Global Public Goods & The Sovereignty Reponsibility Approach

Öz

The problems with the production and financing of Global Public Goods weaken the thesis that nation-states have lost their sovereignty and that international governance structures are the determinant of the system in the globalization process. The increase in global public goods and its inability to be resolved with transnational systems further strengthen the reason why nation-states exist. Failure to solve problems related to KKM by international institutions increased the role and importance of the nation-state. The increasing role of the state in solving the production and financing problems of global public goods brings the concept of “sovereign responsibility”. Responsibility for sovereignty expresses the necessity of political sovereignty to behave sensitively towards the citizens of the countries inside and to the international community outside. In this framework, each sovereign state is responsible for planning global public goods supply and demand in its jurisdiction and producing it to meet the needs of all global elements. For global public goods, which is beyond the dominance of the state, the states, international and supranational structures that steer the world economy and politics should be engaged.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• global public goods,public goods,sovereignity,global governance,state

Global Public Goods & The Sovereignty Reponsibility Approach

Öz

The problems with the production and financing of Global Public Goods weaken the thesis that nation-states have lost their sovereignty and that international governance structures are the determinant of the system in the globalization process. The increase in global public goods and its inability to be resolved with transnational systems further strengthen the reason why nation-states exist. Failure to solve problems related to KKM by international institutions increased the role and importance of the nation-state. The increasing role of the state in solving the production and financing problems of global public goods brings the concept of “sovereign responsibility”. Responsibility for sovereignty expresses the necessity of political sovereignty to behave sensitively towards the citizens of the countries inside and to the international community outside. In this framework, each sovereign state is responsible for planning global public goods supply and demand in its jurisdiction and producing it to meet the needs of all global elements. For global public goods, which is beyond the dominance of the state, the states, international and supranational structures that steer the world economy and politics should be engaged.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Küresel Kamusal Mal,Egemenlik,Devlet,Küresel Yönetişim

Kaynakça

1. Akyol, S. ve Ulutürk, S. (2007). “Küresel Kamu Malları: Hegemonya ve İstikrarın Küresel Ekonomi Politiği”. Akdeniz İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi (13) 2007. 62-85.
2. Albin, C. (2003). “Negotiating International Cooperation: Global Public Goods And Fairness”, Review ofInternational Studies. 29,365–385.
3. Anand, P. B.(2004) “Financing the Provision of Global Public Goods,”. The World Economy. 27, no. 2, pp. 215–235.
4. Carbone, M. (2007). “Supporting or Resisting Global Public Goods? The Policy Dimension of a Contested Concept”, Global Governance 13, 179-198.
5. Champney, L. (1988), “Public Goods and Policy Types”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 48, No. 6 (Nov. - Dec., 1988), pp. 988-994 Brando, N. Boonen, C. Cogolati, S. Hagen, R. Vanstappen, N. and Wouters. J. (2019), “Governing as commons or as global public goods: two tales of power”, International Journal of the Commons. Vol. 13. no 1. pp. 553–577.
6. Deneulin, S. Townsend, N. (2007) “Public goods, global public goods and the common goodInternational”. Journal of Social Economics Vol. 34 No. 1/2, pp. 19-36.
7. Desai, Meghnad, (2003), Publıc Goods: A Hıstorıcal Perspectıve, içinde ed. (Kaul, I., Conceicao, P., Goulven, K. and Mendoza, R.U.), Providing Global Public Goods: Managing Globalization, New York: Oxford University Press, USA, pp. 63-78 (16).
8. Edizdoğan, N. Çetinkaya, Ö. Gümüş, E. (2017), Kamu Maliyesi, 8. Baskı, Bursa: Ekin basım, yayın dağıtım.

9. Ferroni, M., Mody, A. (2002) (Eds.); International Public Goods:Incentives, Measurement and Financing, Washington D.C., Kluwer Academic Publishers and World Bank.
10. Kanbur, R. (2004). Cross-Border Externalities, International Public Goods And Their Implications for Aid Agencies, Global Tensions: Challenges and Opportunities in the World Economy (Ed: Benería, L. and Bisnath, S.). New York and London: Routledge. Karayılmazlar, E. (2006). “Uluslararası Kamusal Mallara İlişkin Kavramsal sorunların Kamu Maliyesi Perspektifinden Tartışılması”. Vergi Dünyası. Sayı: 300, 148-159 (11).
11. Kaul, I. Grunberg I. and Stern A. (1999). “Global Public Goods Concepts, Policies and Strageties”. Global Public Goods: International Cooperation in the 21 st Century (Ed. By, Kaul, Inge, Isabella Grunberg ve Stern A.). Newyork.
12. Kaul, I. Mendoza, R.U. (2003). “Advancıng The Concept Of Publıc Goods”. Providing Global Public Goods: Managing Globalization (Ed: Kaul, I., Conceicao, P., Goulven, K. and Mendoza, R.U.). New York: Oxford University Press, USA, pp. 78-112.
13. Kaul I. Conceicao, P. Le Goulven, K. and Ronald U. Mendoza, (2003a). “How To Improve The Provısıon Of Global Public Goods”. Providing Global Public Goods: Managing Globalization (Ed: Kaul, I., Conceicao, P., Goulven, K. and Mendoza, R.U.). New York: Oxford University Press, USA.
14. Kaul, I. Conceicao, P. le Goulven, K. and Mendoza, R.U. (2003b). “Why Do Global Public Goods Matter Today. Providing Global Public Goods: Managing Globalization (Ed: Kaul, I., Conceicao, P., Goulven, K. and Mendoza, R.U.). New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 2-22.
15. Kindleberger, C.P. (1986). “International Public Goods Without International Government”. The American Economic Review, 76 (1). pp.1-13. https://www.jstor.org/ stable/pdf/1804123.pdf (Erişim: 16/03/2020).
16. Kirmanoğlu, H. Yılmaz, B.E. Susam, N. (2006). Maliye Teorisi’nin Çıkmazı: Küresel Kamusal Mallar (Kalkınma Yardımları İçinde Küresel Kamusal Malların Finansmanı). Maliye Dergisi. Sayı 150.
17. Martin, L. L. (1999). ‘‘The Political Economy of International Cooperation’’. Global Public Goods: International Cooperation in the 21st Century (Ed: Inge Kaul, Isabelle Grunberg, and Marc A. Stern). New York: Oxford University, Press.
18. Mutlu, A. (2006). Küresel Kamusal Mallar Bağlamında Sağlık Hizmetleri ve Çevre Kirlenmesi: Üretim, Finansman ve Yönetim Sorunları. Maliye Dergisi. Sayı 150.
19. Nordhaus, W. D. (2006). “Paul Samuelson and Global Public Goods” Samuelsonian Economics and the Twenty-First Century (Ed: Szenberg, M. Ramrattan, L. Gottesman, A. A.), New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
20. Sandler, T. ( 1999). “Intergenerational Public Goods: Strategies, Efficiency, and Institutions,”. Global Public Goods: International Cooperation in the 21st Century (Inge Kaul, Isabelle Grunberg, Marc A. Stern). New York: Oxford University Press, USA.
21. Samuelson, P. A., (1954). “The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure”. The Review of Economics and Statistics. Volume XXXVI, Issue 4 (Now., 1954), 387-389.
22. Şener, O. (1996). Kamu Ekonomisi. 5. Baskı. İstanbul: Beta Yayınevi.
23. Yılmaz, B. E. ve Yaraşır, S. (2011). “Bir Küresel Kamusal Mal Olarak Sağlık Ve Finansmanında Resmi Kalkınma Yardımlarının Rolü”. İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Maliye Araştırma Merkezi Konferansları 55. Seri / Yıl 2011-[1].
24. The Guardian, What does the WHO do, and why has Trump stopped supporting it? https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020 /apr/15/world-health-organization -why-has-trump-suspended-funding (Erişim: 18/04/2020)