DİASPORA VE DIŞ POLİTİKA: TÜRKİYE-ERMENİSTAN İLİŞKİLERİNDE DİASPORANIN ROLÜ

Öz

Dış politika yapım süreçlerini ve ikili ilişkileri şekillendiren, iç siyasiyapı, liderler, bürokrasi, danışmanlar, tarih ve kültür, medya, kamuoyu,düşünce kuruluşları, bölgesel ve uluslararası bağlam gibi çok sayıda etkenbulunmaktadır. Sayılan etkenlere ek olarak Ermenistan ve Türkiye ilişkilerisöz konusu olduğunda ise Ermeni diasporanın dış ve iç politika üzerindekietkisini de dikkate almak gerekmektedir. Diasporanın siyaseti hem yaşadığıülkenin hem anavatanının siyasi ve ekonomik yapısı ile şekillenmektedir.Ermeni diaspora Ermeni ulusal kimliğinin bir parçası sayıldığı kadar ulusalkimliğin kurulmasında da merkez bir rol edinmektedir. Bununla beraberdiaspora, Ermenistan’ın resmi dış politika önceliklerinden daha farklı veuzlaşmaz bir konum tercih edebilmektedir. Bu nedenlerle Türkiye veErmenistan arasında başlatılabilecek olumlu ikili ilişkilerde diasporanınüçüncü ve etkili bir taraf olarak dikkate alınması gerekmektedir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Diaspora, Ermeni diasporası, dış politika, ulusalkimlik, Türkiye-Ermenistan ilişkileri

(DIASPORA AND FOREIGN POLICY: DIASPORA’S ROLE IN TURKEY-ARMENIA RELATIONS)

Öz

There are several influential factors such as, domestic politicalstructure, leaders, bureaucracy, advisors, history and culture, media, publicopinion, think tanks, regional and international context that shape bilateralrelations and foreign policy making process. In addition to factors justmentioned, diaspora’s role on internal and external affairs is to beemphasized in the relations between Armenia and Turkey. The policycarried out by diaspora is determined mainly by political structure andeconomic conditions of the host and home country. Armenian diaspora isthought to be not only an integral part of the Armenian national identitybut also occupying pivotal role in constructing the same national identity.Moreover, diaspora can hold rather irreconcilable and different positionson Armenia’s foreign policy compared to Armenia’s formal foreign policypriorities. For that reason diaspora should be considered as the thirdinfluential party in the bilateral relations between Turkey and Armenia

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Diaspora, Armenian diaspora, foreign policy, national identity,Turkey-Armenia relations

Kaynakça

1. Arlen, M., Passage to Ararat (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1975).
2. Astourian, S. H., From Ter-Petrosian to Kocharian: Leadership Change in Armenia, Working Paper (Berkeley, California: Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies, 2000 /2001).
3. Beilin, Y., His Brother’s Keeper: Israel and Diaspora Jewry in the Twenty First Century (New York: Schocken Books, 2000).
4. Breuning, M., Foreign Policy Analysis: A Comparative Introduction (New York: Palgrave, 2007).
5. Clough, M., ‘Grass-Roots Policymaking: Say Good-Bye to the ‘Wise Man’’, Foreign Affairs, Cilt 73, Sayı 1, 1994.
6. Çelikpala, M., ‘Türkiye ve Kafkasya: Reaksiyoner Dış Politikadan Proaktif Ritmik Diplomasiye Geçiş’, Uluslararası İlişkiler, Cilt 7, Sayı 25, Bahar 2010.
7. Demir, A. F., ‘SSCB Sonrası Dönemde Türkiye Ermenistan İlişkileri’, Uluslararası İlişkiler, Cilt 2, Sayı 5, Bahar 2005.
8. Drezner, D. W., ‘Ideas, Bureaucratic Politics, and the Crafting of Foreign Policy’, American Journal of Political Science, Cilt 44, Sayı 4, Ekim 2000.

9. Entman, R. M., Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004).
10. Esman, M. J., ‘Diasporas and International Relations’, G. Sheffer, (der.), Modern Diasporas in International Politics, içinde ( NewYork: St. Martin’s Press, 1986).
11. Goldstein, J., R. O. Keohane, (der), Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993).
12. Graham, T. W., “Public Opinion and U.S. Foreign Policy Decision Making”, D. A. Deese, The New Politics of American Foreign Policy, içinde (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1994).
13. Holsti, O. R., Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2004).
14. Hudson, V. M., (der.), Culture and Foreign Policy (Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1997).
15. Huntington, S. P., ‘The Erosion of American National Interests’, Foreign Affairs, Cilt 76, Sayı 5, 1997.
16. Knecht, T., M. S.Weatherford ‘Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: The Stages of Presidential Decision Making’, International Studies Quarterly, Cilt 50, Sayı 3, 2006.
17. Lang, D., Armenia: Cradle of Civilization (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1970).
18. Libaridian, G. J., The Challenge of Statehood: Armenian Political Thinking Since Independence (Massachusetts: Blue Crane Books, 1999).
19. Lindsay, J. M., ‘Getting Uncle Sam’s Ear: Will Ethnic Lobbies Cramp America’s Foreign Policy Style’, Brookings Review, Cilt 20, Sayı 1, 2002.
20. Lyall, J. M. K., ‘Pocket Protests: Rhetorical Coercion and the Micropolitics of Collective Action in Semiauthoritarian Regimes’, World Politics, Cilt 58, Nisan 2006.
21. MacDonald, D. B., Identity Politics in the Age of Genocide: The Holocaust and Historical Representation (New York: Routledge, 2008).
22. Miller, D. E., L. Touryan Miller, ‘Memory, Identity Across Generations: A Case Study of Armenian Survivors and Their Progeny’, Qualitative Sociology, Cilt 14, Sayı 1, 1991.
23. Mintz, A., “Integrating Cognitive and Rational Theories of Foreign Policy Decision Making: A Poliheuristic Perspective”, A. Mintz, (der.), Integrating Cognitive and Rational Theories of Foreign Policy Decision Making, içinde (New York: Palgrave, 2003).
24. Müller, H., T. Risse-Kappen, ‘From the Outside In and from the Inside Out: International Relations, Domestic Politics, and Foreign Policy’ D.
25. Skidmore, V. Hudson, (der.), The Limits of State Autonomy: Societal Groups and Foreign Policy Formation, içinde (Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1993).
26. Panossian, R., ‘Between Ambivalance and Intrusion: Politics and Identity in Armenia-Diaspora Relations’, Diaspora, Cilt 7, Sayı 2, 1998.
27. Panossian, R., ‘Homeland-Diaspora Relations and Identity Differences’, E. Herzig, M. Kurkchiyan, The Armenians Past and Present in the Making of National Identity (New York: Routledge Curzon, 2005).
28. Pattie, S. P., ‘Armenians in Diaspora’, E. Herzig, M. Kurkchiyan, The Armenians Past and Present in the Making of National Identity (New York: Routledge Curzon, 2005).
29. Powlick, P. J., A. Z. Katz ‘Defining the American Public Opinion/Foreign Policy Nexus’ Mershon International Studies Review, Cilt 42, Sayı 1, Mayıs 1998.
30. Risse-Kappen, T., ‘Public Opinion, Domestic Structure, and Foreign Policy in Liberal Democracies’, World Politics, Cilt 43, 1991.
31. Risse-Kappen, T., ‘Ideas Do Not Float Freely: Transnational Coalitions, Domestic Structures, and the End of the Cold War.’ International Organization, Cilt 48, İlkbahar, 1994.
32. Shain, Y., Marketing the American Creed Abroad: Diasporas in the US and Their Homelands (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999).
33. Shain, Y., M. Sherman, ‘Diasporic Transnational Financial Flows and Their Impact on National Identity’, Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, Cilt 7, Sayı 4, 2001.
34. Shain, Y., A. Barth, “Diasporas and International Relations Theory”, International Organization, Cilt 57, Sayı 3, Yaz 2003.
35. Suny, R., ‘Provisional Stabilities: The Politics of Identitiesin Post-Soviet Eurasia’, International Security, Cilt 24, Sayı 3, ss. 139-178, 1999/ 2000.
36. Van Belle, D. A., Press Freedom and Global Politics (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2000).
37. Van Belle, D. A., J. S. Rioux, D. M. Potter, Media, Bureaucracies and Foreign Aid: A Comparative Analysis of the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, France, and Japan (New York: Palgrave, 2004).
38. Vertzberger, Y. Y. I., The World in Their Minds: Information Processing, Cognition, and Perception in Foreign Policy Decision Making (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1990).
39. Walker, C., .Armenia: Survival of a Nation (New York: St. Martin Press, 1980). Weiner, M., M. S. Teitelbaum (der.), Political Demography, Demographic Engineering (New York: Berghahn Books, 2001).