Üst Ekstremite Hipermobilite Değerlendirme Aracı’nın (ULHAT) Türkçe Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirliliği

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, Üst Ekstremite Hipermobilite Değerlendirme Aracı’nın (ULHAT) Türkçe diline adaptasyonunu gerçekleştirerek geçerlilik ve güvenirliğini araştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: ULHAT’ın Türkçe versiyonu (TR-ULHAT), uluslararası yönergelere uygun olarak çok aşamalı bir süreçle oluşturulmuştur. Katılımcıların değerlendirilmesinde Beighton Skorlama Sistemi ve TR-ULHAT kullanılmıştır. Tüm katılımcılar birbirinin bulgularına kör iki bağımsız değerlendirici tarafından değerlendirilmiştir. Ölçeğin güvenilirliliğini değerlendirmek amacıyla test-tekrar test güvenilirlilik ve değerlendiriciler arası güvenilirlilik analizleri yapılmıştır. Kriter geçerliliğini incelemek amacıyla TR-ULHAT ve Beighton toplam puanları arasındaki ilişki incelenmiştir. Sonuçlar: Çalışmaya 101 katılımcı (74 kadın, 27 erkek) dahil edilmiştir. Ölçeğin test-tekrar test güvenilirliliği orta düzeydeydi (ICC [2,1]=0,712, p<0,001) ve değerlendiriciler arası güvenilirliliği iyiydi (ICC [2,1]=0,780, p<0,001). Beighton ve TR-ULHAT skorları arasında anlamlı ve orta düzeyde pozitif korelasyon saptanmıştır (rₛ=0,658, p<0,001). Tartışma: Sonuçlarımız TR-ULHAT’ın, güvenilir ve geçerli bir ölçüm aracı olduğunu göstermiştir. TR-ULHAT, üst ekstremite hipermobilitesini değerlendirmek için pratik bir değerlendirme aracı olarak klinik uygulamaya sunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Eklem Hipermobilitesi
• Üst Ekstremite
• Güvenilirlik
• Geçerlilik

The Turkish Validity and Reliability of the Upper Limb Hypermobility Assessment Tool (ULHAT)

Öz

Purpose: The aim of this study is to investigate the validity and reliability of the Upper Limb Hypermobility Assessment Tool (ULHAT) by adapting it into the Turkish language. Material and Methods: The Turkish version of ULHAT (TR-ULHAT) has been constructed through a multi-stage process in accordance with international guidelines. The Beighton Scoring System and TR-ULHAT were used in the assessment of participants. All participants were assessed by two independent raters who were blinded to each other's findings. To assess the reliability of the scale, analyses of test-retest reliability and inter-rater reliability were conducted. To examine criterion validity, the relationship between TR-ULHAT and Beighton total scores was investigated. Results: The study included 101 participants (74 female, 27 male). The test-retest reliability of the scale was moderate (ICC [2,1]=0.712, p<0.001), and the inter-rater reliability was good (ICC [2,1]=0.780, p<0.001). A significant and moderate positive correlation was found between the Beighton and TR-ULHAT scores (rₛ=0.658, p<0.001). Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that TR-ULHAT is a reliable and valid measurement tool. TR-ULHAT has been presented to clinical practice as a practical assessment tool for evaluating upper extremity hypermobility.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Joint Hypermobility
• Upper Extremity
• Reliability
• Validity

Kaynakça

1. Antonio, D. H., & Magalhaes, C. S. (2018). Survey on joint hypermobility in university students aged 18-25 years old. Adv Rheumatol, 58, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42358-018-0008-x
2. Bates, A. V., & Alexander, C. M. (2015). Kinematics and kinetics of people who are hypermobile. A systematic review. Gait Posture, 41(2), 361-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.01.009
3. Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186-3191.
4. Beighton, P., Solomon, L., & Soskolne, C. (1973). Articular mobility in an African population. Ann Rheum Dis, 32(5), 413-418. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.32.5.413
5. Blajwajs, L., Williams, J., Timmons, W., & Sproule, J. (2023). Hypermobility prevalence, measurements, and outcomes in childhood, adolescence, and emerging adulthood: a systematic review. Rheumatol Int, 43(8), 1423-1444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-023-05338-x
6. Bockhorn, L. N., Vera, A. M., Dong, D., Delgado, D. A., Varner, K. E., & Harris, J. D. (2021). Interrater and intrarater reliability of the Beighton Score: a systematic review. Orthop J Sports Med, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967120968099
7. Castori, M,. & Colombi, M. (2015). Generalized joint hypermobility, joint hypermobility syndrome and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, hypermobility type. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet, 169(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.31432
8. Castori, M., Tinkle, B., Levy, H., Grahame, R., Malfait, F., & Hakim, A. (2017). A framework for the classification of joint hypermobility and related conditions. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet, 175(1), 148–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.31539

9. Cazzato, D., Castori, M., Lombardi, R., Caravello, F., Dalla Bella, E., Petrucci, A., et al. (2016). Small fiber neuropathy is a common feature of Ehlers-Danlos syndromes. Neurology, 87(2), 155-159. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002847
10. Chopra, P., Tinkle, B., Hamonet, C., Brock, I., Gompel, A., Bulbena, A., et al. (2017). Pain management in the Ehlers–Danlos syndromes. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet, 175(1), 212–219. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.31554
11. Di Stefano, G., Celletti, C., Baron, R., Castori, M., Di Franco, M., La Cesa, S., et al. (2016). Central sensitization as the mechanism underlying pain in joint hypermobility syndrome/Ehlers–Danlos syndrome, hypermobility type. Eur J Pain, 20(8), 1319-1325. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.856
12. Hakim, A., & Grahame, R. (2003). Joint hypermobility. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol, 17(6), 989-1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2003.08.001
13. Hornsby, E. A., Tucker, K., & Johnston, L. M. (2023). Reproducibility of hypermobility assessment scales for children when performed using telehealth versus in-person modes. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr, 43(4), 446-462. https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2022.2151393
14. Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med, 15(2), 155-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
15. Malfait, F., Francomano, C., Byers, P., Belmont, J., Berglund, B., Black, J., et al. (2017). The 2017 international classification of the Ehlers–Danlos syndromes. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet, 175(1), 8–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.31552
16. Mokkink, L. B., Prinsen, C., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Bouter, L. M., De Vet, H., et al. (2019). COSMIN Study Design checklist for Patient-reported outcome measurement instruments. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1-32.
17. Nicholson, L. L., & Chan, C. (2018). The upper limb hypermobility assessment tool: a novel validated measure of adult joint mobility. Musculoskelet Sci Pract, 35, 38-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2018.02.006
18. Pacey, V., Nicholson, L. L., Adams, R. D., Munn, J., & Munns, C. F. (2010). Generalized joint hypermobility and risk of lower limb joint injury during sport: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med, 38(7), 1487-1497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546510364838
19. Remvig, L., Jensen, D. V., & Ward, R. C. (2007). Epidemiology of general joint hypermobility and basis for the proposed criteria for benign joint hypermobility syndrome: review of the literature. J Rheumatol, 34(4), 804-809.
20. Rombaut, L., Malfait, F., De Wandele, I., Taes, Y., Thijs, Y., De Paepe, A., et al. (2012). Muscle mass, muscle strength, functional performance, and physical impairment in women with the hypermobility type of Ehlers‐Danlos syndrome. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken), 64(10), 1584-1592. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.21726
21. Rombaut, L., Scheper, M., De Wandele, I., De Vries, J., Meeus, M., Malfait, F., et al. (2015). Chronic pain in patients with the hypermobility type of Ehlers–Danlos syndrome: evidence for generalized hyperalgesia. Clin Rheumatol, 34(6), 1121-1129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-014-2499-0
22. Sackett, D. L. (1997). Evidence-based medicine. Semin Perinatol, 21(1), 3-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-0005(97)80013-4
23. Scheper, M. C., de Vries, J. E., Verbunt, J., & Engelbert, R. H. (2015). Chronic pain in hypermobility syndrome and Ehlers–Danlos syndrome (hypermobility type): it is a challenge. J Pain Res, 8, 591-601. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S64251
24. Schober, P., Boer, C., & Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth Analg, 126(5), 1763-1768. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864
25. Smith, T. O., Jerman, E., Easton, V., Bacon, H., Armon, K., Poland, F., et al. (2013). Do people with benign joint hypermobility syndrome (BJHS) have reduced joint proprioception? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatol Int, 33, 2709-2716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-013-2790-4
26. Soucie, J. M., Wang, C., Forsyth, A., Funk, S., Denny, M., Roach, K. E., et al. (2011). Range of motion measurements: reference values and a database for comparison studies. Haemophilia, 17(3), 500-507. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2516.2010.02399.x
27. Tobias, J. H., Deere, K., Palmer, S., Clark, E., & Clinch, J. (2013). Joint hypermobility is a risk factor for musculoskeletal pain during adolescence: findings of a prospective cohort study. Arthritis Rheum, 65(4), 1107-1115. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.37836
28. Vallis, A., Wray, A., & Smith, T. (2015). Inter-and intra-rater reliabilities of the Beighton score compared to the contompasis score to assess generalised joint hypermobility. Myopain, 23(1-2), 21-27. https://doi.org/10.3109/10582452.2016.1140255
29. Weir, J. P. (2005). Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res, 19(1), 231-240.
30. Williams, C. M., Welch, J. J., Scheper, M., Tofts, L., & Pacey, V. (2024). Variability of joint hypermobility in children: A meta-analytic approach to set cut-off scores. Eur J Pediatr, 183(8), 3517-3529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-024-05621-4