Main Determinants of Turkey’s Foreign Oil and Natural Gas Strategy

Öz

This paper has the goal of contributing to the academic literature on Turkey’s energy strategy in two ways. Firstly, through explaining the role of and interaction between the most important determinants of Turkey’s foreign oil and natural gas strategy, the paper aims at contributing to further understanding of the strategy. Secondly, while a number of academic studies have analyzed Ankara’s energy policy, they have remained mostly policy-based. Thus, by describing the key determinative elements of Ankara’s external oil and natural gas strategy in the framework of Realism and Liberalism, the paper also aims to fill in this important gap in the academic literature. As shown in this article, both theories are rather helpful in explaining the principal determinants of Turkey’s foreign oil and natural gas strategy. The paper argues that the most crucial determinative elements of the strategy, in terms of the order of their importance, are the concerns of the country over its energy security, its goal of becoming an energy hub, several regional developments, the economic and business partnerships between Turkey and its energy allies, and foreign ambitions of Turkish energy firms. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Energy Security,(Inter)Dependence,Energy Collaboration,National Interests,Energy Hub

Türkiye’nin Dış Petrol ve Doğal Gaz Stratejisinin Temel Belirleyici Faktörleri

Öz

Bu çalışma, Türkiye’nin enerji stratejisi konusunda yapılan akademik literatüre iki şekilde katkı sunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İlk olarak, bahsi gecen çalışma, Türkiye’nin dış petrol ve doğal gaz stratejisinin en temel belirleyici faktörlerini ve bu faktörler arasındaki etkileşimi anlatarak, söz konusu stratejinin daha çok anlaşılmasına katkıda bulunmayı hedeflemektedir. İkinci olarak, Ankara’nın enerji politikasını analiz eden birçok akademik çalışma olmakla beraber, bahsi geçen çalışmalar çoğunlukla politika bazlı kalmıştır. Bu nedenle, bu çalışma Ankara’nın dış petrol ve doğal gaz stratejisini Realizm ve Liberalizm çerçevesinde tarif ederek, akademik literatüre katkı sunmayı hedeflemektedir. Bu çalışmada da gösterildiği gibi, söz konusu iki teori Türkiye’nin dış petrol ve gaz stratejisinin en önemli belirleyici faktörlerini anlatmakta oldukça faydalıdır. Sonuç olarak, bu çalışma, bahsi geçen stratejinin en önemli belirleyici faktörlerinin, önem sırasına göre, Türkiye’nin enerji güvenliği konusundaki kaygıları, ülkenin enerji merkezi olma hedefi, bölgedeki bazı gelişmeler, Türkiye ile enerji ortakları arasındaki ekonomik ortaklık ve Türk enerji firmalarının diğer ülkelerdeki hedefleri olduğunu ileri sürmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Enerji Güvenliği,(Karşılıklı) Bağımlılık,Enerji İşbirliği,Ulusal Çıkarlar,Enerji Merkezi

Kaynakça

1. Abbasov, K. (2015). Role of energy in Azerbaijan’s foreign policy during İlham Aliyev era. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12619535/index.pdf
2. Akhundzada, E. (2014). Turkey as an energy hub: Opportunities and challenges. Hazar Report Journal.
3. Alcenat, W., & Özkececi-Taner, B. (2010). Potential roles for Turkey as a rising regional actor in Eurasia. Insight Turkey, 12(3), 237-253.
4. Alsaad, M. (2014). Energy security in international relations Indian’s energy security. (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/handle/10603/25150
5. Alsancak, H. (2010). The role of Turkey in global energy: Bolstering energy infrastructure security. Journal of Energy Security, May 2010, Retrieved from http://www.ensec.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=247:the-role-of-turkey-in-the-global-energy-bolstering-energy-infrastructure-security&catid=106:energysecuritycontent 0510&Itemid=361
6. Güney, N. A., & Korkmaz, V. (2014). The energy interdependence model between Russia and Europe: An evaluation of expectations for change. Perceptions, 19(3), 35-59.
7. Austvik, O. G., & Rzayeva, G. (2016). Turkey in the geopolitics of natural gas. (M-RCBG Associate Working Paper No. 66.) Retrieved from https://www.hks.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/ centers/mrcbg/files/66_final.pdf
8. Babalı, T. (2010). Regional energy equations and Turkish foreign policy: The Middle East and The Cis. Insight Turkey, 12(3), 147-168.

9. Babalı, T. (2012). The role of energy in Turkey’s relations with Russia and Iran. Paper presented at The Turkey, Russia, Iran Nexus: Economic and Energy Dimensions Workshop. Retrieved from public/legacy_files/files/attachments/120529_Babali_TurkeyEnergy.pdf
10. Balcer, A. (2012). Between energy and soft pan-Turkism: Turkey and the Turkic Republics. Turkish Policy Quarterly, 11(2), 151-162. Retrieved from http://turkishpolicy.com
11. Bilgin, M. (2015). Turkey’s energy strategy: Synchronizing geopolitics and foreign policy with energy security. Insight Turkey, 17(2), 67-81.
12. BOTAŞ. (2013). BOTAŞ Sektör Raporu. Retrieved from https://www.botas.gov.tr/ docs/raporlar/tur/sektorap_2013.pdf
13. Çalıkoğlu, E. (2012). Overview of the Turkish energy sector. Retrieved from https://www.deik.org.tr/uploads/e2e421b3664c417bb22c1c068202cff0.pdf
14. Česnakas, G. (2010). Energy resources in foreign policy: A theoretical approach. Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, 3(1), 30-52. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10076-010-0003-y
15. Chow, E. C., & Hendrix, L. E. (2010). Central Asia’s pipelines: Field of dreams and reality (Special Report No. 23). Retrieved from https://csis-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/legacy_files/files/publication/1009_EChow_LHendrix_CentralAsia.pdf
16. Dannreuther, R. (2010). International relations theories: Energy, minerals and conflict. (Polinares Working Paper No. 8).
17. Dimitrov, I. (2015). The dream of south stream: A geopolitical analysis of the pipeline’s development and failure. Retrieved from http://www.geo-europa.nl/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/The-dream-of-South-Stream.pdf
18. Doyle, M. W. (2016). Liberalism and foreign policy. In S. Smith, A. Hadfield, & T. Dunne (Eds.), Foreign policy: Theories, actors, cases (Third ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Eissler, E. R. (2012). Regional energy security: Turkey’s ambition to become a regional energy hub. (7th edition Volume 1). Centre for Policy Analysis and Research on Turkey.
20. EMRA. (2017a). Turkish Natural Gas Market Report 2016. Retrieved from https://www.epdk.org.tr/Detay/Icerik/1-1275/natural-gaspublishments-reports
21. EMRA. (2017b). Turkish Petroleum Market Report 2016. Retrieved from https://www.epdk.org.tr/Detay/Icerik/1-2316/petroleumpublishments-reports
22. Erşen, E. (2003). The impact of Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline on Turkey-U.S. relations. Turkish Review of Eurasian Studies, 73-116. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/1048359/ The_Impact_of_Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan_Pipeline_on_Turkey-U.S._Relations
23. Fettweis, C. J. (2009). No blood for oil: Why resource wars are obsolete?. In G. Luft & A. Korin (Eds.), Energy security challenges for the 21st century a reference handbook. Santa Barbara, Calif.: Praeger Security International.
24. Garibov, A. (2017). Are the littoral states close to signing an agreement on the legal status of the Caspian Sea?. Eurasia Daily Monitor, 14(61). Retrieved from https://jamestown.org/program/littoral-states-close-signing-agreement-legal-status-caspian-sea/
25. Grieco, J. M. (1993). The relative-gains problem for international cooperation. The American Political Science Review, 87(3), 727-743. doi: 10.2307/2938747
26. Heinrich, A., & Pleines, H. (2015). Mixing geopolitics and business: How ruling elites in the Caspian states justify their choice of export pipelines. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 6(2), 107-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euras.2015.03.003
27. Holsti, O. R. (2004). Theories of international relations. In M. J. Hogan & T. G. Paterson (Eds.), Explaining the history of American foreign relations (pp. 51-90). New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. IEA. (2016). Energy policies of IEA countries Turkey 2016 Review. Retrieved from https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/EnergyPoliciesofIEACountriesTurkey.pdf
29. Iozzi, D. (2014). Eni external action: An international relations theories interpretation? (Master's Thesis). Retrieved from https://tesi.luiss.it/12630/1/iozzi-debora-tesi-2014.pdf
30. İpek, P. (2008). Azerbaijan: Oil boom and challenges. In M. Kibaroglu (Ed.), Turkey's neighborhood (pp. 111-141). Ankara: Foreign Policy Institute.
31. İpek, P. (2017). The role of energy security in Turkish foreign policy (2004–2016). In P. Gozen Ercan (Ed.), Turkish foreign policy: International relations, legality and global reach (pp.173-194). US: Palgrave Macmillan.
32. İşeri, E., & Dilek, O. (2011). The limitations of Turkey's new foreign policy activism in the Caucasian regional security complexity. Turkish Studies, 12(1), 41-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2011.563502
33. Kardaş, Ş. (2013). Energy in Turkey’s international affairs and the race for southern corridor. Retrieved from http://www.gmfus.org/publications/energy-turkey%E2%80%99s-international-affairs-and-race-southern-corridor
34. Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1989). Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. New York: HarperCollins.
35. Klare, M. T. (2009). There will be blood: Political violence, regional warfare, and the risk of great-power conflict over contested energy sources. In G. Luft & A. Korin (Eds.), Energy security challenges for the 21st century: A reference handbook (pp. 44-65). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger Security International.
36. Korab-Karpowicz, W. J. (2010). Political realism in international relations. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/realism-intl-relations/
37. Krauer-Pacheco, K. (2011). Turkey as a transit country and energy hub: The link to its foreign policy aims (Report No. 118). Bremen, Germany: Forschungsstelle Osteuropa an der Universität Bremen.
38. Luft, G., & Korin, A. (2009). Energy security: In the eyes of the beholder. In G. Luft & A. Korin (Eds.), Energy security challenges for the 21st century a reference handbook. Santa Barbara, Calif.: Praeger Security International.
39. MENR. (2014). Strategic report 2015-2019. Retrieved from http://www.enerji.gov.tr/File/?path= ROOT%2f1%2fDocuments%2fStrategic%20Plan%2fStrategicPlan2015-2019.pdf
40. Moravcsik, A. (1992). Liberalism and international relations theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
41. Moravcsik, A. (1997). Taking preferences seriously: A liberal theory of international politics. International Organization, 51(4), 513-553. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081897550447
42. Moravcsik, A. (2010). Liberal theories of international relations: A primer. Retrieved from https://www.princeton.edu/~amoravcs/publications.html
43. Ripsman, N. M. (2017). Neoclassical realism. Retrieved from http://internationalstudies.oxfordre.com /view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.001.0001/acrefore-9780190846626-e-36
44. Shaffer, B. (2006). Turkey’s energy policies in a tight global energy market. Insight Turkey, 8(2), 97-104. Retrieved from https://www.belfercenter.org/
45. Sulejmanovic, A. (2014). The Role of Energy in EU-Russian Relations (Master's Thesis). Retrieved from http://www.openaccess.hacettepe.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11655/2554/aeb65fd8-5d54-449c-93ba-bfe0d3ed6c82.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
46. Tokuş, H. I. (2010). Turkey as an emerging energy hub (Master's Thesis). Retrieved from http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a524682.pdf
47. Walt, S. M. (1998). International relations: One world, many theories. Foreign Policy, 110, 29-46. doi: 10.2307/1149275
48. Yardımcı, O. (2015, July 8). Energy cooperation in the history of Turkish-Russian relations [Web log comment]. Retrieved from http://enerjiuzmani.blogspot.be/2015/07/july-08-2015-energy-cooperation-in_8.html
49. Yuldasheva, G. (2008). Geopolitics of Central Asia in the context of the Iranian factor. Caucasian Review of International Affairs, 2(3), 133-145. Retrieved from http://www.cria-online.org/