İkinci Ürün Mısır Silajlarının Kalitesine Farklı Karbonhidrat Kaynaklarının Etkileri

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 3, 133 - 144, 26.12.2025

Abdullah Erkan , Gökhan Şen , Ali Karapinar

https://doi.org/10.32707/ercivet.1695206

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, ikinci ürün mısır silajlarında arpa ve buğday kırmaları ile bonkalit katkı maddelerinin silaj kalitesine olan etkilerini değerlendirmektir. Bu amaçla arpa hasadı yapılan tarlaya ikinci ürün olarak mısır ekilmiştir. Laboratuvara getirilen kıyılmış mısır içerisine katkı maddeleri karıştırılarak 8 tekrarlı olarak katkısız kontrol (K), %2.5 buğday kırığı (2.5 B), %5 buğday kırığı (5 B), %2.5 arpa kırığı (2.5 A), %5 arpa kırığı (%5 A), %2.5 bonkalit (2.5 BNK), %5 bonkalit (5 BNK) grupları oluşturuldu. Silaj olgunlaşması için ağzı kapalı kavanozlarda 60 gün beklenmiş, açılan silajlarda kimyasal analizler ve in vitro gerçek sindirilebilirlik analizleri yapılmıştır. Arpa eklenen grupta silaj pH'ının düştüğü ve katkılar ile propiyonik asitin arttığı belirlendi (P<0.05). Katkılı gruplarda kontrole göre organik madde ve ham protein düzeylerinin arttığı (P<0.05), nötr deterjan lif (NDF) ve asit deterjan lif (ADF) düzeylerinin ise azaldığı (P<0.05) gözlendi. Katkı maddeleriyle in vitro gerçek sindirilebilirlik değişmezken (P>0.05), nispî yem değerlerinin arttığı belirlendi (P<0.05). Sonuç olarak, ikinci ürün mısır silajlarında karbonhidrat kaynağı olarak buğday ve arpa kırmaları ile bonkalit katkı maddelerinin silaj kalitesini olumlu yönde etkilediği belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca canlı hayvanlarda sindirilebilirlik testlerinin yapılması ve etkilerinin izlenmesinin yararlı olacağı düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

ikinci ürün , kalite , mısır , Silaj , yem

Proje Numarası

2024/068

Effects of Different Carbohydrate Sources on The Quality of Second Crop Corn Silages

Öz

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of barley crushing, wheat crushing and boncalite additives on silage quality in second crop corn silages. For this purpose, corn was planted as a second crop on the field where barley was harvested. Groups as 8 replicates were created by mixing crushed barley, crushed wheat and boncalite additives within chopped corn brought to the laboratory; control without additive (C), 2.5% wheat crushed (2.5 W), 5% wheat crushed (5 W), 2.5% barley crushed (2.5 B), 5% barley crushed (%5 B), 2.5% boncalite (2.5 BNC), 5% boncalite (5 BNC). Silage maturation period was waited for 60 days in closed jars, and chemical analyses and in vitro true digestibility (IVTD) analyses were performed on opened silages. It was determined that silage pH decreased in the barley added group and propionic acid increased with the additives (P<0.05). It was observed that organic matter and crude protein levels increased (P<0.05), neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) levels decreased compared to control in added groups (P<0.05). While in vitro true digestibility did not change with additives (P>0.05), it was determined that relative forage values increased (P<0.05). As a result, it was found that wheat and barley crushings and boncalite additives as carbohydrate sources in second crop corn silages positively affected the silage quality. In addition, it is considered that conducting digestibility tests on live animals and monitoring their effects would be useful.

Anahtar Kelimeler

corn , feed , quality , second crop , Silage

Etik Beyan

No ethics committee approval was required for this study.

Destekleyen Kurum

Kırıkkale University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit

Proje Numarası

2024/068

Kaynakça

• Acar Z, Bostan M. The effects of some natural additives on quality of alfalfa silage. ANAJAS 2016; 31(3): 433-40.
• Anonymous Ankom technology, https://www.ankom.com/?srsltid=AfmBOopmo5CgpsODECADwnx3Ch5ixdmIRVkHUtyUpjXwWH-QwXwMO0Rc Accessed Date: 05/05/2025
• Aykan Y, Saruhan V Determination of silage quality features field pea (Pisum sativum L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) mixtures ensiling at different rates. Dicle Üniv Vet Fak Derg 2018; 11(2): 64-70.
• Basmacıoğlu H, Ergül M. Silage microbiology. Hayvansal Üretim, 2002; 43(1): 12-24.
• Bingöl NT, Karslı MA, Bolat D, Akça İ. The effects of molasses and formic acid addition in sainfoin silage harvested at different maturities on silage quality and digestibility. YYÜ Vet Fak Derg 2008; 19(2): 61-6.
• Burgu L, Mut H. Silage yield and some quality traits of silage maize varieties growing as second crop. JOTAF 2023; 20(1): 12-24.
• Can A, Denek N, Yazgan K. Effect of different additives on silage quality and in vitro dry matter digestibility of sugar beet leaves. YYÜ Vet Fak Derg 2003; 14(2): 26-9.
• Demirci M, Kara K, Karsli MA. (2023). Determination of quality and nutrient content of artichoke by-products ensilaged with barley and molasses. JAFS 2023; 32(3):324-30.
• Demirci M., Karslı MA, Şenyüz HH, Tunç AE. Effects of Different Starch Sources Used at High Levels in Cattle on Ruminal Fermentation Properties and Some Blood Parameters. Erciyes Üniv Vet Fak Derg 2024; 21(2), 99-109.
• Ergün A, Çolpan İ, Yalçın S, Yıldız G, Küçükersan MK, Küçükersan S, Şehu A, Saçaklı P. Yemler yem hijyeni ve teknolojisi, 5. Baskı, Pozitif Baskı, 2013; s. 115-132.
• Garipoglu AV, Can M, Kaymak G, Ozturk E, Acar Z, Ayan I. Determining nutritive value of mixed silage of forage rape, forage pea and oat supplemented with molasses and tea wastes. Fresenius Environ Bull 2020; 29(1): 178-83.
• Gül M, Acar Z, Geren H. Research on silage possibility and feeding value of artichoke stalks with leaves. ANADOLU ETAE Dergisi 2001; 11(2): 20-32.
• Gül S. The impact of wheat bran and molasses addition to caramba mix silage on feed value and in vitro organic matter digestibility. J King Saud Univ Sci 2023; 35(1): 102400.
• Gülümser E, Mut H, Başaran U, Doğrusöz MÇ. Effects of molasses or crushed barley addition on the quality of cowpea and soybean silages. BSEU Journal of Science 2019; 6: 161-7.
• Gürsoy E, Kara E, Sürmen M. The effects of different cutting stage and crushed barley applications on silage properties of annual forage crops mixture. Turk J Agric Res 2021; 8(3): 273-81.
• Hayırlı A. Evaluation of roughages, Yem Magazin 2017; 78: 49-54.
• Kara K, Kara K, Erol T, Şen G, Karslı MA. Evaluating the effects of different silage additives on silage quality and in vitro digestion values of the silages of leguminous and gramineous forage plants grown without fertilizer and irrigation in central Anatolian arid conditions. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 2021; 45 (6): 989-98.
• Karadeniz, E. The status of corn silage in Turkey and its importance in animal nutrition. ISPEC J Agricult Sci 2019; 3(1): 170-75.
• Keskin B, Aksoy K. Effects of crushed corn and wheat bran added in different rates on silage quality of quinoa. JIST 2024; 14(3): 1353-65.
• Kung Jr L., Shaver RD, Grant RJ, Schmidt RJ. Silage review: Interpretation of chemical, microbial, and organoleptic components of silages. J Dairy Sci 2018; 101(5): 4020-33.
• Kurtoğlu V. Silage and silage additives, Aybil Publisher, Konya, 2011; s. 77-144.
• Mut H, Gülümser E, Dogrusöz MÇ, Basaran U. Determination of silage quality of narbon vetch (Vicia narbonensis L.) and ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum L.) mixtures. COMUAgri 2020; 8(2): 391-6.
• National Research Council (NRC). Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle, 7th rev. ed. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2001; p. 284.
• Okumuş A. The effects of hazelnut hull on silage fermentation, aerobic stability and in vitro gas production of maize silage grown as a second crop, Yüksek lisans tezi, Uludağ Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 2021; p. 1-17.
• Ramzan HN, Tanveer A, Maqbool R, Akram HM, Mirza MA. Use of sugarcane molasses as an additive can improve the silage quality of sorghum-sudangrass hybrid. Pak J Agric Sci 2022; 59: 75-81.
• Şahin İF, Zaman M. An important cattle feed: SILAGE. Eastern Geographical Review 2011; 15(23): 1-18.
• Şahin S. Türkiye’de mısır ekim alanlarının dağılışı ve mısır üretimi, GEFAD 2001; 21(1): 73-90.
• Tjardes K, Buskırk D, Allen M, Ames N, Bourquın L, Rust S. Brown midrib-3 corn silage improves digestion but not performance of growing beef steers. J Anim Sci 2000; 78(11): 2957-65.
• TÜİK Hayvansal üretim istatistikleri, https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p=Tarim-111, Accessed Date: 01/05/2025.
• Yıldız S, Deniz S, Özkan F, Kale Ç. Forage turnip (Brassica rapa) harvested in different phases of vegetative stage and ensiled with the additives of molasses and barley and the effects of additives on silage quality, in vitro digestibility, and energy content. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 2022; 46(3): 475-82.
• Yılmaz N, Akman O, Aşcı ÖÖ. Determination of yield and quality characteristics of some silage maize (Zea mays L.) varieties. Akademik Ziraat Dergisi 2020; 9(1): 271-8.