Sürdürülebilir İletişimde Güncel Eğilimler ve Haritalama: Bibliyometrik Bir Bakış

Yıl 2024, , 539 - 562, 30.07.2024

Ayşe Aslan , Mehtap Öztürk , Kemalettin Eryeşil

https://doi.org/10.17680/erciyesiletisim.1445304

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, sürdürülebilir iletişim kavramının işletme, yönetim ve iletişim literatüründeki gelişimini bibliyometrik analiz yoluyla incelemektir. Sürdürülebilir iletişim, çevresel, sosyal ve ekonomik faktörleri bütünleştiren, paydaşların katılımını sağlayan, farkındalığı teşvik eden ve sürdürülebilirlik boyutlarının birbirine bağlılığını vurgulayan bilgilerin stratejik, şeffaf bir şekilde yayılmasını içermektedir. Araştırma problemi, sürdürülebilirlik ve iletişim alanındaki çalışmaların bolluğuna rağmen, sürdürülebilir iletişim üzerine kapsamlı bir bibliyometrik çalışmanın yokluğunda yatmaktadır. Bu çalışma literatürdeki bu boşluğu, bibliyometrik analiz yöntemi kullanarak dolduracak ve literatüre katkı sunacaktır. Bu durum araştırmanın literatürdeki önemine işaret etmektedir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda bu çalışma, uygulamalı çalışmalara odaklanarak ve söz konusu makalelerin dağılımı, ortak yazarlık, ortak atıf ve bunları yayınlayan yazarların ortak varlığına odaklanarak sürdürülebilir iletişim üzerine 2724 makaleyi incelemektedir. Bibliyometrik analiz sonucunda sürdürülebilir iletişim alanının incelendiği yıllar itibariyle alanda gelişim seyrinin devam ettiği ve son yıllarda özellikle Endüstri 4.0 kapsamında büyük veri, yeşil iş, sürdürülebilir işletme, sürdürülebilir tedarik zinciri yönetimi, çevresel performans, yeşil aklama ve döngüsel ekonomi kavramlarının ön plana çıktığı tespit edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, hem yazarların, belgelerin ve dergilerin mevcut performansını hem de temaların ilerleyişini gösterdiğinden akademisyenlere yardımcı olabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

İletişim, Sürdürülebilirlik, Sürdürülebilir İletişim, Bibliyometrik Analiz, Web of Science.

Mapping and Current Trends in Sustainable Communication: A Bibliometric View

Öz

The aim of this study is to examine the development of the concept of sustainable communication in the business, management and communication literature through bibliometric analysis. Sustainable communication involves strategic, transparent dissemination of information integrating environmental, social, and economic factors, engaging stakeholders, promoting awareness, and emphasizing the interconnectedness of sustainability dimensions. The research problem lies in the absence of a comprehensive bibliometric study on sustainable communication, despite the abundance of studies in field of sustainability and communication. This study will fill this gap in the literature by utilizing the bibliometric analysis method and contributing to the existing literature. The situation underscores the significance of research. In line with this purposes, this study examines 2724 articles on sustainable communication, focusing on applied studies and focusing on the distribution of these articles, co-authorship, co-citation, and co-occurence of the authors who published them. As a result of the bibliometric analysis, it has been determined that the field of sustainable communication has continued to develop over the years and that the concepts of big data within the scope of Industry 4.0, green business, sustainable business, sustainable supply chain management, environmental performance, greenwashing, and the circular economy have come to the fore in recent years. The study’s findings can be beneficial to scholars as they reveal the current performance of authors, documents, as well as the progression of themes.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Communication, Sustainability, Sustainable Communication, Bibliometric Analysis, Web of Science.

Kaynakça

• Adomßent, M., & Godemann, J. (2011). Sustainability communication: An integrative approach. Sustainability communication: Interdisciplinary perspectives and theoretical foundation, 27-37.
• Akbari, M., Khodayari, M., Danesh, M., Davari, A., & Padash, H. (2020). A bibliometric study of sustainable technology research. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), Article 1751906. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1751906
• Akerlof, K. L., Timm, K. M., Rowan, K. E., Olds, J. L., & Hathaway, J. (2022). The growth and disciplinary convergence of environmental communication: A bibliometric analysis of the field (1970–2019). Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, 814599.
• Alam, M., Ahmad, T., Abunar, S., & Naseem, M. (2024). Analyzing the use and benefits of green communication in higher educational institutes. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 8(3), 1863-1872.
• Alarcón-Sánchez, K. M., & Soriano-Sandoval, J. L. (2022). The integration of CSR within communication as a strategic factor of competitiveness: Bibliometric analysis. Scientia et PRAXIS, 2(03), 55-73.
• AlRyalat, S. A. S., Malkawi, L. W., & Momani, S. M. (2019). Comparing bibliometric analysis using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. JoVE (Journal of Visualized Experiments)(152), e58494.
• Asmi, F., Anwar, M. A., Zhou, R. T., Wang, D., & Sajjad, A. (2019). Social aspects of ?climate change communication? in the 21<SUP>st</SUP> century: a bibliometric view. Journal of environmental planning and management, 62(14), 2393-2417. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2018.1541171
• Bae, H.-S. (2024). The effects of trust and communication on flexibility and customer relationships between port logistics firms and shippers. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 40(2), 118-125.
• Barchilon, M. G. (2011). Sustainability communication tracks in technical communication: Our value in deriving sound, sustainable solutions. 2011 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference,
• Bernard, S., Rahman, I., & Douglas, A. (2023). Sustainability communication in hotels: The role of cognitive linguistics. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 10963480231158757.
• Bota-Avram, C. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of sustainable business performance: where are we going? A science map of the field. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 36(1), 2137-2176.
• Bradford, S. C. (1934). Sources of information on specific subjects. Engineering, 137, 85-86.
• Butler, B. S. (2001). Membership size, communication activity, and sustainability: A resource-based model of online social structures. Information systems research, 12(4), 346-362.
• Castillo-Esparcia, A., Rubio-Moraga, A., & Almansa-Martínez, A. (2012). Communication research. Bibliometric analysis of the most-cited ISI-indexed journals. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 67, 247-267. https://doi.org/10.4185/rlcs-067-955-247-267
• Chaudhri, V. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and the communication imperative: Perspectives from CSR managers. International Journal of Business Communication, 53(4), 419-442.
• Ciletti, D., Lanasa, J., Ramos, D., Luchs, R., & Lou, J. (2010). Sustainability communication in North American professional sports leagues: Insights from web-site self-presentations. International Journal of Sport Communication, 3(1), 64-91.
• Çankaya, S. Y., & Sezen, B. (2019). Effects of green supply chain management practices on sustainability performance. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(1), 98-121. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmtm-03-2018-0099
• Çetintaş, H. B. (2023). Sustainability Communication. In M. A. Göngen (Ed.), Digital Media Studies. Özgür Publications. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.58830/ozgur.pub259.c1179
• Da Silva, W. A. M., Fantin, C. O., Fukui, M., & Jucá, M. N. (2021). Startups’ Valuation: A Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Literature Review. Open Journal of Business and Management, 9(4), 1647-1670.
• de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., Jabbour, C. J. C., Foropon, C., & Godinho Filho, M. (2018). When titans meet–Can industry 4.0 revolutionise the environmentally-sustainable manufacturing wave? The role of critical success factors. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 132, 18-25.
• Dincer, B., & Dincer, C. (2022). Sustainable Communication; Perceived Motivation and Nature of the Commitment. Sustainability, 14(15), 9783.
• Djafarova, E., & Foots, S. (2022). Exploring ethical consumption of generation Z: Theory of planned behaviour. Young Consumers, 23(3), 413-431.
• Farrukh, M., Meng, F., Raza, A., & Tahir, M. S. (2020). Twenty‐seven years of Sustainable Development Journal: A bibliometric analysis. Sustainable Development, 28(6), 1725-1737.
• Fels, S. (2010). Sustainable communities: where does communication fit in? First Interdisciplinary Workshop on Communication for Sustainable Communities,
• Fischer, D., Lüdecke, G., Godemann, J., Michelsen, G., Newig, J., Rieckmann, M., & Schulz, D. (2016). Sustainability communication. Sustainability Science: An Introduction, 139-148.
• Fischer, D., Reinermann, J.-L., Mandujano, G. G., DesRoches, C. T., Diddi, S., & Vergragt, P. J. (2021). Sustainable consumption communication: A review of an emerging field of research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 300, 126880.
• Franz‐Balsen, A., & Heinrichs, H. (2007). Managing sustainability communication on campus: experiences from Lüneburg. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 8(4), 431-445.
• Genç, R. (2017). The importance of communication in sustainability & sustainable strategies. Procedia Manufacturing, 8, 511-516.
• Godemann, J. (2011). Sustainable communication as an inter-and transdisciplinary discipline. Sustainability communication: Interdisciplinary perspectives and theoretical foundation, 39-51.
• Godemann, J. (2021). Communicating sustainability. Some thoughts and recommendations for enhancing sustainability communication. The Sustainability Communication Reader: A Reflective Compendium, 15-29.
• Godemann, J., & Michelsen, G. (2011). Sustainability communication – An introduction. In J. Godemann & G. Michelsen (Eds.), Sustainability communication: Interdisciplinary perspectives and theoretical foundation (pp. 3-11). Springer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1697-1
• Golob, U., Podnar, K., & Zabkar, V. (2023). Sustainability communication. International journal of advertising, 42(1), 42-51.
• Hardeman, G., Font, X., & Nawijn, J. (2017). The power of persuasive communication to influence sustainable holiday choices: Appealing to self-benefits and norms. Tourism Management, 59, 484-493.
• Herzig, C., & Schaltegger, S. (2011). Corporate sustainability reporting. In J. Godemann & G. Michelsen (Eds.), Sustainability communication: Interdisciplinary perspectives and theoretical foundation (pp. 151-169). Springer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1697-1
• Inman, J. J., & Nikolova, H. (2017). Shopper-facing retail technology: A retailer adoption decision framework incorporating shopper attitudes and privacy concerns. Journal of retailing, 93(1), 7-28.
• Jha, A. K., & Verma, N. K. (2023). Social media platforms and user Engagement: A multi-platform study on one-way firm sustainability communication. Information Systems Frontiers, 1-18.
• Ji, Y. G., Tao, W., & Rim, H. (2021). Theoretical insights of CSR research in communication from 1980 to 2018: A bibliometric network analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-23.
• Ji, Y. G., Tao, W. T., & Rim, H. J. (2020). Mapping corporate social responsibility research in communication: A network and bibliometric analysis. Public Relations Review, 46(5), Article 101963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101963
• Kang, J., Liu, C., & Kim, S. H. (2013). Environmentally sustainable textile and apparel consumption: the role of consumer knowledge, perceived consumer effectiveness and perceived personal relevance. International Journal of consumer studies, 37(4), 442-452.
• Karmasin, M., Voci, D., Weder, F., & Krainer, L. (2021). Future perspectives: Sustainability communication as scientific and societal challenge. The Sustainability Communication Reader: A Reflective Compendium, 585-591.
• Kim, J., Kang, S., & Lee, K. H. (2021). Evolution of digital marketing communication: Bibliometric analysis and network visualization from key articles. Journal of Business Research, 130, 552-563.
• Kobayashi, A. R. K., Kniess, C. T., Serra, F. A. R., Ferraz, R. R. N., & Ruiz, M. S. (2017). Smart sustainable cities: Bibliometric study and patent information International Journal of Innovation, 5(1), 77-96. https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v5i1.159
• Kolandai‐Matchett, K. (2009). Mediated communication of ‘sustainable consumption’in the alternative media: a case study exploring a message framing strategy. International Journal of consumer studies, 33(2), 113-125.
• Kong, H. M., Witmaier, A., & Ko, E. (2021). Sustainability and social media communication: How consumers respond to marketing efforts of luxury and non-luxury fashion brands. Journal of Business Research, 131, 640-651.
• Kruse, L. (2011). Psychological aspects of sustainability communication. Sustainability communication: Interdisciplinary perspectives and theoretical foundation, 69-77.
• Kulevicz, R. A., Porfirio, G. E. d. O., de Oliveira, O. S., Zavala Zavala, A. A., Silva, B. A. d., & Constantino, M. (2020). Influence of sustainability reports on social and environmental issues: bibliometric analysis and the word cloud approach. Environmental Reviews, 28(4), 380-386.
• Kürklü, S. (2020). Biyoetik konusunda yapılan araştırmaların bibliyometrik analizi; WOS örneği. Türkiye Biyoetik Dergisi, 6(3), 87-99.
• Lee, Y. C. (2020). Communicating sustainable development: Effects of stakeholder‐centric perceived sustainability. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(4), 1540-1551.
• Liao, H.-T., & Chen, K.-S. (2021). Mapping the landscape of green communications and green computing: A review based on bibliometric analysis. 2021 IEEE 21st International Conference on Communication Technology (ICCT),
• Lichtenthaler, U. (2011). Open innovation: Past research, current debates, and future directions. Academy of management perspectives, 25(1), 75-93.
• Liew-Tsonis, J., & Cheuk, S. (2012). Sustainability challenges: Changing attitudes and a demand for better management of the tourism industry in Malaysia. INTECH Open Access Publisher.
• Line, N. D., Hanks, L., & Zhang, L. (2016). Sustainability communication: The effect of message construals on consumers’ attitudes towards green restaurants. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 57, 143-151.
• Mas-Tur, A., Kraus, S., Brandtner, M., Ewert, R., & Kürsten, W. (2020). Advances in management research: a bibliometric overview of the Review of Managerial Science. Review of Managerial Science, 14(5), 933-958.
• Merigó, J. M., & Yang, J.-B. (2017). A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science. Omega, 73, 37-48.
• Meseguer-Sánchez, V., Gálvez-Sánchez, F. J., López-Martínez, G., & Molina-Moreno, V. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and sustainability. A bibliometric analysis of their interrelations. Sustainability, 13(4), Article 1636. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041636
• Newig, J., Schulz, D., Fischer, D., Hetze, K., Laws, N., Lüdecke, G., & Rieckmann, M. (2013). Communication regarding sustainability: Conceptual perspectives and exploration of societal subsystems. Sustainability, 5(7), 2976-2990.
• Nyaga, G. N., Whipple, J. M., & Lynch, D. F. (2010). Examining supply chain relationships: do buyer and supplier perspectives on collaborative relationships differ? Journal of operations management, 28(2), 101-114.
• Ogutu, H., El Archi, Y., & Dénes Dávid, L. (2023). Current trends in sustainable organization management: A bibliometric analysis. Oeconomia Copernicana, 14(1), 11-45.
• Oral, U. (2023). The Need for Etiquette and Protocol Rules in Political Communication where Courtesy Is About to Disappear. Agathos, 14(1), 211-222.
• Ott, K., Muraca, B., & Baatz, C. (2011). Strong sustainability as a frame for sustainability communication. Sustainability communication: Interdisciplinary perspectives and theoretical foundation, 13-25.
• Özgen, E. (2022). Sürdürülebilirlik iletişimi ve halkla ilişkiler. In (pp. 1-4): Marmara University.
• Özsoy, T., & Sezgili, K. (2024). Exploring the Current Practices and Future Directions in Project Management Education and Training. SAGE Open, 14(1), 21582440241236053.
• Öztürk, O., & Dil, E. (2022). Bibliometric analysis of organizational ecology theory (OET): To review past for directing the future of the field. Ege Academic Review, 22(2), 195-212.
• Parmar, B. L., Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Purnell, L., & De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 403-445.
• Petts, J. I. (2000). Sustainable communication: Implications for industry. Process safety and environmental protection, 78(4), 270-278.
• Qiu, J., & Lv, Hong (2014). An overview of knowledge management research viewed through the web of science (1993-2012). . Aslib Journal of Information Management, 66(4), 424-442.
• Reeves, C. H. (2016). The sustainability story: a mixed methods study of social responsibility communication in multinational corporations University of Georgia].
• Saleh, M. S. M., & Mehellou, A. (2024). The pertinence of a communication for sustainable development course in university: A case of Universiti Sains Malaysia. SEARCH Journal of Media and Communication Research, 16(1), 17-31.
• Saydam, Z. A. (2014). Sürdürülebilir iletişimin Kurumsal sürdürülebilirliğe Etkisi-işletmeler örneğinde karşılaştırmalı Uygulama Marmara Universitesi (Turkey)].
• Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2011). Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: categories and interactions. Business strategy and the environment, 20(4), 222-237.
• Shen, L., Qian, J., & Chen, S. C. (2020). Effective communication strategies of sustainable hospitality: A qualitative exploration. Sustainability, 12(17), 6920.
• Signitzer, B., & Prexl, A. (2008). Corporate sustainability communications: Aspects of theory and professionalization. Journal of Public Relations Research, 20(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627260701726996
• Suldani, M. R. Y., Wahyuni, H. I., & Priyotamtama, P. W. (2023). The Global Evolution of Ecological Communication Studies in Disasters: A Bibliometric Analysis. Daengku: Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Innovation, 3(6), 1036-1044.
• Sururi, R. Y., & Gantyowati, E. (2023). Development of sustainability report research tren in Indonesia. Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, 6(2), 1-10.
• Tang, M., Liao, H., Wan, Z., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Rosen, M. A. (2018). Ten years of sustainability (2009 to 2018): A bibliometric overview. Sustainability, 10(5), 1655.
• Tate, W. L., Ellram, L. M., & Kirchoff, J. F. (2010). Corporate social responsibility reports: A thematic analysis related to supply chain management Journal of Supply Chain Management, 46(1), 19-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2009.03184.x
• Tchamyou, V. S., Erreygers, G., & Cassimon, D. (2019). Inequality, ICT and financial access in Africa. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 139, 169-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.11.004
• Țigan, E., Blaga, Radu Lucian, Isac, Florin-Lucian, Lungu, Monica., Milin, Ioana Anda, Tripa, Florin, & Gavrilaș, Simona. (2022). Analysis of sustainable communication patterns during the telework period in western Romanian corporations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(16), 9796.
• Tölkes, C. (2018). Sustainability communication in tourism - A literature review. Tourism Management Perspectives, 27, 10-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2018.04.002
• Vardar, N. (2014). A global brand in a local market. Emerald Emerging Markets Case Studies, 4(8), 1-6.
• Vehmas, K., Raudaskoski, A., Heikkilä, P., Harlin, A., & Mensonen, A. (2018). Consumer attitudes and communication in circular fashion. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 22(3), 286-300. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfmm-08-2017-0079
• Vergura, D. T., Zerbini, C., Luceri, B., & Palladino, R. (2023). Investigating sustainable consumption behaviors: a bibliometric analysis. British Food Journal, 125(13), 253-276.
• Vidal-Serrano, L., Rodríguez-Antón, J. M., Rubio-Andrada, L., & Narbona-Reina, B. (2022a). INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES (ICT) AS A TOOL FOR SUSTAINABLE TOURISM MANAGEMENT: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS. Cuadernos De Turismo(50), 97-117. https://doi.org/10.6018/turismo.541881
• Vidal-Serrano, L., Rodríguez-Antón, J. M., Rubio-Andrada, L., & Narbona-Reina, B. (2022b). Information and communication technologies (ICT) as a tool for sustainable tourism management: A Bibliometric anaysis Cuadernos de Turismo(50), 97-117. https://doi.org/10.6018/turismo.541881
• Villarino, J., & Font, X. (2015). Sustainability marketing myopia: The lack of sustainability communication persuasiveness. Journal of Vacation Marketing.
• von Kutzschenbach, M., & Brønn, C. (2006). Communicating sustainable development initiatives: Applying co‐orientation to forest management certification. Journal of Communication Management, 10(3), 304-322.
• Wang, X., Wong, Y. D., Li, K. X., & Yuen, K. F. (2021). Shipping industry's sustainability communications to public in social media: A longitudinal analysis. Transport Policy, 110, 123-134.
• Weder, F., Karmasin, M., Krainer, L., & Voci, D. (2021). Sustainability communication as critical perspective in media and communication studies—An introduction. In F. Weder, L. Krainer, & M. Karmasin (Eds.), The Sustainability Communication Reader. Springer VS, Wiesbaden (pp. 1-12). Springer VS. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31883-3_1
• Wu, M., Long, R., Bai, Y., & Chen, H. (2021). Knowledge mapping analysis of international research on environmental communication using bibliometrics. Journal of Environmental Management, 298, 113475.