Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2023, Cilt: 39 Sayı: 3, 369 - 378, 31.12.2023

Öz

Kaynakça

  • [1] S. Mavroulis et al., “Emergency response, intervention, and societal recovery in Greece and Turkey after the 30th October 2020, MW = 7.0, Samos (Aegean Sea) earthquake,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 20, no. 14, pp. 7933–7955, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10518-022-01317-y.
  • [2] B. B. Erkan, A. N. Karanci, S. Kalaycioʇlu, A. T. Özden, I. Çalişkan, and G. Özakşehir, “From emergency response to recovery: Multiple impacts and lessons learned from the 2011 van earthquakes,” Earthquake Spectra, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 527–540, Feb. 2015, doi: 10.1193/060312EQS205M.
  • [3] S. Platt and B. D. Drinkwater, “Post-earthquake decision making in Turkey: Studies of Van and I˙zmir,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 17, pp. 220–237, Aug. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.03.010.
  • [4] The Federal Emergency Management Agency, “The Federal Disaster Response and Emergency Management,” 2010.
  • [5] S. Tanaka, “LOCAL DISASTER MANAGEMENT AND HAZARD MAPPING,” 2008.
  • [6] A. Greer, “Earthquake Preparedness and Response: Comparison of the United States and Japan,” ASCE, 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000179.
  • [7] R. Havidan, Q. Enrico L., D. Russell R., and B. Neil R., National planning and response: National systems. 2007.
  • [8] AFAD, “Ministry of Interior-Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency,” 2023. https://en.afad.gov.tr (accessed Jun. 26, 2023).
  • [9] Istanbul Technical University, “6 Şubat 2023 04.17Mw 7,8 Kahramanmaraş-Hatay ve 13.24 Mw 7,7 Kahramanmaraş Depremleri Ön İnceleme Raporu,” 2023.
  • [10] United States Geological Survey, “The 2023 Kahramanmaraş, Turkey, Earthquake Sequence,” 2023. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/storymap/index-turkey2023.html (accessed Jun. 26, 2023).
  • [11] K. Ö. Çetin, M. Ilgaç, G. Can, and E. Çakır, “Preliminary Reconnaissance Report on February 6, 2023, Pazarcık M w =7.7 and Elbistan M w =7.6, Kahramanmaraş-Türkiye Earthquakes,” 2023. Accessed: Sep. 07, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://eerc.metu.edu.tr/en/system/files/documents/DMAM_Report_2023_Kahramanmaras-Pazarcik_and_Elbistan_Earthquakes_Report_final_ENG.pdf
  • [12] World Bank Group, “Global Rapid Post-Disaster Damage Estimation (GRADE) Report- February 6, 2023 Türkiye/Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes,” 2023.
  • [13] Türk Mühendis ve Mimar Odaları Birliği, “TMMOB Ön Değerlendirme Raporu,” 2023. https://www.tmmob.org.tr/icerik/tmmob-degerlendirme-raporu-yayimlandi (accessed Jun. 26, 2023).
  • [14] J. R. Martin, “Session 11: Earthquake Disaster Response and Recovery Earthquake Hazard and Emergency Management Session No. 11 Course Title: Earthquake Hazard and Emergency Management Session Title: Earthquake Disaster Response and Recovery.” [Online]. Available: http://www.fema.gov/rrr/frp/
  • [15] P. Yariyan, H. Zabihi, I. D. Wolf, M. Karami, and S. Amiriyan, “Earthquake risk assessment using an integrated Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process with Artificial Neural Networks based on GIS: A case study of Sanandaj in Iran,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 50, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101705.
  • [16] R. J. Dawson et al., “A systems framework for national assessment of climate risks to infrastructure,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 376, no. 2121, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2017.0298.
  • [17] P. K. P. Liang, M. P. N. Burrow, M. Sasidharan, M. E. Torbaghan, and G. S. Ghataora, “A rational framework for post-flood road network condition recovery,” Infrastructure Asset Management, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 38–51, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1680/jinam.21.00027.
  • [18] The Association of Southeast Asian Nation, “ASEAN Comprehensive Recovery Framework,” 2020.
  • [19] S. Greiving et al., “Multi-risk assessment and management—a comparative study of the current state of affairs in chile and ecuador,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1–23, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13031366.
  • [20] A.-M. Glod-Lendvai, “Comparative analysis of disaster risk management practices in Bucharest, Ciudad de Mexico and Istanbul,” GeoPatterns, vol. 4, pp. 16–25, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.5719/GeoP.4/2.
  • [21] P. Banerji, “Comparative Analysis of Disaster Management between Japan & India,” IOSR Journal of Business and Management, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 62–74, 2013, doi: 10.9790/487X-1366274.
  • [22] T. Yustisia Lestari, R. Rachman, and A. Septhiany Prihatiningsih Syamsuddin, “Comparative Analysis of Disaster Management Between Indonesia and Japan from Regulatory and Institutional Aspects,” MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 331, p. 01007, 2020, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/202033101007.
  • [23] A. Tolga Özden, “ARCHITECTURE AND DISASTER: A HOLISTIC AND RISK-BASED BUILDING INSPECTION PROFESSIONAL TRAINING MODEL FOR PRACTICING ARCHITECTS IN TURKEY A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN ARCHITECTURE,” 2013.
  • [24] International Strategy for Disaster Reduction, “Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015: Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters,” 2007. [Online]. Available: www.unisdr.org/hfa
  • [25] Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, “Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015 - 2030,” 2015.
  • [26] B. C. Lin and C. H. Lee, “Constructing an adaptability evaluation framework for community-based disaster management using an earthquake event,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 93, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103774.
  • [27] D. M. Levy, J. A. Kottler, J. W. Adams, J. R. Crawford, and M. L. Levy, “Using a Hybrid Approach to Increase the Impact of Medical Response to Natural Disasters,” Disaster Med Public Health Prep, vol. 17, no. 1, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1017/dmp.2022.263.
  • [28] A. Warsame, K. Blanchet, and F. Checchi, “Towards systematic evaluation of epidemic responses during humanitarian crises: A scoping review of existing public health evaluation frameworks,” BMJ Glob Health, vol. 5, no. 1, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002109.
  • [29] T. Ghawana, M. Aleksandrov, and S. Zlatanova, “3D geospatial indoor navigation for disaster risk reduction and response in urban environment,” in ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Copernicus GmbH, Sep. 2018, pp. 49–57. doi: 10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-4-49-2018.
  • [30] M. J. Sani and A. A. Rahman, “GIS and BIM integration at data level: A review,” in International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives, International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Oct. 2018, pp. 299–306. doi: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W9-299-2018.
  • [31] G. Charalambos, V. Dimitrios, and C. Symeon, “Damage Assessment, Cost Estimating, and Scheduling for Post-Earthquake Building Rehabilitation Using BIM,” Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, 2014.
  • [32] J. Um, J. min Park, S. yeon Park, and G. Yilmaz, “Low-cost mobile augmented reality service for building information modeling,” Autom Constr, vol. 146, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104662.
  • [33] B. Schönfuß, D. McFarlane, G. Hawkridge, L. Salter, N. Athanassopoulou, and L. de Silva, “A catalogue of digital solution areas for prioritising the needs of manufacturing SMEs,” Comput Ind, vol. 133, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2021.103532.
  • [34] G. Yilmaz, L. Salter, D. McFarlane, and B. Schönfuß, “Low-cost (Shoestring) digital solution areas for enabling digitalisation in construction SMEs,” Comput Ind, vol. 150, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2023.103941.
  • [35] J. Macias-Aguayo, D. McFarlane, B. Schönfuß, and L. Salter, “A catalogue of digital solution areas for logistics SMEs,” in IFAC-PapersOnLine, Elsevier B.V., 2022, pp. 1828–1833. doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.664.
  • [36] J. Macias-Aguayo, G. Yilmaz, A. Mukherjee, and D. McFarlane, “The Role of Low-Cost Digitalisation in Improving Operations Management,” in Service Oriented, Holonic and Multi-Agent Manufacturing Systems for Industry of the Future, 2023.
  • [37] G. Yilmaz, A. Mukherjee, J. M. Aguayo, and D. McFarlane, “Impact Assessment Model for Low Cost (Shoestring) Digitalisation in Small Construction Organizations,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Institute of Physics, 2022. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1101/9/092043.
  • [38] C. Chandrakumar, R. Prasanna, M. Stephens, and M. L. Tan, “Earthquake early warning systems based on low-cost ground motion sensors: A systematic literature review,” Frontiers in Sensors, vol. 3, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.3389/fsens.2022.1020202.
  • [39] A. Kamat, S. Shanker, and A. Barve, “Assessing the Factors Affecting Implementation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Indian Humanitarian Logistics: A G-DANP Approach,” Journal of Modelling in Management, pp. 416–456, 2023.
  • [40] E. Yulianto, P. Utari, and I. A. Satyawan, “Communication technology support in disaster-prone areas: Case study of earthquake, tsunami and liquefaction in Palu, Indonesia,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 45, May 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101457.
  • [41] A. Khan, S. Gupta, and S. K. Gupta, “Multi-hazard disaster studies: Monitoring, detection, recovery, and management, based on emerging technologies and optimal techniques,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 47. Elsevier Ltd, Aug. 01, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101642.
  • [42] Z. Lokmic-Tomkins, D. Bhandari, C. Bain, A. Borda, T. C. Kariotis, and D. Reser, “Lessons Learned from Natural Disasters around Digital Health Technologies and Delivering Quality Healthcare,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 20, no. 5. MDPI, Mar. 01, 2023. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054542.
  • [43] E. J. Sommerfeldt, “Disasters and Information Source Repertoires: Information Seeking and Information Sufficiency in Postearthquake Haiti,” Journal of Applied Communication Research, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 1–22, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1080/00909882.2014.982682.
  • [44] R. K. Yin, Case Study Research: Design and Methods. SAGE Publications, 2003.
  • [45] AFAD and MINISTRY OF INTERIOR DISASTER AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PRESIDENCY, “Strategic Plan 2019-2023.” [Online]. Available: www.afad.gov.tr
  • [46] NY Times, “Turkey Earthquake Damage.” https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/02/06/world/turkey-earthquake-damage.html

Digital Solutions to Support Emergency Response and Relief based on the Findings from Ground Zero after the 6th February 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Series

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 39 Sayı: 3, 369 - 378, 31.12.2023

Öz

Öz: Bu makale, 6 Şubat 2023'te meydana gelen Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye deprem dizisinin ardından deprem bölgesine intikal eden afet yönetiminden sorumlu büyükşehir belediyelerinin yürüttüğü acil durum yönetimi ve yardımı aktivitelerini Malatya özelinde incelemiştir. Bu kapsamda çalışma, Malatya afet yönetimi merkezinde acil durum operasyonlarından sorumlu olarak bulunan Balıkesir Büyükşehir Belediyesine mensup yaklaşık iki yüz kişilik bir afet yönetimi ekibini yöneten mimar ve sağlık ve sosyal hizmetlerden sorumlu bir personel ile yapılan mülakatların bulgularını sunmaktadır. Saha incelemeleri ve mülakatlar sonucunda, sahada yürütülen operasyonları engelleyen tehlikeler dört acil durum yönetimi ve yardımı başlığı altında listelenmiştir. Bu engel ve tehlikelerin önlenmesi ve acil durum yönetimi ve yardımı aktivitelerinin sahada daha etkin şekilde yürütülmesi için literatür taraması ve uzman görüşmeleri sonucunda orta çıkan ucuz maliyetli dijital çözümler listesi önerilmiştir. Bu çalışma, saha operasyonlarını düzenlemek, koordinasyonu, iletişimi ve bilgi paylaşımını arttırmak için sistematik acil durum yönetimi ve yardımı yaklaşıma ihtiyaç olduğunu ortaya çıkararak, saha operasyonlarının dijital araçlar ile desteklenmesi gerektiğinin altını çizmiştir.

Kaynakça

  • [1] S. Mavroulis et al., “Emergency response, intervention, and societal recovery in Greece and Turkey after the 30th October 2020, MW = 7.0, Samos (Aegean Sea) earthquake,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 20, no. 14, pp. 7933–7955, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10518-022-01317-y.
  • [2] B. B. Erkan, A. N. Karanci, S. Kalaycioʇlu, A. T. Özden, I. Çalişkan, and G. Özakşehir, “From emergency response to recovery: Multiple impacts and lessons learned from the 2011 van earthquakes,” Earthquake Spectra, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 527–540, Feb. 2015, doi: 10.1193/060312EQS205M.
  • [3] S. Platt and B. D. Drinkwater, “Post-earthquake decision making in Turkey: Studies of Van and I˙zmir,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 17, pp. 220–237, Aug. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.03.010.
  • [4] The Federal Emergency Management Agency, “The Federal Disaster Response and Emergency Management,” 2010.
  • [5] S. Tanaka, “LOCAL DISASTER MANAGEMENT AND HAZARD MAPPING,” 2008.
  • [6] A. Greer, “Earthquake Preparedness and Response: Comparison of the United States and Japan,” ASCE, 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000179.
  • [7] R. Havidan, Q. Enrico L., D. Russell R., and B. Neil R., National planning and response: National systems. 2007.
  • [8] AFAD, “Ministry of Interior-Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency,” 2023. https://en.afad.gov.tr (accessed Jun. 26, 2023).
  • [9] Istanbul Technical University, “6 Şubat 2023 04.17Mw 7,8 Kahramanmaraş-Hatay ve 13.24 Mw 7,7 Kahramanmaraş Depremleri Ön İnceleme Raporu,” 2023.
  • [10] United States Geological Survey, “The 2023 Kahramanmaraş, Turkey, Earthquake Sequence,” 2023. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/storymap/index-turkey2023.html (accessed Jun. 26, 2023).
  • [11] K. Ö. Çetin, M. Ilgaç, G. Can, and E. Çakır, “Preliminary Reconnaissance Report on February 6, 2023, Pazarcık M w =7.7 and Elbistan M w =7.6, Kahramanmaraş-Türkiye Earthquakes,” 2023. Accessed: Sep. 07, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://eerc.metu.edu.tr/en/system/files/documents/DMAM_Report_2023_Kahramanmaras-Pazarcik_and_Elbistan_Earthquakes_Report_final_ENG.pdf
  • [12] World Bank Group, “Global Rapid Post-Disaster Damage Estimation (GRADE) Report- February 6, 2023 Türkiye/Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes,” 2023.
  • [13] Türk Mühendis ve Mimar Odaları Birliği, “TMMOB Ön Değerlendirme Raporu,” 2023. https://www.tmmob.org.tr/icerik/tmmob-degerlendirme-raporu-yayimlandi (accessed Jun. 26, 2023).
  • [14] J. R. Martin, “Session 11: Earthquake Disaster Response and Recovery Earthquake Hazard and Emergency Management Session No. 11 Course Title: Earthquake Hazard and Emergency Management Session Title: Earthquake Disaster Response and Recovery.” [Online]. Available: http://www.fema.gov/rrr/frp/
  • [15] P. Yariyan, H. Zabihi, I. D. Wolf, M. Karami, and S. Amiriyan, “Earthquake risk assessment using an integrated Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process with Artificial Neural Networks based on GIS: A case study of Sanandaj in Iran,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 50, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101705.
  • [16] R. J. Dawson et al., “A systems framework for national assessment of climate risks to infrastructure,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 376, no. 2121, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2017.0298.
  • [17] P. K. P. Liang, M. P. N. Burrow, M. Sasidharan, M. E. Torbaghan, and G. S. Ghataora, “A rational framework for post-flood road network condition recovery,” Infrastructure Asset Management, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 38–51, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1680/jinam.21.00027.
  • [18] The Association of Southeast Asian Nation, “ASEAN Comprehensive Recovery Framework,” 2020.
  • [19] S. Greiving et al., “Multi-risk assessment and management—a comparative study of the current state of affairs in chile and ecuador,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1–23, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13031366.
  • [20] A.-M. Glod-Lendvai, “Comparative analysis of disaster risk management practices in Bucharest, Ciudad de Mexico and Istanbul,” GeoPatterns, vol. 4, pp. 16–25, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.5719/GeoP.4/2.
  • [21] P. Banerji, “Comparative Analysis of Disaster Management between Japan & India,” IOSR Journal of Business and Management, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 62–74, 2013, doi: 10.9790/487X-1366274.
  • [22] T. Yustisia Lestari, R. Rachman, and A. Septhiany Prihatiningsih Syamsuddin, “Comparative Analysis of Disaster Management Between Indonesia and Japan from Regulatory and Institutional Aspects,” MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 331, p. 01007, 2020, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/202033101007.
  • [23] A. Tolga Özden, “ARCHITECTURE AND DISASTER: A HOLISTIC AND RISK-BASED BUILDING INSPECTION PROFESSIONAL TRAINING MODEL FOR PRACTICING ARCHITECTS IN TURKEY A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN ARCHITECTURE,” 2013.
  • [24] International Strategy for Disaster Reduction, “Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015: Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters,” 2007. [Online]. Available: www.unisdr.org/hfa
  • [25] Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, “Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015 - 2030,” 2015.
  • [26] B. C. Lin and C. H. Lee, “Constructing an adaptability evaluation framework for community-based disaster management using an earthquake event,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 93, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103774.
  • [27] D. M. Levy, J. A. Kottler, J. W. Adams, J. R. Crawford, and M. L. Levy, “Using a Hybrid Approach to Increase the Impact of Medical Response to Natural Disasters,” Disaster Med Public Health Prep, vol. 17, no. 1, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1017/dmp.2022.263.
  • [28] A. Warsame, K. Blanchet, and F. Checchi, “Towards systematic evaluation of epidemic responses during humanitarian crises: A scoping review of existing public health evaluation frameworks,” BMJ Glob Health, vol. 5, no. 1, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002109.
  • [29] T. Ghawana, M. Aleksandrov, and S. Zlatanova, “3D geospatial indoor navigation for disaster risk reduction and response in urban environment,” in ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Copernicus GmbH, Sep. 2018, pp. 49–57. doi: 10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-4-49-2018.
  • [30] M. J. Sani and A. A. Rahman, “GIS and BIM integration at data level: A review,” in International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives, International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Oct. 2018, pp. 299–306. doi: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W9-299-2018.
  • [31] G. Charalambos, V. Dimitrios, and C. Symeon, “Damage Assessment, Cost Estimating, and Scheduling for Post-Earthquake Building Rehabilitation Using BIM,” Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, 2014.
  • [32] J. Um, J. min Park, S. yeon Park, and G. Yilmaz, “Low-cost mobile augmented reality service for building information modeling,” Autom Constr, vol. 146, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104662.
  • [33] B. Schönfuß, D. McFarlane, G. Hawkridge, L. Salter, N. Athanassopoulou, and L. de Silva, “A catalogue of digital solution areas for prioritising the needs of manufacturing SMEs,” Comput Ind, vol. 133, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2021.103532.
  • [34] G. Yilmaz, L. Salter, D. McFarlane, and B. Schönfuß, “Low-cost (Shoestring) digital solution areas for enabling digitalisation in construction SMEs,” Comput Ind, vol. 150, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2023.103941.
  • [35] J. Macias-Aguayo, D. McFarlane, B. Schönfuß, and L. Salter, “A catalogue of digital solution areas for logistics SMEs,” in IFAC-PapersOnLine, Elsevier B.V., 2022, pp. 1828–1833. doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.664.
  • [36] J. Macias-Aguayo, G. Yilmaz, A. Mukherjee, and D. McFarlane, “The Role of Low-Cost Digitalisation in Improving Operations Management,” in Service Oriented, Holonic and Multi-Agent Manufacturing Systems for Industry of the Future, 2023.
  • [37] G. Yilmaz, A. Mukherjee, J. M. Aguayo, and D. McFarlane, “Impact Assessment Model for Low Cost (Shoestring) Digitalisation in Small Construction Organizations,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Institute of Physics, 2022. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1101/9/092043.
  • [38] C. Chandrakumar, R. Prasanna, M. Stephens, and M. L. Tan, “Earthquake early warning systems based on low-cost ground motion sensors: A systematic literature review,” Frontiers in Sensors, vol. 3, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.3389/fsens.2022.1020202.
  • [39] A. Kamat, S. Shanker, and A. Barve, “Assessing the Factors Affecting Implementation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Indian Humanitarian Logistics: A G-DANP Approach,” Journal of Modelling in Management, pp. 416–456, 2023.
  • [40] E. Yulianto, P. Utari, and I. A. Satyawan, “Communication technology support in disaster-prone areas: Case study of earthquake, tsunami and liquefaction in Palu, Indonesia,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 45, May 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101457.
  • [41] A. Khan, S. Gupta, and S. K. Gupta, “Multi-hazard disaster studies: Monitoring, detection, recovery, and management, based on emerging technologies and optimal techniques,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 47. Elsevier Ltd, Aug. 01, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101642.
  • [42] Z. Lokmic-Tomkins, D. Bhandari, C. Bain, A. Borda, T. C. Kariotis, and D. Reser, “Lessons Learned from Natural Disasters around Digital Health Technologies and Delivering Quality Healthcare,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 20, no. 5. MDPI, Mar. 01, 2023. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054542.
  • [43] E. J. Sommerfeldt, “Disasters and Information Source Repertoires: Information Seeking and Information Sufficiency in Postearthquake Haiti,” Journal of Applied Communication Research, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 1–22, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1080/00909882.2014.982682.
  • [44] R. K. Yin, Case Study Research: Design and Methods. SAGE Publications, 2003.
  • [45] AFAD and MINISTRY OF INTERIOR DISASTER AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PRESIDENCY, “Strategic Plan 2019-2023.” [Online]. Available: www.afad.gov.tr
  • [46] NY Times, “Turkey Earthquake Damage.” https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/02/06/world/turkey-earthquake-damage.html

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Bilgi Sistemleri Organizasyonu ve Yönetimi, Bilgisayar Yazılımı, Gereksinim Mühendisliği, Yazılım Kalitesi, Süreçler ve Metrikler
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Gökçen YILMAZ

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 31 Aralık 2023
Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Aralık 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 39 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA YILMAZ, G. (2023). Digital Solutions to Support Emergency Response and Relief based on the Findings from Ground Zero after the 6th February 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Series. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 39(3), 369-378.
AMA YILMAZ G. Digital Solutions to Support Emergency Response and Relief based on the Findings from Ground Zero after the 6th February 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Series. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. Aralık 2023;39(3):369-378.
Chicago YILMAZ, Gökçen. “Digital Solutions to Support Emergency Response and Relief Based on the Findings from Ground Zero After the 6th February 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Series”. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 39, sy. 3 (Aralık 2023): 369-78.
EndNote YILMAZ G (01 Aralık 2023) Digital Solutions to Support Emergency Response and Relief based on the Findings from Ground Zero after the 6th February 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Series. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 39 3 369–378.
IEEE G. YILMAZ, “Digital Solutions to Support Emergency Response and Relief based on the Findings from Ground Zero after the 6th February 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Series”, Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, c. 39, sy. 3, ss. 369–378, 2023.
ISNAD YILMAZ, Gökçen. “Digital Solutions to Support Emergency Response and Relief Based on the Findings from Ground Zero After the 6th February 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Series”. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 39/3 (Aralık 2023), 369-378.
JAMA YILMAZ G. Digital Solutions to Support Emergency Response and Relief based on the Findings from Ground Zero after the 6th February 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Series. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2023;39:369–378.
MLA YILMAZ, Gökçen. “Digital Solutions to Support Emergency Response and Relief Based on the Findings from Ground Zero After the 6th February 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Series”. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, c. 39, sy. 3, 2023, ss. 369-78.
Vancouver YILMAZ G. Digital Solutions to Support Emergency Response and Relief based on the Findings from Ground Zero after the 6th February 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Series. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2023;39(3):369-78.

✯ Etik kurul izni gerektiren, tüm bilim dallarında yapılan araştırmalar için etik kurul onayı alınmış olmalı, bu onay makalede belirtilmeli ve belgelendirilmelidir.
✯ Etik kurul izni gerektiren araştırmalarda, izinle ilgili bilgilere (kurul adı, tarih ve sayı no) yöntem bölümünde, ayrıca makalenin ilk/son sayfalarından birinde; olgu sunumlarında, bilgilendirilmiş gönüllü olur/onam formunun imzalatıldığına dair bilgiye makalede yer verilmelidir.
✯ Dergi web sayfasında, makalelerde Araştırma ve Yayın Etiğine uyulduğuna dair ifadeye yer verilmelidir.
✯ Dergi web sayfasında, hakem, yazar ve editör için ayrı başlıklar altında etik kurallarla ilgili bilgi verilmelidir.
✯ Dergide ve/veya web sayfasında, ulusal ve uluslararası standartlara atıf yaparak, dergide ve/veya web sayfasında etik ilkeler ayrı başlık altında belirtilmelidir. Örneğin; dergilere gönderilen bilimsel yazılarda, ICMJE (International Committee of Medical Journal Editors) tavsiyeleri ile COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics)’un Editör ve Yazarlar için Uluslararası Standartları dikkate alınmalıdır.
✯ Kullanılan fikir ve sanat eserleri için telif hakları düzenlemelerine riayet edilmesi gerekmektedir.