain unit roots.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Great Recession,Break Unit Root Test,Unemployment,2008 Crisis

Kaynakça

1. Bakas, D., Paragiotidis, T., & Pelloni, G. (2016). On the significance of labour real-location for European unemployment: Evidence from a panel of 15 countries. Journal of Empirical Finance, 39(B), 229-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2016.05.003
2. Bertola, G. (2017). European unemployment revisited: Shock, institutions integration. Research in Economics, 71(3), 588-612. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rie.2017.06.002
3. Bhattrai, K. (2016). Unemployment-inflation trade off in OECD countries. Economic Modelling, 58, 93-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.05.007
4. Bianco, S. D., Bruno, R. L., & Signorelli, M. (2015). The joint impact of labour policies and the “Great Recession” on unemployment in Europe. Economic Systems, 39(1), 3-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2014.06.002
5. Boeri, T., & Jimeno, J. F. (2016). Learning from the great divergence in unemployment in Europe during the crisis. Labour Economics, 41, 32-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016 /j.labeco.2016.05.022
6. Caggiano, G., Castelnuova, E., & Groshenny, N. (2014). Uncertainty shocks and unemployment dynamics in U.S recessions. Journal of Monetary Economics, 67, 78-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2014.07.006
7. Casares, M., Moreno A., & Vazquez, J. (2014). An estimated New-Keynesian model with unemployment as excess supply of labour. Journal of Macroeconomics, 40, 338-359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2014.01.010
8. Chai, S., & Loungani, P. (2015). Uncertainty and unemployment: The effects of aggregate and sectoral channels. Journal of Macroeconomics, 46, 344-358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2015.10.007

9. Cheng, K. M., Durmaz, N., & Stern, M. L. (2012). Hysteresis vs. natural of U.S unemployment. Economic Modelling, 29(2), 428-434. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2011.11.012
10. Cuestas, J. C., Gil-Alana, L. A., & Staehr, K. (2011). A further investigation of unemployment persistence in European transition economies. Journal of Comparative Economics, 39(4), 514-532. doi: 10.1016/j.jce.2011.09.002
11. Dolado, J. J., & Jimeno, J. F. (1997). The causes of Spanish unemployment: A structural VAR approach. European Economic Review, 41(7), 1281-1307. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0014-2921(97)00058-5
12. Donayre, L., & Panovska, I. (2017). U.S wage growth and nonlinearities: The roles of inflation and unemployment. Economic Modelling, 68, 273-292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2017.07.019
13. Ferrara, L., Marcellino, M., & Mogliani, M. (2015). Macroeconomic forecasting during The Great Recession: The return of nonlinearity. International Journal of Forecasting, 31(3), 664-679. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2014.11.005
14. Ghoshray, A., Ordonez, J., & Sala, H. (2016). Euro, crisis and unemployment: Youth patterns, youth policies?. Economic Modelling, 58, 442-453. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.econmod.2016.05.017
15. Gorcia-Cintado, A., Avila, D. R., & Usabiaga, C. (2015). Can the hysteresis in Spanish regional unemployment be beaten? New evidence from unit root tests with breaks. Economic Modelling, 47, 244-252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.02.035
16. Grant, A. L. (2017). The Great Recession and Okun’s Law. Economic Modelling, 69, 291-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2017.10.002
17. Güloğlu, B. ve İspir, M. S. (2011). Doğal İşsizlik Oranı Mı? İşsizlik Histerisi Mi? Türkiye İçin Sektörel Panel Birim Kök Sınaması Analizi. Ege Akademik Bakış, 11(2), 205-215. Erişim adresi: http://www.onlinedergi.com/eab/
18. Holmes, M. J., Otero, J., & Panagiotidis, T. (2013). Modelling the behaviour of unemployment rates in the U.S over time and across space. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 392(22), 5711-5722. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2013.07.023
19. Lee, C. C., & Chang, C. P. (2008). Unemployment hysteresis in OECD countries: Centurial time series evidence with structural breaks. Economic Modelling, 25(2), 312-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2007.06.002
20. Lee, C. F., Hu, T. C, Li, P. C., & Tsong, C. C. (2013). Asymmetric behaviour of unemployment rates: Evidence from the quantile covariate unit root test. Japan and the World Economy, 28, 72-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.japwor.2013.08.002
21. Lipsey, R. G. (1960). The relation between unemployment and the rate of change of money wage rates: A further analysis. Economica, 27(105), 1-31. doi: 10.2307/2551424
22. Louis, R. J., & Balli, F. (2013). Low-inflation-targeting monetary policy and differential unemployment rate: Is monetary policy to be blamed for the financial crisis? Evidence from major OECD countries. Economic Modelling, 30, 546-564. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.09.042
23. Marques, A. M., Lima, G. T., & Troster, V. (2017). Unemployment persistence in OECD countries after the great recession. Economic Modelling, 64, 105-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2017.03.014
24. Mondschean, T., & Oppenheimer, M. (2011). Regional long-term and short-term unemployment and education in transition: The case of Poland. The Journal of Econometrics Asymmetries, 8(2), 23-47. https://doi.org /10.1016/j.jeca.2011.02.004
25. Song, F. M., & Mu, Y. (1998). Hysteresis in unemployment: Evidence from OECD countries. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 38(2), 181-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1062-9769(99)80111-2
26. Parent, D. (2015). Performance pay and unemployment during the great recession. Economics Letter, 126, 31-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2014.11.011
27. Phillips, A. W. (1958). The relation between unemployment and the rate of change of money wage rates in the United Kingdom 1861-1957. Economica, 25(100), 283-299. doi: 10.2307/2550759
28. Pissarides, C. A. (2013). Unemployment in The Great Recession. Economica, 80, 385-403. doi:10.1111/ecca.12026
29. Watson, P., & Deller, S. (2017). Economic diversity, unemployment and The Great Recession. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 64, 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2016.12.003
30. Yılancı, V. (2009). Yapısal kırılmalar altında Türkiye için işsizlik histerisinin sınanması. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 10(2) , 324-335.
31. http://databank.worldbank.org/data/home.aspx