KİŞİLİK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN İZLEYİCİ ETKİSİ (BYSTANDER EFFECT) ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİNDE KONTROL ODAĞININ ROLÜ

Yıl 2013, Sayı: 42, 25 - 40, 18.05.2015

Mahmut Özdevecioğlu Yasemin Kaya Tuğba Dedeoğlu

Öz

Bu çalışmada örgütlerde çalışan bireylerin beş faktör kişilik özelliklerinin izleyici etkisi üzerindeki etkileri ve bu etkide kontrol odağının aracılık rolü incelenmiştir. İzleyici etkisi, izleme ve cesaretlendirme davranışları olarak iki boyutlu, kontrol odağı ise iç ve dış kontrol odağı olarak ele alınmıştır. Kişilik özellikleri ise beş faktör kişilik özellikleri açısından ele alınmıştır.  Araştırma sonuçlarına göre kişilik özellikleri ile izleme davranışları arasında anlamlı ilişkiler tespit edilirken cesaretlendirme davranışları ile herhangi bir ilişki tespit edilememiştir. Uyumlu bireylerin olaylarda izleyici kalmayı tercih ettikleri, sorumluluk sahibi, duygusal dengesi yüksek, yeni deneyimlere açık ve dışadönük bireylerin ise gözü önünde meydana gelen olaylara izleyici kalmadıkları anlaşılmıştır. Kontrol odağının aracılık rolüne ilişkin analiz sonuçlarına göre ise, kontrol odağının uyumluluk, dışa dönüklük, yeni deneyimlere açıklık, duygusal denge ve sorumluluğun izleme davranışları üzerindeki etkisinde anlamlı kısmi aracılık etkisine sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

İzleyici Etkisi, Beş Faktör Kişilik Özellikleri, Kontrol Odağı.

Kaynakça

• ABU ELANAIN, Hossam M.; (2010), “Work Locus of Control and Interactio- nal Justice as Mediators of The Relationship Between Openness to Experience and Organizational Citizenship Behavior”, Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 17 (2), pp.170–192.
• AKÇA, Figen and Banu YAMAN; (2010), “The Effects of Internal-External Locus of Control Variables on Burnout Levels of Teachers”Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, pp. 3976-3980.
• ALLPORT, Gordon W. ; (1961), Pattern and Growth in Personality, New York: Holt, Rienhart and Winston.
• BARON, Reuben M. and David A. KENNY; (1986), “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic and Statistical Considerations”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), pp. 1173–1182.
• BARRICK, Murray R. and Michael K. MOUNT; (1991), “The Big Five Perso- nality Dimensions and Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis”, Personnel Psychology, 44, pp. 1–26.
• BOZIONELOS, Nikos; (2004), “The Big Five of Personality and Work Invol- vement”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19 (1), pp.69–81.
• BRUCK, Carly S. and Tammy D. ALLEN; (2003), “The Relationship Between Big Five Personality Traits, Negative Affectivity, Type a Behavior and Work–Family Conflict”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, pp. 457– 472.
• CHEKROUN, Peggy and Markus BRAUER; (2002), “The Bystander Effect and Social Control Behavior: The Effect of The Presence of Others on Peop- le’s Reactions to Norm Violations”, European Journal of Social Psyc- hology, 32, pp.853–867.
• ÇINGI, Hülya; (1994), Örnekleme Kuramı, İkinci Baskı, Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Basımevi.
• DANZIS, Deborah A. and Eugene F. STONE-ROMERO; (2009), “Effects of Helper Sex, Recipient Attractiveness and Recipient Femininity on Hel- ping Behavior in Organizations”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24 (8), pp.722–737.
• DARLEY, John M. and Bibb LATANE; (1968), “Bystander Intervention in Emergencies: Diffusion of Responsibility”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, pp.377–383.
• D'CRUZ, Premilla and Ernesto NORONHA ; (2011), “The Limits to Workpla- ce Friendship: Managerialist HRM and Bystander Behaviour in The Context of Workplace Bullying ”, Employee Relations, 33(3), pp.269– 288.
• DURNA, Ufuk ve Faruk K. ŞENTÜRK; (2012), “Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Sosyal Faaliyetlerinin Denetim Odağı Düzeyi Açısından İncelenmesi: Bir Devlet Üniversitesi Örneği”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İkti- sadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 17, ss.187–202.
• FREDRICKS, Susan; Michele RAMSEY and Andrea HORNETT; (2011), “Kinship and Bystander Effect: The Role Of Others in Ethical Decisi- ons” ,Journal of Religion and Business Ethics, 2(1), pp.1–23.
• GOSLING, Samuel D.; Peter J. RENTFROW and William B. SWANN ; (2003), “A Very Brief Measure of The Big-Five Personality Domains”, Journal of Research in Personality, 37, pp. 504–528.
• GRANTHAM, Tarek C.; (2011), “New Directions for Gifted Black Males Suf- fering From Bystander Effects: A Call for Upstanders”, Roeper Re- view, 33, pp.263–272.
• HUDSON, James M. and Amy S. BRUCKMAN; (2004), “The Bystander Ef- fect: A Lens For Understanding Patterns Of Participation”. The Journal of The Learning Sciences, 13(2),pp. 165–195.
• JOHNSON, Sheena J.; Mark BATEY and Lynn HOLDSWORTH; (2009), “Personality and Health: The Mediating Role of Trait Emotional Intelli- gence and Work Locus of Control”, Personality and Individual Diffe- rences, 47, pp.470–475.
• KINGSTON, Shauna; (2008), “Bullying as a Social Process: Factors Influen- cing Bystander Behaviour”, Master Of Arts Ontario, pp.1–173.
• LUTHANS, Fred; (2008), Organizational Behavior, Eleventh Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill International Editions.
• MCCRAE, Robert R. and Oliver P. JOHN ; (1992), “An Introduction to the Five Factor Model and Its Applications”, Journal of Personality, 60, pp.175-215.
• MCCRAE, Robery R. and Paul T. COSTA; (1987),“Validation of the Five- Factor Model of Personality Across Instruments and Observers”, Jour- nal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, pp. 81-90.
• MCGEE, Andrew and Peter MCGEE; (2011), “Search, Effort, and Locus of Control”, IZA Discussion Paper, No. 5948, pp. 1-53.
• MOUNT, Michael K., and Murray R. BARRICK; (1998), “ Five Reasons Why The “Big Five” Article Has Been Frequently Cited”, Personnel Psycho- logy, 51, pp.849-857.
• OLIVER, Joseph E.; Paul E. JOSE and Paula BROUGH; (2006), “Confirma- tory Factor Analysis of The Work Locus of Control Scale”, Educatio- nal and Psychological Measurement, 66, pp. 835-851.
• ÖZDEVECİOĞLU, Mahmut; (2002), “Kamu ve Özel Sektör Yöneticileri Ara- sındaki Davranışsal Çalışma Koşulları ve Kişilik Farklılıklarının Belir- lenmesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma”, Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 19, ss.115-134.
• PAULL, Megan; Mayram OMARI and Peter STANDEN; (2012),“When is a Bystander Not a Bystander? A Typology of The Roles of Bystanders in Workplace Bullying”, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 50, pp. 351–366.
• PAUNONEN, Sampo V.; (2003), “Big Five Factors of Personality and Replica- ted Predictions of Behavior”, Journal of Personality and Social Psyc- hology, 84 (2), pp.411-422.
• ROBBINS, Stephan P. and Timothy A. JUDGE; 2009. Organizational Behavi- our, Thirteenth Edition, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
• ROSSIER, Jérôme; Donatien DAHOURO and Robert R. MCCRAE; (2005), Structural and Mean-Level Analyses of The Five-Factor Model and Lo- cus of Control: Further Evidence From Africa, Journal of Cross- Cultural Psychology, 36, pp. 227-246.
• SHI, Junqi; Han LIN; WALei WANG and Mo WANG; (2009), “Linking The Big Five Personality Constructs to Organizational Justice”, Social Be- havior and Personality, 37(2), pp.209-222.
• TWENGE, Jean M.; Liqing ZHANG and Charles IM; (2004), “It's Beyond My Control: A Cross-Temporal Meta-Analysis of Increasing Externality In Locus Of Control”, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(3), pp. 308-319.
• WILLIAMS, Kipling D. and Alvin Ty LAW; (2011), “Bystander Effect”, Hu- man Psychology and Sociology, 10, pp.132-134.