Bibliometric Analysis of Studies on Populism and Social Media

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1, 283 - 304, 30.01.2023

Hacı Hasan Saf

https://doi.org/10.17680/erciyesiletisim.1168214

Cited By: 1

Öz

Due to the fact that populist discourses are frequently seen in social media in recent years has increased the number of researches in this field. Populism and social media has been frequently studied in terms of the relationship between them, their potential, functions, useage patterns and effects. In this study, it is aimed to examine the studies on populism and social media with bibliometric analysis. Studies on populism and social media indexed in the Web of Science database are discussed. The studies in the database are scanned to include the words "populism" and "social media", and studies containing these subjects are reached. 467 studies published between 2013, when the first study was published, and August 2022, when this study was conducted, are analyzed bibliometrically with VOSviewer. As a result of the analysis carried out in parallel with the research questions, it is seen that the studies on these two subjects were mostly in 2020 and mostly in the field of communication. Most studies are issued in England and at the University of Amsterdam. The most cited author is Sven Engesser, and the most cited publication is one of his work. In the research made with this perspective, the total connection strengths and connections of the elements are also revealed.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Communication Studies, Populism, Social Media, Bibliometric Analysis

Popülizm ve Sosyal Medyayla İlgili Çalışmaların Bibliyometrik Analizi

Öz

Popülist söylemlerin son yıllarda sosyal medyada sıklıkla görülmesi, bu alanda yapılan araştırmaların artmasını sağlamıştır. Popülizm ve sosyal medya; aralarındaki ilişki, potansiyelleri, işlevleri, kullanım durumları ve etkileri bağlamında sıklıkla incelenmiştir. Bu çalışmada popülizm ve sosyal medya konuları üzerine yapılan çalışmaların bibliyometrik analiz ile incelenmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Popülizm ve sosyal medyayla ilgili Web of Science veri tabanında indekslenen çalışmalar ele alınmıştır. Veri tabanında yer alan çalışmalar, “populism” ve “social media” kelimelerini kapsayacak şekilde taranmış ve bu konuları içeren çalışmalara ulaşılmıştır. İlk çalışmanın yayınlandığı 2013 ile bu çalışmanın yürütüldüğü 2022 yılı ağustos ayı arasında yayınlanan 467 çalışma VOSviewer ile bibliyometrik olarak analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma sorularına paralel yürütülen analiz sonucunda bu iki konu üzerine yapılan çalışmaların en fazla 2020 yılında ve en çok iletişim alanında olduğu görülmüştür. En çok çalışma İngiltere’de ve University of Amsterdam’da hazırlanmıştır. En çok atıf alan yazar Sven Engesser, en çok atıf alan yayın yine onun bir çalışması olmuştur. Bu perspektiften yapılan araştırmada unsurların toplam bağlantı güçleri ve bağlantıları da ortaya konulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

İletişim Çalışmaları, Popülizm, Sosyal Medya, Web of Science, Bibliyometrik Analiz, Communication Studies, Populism, Social Media, Bibliometric Analysis

Kaynakça

• Betz, H. G., & Johnson, C. (2004). Against the current—stemming the tide: The nostalgic ideology of the contemporary radical populist right. Journal of Political Ideologies, 9(3), 311-327. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1356931042000263546
• Bobba, G. (2019). Social media populism: Features and 'likeability'of Lega Nord communication on Facebook. European Political Science, 18(1), 11-23. doi:https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41304-017-0141-8
• Bossetta, M., & Husted, E. (2017). Introduction: Populism in the 21st century: reflections on a global phenomenon. Politik, 1-4.
• Botker, H. (2019). Populist Time: Mediating ımmediacy and delay in liberal democracy. International Journal of Communication, 13, 5948-5966.
• Boulianne, S. (2020). ) Right-wing populism, social media and echo chambers in western democracies. New Media & Society, 22(4), 683-699.
• Bracciale, R. (2021). Does populism go viral? How Italian leaders engage citizens through social media. Information, Communication & Society, 24(10), 1477-1494. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1874472
• Chen, C. (2017). Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of Data and Information Science 2(2), 1-40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/jdis-2017-0006
• Cobo, M., A.G, L.-H., E., H.-V., & F., H. (2012). Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(2), 1382-1402.
• Crilly, R. (2019). Populism and Contemporary Global Media: Populist Communication Logics and the Co-construction of Transnational Identities: Exploring Inter- and Transnational Dimensions.
• Dindin, S. (2020). Internet and Islamic Learning Practices in Indonesia: Social Media, Religious Populism, and Religious Authority. Religions, 11(19), 1-12. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11010019
• Engesser, S. (2017). ). Populist online communication: introduction to the special issue, Information. Information, Communication& society, 20(9), 1279-1292.
• Ernst, N. (2017). Extreme parties and populism: An analysis of Facebook and Twitter across six countries. Communication & Society, 1347-1364.
• Ernst, N. (2019). Populists prefer social media over talk shows: An analysis of populist messages and stylistic elements across six countries. Social Media+Society, 5(1), 1-14.
• Flew, T. (2020). Globalization, neo-globalization and post-globalization: The challenge of populism and the return of the national. Global Media & Communication, 6(2), 22-40.
• Gerbaudo, P. (2018). Social media and populism: An elective affinity? Media, Culture & Society, 40(5), 745-753.
• Gustafsson, N. (2020). The populist allure of social media activism: Individualized charismatic authority. Organization, 5(22), 50-70.
• Hameleers, M. (2017). “They did it”: The effects of emotionalized blame attribution in populist communication. Communication Research, 44(6), 870-900.
• Hopster, J. (2021). Mutual affordances: the dynamics between social media and populism. Media, Culture & Society, 43(3), 1-10.
• Jagers, J., & Walgrave, S. (2007). ) Populism as political communication style: an empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research, 46(3), 319-345.
• Jan Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software Survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538.
• Kriesi, H. (2014). ) The Populist Challenge. West European Politics, 37(2), 361-378.
• Laclau, E. (2005). On Populist Reason. London: Verso.
• Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39, 542-564.
• Postill, J. (2018). Populism and social media: a global perspective. Media Culture & Society, 40(3), 25-40.
• Roncarolo, F. (2017). ‘Media Politics and Populism as a Mobilization Resource’. In Holtz- Bacha, Heinisch, & Mazzoleni (Dü) içinde, Political populism. Baden Baden: Nomos Hand Book.
• Sınha, S. (2017). Fragile Hegemony: Modi, Social Media, and Competitive Electoral Populism in India. International Journal of Communication, 11, 4158-4180. Retrieved from http://ijoc.org. adresinden alındı
• Seyran, F. (2021). İşyeri Şiddeti Çalışmalarının Bibliyometrik Analizi. Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 17(36), 2868-2889.
• Solahudin, D. (2020). Internet and Islamic Learning Practices in Indonesia: Social Media, Religious Populism, and Religious Authority. Religions, 11(9), 1-12.
• Şen, Ö. (2020). BİBLİYOMETRİK ANALİZ YÖNTEMİ İLE AĞIZDAN AĞIZA İLETİŞİM (WOM) KONUSUNUN İNCELENMESİ. Social Sciences Studies Journal, 6(54), 1-10.
• Turcotte, A. (2014). Boutique Populism: The Emergence of the Tea Party Movement in the Age of Digital Politics (1 b.). (J.Lees-Marshment, B. Conley, & K. Cosgrove, Dü) Rautledge.
• Web of Science. (2022). 08 08, 2022 tarihinde https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/analyze-results/b2364eca-c198-4339-b048-dc965c916cdd-4986caa2 adresinden alındı
• Zuniga, H. D. (2020). Populism in the era of Twitter: How social media contextualized new insights into an old phenomenon. New Media& Society, 22(4), 585-594.