Farklılıkla Öğrenme Antrenmanlarının Basketbol Oyuncuları Üzerindeki Etkisi

Öz

Antrenmanın başlıca amacı sporcuları müsabakalara en iyi şekilde hazırlamaktır. Genel hatlarıyla

incelendiğinde antrenman yöntemleri, doğrusal ve farklılıkla öğrenme olarak iki ana öğrenme yöntemi

içermektedir. Fakat hangi yöntemin daha etkili olduğu konusunda tartışmalar devam etmektedir.

Yaptığımız bu çalışmanın amacı farklılıkla öğrenme yönteminin antrenman programlarına eklenip 16-

18 yaş aralığındaki yarışmacı genç erkek takım basketbol oyuncularının, basketbol sporunun temeli olan

pas verme, şut atma, top sürme ve turnike parametreleri üzerindeki etki ve gelişimlerini test etmek ve bu

konudaki literatür açığını doldurmaktır.

16-18 yaş aralığındaki UPS Spor ve Kültür Kulübü Yarışmacı Basketbol Genç takımı oyuncularından

gönüllü olarak 24 erkek sporcu bu çalışmada yer almıştır. Çalışmada basketbol becerilerini test amacıyla

German Heidelberger Basketball Test kullanılmıştır. Oyuncular 12’ şer kişilik kontrol ve deney grubu olarak

ayrıldıktan sonra ön teste tabii tutulmuştur. Ön test sonrası sekiz hafta boyunca haftada dört gün, deney

grubuna, farklılıkla öğrenme yöntemi ile zenginleştirilmiş basketbol antrenman programı takip ettirilmiştir.

Kontrol grubu ise altı gün boyunca olağan basketbol antrenman programlarına devam etmişlerdir.

Analiz sonuçları için SPSS Statistics 23.0 programında Wilcoxon testi ve denekler arasındaki anlamlı

farklılık için ise T testi yapılmıştır. Beceri testinde ön test ile son test arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı

fark bulunmuştur (p<0.05). Kontrol ve deney grubu arasındaki anlamlı farka baktığımız T testinde iki grup

arasındaki tüm becerilerde anlamlı farklılık bulunmuştur. (p <0.05).

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Farklılıkla Öğrenme,Basketbol,Motor Beceri,Öğrenim Teorisi,Heidelberger Basketbol Testi

The Effects of Differential Learning Training on Basketball Players

Öz

The aim of the training is to prepare the athletes for the competition. The selected training program should

be the most ideal program. Generally speaking, there are two main methods of learning with differential

and traditional training. The aim of this study is to test the effect and development of the competitor young

man basketball players, who are 16-18 years old, in basketball, which is the basis of basketball sport, on the

pass, shot, dribbling and lay up parameters.

UPS Sports and Culture Club Competitor Man Basketball Youth team players between the ages of 16-18

took part in this study voluntarily. German Heidelberger Basketball Test was used to test basketball skills

and 24 athletes were included in the study. After the pre-test, for eight weeks, four days a week, the control

group is followed by the traditional basketball team training, while the experimental group is followed by

the basketball training program enriched with the learning method.

Wilcoxon test was used for SPSS Statistics 23.0 program and T test was used for significant differences

between subjects. There was a statistically significant difference between pre-test and post-test performance

of the players (p <0.05). In addition, in the T test, we found a significant difference between the two groups

in all skills and that significants shows us differential training program more usefull than traditional

training in this study between experimental and control group (p <0.05).

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Differential Learning,Basketball,Motor Skill,Learning Theory,Heidelberger Basketball Test

Kaynakça

1. Alpullu, A., & Bozkurt, S. (2018). The Effects Of Differential Learning Trainings On Technical Development Of Basketball School Players European Journal of Education Studies, 4(12), 72-79. doi:10.5281/zenodo.1469844
2. Baker, J., Côté, J., & Abernethy, B. (2003). Learning from the experts: Practice activities of expert decision makers in sport. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74(3), 342–347. doi:10.1080/0 2701.367.2003.10609101
3. Baker, J., Horton, S., Robertson-Wilson, J., & Wall, M. (2003). Nurturing sport expertise: Factors influencing the development of elite athlete. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 2(1), 1–7. Bompa, T. O., & Buzzichelli, C. (2018). Periodization: theory and methodology of training. Human Kinetics, 3.
4. Bozkurt, S. (2018).The Effects of Differential Learning and Traditional Learning Trainings on Technical Development of Football Players. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(4a), 25-29. doi:10.11114/jets.v6i4a.3229 Bös, K. (1987). Heidelberger Basketball-Test: HBT. Deutscher Sportbund.
5. Chow, J. Y., Davids, K., Button, C., & Renshaw, I. (2015). Nonlinear pedagogy in skill acquisition: An introduction. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.
6. Chow, J., Davids, K., Button, C., Shuttleworth, R., Renshaw, I., & Araújo, D. (2007). The role of nonlinear pedagogy in physical education. Review of Educational Research, 77(3), 251-278.
7. Côté, J., & Vierimaa, M. (2014). The developmental model of sport participation: 15 years after its first conceptualization. Science & Sports, 29 (Supplement), S63–S69. doi:10.1016/j.scispo.2014.08.133
8. Faude, O., Koch, T., & Meyer, T. (2012). Straight sprinting is the most frequent action in goal situations in professional football. Journal of Sports Sciences, 30(7), 625–631. doi:10.1080/02640.41 4.2012.665940 Giblin, S., Collins, D. and Button, C. (2014). Physical Literacy: Importance, Assessment and Future Directions. Sports Medicine, 44(9), 1177-1184.

9. Haudum, A., Birklbauer, J., Kröll, J. and Müller, E. (2012). Constraint-led changes in internal variability in running. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 11, 8-15.
10. Higgs, C. (2010). Physical Literacy – Two approaches, one concept. SPRING Torrents, C. and Balagué, N. (2006). Dynamics system theory and sports training. Socialiniai Mokslai, 1(60), 72-83.
11. Jaakkola, T., Yli-Piipari, S., Huotari, P., Watt, A., & Liukkonen, J. (2016). Fundamental movement skills and physical fitness as predictors of physical activity: A 6-year follow-up study. Scandinavian Journal Medicine Science Sports, 26(1), 74–81. doi:10.1111/sms.12407
12. Longmuir, P. E., Boyer, C., Lloyd, M., Yang, Y., Boiarskaia, E., Zhu, W., & Tremblay, M. S. (2015). The Canadian assessment of physical literacy: Methods for children in grades 4 to 6 (8 to 12 years). BMC Public Health, 15(1), 767. doi:10.1186/s12889.015.2106-6
13. Mateus, N., Santos, S., Vaz, L., Gomes, I., & Leite, N. (2015). The effect of a physical literacy and differential learning program in motor, technical and tactical basketball skills. Revista de Psicologi?a del Deporte, 24, 73-76.
14. Meier, K. V. (1988). Tirad trickery: Playing with sport and games. journal of the Philosophy and Sport, 15(1), 11-20.
15. Passos, P., Araújo, D., Davids, K., & Shuttleworth, R. (2008). Manipulating constraints to train decision making in rugby union. International Journal of Sport Science & Coaching, 3(1), 125-140.
16. Reinhart, B. (1981) Free throw shooting: a manual for coaches and players. Chicago, IL: Chicago Review Press.
17. Santos, S., Mateus, N., Sampaio, J., & Leite, N. (2017). Do previous sports experiences influence the effect of an enrichment programme in basketball skills? J Sports Sci, 35(17), 1759-1767. doi:10.1 080/02640.414.2016.1236206
18. Schöllhorn WI, Bauer HU. (1998). International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports. In: Riehle H, Vieten M, Eds. XVI. Konstanz: Universitätsverlag; pp. 574-7.
19. Schöllhorn, W. I., Beckmann, H., Janssen, D., & Drepper, J. ( 2010). Stochastic Perturbations in Athletics Field Events Enhance Skill Acquisition. Motor Learning in Practice. A constraints-led approach. London: Routledge, 69-82.
20. Schöllhorn, W. I., Hegen, P., & Davids, K. (2012). The Nonlinear Nature of Learning –A Differential Learning Approach. The Open Sport Science Journal, 5, 100-112.
21. Shea, C. H., &Kohl. I ,L. (1990) Specificicy and variability of practice. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sporf, 61, 169-177
22. Shoenfelt, E. L., Snyder, L. A., Maue, A. E., McDowell, C. P., & Woolard, C. D. (2002). Comparison of Constant and Variable Practice Conditions on Free-Throw Shooting. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 94, 1113-1123.
23. Smith, W. (2014). Fundamental movement skills and fundamental games skills are complementary pairs and should be taught in complementary ways at all stages of skill development. . Sport, Education and Society, 1-12.
24. Tallır, I. B. , Phılıppaerts, R., Valcke, M., Musch, E., & Lenoır, M. (2012). Learning opportunities in 3 on 3 versus 5 on 5 basketball game play – An application of nonlinear pedagogy. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 43, 420-437. doi:10.7352/IJSP
25. Torrents, C., Balagué, NPerl, J. and Schöllhorn, W. (2007). Linear and nonlinear analysis of the traditional and differential strength training. Biomedicinos Mokslai, 3(66), 39-47.