A study on determining the factors preventing enterprises from innovation: Erzincan organized industrial zone example

Yıl 2019, Sayı: 54, 417 - 446, 31.12.2019

Serkan Demirdöğen

https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.521871

Öz

This study was conducted to determine the internal and external factors
that prevent the innovation activities of enterprises operating in the Erzincan
Organized Industrial Zone (OIZ). Additionally, it was also aimed in this study
to determine whether there was a statistically significant relationship between
internal and external innovation barriers, and also between the innovation
barriers and general structures of the enterprises (annual return, operating
cycle, and number of employees). The survey form that was prepared in line with
these aims was applied to all the owners and managers of 35 enterprises that
were functioning in the Erzincan OIZ as of April 2018. According to the results
of the study, “the simplicity of copying the product innovation” was determined
as the external innovation barrier, and “insufficient skills of the employees”
was determined as the internal innovation barrier. Additionally, based on the
results of the correlation analysis, it was determined that there was a
statistically significant and strong relationship between the internal and
external innovation barriers. It is considered that this study will make
important contributions to the plans and studies to be conducted by the central
and local units for increasing the innovation potentials of enterprises. By
this means, it is expected that this will also contribute to the technological
development and international competitiveness of enterprises and country. In
addition, it is thought that the study will contribute to the academic studies
that will be conducted in order to identify internal and external innovation
barriers throughout the country.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Innovation, Innovation Barriers, Erzincan OIZ

İşletmelerin inovasyon yapmalarına engel olan faktörlerin belirlenmesine yönelik bir araştırma: Erzincan organize sanayi bölgesi örneği

Öz

Bu çalışma Erzincan Organize
Sanayi Bölgesinde (OSB) faaliyet gösteren işletmelerin inovasyon yapmalarına
engel olan iç ve dış faktörlerin belirlenmesi amacıyla yapılmıştır. Çalışmada
ayrıca iç inovasyon engelleri ile dış inovasyon engelleri arasında ve inovasyon
engelleri ile işletmelerin genel yapısı (yıllık ciro, faaliyet süresi ve
çalışan sayısı) arasında anlamlı bir ilişkinin olup olmadığının tespit edilmesi
amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaçlar doğrultusunda hazırlanan anket formu 2018 yılı Nisan
ayı itibariyle, Erzincan OSB’ de faaliyet gösteren 35 işletmenin sahip ve
yöneticilerinin tamamına uygulanmıştır. Araştırmanın sonuçlarına göre, dış
inovasyon engeli olarak “ürün yeniliğinin kopyalanmasının kolay olması”, iç
inovasyon engeli olarak da “çalışanların yeteneklerinin yetersiz olması” ön
plana çıkan engeller olmuştur. Ayrıca yapılan korelasyon analizi sonuçlarına
göre iç ve dış inovasyon engelleri arasında güçlü ve anlamlı bir ilişki
bulunmuştur. Çalışmanın merkezi ve yerel birimler
tarafından işletmelerin inovasyon güçlerinin arttırılmasına yönelik olarak
yapacakları planlamalara ve çalışmalara önemli katkılar sağlayacağı
düşünülmektedir.  Bu sayede de
işletmelerin ve ülkenin teknolojik gelişimine ve uluslararası rekabetçiliğine
çeşitli katkılar sağlanması umulmaktadır. 
Ayrıca çalışmanın ülke genelinde iç ve dış inovasyon engellerinin
belirlenmesine yönelik yapılacak akademik çalışmalara da katkı sağlayacağı
düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

İnovasyon, İnovasyon Engelleri, Erzincan OSB

Kaynakça

• ATALAY, Murat, Nilgün ANAFARTA ve Fulya SARVAN; (2013), “The Relationship Between Innovation and Firm Performance: An Empirical Evidence From Turkish Automotive Supplier Industry”, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 75, pp. 226-235, Internet Address: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/ pii/S1877042813005624, Date of Access: 12.04.2018.
• BLASCO, Agustí Segarra, Jose Garcia QUEVEDO and Mercedes Teruel CARRİZOSA; (2008), “Barriers to Innovation and Public Policy in Catalonia”, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4(4), pp. 431-451, Internet Address: https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/236202322_Barriers_to_Innovation_and_Public_Policy_in_Catalonia, Date of Access: 11.03.2018.
• CHASANİDOU, Dimitra, Njål SİVERTSTØL and Jarle HİLDRUM; (2018), “Exploring Employee Interactions And Quality Of Contributions in Intra‐Organisational Innovation Platforms”, Creativity and Innovation Management, 27(4), pp. 1-18, Internet Address: https://onlinelibrary. wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ caim.12290, Date of Access: 23.08.2018.
• DAMANPOUR, Fariborz, Richard M. WALKER and Claudia N. AVELLANEDA; (2009), “Combinative Effects of Innovation Types and Organizational Performance: A Longitudinal Study of Service Organizations”, Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), pp.650-675, Internet Address: https://onlinelibrary.wiley. com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00814.x, Date of Access: 06.05.2018.
• FRENKEL, Amnon; (2003), “Barriers and Limitations in the Development of Industrial Innovation in the Region”, European Planning Studies, 11(2), pp.115-137, Internet Address: https://www. tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0965431032000072837, Date of Access: 21.04.2018.
• GAULT, Fred; (2018), “Defining and Measuring Innovation in all Sectors of The Economy”, Research Policy, 47, pp. 617-622, Internet Address: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0048733318300076, Date of Access: 12.05.2018.
• GUİJARRO, Antonia Madrid, Domingo GARCİA and Howard Van AUKEN; (2009), “Barriers to Innovation among Spanish Manufacturing SMEs”, Journal of Small Business Management, 47(4), pp. 465-488, Internet Address: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/ 10.1111/ j.1540-627X.2009.00279.x, Date of Access: 15.03.2018.
• INSEAD; (2017), “The Global Innovation Index 2017”, Internet Address: http://www.wipo.int/edocs/ pubdocs/en/ wipo_pub_gii_2017.pdf, Date of Access: 02.07.2018.
• INSEAD; (2018), “The Global Innovation Index 2018”, Internet Address: http://www.wipo.int/edocs/ pubdocs/en/ wipo_pub_gii_2018.pdf, Date of Access: 20.01.2019.
• KAHN, Kenneth B.; (2018), “Understanding Innovation”, Kelley School of Business, 61, pp. 453-460, Internet Address: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0007681318300119.2018. 01.011, Date of Access: 03.05.2018.
• KARABULUT, Ahu Tuğba; (2015), “Effects of Innovation Types on Performance of Manufacturing Firms in Turkey”, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, pp. 1355-1364, Internet Address: https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187704281503801X, Date of Access: 09.06.2018.
• KİM, Youngok and Steven S. LUİ; (2015), “The Impacts of External Network and Business Group on Innovation: Do The Types of Innovation Matter?”, Journal of Business Research, 68, pp. 1964-1973, Internet Address: https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014829631500020X, Date of Access: 13.04.2018.
• KOTEY, Bernice and Anthony SORENSEN; (2014), “The Identification and Characterization of Open Innovation Profiles in Italian Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises”, Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, 20(3), pp. 405-429, Internet Address: https://www.anzrsai.org/assets/Uploads/ PublicationChapter/Kotey-and-Sorenson-final.pdf, Date of Access: 18.05.2018.
• LARSEN, Povl and Alan LEWİS; (2007), “How Award-Winning SMEs Manage The Barriers to Innovation”, Creativity And Innovation Management, 16(2), pp. 142-151, Internet Address: https://onlinelibrary. wiley.com/doi/full/ 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00428.x, Date of Access: 24.04.2018.
• MOELLERS, Thomas, Camillo VİSİNİ and Mirella HALDİMANN; (2018), “Complementing Open Innovation in Multi-Business Firms: Practices For Promoting Knowledge Flows Across Internal Units”, R&D Management, 6(1), pp. 1-20, Internet Address: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ doi/full/10.1111/radm.12343, Date of Access: 23.08.2018.
• RAJAPATHIRANA, R.P. Jayani and Yan HUI; (2018), “Relationship between innovation capability, innovation type, and firm performance”, Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3, pp. 44-55, Internet Address: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S2444569X17300409, Date of Access: 06.05.2018.
• RAMİLO, Runddy and Mohamed Rashid Bin EMBİ; (2014), “Critical Analysis of Key Determinants and Barriers to Digital Innovation Adoption Among Architectural Organizations”, Frontiers of Architectural Research, 3, pp. 431-451, Internet Address: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S2095263514000429, Date of Access: 13.08.2018.
• SAATÇİOĞLU, Ömür Yaşar and Ömür Neczan TİMURCANDAY ÖZMEN; (2010), “Analyzing the Barriers Encountered in Innovation Process Through Interpretive Structural Modelling: Evidence From Turkey”, Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(2), pp. 207-225, Internet Address: http://dergipark.gov.tr/yonveek/ issue/13693/165729, Date of Access: 10.08.2018.
• SABUNCU, Birsel; (2014), “KOBİ’lerde Yenilik ve Engellerinin Tespitine Yönelik Bir Araştırma: Denizli Örneği”, İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(1), pp. 103-123, İnternet Adresi: http://isarder.com/isardercom/2014vol6issue1/vol.6_issue.1_article08.full.text.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 07.08.2018.
• SAIGOSOOM, Natawat; (2012), “Barriers and Opportunities For Small And Medium-Sized Thai Food Firms in The Context of Innovation Management: The Case of Processed Marine And Processed Fruit And Vegetable Sectors”, Unpublished PhD Thesis, Manchester Business School Internet Address: https://www.escholar. manchester.ac.uk/uk-ac-man-scw:185612, Date of Access: 07.02.2018.
• SANDBERG, Birgitta and Leena Aarikka STENROOS; (2014), “What Makes it So Difficult? A Systematic Review on Barriers to Radical Innovation”, Industrial Marketing Management, 43, pp. 1293-1305, Internet Address: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0019850114001400, Date of Access: 03.04.2018.
• SCHACHTER, Monica Edwards; (2018), “The Nature and Variety of Innovation”, International Journal of Innovation Studies, 2, pp.1-15, Internet Address: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S2096248718300249, Date of Access: 14.04.2018.
• TAVASSOLİ, Sam and Charlie KARLSSONB; (2015), “Persistence of Various Types of Innovation Analyzed and Explained”, Research Policy, 44, pp. 1887-1901, Internet Address: https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S0048733 315000980, Date of Access: 14.04.2018.
• WEBER, Benjamin and Sven HEIDENREICH; (2018), “When and With Whom to Cooperate? Investigating Effects of Cooperation Stage and Type on Innovation Capabilities and Success”, Long Range Planning, 51, pp. 334-350, Internet Address: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0024630117302996, Date of Access: 10.05.2018.
• WERNER, Hölzl and Janger JÜRGEN; (2012), “Innovation Barriers across Firms and Countries”, WIFO Working Papers 426, Internet Address: https://www. econstor.eu/handle/10419/128992, Date of Access: 19.04.2018.
• YAXUAN, Chu; (2017), “Innovation Activities, Knowledge Sourcing and Perception of Innovation Barriers Evidence from China”, Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Durham, Internet Address: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/12073/, Date of Access: 22.03.2018.