Tuvalet Alışkanlıkları Profili Ölçeği–İkinci Revizyonun (TAPÖ-R2) Türkçeye Uyarlanması ve Kapsam Geçerliğinin Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Amaç: Duyusal işlemleme farklılıkları, fonksiyonel dışkılama bozukluğu (FDB) olan çocuklarda görülen tuvalet alışkanlığı güçlüklerinin önemli nedenlerinden biridir. Tuvalet Alışkanlıkları Profili Ölçeği–İkinci Revizyonu (TAPÖ-R2), duyusal temelli tuvalet davranışlarını değerlendiren bir ölçektir; ancak Türkçe versiyonu bulunmamaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, TAPÖ-R2’nin Türkçeye çevrilmesi, kültürel uyarlamasının yapılması ve içerik geçerliğinin değerlendirilmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntem: TAPÖ-R2, uluslararası kültürel uyarlama kılavuzları doğrultusunda çeviri, sentez, geri çeviri, uzman değerlendirmesi ve ön test aşamalarını içeren yedi basamaklı bir süreçle Türkçeye uyarlanmıştır. Disiplinler arası bir uzman paneli maddelerin uygunluğunu ve anlaşılırlığını değerlendirmiştir. İçerik geçerliği; Madde Düzeyinde İçerik Geçerlik İndeksi (I-CVI), Ortalama İçerik Geçerlik İndeksi (Ave-CVI) ve düzeltilmiş kappa katsayısı (k*) kullanılarak incelenmiştir. Ölçeğin anlaşılırlığı ve kullanılabilirliği bakım verenlerle gerçekleştirilen ön test aracılığıyla değerlendirilmiştir. Sonuçlar: TAPÖ-R2’nin Türkçe çevirisi, orijinal ölçekle güçlü anlamsal, kavramsal ve kültürel eşdeğerlik göstermiştir. Kültürel ve dilsel uygunluğu artırmak amacıyla bazı uyarlamalar yapılmıştır. Tüm maddeler mükemmel içerik geçerliği değerlerine ulaşmış (I-CVI=1,00; Ave-CVI=1,00; k*=1,00) ve uzmanlar arasında tam görüş birliği (%100) sağlanmıştır. Ön test sonuçları, ölçeğin anlaşılabilir ve uygulanabilir olduğunu göstermiştir. Tartışma: Türkçe TAPÖ-R2’nin içerik geçerliğinin mükemmel olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ölçek, Türkçeye çevrilmiş ve Türk kültürel bağlamına uygun şekilde uyarlanmıştır. Psikometrik özelliklerinin değerlendirilmesine yönelik daha geniş örneklemli çalışmalara ihtiyaç vardır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• duyusal işlemleme
• Dışkılama bozuklukları
• Çocuk
• Anketler ve ölçekler

Turkish Adaptation and Content Validity Analysis of the Toileting Habit Profile Questionnaire – 2nd Revision Form (THPQ-R2)

Öz

Objective: Sensory processing differences are an important contributor to toileting difficulties in children with functional defecation disorders (FDD). The Toileting Habit Profile Questionnaire–Revised 2 (THPQ-R2) assesses sensory-based toileting behaviors; however, a Turkish version is unavailable. This study aimed to translate the THPQ-R2 into Turkish, culturally adapt it, and evaluate its content validity. Materials and Methods: The THPQ-R2 was adapted into Turkish through a seven-step process including translation, synthesis, back-translation, expert review, and pretesting in accordance with international cross-cultural adaptation guidelines. An interdisciplinary expert panel evaluated item relevance and clarity. Content validity was assessed using the Item-Level Content Validity Index (I-CVI), Average Content Validity Index (Ave-CVI), and modified kappa coefficient (k*). Comprehensibility and usability were evaluated through caregiver pretesting. Results: The Turkish translation of the THPQ-R2 demonstrated strong semantic, conceptual, and cultural equivalence with the original instrument. Adaptations were made to enhance cultural and linguistic appropriateness. All items achieved excellent content validity (I-CVI=1.00, Ave-CVI=1.00, k*=1.00), with complete agreement among experts (100%). Pretesting indicated that the scale was understandable and feasible. Discussion: The Turkish THPQ-R2 demonstrated excellent content validity and was successfully adapted to the Turkish language and cultural context. Further studies are needed to evaluate psychometrics in larger samples.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• sensory processing
• Defecation disorders
• Child
• Surveys and questionnaires

Kaynakça

1. Almanasreh, E., Moles, R., & Chen, T. F. (2019). Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity. Res Social Adm Pharm, 15(2), 214–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.03.066
2. Beaudry-Bellefeuille, I., Booth, D., & Lane, S. J. (2017). Defecation-specific behavior in children with functional defecation issues: A systematic review. Perm J, 21, 17–047. https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/17-047
3. Beaudry-Bellefeuille, I., Bundy, A., Lane, A., Ramos-Polo, E., & Lane, S. J. (2018). The Toileting Habit Profile Questionnaire: Examining construct validity using the Rasch model. Br J Occup Ther, 82(4),235–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308022618813266
4. Beaudry-Bellefeuille, I., & Lane, S. J. (2017). Examining sensory over responsiveness in preschool children with retentive fecal incontinence. Am J Occup Ther, 71(5), 7105220020p1–7105220020p8. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2017.022707
5. Beaudry-Bellefeuille, I., Lane, S. J., & Lane, A. E. (2019). Sensory integration concerns in children with functional defecation disorders: A scoping review. Am J Occup Ther, 73(3), 7303205050p1–7303205050p13. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2019.030387
6. Beaudry-Bellefeuille, I., Lane, A., Ramos-Polo, E., & Lane, S. J. (2019). Examining hyper-reactivity to defecation related sensations in children with functional defecation disorders. Ann Colorectal Res,7(4),1–7. https://doi.org/10.30476/ACRR.2019.45965
7. Beaudry-Bellefeuille, I., Lane, S. J., & Ramos-Polo, E. (2016). The Toileting Habit Profile Questionnaire: Screening for sensory-based toileting difficulties in young children with constipation and retentive fecal incontinence. J Occup Ther Sch Early Interv, 9(2),163–175.https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2016.1141081
8. Beaudry-Bellefeuille, I., & Ramos-Polo, E. (2025). Improving participation in toileting routines in a child with functional constipation: A case study using the Integrated Sensory Toileting® Approach. Occup Ther Health Care, 39(3), 685–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380577.2024.2394947

9. Beaudry-Bellefeuille, I., & Ramos-Polo, E. (2026). Development of the Toileting Habit Profile Questionnaire–2nd Revision: Assessing sensory-based toileting difficulties. J Child Sci, 16(1), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.53391/2474-5871.1013
10. Beaudry-Bellefeuille, I., Schaaf, R. C., & Ramos-Polo, E. (2013). Occupational therapy based on Ayres Sensory Integration in the treatment of retentive fecal incontinence in a 3-year-old boy. Am J Occup Ther,67(5),601–606. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2013.008086
11. Beaudry-Bellefeuille, I., Tosun, C., & Balıkçı, A. (2026). The Toileting Habit Profile Questionnaire–Revised: Screening for sensory-based toileting difficulties in Turkish children with functional defecation disorders. J Coloproctol, 46(1), 001–007. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0046-1820491
12. Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
13. Behr, D. (2017). Assessing the use of back translation: The shortcomings of back translation as a quality testing method. Int J Soc Res Methodol, 20(6), 573–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1252188
14. Bloem, M. N., Baaleman, D. F., Thapar, N., Roberts, S. E., Koppen, I. J., & Benninga, M. A. (2025). Prevalence of functional defecation disorders in European children: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 80(4), 580-597. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpn3.12437
15. Bundgaard, K., & Brøgger, M. N. (2019). Who is the back translator? An integrative literature review of back translator descriptions in cross-cultural adaptation of research instruments. Perspectives, 27(6),833–845. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2018.1544649
16. Byrne, B. M. (2016). Adaptation of assessment scales in cross-national research: Issues, guidelines, and caveats. Int Perspect Psychol, 5(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/ipp0000042
17. Cruchinho, P., López-Franco, M. D., Capelas, M. L., et al. (2024). Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of measurement instruments: A practical guideline for novice researchers. J Multidiscip Healthc, 17, 2701–2728. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S419714
18. Daouk-Öyry, L., & McDowall, A. (2013). Using cognitive interviewing for the semantic enhancement of multilingual versions of personality questionnaires. J Pers Assess, 95(4), 407–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.735300
19. Fedele, F., Fioretti, M. T., Scarpato, E., Martinelli, M., Strisciuglio, C., & Miele, E. (2024). The ten “hard” questions in pediatric functional constipation. Ital J Pediatr, 50, 64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-024-01623-y
20. Gontard, A. V. V., Mosiello, G., Tarcan, T., Ende, M. V. D., Koeveringe, G. V. V., & Joinson, C. (2026). What evidence do we need to improve the attainment of bladder and bowel control in children and prevent negative sequelae in adolescence and adult life? ICI-RS 2025. Neurourol Urodyn. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.70219
21. International Test Commission. (2017). The ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests. Int J Test,18(2),101–134.https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2017.1398166
22. International Test Commission. (2019). ITC guidelines for the large-scale assessment of linguistically and culturally diverse populations. Int J Test, 19(4), 301–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2019.1631024
23. Irmak, D. E., & Bumin, G. (2026). The Turkish adaptation of the Child Occupational Self-Assessment Scale (COSA) and its psychometric properties in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. BMC Psychol, 14(1), 606. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-04369-w
24. Klotz, A. C., Swider, B. W., & Kwon, S. H. (2023). Back-translation practices in organizational research: Avoiding loss in translation. J Appl Psychol, 108(5), 699–727. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001050
25. Koppen, I. J., Vriesman, M. H., Saps, M., Rajindrajith, S., Shi, X., van Etten-Jamaludin, F. S., et al. (2018). Prevalence of functional defecation disorders in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr,198,121–130.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.02.029
26. Küka, B., Balıkçı, A., Asqarova, S., & May-Benson, T. A. (2025). Psychometric evaluation and developmental validity of the Turkish Child Oral and Motor Proficiency Scale (ChOMPS). Med Records,(1). https://doi.org/10.37990/medr.1823305
27. Little, L. M., Benton, K., Manuel-Rubio, M., Saps, M., & Fishbein, M. (2019). Contribution of sensory processing to chronic constipation in preschool children. J Pediatr, 210, 141–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.03.020
28. Ohrbach, R., Bjorner, J., Jezewski, M., et al. (2013). Guidelines for establishing cultural equivalency of instruments. University at Buffalo, Research Foundation for the State University of New York.
29. Özdemir, Z., Asqarova, S., May-Benson, T., & Balıkçı, A. (2025). Turkish translation and cultural adaptation of the Motor Planning Maze Assessment (MPMA). Behav Sci (Basel), 15(4), 492. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15040492
30. Peters, M., & Passchier, J. (2006). Translating instruments for cross-cultural studies in headache research. Headache, 46(1), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.15264610.2006.00298.x
31. Pollock, M. R., Metz, A. E., & Barabash, T. (2014). Association between dysfunctional elimination syndrome and sensory processing disorder. Am J Occup Ther, 68(4), 472–477. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2014.011411
32. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health, 29(5), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
33. Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health, 30(4),459–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199
34. Ruffini, M., Berardi, A., Benvenuti, A., Beaudry-Bellefeuille, I., Tofani, M., Galeoto, G., & Valente, D. (2022). Italian translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Toileting Habit Profile Questionnaire Revised (THPQ-R) in typically developing children. Children (Basel), 9(7), 1052. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9071052
35. Sagliyan, M., Asqarova, S., Sirma, G. C., May-Benson, T., & Balikci, A. (2026). Turkish translation and cultural adaptation of the Test of Ideational Praxis. Br J Occup Ther. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/03080226261429334
36. Schuster, C., Hahn, S., & Ettlin, T. (2010). Objectively-assessed outcome measures: A translation and cross-cultural adaptation procedure applied to the Chedoke McMaster Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI). BMC Med Res Methodol, 10, 106. https://doi.org/1086/1471-2288-10-106
37. Sousa, V. D., & Rojjanasrirat, W. (2011). Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: A clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract, 17(2), 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x
38. Wood, J. K., Garcia, K. E., & Carey, R. G. (2022). Increased prevalence of sensory processing issues in pediatric gastrointestinal patient population. Perm J, 26(4), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/22.071
39. Yang, Y., An, T., Feng,L., & Liang, Y. (2026). Quality of life in children with defecation disorders compared with healthy controls. Sci Rep, 16, 12962. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-43007-8