Araştırma Makalesi

The Comparison of Saturated and Unsaturated Fatty Acid Compositions in Safflower Herbage and Safflower Straw as Alternative Forage for Ruminant

Cilt: 17 Sayı: 3 1 Aralık 2020
  • Kanber Kara *
PDF İndir
TR EN

The Comparison of Saturated and Unsaturated Fatty Acid Compositions in Safflower Herbage and Safflower Straw as Alternative Forage for Ruminant

Öz

In this study, it was aimed to investigate the saturated and unsaturated fatty acid compositions in herbage and straw of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L. Dinçer; thornless) plant as alternative forage for ruminant. Major fatty acids in safflower herbage and safflower straw were determined as linoleic, palmitic, oleic and stearic acids. The pro-portions of myristic, pentadecanoic, cis-10-pentadecenoic, palmitic, palmitoleic, cis-10-pentadecenoic, α-linolenic, cis-eicosatrienoic, erucic, cis-docosahexaenoic, tricosanoic and lignoceric acids in total fat acids of safflower herbage were higher than those of safflower straw (P<0.01). The proportions of margaric, stearic, elaidic, oleic, linoleic, cis-11-eicoenioic, arachidonic, cis-eicosapentaenoic and nervonic acids in total fatty acids of safflower herbage were lower than those of safflower straw (P<0.001). The proportions of saturated fatty acid (SFA), medium-chain fatty acids (MCFA), very-long-chain fatty acids (VLCFA) and w-3, and w-3/w-6 ratio for fatty acids of safflower herbage were high-er than those of safflower straw (P<0.001). The proportions of unsaturated fatty acid (UFA), monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA), polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA), w-6, w-9 and long-chain fatty acids (LCFA) in total fatty acids of safflower straw were higher than those of safflower herbage (P<0.001). Palmitic, stearic, oleic and linoleic acids contents as mg/g in dry matter (DM) of safflower herbage were lower than those of safflower straw. As a result, safflower herbage and safflower straw had a rich fatty acid content in mg/g DM. The proportions and amounts of essential fatty acids in saf-flower straw, which have important biological activity, were higher than safflower herbage. In general, these feedstuffs stand out as rich alternative forages in w-3 and w-6 fatty acids.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Aardema H, Vos PL, Lolicato F, Roelen BAJ, Knijn HM, Vaandrager AB, Helms JB, Gadella BM. Oleic acid prevents detrimental effects of saturated fatty acids on bovine oocyte developmental competen-ce. Biol Reprod 2011: 85; 62-9.
  2. Altin TB, Barak B, Altin BN. Change in precipitation and temperature amounts over three decades in central Anatolia, Turkey. Atmosph Clim Sci 2012; 2: 107-25.
  3. Asgharzadeh F, Nasri MHF, Behdani MA. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers on nutritive value of safflower forage and silage. J Anim PoultSci 2013; 3: 66-75.
  4. Baumler E, Cuniberti A, Nolascoa SM, Riccobene IC. Moisture dependent physical and compression properties of safflower seed. J Food Eng 2006; 72: 134-40.
  5. Boufaied H, Chouinard PY, Tremblay GF. Fatty acids in forages. I. Factors affecting concentrations. Can J Anim Sci 2003: 83; 501-11.
  6. Cagri A, Kara K. The effect of safflower on the in vitro digestion parameters and methane production in horse and ruminant. Acta Vet Eurasia 2018; 44: 73-84.
  7. Dewhurst RJ, Scollan ND, Youell SJ. Influence of species, cutting date and cutting interval on the fatty acid composition of grasses. Grass Forage Sci 2001: 56; 68-74.
  8. Dierking RM, Kallenbach RL, Roberts CA. Fatty acid profiles of orchardgrass, tall fescue, perennial ryegrass, and alfalfa. Crop Sci 2010: 50; 391-402.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

1 Aralık 2020

Gönderilme Tarihi

30 Haziran 2020

Kabul Tarihi

24 Ağustos 2020

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2020 Cilt: 17 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA
Kara, K. (2020). The Comparison of Saturated and Unsaturated Fatty Acid Compositions in Safflower Herbage and Safflower Straw as Alternative Forage for Ruminant. Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(3), 248-254. https://doi.org/10.32707/ercivet.828777
AMA
1.Kara K. The Comparison of Saturated and Unsaturated Fatty Acid Compositions in Safflower Herbage and Safflower Straw as Alternative Forage for Ruminant. Erciyes Üniv Vet Fak Derg. 2020;17(3):248-254. doi:10.32707/ercivet.828777
Chicago
Kara, Kanber. 2020. “The Comparison of Saturated and Unsaturated Fatty Acid Compositions in Safflower Herbage and Safflower Straw as Alternative Forage for Ruminant”. Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 17 (3): 248-54. https://doi.org/10.32707/ercivet.828777.
EndNote
Kara K (01 Aralık 2020) The Comparison of Saturated and Unsaturated Fatty Acid Compositions in Safflower Herbage and Safflower Straw as Alternative Forage for Ruminant. Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 17 3 248–254.
IEEE
[1]K. Kara, “The Comparison of Saturated and Unsaturated Fatty Acid Compositions in Safflower Herbage and Safflower Straw as Alternative Forage for Ruminant”, Erciyes Üniv Vet Fak Derg, c. 17, sy 3, ss. 248–254, Ara. 2020, doi: 10.32707/ercivet.828777.
ISNAD
Kara, Kanber. “The Comparison of Saturated and Unsaturated Fatty Acid Compositions in Safflower Herbage and Safflower Straw as Alternative Forage for Ruminant”. Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 17/3 (01 Aralık 2020): 248-254. https://doi.org/10.32707/ercivet.828777.
JAMA
1.Kara K. The Comparison of Saturated and Unsaturated Fatty Acid Compositions in Safflower Herbage and Safflower Straw as Alternative Forage for Ruminant. Erciyes Üniv Vet Fak Derg. 2020;17:248–254.
MLA
Kara, Kanber. “The Comparison of Saturated and Unsaturated Fatty Acid Compositions in Safflower Herbage and Safflower Straw as Alternative Forage for Ruminant”. Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 17, sy 3, Aralık 2020, ss. 248-54, doi:10.32707/ercivet.828777.
Vancouver
1.Kanber Kara. The Comparison of Saturated and Unsaturated Fatty Acid Compositions in Safflower Herbage and Safflower Straw as Alternative Forage for Ruminant. Erciyes Üniv Vet Fak Derg. 01 Aralık 2020;17(3):248-54. doi:10.32707/ercivet.828777